India: Resolution Of IPR Disputes Using Arbitration, Feasible Or Not?

Last Updated: 31 May 2019
Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Partner and Satyam Sharma

Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court, Partner & Head of Intellectual Property Laws Division, Vaish Associates Advocates, India

The question as to whether IPR disputes are arbitrable or not, has been around for quite some time now. With the growing trend of arbitration clauses being invoked to resolve IPR disputes, a better understanding of this concept seems to be imperative for lawyers. Keeping in mind that the range of activities that can be dealt using Intellectual property rights is ever increasing and only limited by the extent of human imagination. The courts in India although have tried to answer this question, subsequent judgements of various High Courts and the Supreme Court have made the answer increasingly complex and encrypted. While the courts on one hand uphold the sanctity of arbitration and have been constantly pushing it as an alternate dispute resolution mechanism they are not ready to budge on their authority or dissolve the powers vested in them. The Supreme Court in the case of Booz Allen and Hamilton v. SBI Home Finance,[1] although laid down the broad logic governing the aforementioned question, its open ended explanation has left a lot of scope for interpretation and exploitation by lawyers. The judgement lays down that all disputes relating to rights in personam are considered to be amenable to arbitration and all disputes relating to rights in rem required to be adjudicated by courts and public tribunals, are unsuited for private arbitration. This judgement while creating this distinction also makes a rather vague observation about disputes relating to sub-ordinate rights in personam arising from rights in rem being arbitrable without mentioning proper jurisprudence to explain it. O.P. Malhotra in his book 'The Law & Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation' explicitly holds some disputes as non-arbitrable:

  1. Patent, trademarks and copyright.
  2. Antitrust/competition laws.
  3. Insolvency/winding up
  4. Bribery/corruption
  5. Fraud
  6. Criminal matters.

The rationale behind this observation being that a judgment pertaining to a right in rem directly impinges the public policy of a country u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, 'the act").[2]

The Supreme Court in Common Cause v. UOI[3] had mentioned that a judgment on a Patent, Trade mark or Copyright is a judgment in rem which includes infringement of a patent or trademark or copyright etc. and the remedy against violation of such right in rem would be only before a Civil Court and not before an Arbitrator. The Delhi High Court on similar lines held in Mundipharma AG v. Wockhardt[4] that claims arising out of copyright infringement are not arbitrable given that copyright is a statutorily granted right. On the contrary the Bombay High Court in the case of Eros International v. Telemax Media[5] while deciding an application u/s 8 of the act, completely disregarded the question of non-arbitrability just because there was a question of copyright infringement involved. The judgement dwells on the supremacy of the parties' will to arbitrate and discourages the courts stepping in to supersede this will. It creates a sub-category among IPR disputes pertaining to infringement claims, affecting only rights in personam and therefore being amenable to arbitration.

This stringent principle has further been diluted by various judicial pronouncements. The Supreme Court in the case of A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam[6] where although the dispute was relating to a right in rem (i.e. adjudication of fraud) which can normally be done only by ordinary civil courts allowed an application u/s 8 of the act. The court observed that the allegations of fraud were not that serious and could be taken care by the arbitrator as well. This shows a subjective approach of the courts towards arbitrability of matters pertaining to rights in rem. Further, the Madras High Court in the case of Lifestyle Equity v. Q.D. Seatoman Designs[7] specifically held that disputes pertaining to IPR are arbitrable when they don't necessarily affect a right in rem. The court explained this analogy by citing an example of a dispute relating to patent licensing which may be arbitrable but not a dispute that questions the validity of the patent. Although in the dispute the question was in relation to a right in rem, it was observed that it pertained to only a better right of usage vis-a-vis the other and therefore in the present case it would fall only within the realm of a right in personam rather than a right in rem, bringing in the much required test of "facts and circumstances" into picture yet again.

The above trend showcases how the courts are aligning themselves further towards arbitration and deviating from the straight-jacket formula to ascertain the arbitrability of IPR disputes. They are relaxing the rule as and when they deem fit. An essential consideration being that it doesn't impinge on their duty to act in accordance of public policy. The courts have to balance this duty of protecting rights in rem of individuals not being ascertained in a private forum with the duty of a tribunal to grant an enforceable award. They need to be extra cautious and vigilant while deciding an application u/s 8 of the act rather than holding it unenforceable u/s 34 after the tribunal has granted the award at a later stage. This in turn doesn't lead to questioning the 'competence' of an Arbitration Tribunal u/s 16 of the act but supplements it by making sure that its 'competence' isn't questioned in the future by the courts. Although this doesn't mean that the Arbitration Tribunals can turn a blind eye towards the issue of subject-matter arbitrability while deliberating on the issue of jurisdiction, and passing an award that is subsequently set aside. Therefore, the courts need to be extremely judicious and cautious while deciding when to delegate their authority to a tribunal and to what extent.

[1] Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd. and Ors, AIR 2011 SC 2507.

[2] Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority, AIR 2015 SC 620.

[3] Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India & Ors., (1999) 6 SCC 667.

[4] Mundipharma AG v. Wockhardt Ltd., (1991) ILR 1 Delhi 606.

[5] Eros International Media Limited v. Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd. and Ors, 2016 (6) BomCR 321.

[6] A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, AIR 2016 SC 4675.

[7] Lifestyle Equities CV v. Q.D. Seatoman Designs Pvt. Ltd. and Ors, (2017) 8 MLJ 385.

© 2018, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

Mobile: +91-9810081079

Mobile: +91 9911456255

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Dhir & Dhir Associates
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions