Ireland: Recent Decision Of The Court Of Appeal On Delay In Historic Child Abuse Claims

The new Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in the case of Cassidy v. The Provincialate on 16 April, 2015. The unanimous judgment of the Court was delivered by Ms Justice Irvine and is to be welcomed, as it brings a measure of clarity to the jurisprudence in the area concerning delay in initiating legal proceedings in respect of childhood abuse.

In a pre-trial preliminary application brought by the defendant, the Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff's claim by reason of the fact that there had been delay of over 30 years by the plaintiff in bringing a claim for damages for child abuse, which was inexcusable on the facts and in particular the Court held that the defendant's ability to obtain a fair trial was severely prejudiced due to the fact that the alleged perpetrator was dead.

The decision of the Court of Appeal overturned the earlier decision of the High Court in this case which had deemed that the plaintiff could proceed with her action despite the delay.

Background to the Case

The plaintiff commenced her proceedings in May, 2012, claiming damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered by her by reason of abuse, by a man between the years 1977 and 1980, when she would have been aged between 12 and 16 years. The plaintiff also claimed that the accused man was an employee of the defendant, a religious congregation. As part of her action, she maintained that the unlawful conduct of the accused was, as a result of the negligence and breach of duty of the defendant, and that the defendant, as the employer of this individual, was vicariously liable in respect of his wrongdoing.

The defendant, who was represented by us, brought a pre-trial application in the High Court to dismiss the plaintiff's claim on the basis of inordinate and inexcusable delay, of more than 30 years, as a result of which, the defendant was severely prejudiced in obtaining a fair trial of the action. The defendant relied on the following factors to show the inherent difficulties in defending the claim: (a) the accused was believed to be dead, although that fact had not been established with certainty, but it was clear that there was no trace of this individual; (b) there were no records which showed that the accused had in fact been an employee of the defendant and (c) the defendant had identified a number of potential witnesses who were either dead or their whereabouts were unknown, except for one former staff member who had a recollection of the accused having worked as a general handyman in the defendant's premises.

High Court

The pre-trial application was heard by High Court Judge, Mr Justice Barrett, who delivered a judgment on 28 February, 2014, in which he dismissed the defendant's application. He concluded that whilst the plaintiff's delay in instituting proceedings had been inordinate, it was excusable by reference to three factors: (1) her upbringing, (2) the fact that her abuser had dominion over her and (3) by reason of the fact that she had been subjected to a "myriad of miseries", which had impeded her ability to bring proceedings sooner than she had done.

In particular, Judge Barrett concluded that there was no real or serious risk if the claim was allowed to proceed, that the defendant would be at risk of an unfair trial. He was satisfied that the death of the accused was not a solid basis on which to base the risk of a fair trial to the defendant. Instead, he placed particular emphasis on the fact that evidence could be obtained from the former staff member who had worked for the defendant and who had a recollection of the accused.

The defendant appealed the decision of the High Court judge to the Court of Appeal

Court of Appeal

The unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Ms Justice Irvine with whom the other two judges, Judge Peart and Judge Mahon, agreed.

In reaching her decision, Ms Justice Irvine, looked at three factors:

  1. Was the delay inordinate?
  2. If the delay was inordinate, was it excusable?
  3. If there was both inordinate and inexcusable delay, was there a real risk of an unfair trial for a defendant or, on balance, could justice be best served by allowing the case to proceed?

Based on the facts of this case, Judge Irvine, decided firstly, that there had been inordinate delay of 30 years by the plaintiff in instituting legal proceedings - this was a fact not in dispute by the plaintiff. Secondly, the Court decided that this delay was inexcusable. In reaching this decision, the Court noted that the plaintiff had not produced any evidence, including psychological or psychiatric evidence which could have explained the delay. On this basis, Ms Justice Irvine found that there was no "sound evidential basis" for the findings made by the High Court in excusing the delay by the plaintiff. In particular, the Court of Appeal found, unlike the High Court, that (1) the alleged abuser had no power over the plaintiff after the alleged abuse ceased in 1980, (2) that she did not have a disadvantaged upbringing as the facts "imply that she came from a relatively normal middle class background" and (3) there was no evidence to support the conclusion of the High Court that the plaintiff had experienced a "myriad of miseries" which could excuse the delay.

Thirdly, as the delay was both inordinate and inexcusable, the Court decided that the balance of justice warranted the dismissal of the proceedings, as there was a real risk of an unfair trial for the defendant. 

In reaching this conclusion, Ms Justice Irvine placed great weight on the fact that the accused was believed to be dead and concluded that the death of the accused "visited the grossest imaginable prejudice upon the defendant". This was of particular significance as the defendant was sued for being vicariously liable for the alleged actions of the accused. Ms Justice Irvine also added that the death of all other witnesses which would have been available to the defendant put the issue beyond all doubt. On the basis of all the evidence, Judge Irvine was satisfied that to allow the action to proceed would "put justice to the hazard" and the defendant would not only be at risk of an unfair trial but would have no prospect whatsoever of a fair hearing or just result. 

For a more detailed analysis of the judgment, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions