India: Applicability Of The Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015: Ssangyong Engineering v. National Highway Authority Of India

Last Updated: 12 July 2019
Article by Krrishan Singhania and Alok Vajpeyi

The purpose of this article is to analyse the Judgment delivered by the Apex Court of India in the case of Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Ltd. v. National Highway Authority of India, Civil Appeal No. 4779 of 2019. This article shall attempt to analyze the implications of the said Judgment on the Arbitration regime in India.

Factual Background

The Appellant, a Korean Company filed an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act')[1] before the Supreme Court of India for the setting aside of an Arbitral Award passed in favor of the Respondent – National Highway Authority of India. The Parties had disagreements on whether a Circular issued by the Respondent could be made applicable to the Contract. The significance of the Circular was such that if incorporated, it would alter the way the outstanding debts were to be calculated. The Tribunal held that the Circular could be made applicable to the Contract.

The Appellant submitted that the Tribunal had erred in passing the said award by taking into consideration such factors that were not part of the Contract between the parties. It was contended that this violated principles of natural justice, hence vide s. 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Act was liable to be set aside. Further, the Appellant contended that the Tribunal had adjudicated upon matters that were beyond its jurisdiction. Consequently, it ought to be set aside in light of s. 34(2)(a)(iv) of the Act. It is pertinent to mention that several amendments had been introduced to the Act in 2015[2] and thus the primary issue before the court was whether such amendments could be made applicable to the present dispute.

Judgment

The Supreme Court in its earlier decision[3] had clarified that in view of s. 26 of the Amending Act of 2015, the application of the said Act would only be restricted to arbitration proceedings commenced on or after 23.10.2015 or if the parties expressly consented to the Application. Therefore the Amending Act had to be applied prospectively and not retrospectively.

In the present case, the Supreme Court ruled that the amended Section 34 shall be applicable to all cases in which the application under Section 34 of the Act was filed on or after 23.10.2015. This was to be case irrespective of when the Arbitration proceedings commenced.

Further, the Court set aside the majority award under s. 34(2)(a)(iii) considering that the material on which the Tribunal had placed reliance (the guidelines of the Ministry of Industrial Development) was not placed on record by either of the two parties. This prevented the Appellant from presenting his case as envisaged by s. 34(2)(a)(iii) of the Act.

The second contention of the Appellant was rejected which pertained to setting aside of the award vide Section 34(2)(a)(iv) of the Act. While exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the Court upheld the minority award passed by the Tribunal for the speedy resolution of the dispute.

Analysis

This judgment proves to be a landmark judgment for two reasons – (i) The Supreme Court overturned to an extent its previous decision in Kochi Cricket by giving retrospective effect to Section 34 of the Act; (ii) The Supreme Court for the first time not only set aside an award under a Section 34 Application, but also upheld a minority award passed by an Arbitration Tribunal.

This decision of the Court is bound to have several implications on the Arbitration regime in India. To begin with, giving retrospective effect to a specific provision when arbitration proceedings have already been commenced is counterproductive as the party never intended for the same. This is more so because Section 34 also applies to International Commercial Arbitration where the place of arbitration is India.

Arbitration is a contractual creation, where party autonomy is vital. It is important to bear in mind, that each party contracts keeping in mind the prevailing law of any Jurisdiction. The fact that Arbitration Proceedings have already commenced before any amendments were introduced to the law of the place of arbitration implies that the parties had no intention to be bound by the same. Thus when provisions with substantive changes are given retrospective operation, they undermine party autonomy. The parties have absolutely no say in such application and further when made applicable at the setting aside stage, they have no time to contemplate the same either. It is also worthwhile to mention that such an approach adopted by the Court leads to confusion about the relevant provisions of the Applicable Law. Considering that ignorance of law is not a defense in law, such an approach is extremely problematic.

Advocates of retrospective operation would in this case argue that these substantive changes have only been introduced to further safeguard the interests of the parties. For example, Section 34 of the Act vide sub-section (2A) now enumerates another safeguard for the party seeking setting aside of the Award. This sub-section pertains to an award being set aside on the ground of it being 'patently illegal.' From a cursory glance therefore, this Judgment of the Court would be well appreciated considering it provides to the parties an additional ground to safeguard their interests. However, in a past decision[4] (later overturned[5]) the Supreme Court has already voiced the ground enshrined therein as being part of the 'public policy of India.' Therefore this new approach of the Court of giving retrospective operation to a provision that contains a stipulation that has been previously rejected is unexpected and will adversely affect the arbitration regime of the country.

With regard to the second aspect of the Judgment that pertains to setting aside the majority award and upholding the minority award, it can be argued that exercising extraordinary constitutional powers vide Article 142 reflects the farsightedness of the Supreme Court. Such a decision was taken in the interest of speedy disposal of the dispute and in the interest of justice. On the flip side, it can also be argued that such an approach is not very conducive for the growth prospects of International Commercial Arbitration in India. This is because the Court by substituting its own reasoning acts as an Appellate Court and undermines party autonomy. Since the parties have explicitly contracted to settle their disputes through arbitration, the matter should be reverted back to the arbitral tribunal and the dispute resolution process should be commenced again through Arbitration.

Conclusion

This landmark judgment of the Apex Court of India will have serious repercussions on the Arbitration Regime in India. If India is to boost its chances of becoming a leading destination for International Commercial Arbitration, the first thing that needs to be done is clarify the applicability of the various provisions of the Applicable Law. This is especially important in light of the fact that no individual/company would choose a jurisdiction in which the Courts are continuously interpreting the law and changing the interpretation from time to time. Those arbitrating in an international setting primarily seek clarity in the relevant provisions of the Applicable Law and only that law is opted for that suits their interests. Thus giving retrospective operation to a certain provision adversely impacts India's chances of boosting its growth prospects. Reiterating the arguments against such operation, such an action not only undermines party autonomy but also further adds to confusion about the relevant law. In the future, parties may not opt for India as Applicable Law in light of the fact that the Courts might again change their interpretation and understanding of the relevant provisions. The Supreme Court has itself in the past[6] held that simplification of law is required to ensure that the law is not misused and is free from the clutches of interpretation.

Moreover, substituting its own reasoning for the reasoning of the Tribunal by upholding a minority award also impacts the Arbitration regime of the country negatively. The fact that Arbitration is a contractual creation should at no point in time be forgotten and thus it is imperative that only the Arbitrators who have been appointed by the Parties have a decisive say in the final verdict. The Court should restrict its intervention only to examining whether any ground encapsulated in s. 34 is being violated. It should not exercise its discretion and change the method of dispute resolution from Arbitration to Litigation.

It is imperative that the Court's deliver their judgments in harmony with the very objectives of the Act, which is creating an Arbitration friendly regime in the Country. By giving retrospective operation to provisions and upholding minority views, the Courts act contrary to the objectives of the Act. Before pronouncing such judgments, the Courts must bear in mind, that speedy justice is not the only reason why parties opt for Arbitration instead of litigation, but there are other factors involved as well like confidentiality, absence of prejudices, etc.

[The authors recognize the efforts put by Gauri Bharti, 3rd year student, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat for the assistance]

[1] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.

[2] The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2015.

[3] Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Kochi Cricket Private Limited and Ors., [2018] 6 SCC 287.

[4] ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd., [2003] 5 SCC 705.

[5] Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority, [2015] 3 SCC 49.

[6] Food Corporation of India v. Joginderpal Mohinderpal, [1989] AIR SC 1263.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions