India: IP Value 2009: Recent Developments In Intellectual Property

Last Updated: 13 March 2009
Article by Ankit Prakash

This article first appeared in "IP Value 2009 – An international guide for the boardroom", published by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) magazine.

Nineteenth-century economist Alfred Marshall believed that with advancements in technology, commodities alone would no longer be the primary factor in determining the real value of money: "But if inventions have increased man's power over nature very much, then the real value of money is better measured for some purposes in labour than in commodities." This was so because commodities would gradually begin to have an ever-increasing intrinsic labour value ascribed to them. Today, this intrinsic labour value exists in the form of knowledge.

Therefore, as knowledge increases the value of commodities, there needs to be a mechanism to protect such knowledge and to allow legal entities to claim exclusive proprietary rights in such knowledge. IP rights are privileges which grant control and ownership over the results of knowledge-intensive activities. IP rights grant the creator a right to prevent others from using its own knowledge-intensive creations so that the labour invested is duly rewarded.

Industrialisation, propelled by advancements in technology, has made intellectual property a dynamic concept and an integral part of commercial development and economic activity. Therefore, the development of the exploitation and enforcement of intellectual property is of prime importance for sustainable development.

The development of intellectual property in India has always engendered heated debate and keen interest around the world. In recent years India has made robust progress not only in implementing its obligations under the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs), but also in developing its own IP regime which endeavours to balance the trade-off between monopoly rights and free access to knowledge.


Political will, manifesting itself in the form of effective legislation, has always been recognised as the stepping stone for all forms of legal redress. Legislation serves to institutionalise IP control programmes and, compared to regulations and policies, helps to ensure continuity.

India has come a long way in protecting intellectual property through legislation; over the last decade, the number of statutes dealing with intellectual property has more than doubled. Although no new IP laws have been enacted over the last year, it would be wrong to say that there have been no parliamentary developments with respect to intellectual property. Some significant legislative tools that are in the pipeline are discussed below.

Trademarks (Amendment) Bill 2007

One of the most significant developments has been the Trademarks (Amendment) Bill 2007, which was tabled in Parliament on August 23 2007. The bill would implement the Madrid Protocol in India and make trademark applications analogous to Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings. In other words, applicants will no longer be required to file a separate trademark application in India in order to secure statutory rights in a trademark. Like PCT applications, an applicant may simply file a trademark application in any Madrid Protocol member country and choose India as one of the countries in which it wishes to seek trademark registration. This should be beneficial to applicants since costs and time would be saved.

Further, the bill prescribes a period of 18 months for the grant of an application to register a trademark, in line with the provisions of the Madrid Protocol.

India Innovation Act

The Indian legislature is proposing to introduce comprehensive legislation to boost research and innovation in India. The India Innovation Act, based on the US America COMPETES Act, would focus on:

  • increasing research investment;
  • strengthening educational opportunities in science technology, engineering and mathematics from elementary through to graduate school; and
  • developing an innovation infrastructure.

Optical Disc Law

The Indian entertainment industry suffers an annual loss of around $3.2 billion due to theft and piracy, in addition to the loss of an estimated 80,000 jobs. To curb these economic and social losses, the Indian legislature is contemplating the introduction of the Optical Disc Law, under which a licence would be a prerequisite for manufacturing CDs or DVDs. The proposed act would also require a secret code on discs so that each disc is traceable.

Until now, all anti-counterfeiting and anti-piracy measures have been industry driven; this act would be the first government initiative in this area.

Indian Version Of The US Bayh-Dole Act

The US Bayh-Dole Act allows US universities, small businesses and non-profit organisations to retain the IP rights in inventions developed from federal government-funded research. On a similar note, the Indian legislature hopes to enact the Public Funded Research and Development (Protection, Utilisation and Regulation of Intellectual Property) Bill 2007. The proposed bill seeks to enable government institutions to work in a manner that promotes research and allows them to secure patent protection in the original work created by the individual or the institution.


The recently enacted IP Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules 2007 are noteworthy as they go beyond India's obligations under the TRIPs Agreement with respect to border control measures. The new Customs Rules now include copyrights, designs and even geographical indications within their scope.


Although comprehensive legislation is at the heart of effective IP control, the Indian judiciary has also played a pivotal role when it comes to the enforcement and protection of IP rights.

The recent cases discussed below highlight the proactive role played by the judiciary in the development of IP protection.

Patents And Exclusive Marketing Rights

In GlaxoSmithKline plc v Controller of Patents and Designs (Civil Appeal 5588/2008) the Supreme Court held that since Chapter IV-A of the Patents Act 1970 had been repealed, the writ petition filed by GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) had to be dealt with under the General Clauses Act, which specifically states that repeal will not affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred under any repealed enactment. The court further held that the Patents (Amendment) Act 2005 had no application to the proceedings which had previously been concluded.

In the case at hand GSK had filed an application at the Patent Office for an exclusive marketing right, which was refused. GSK appealed the refusal to the High Court, which remitted the matter back to the Patent Office.

The respondent again refused GSK's application in an order dated December 28 2004. Meanwhile, on January 1 2005 the Patent (Amendment Act) 2005 came into force and Chapter IV-A of the Patents Act 1970, which specified the mode of adjudication of an exclusive marketing right claim, was repealed.

In June 2005 GSK filed a writ petition challenging the Patent Office's second refusal and contending that, as of January 1 2005, GSK had no pending application for the grant of an exclusive marketing right. The controller of patents also filed a writ petition challenging the maintainability of GSK's writ. The High Court accepted the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition and stated that appeals can be set aside only by the Supreme Court.

Non-Use In Trademark Rectification Proceedings

The Supreme Court recently decided an appeal arising out of a rectification petition filed by Tosiba Appliances against Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba, also known as Toshiba Corporation. The appeal was one of many cross-proceedings which started with Toshiba calling on the respondent to desist from using the trademark TOSIBA in respect of electrical goods. The respondent filed a cancellation petition at the Trademark Office and succeeded in having Toshiba's registrations cancelled in respect of various goods on the grounds of non-use.

The Supreme Court allowed Toshiba's appeal and held that Tosiba Appliances was not the aggrieved party for the purpose of cancellation of a trademark on the grounds of non-use. The court further held that the non-use of the trademark, which was shown to have been due to special circumstances in the trade and not due to any intention to abandon or not to use the trademark, did not amount to non-use for the purposes of cancellation proceedings. The Supreme Court further held that a combined application for cancellation and/or correction is permissible in law.

Pre-Grant And Post-Grant Objections Regarding Patents

J Mitra & Co v Asst Controller of Patents (SLP 15729 of 204 Building 2008) brought a peculiar set of facts before the Supreme Court. J Mitra & Co filed a patent application, which was published. Span Diagnostics then filed a pre-grant opposition against the patent. The opposition failed and the patent was eventually granted to J Mitra. Thereafter, aggrieved by the failure of the opposition, Span filed an appeal against the controller's decision in the High Court under unamended Section 116 of the Patents Act, which allowed appeals against the controller's decision in a pre-grant opposition to be filed before the High Court.

At the time when Span filed the appeal in the High Court against the order of the controller of patents, the legislature had passed several amendment to the Patents Act whereby:

  • no appeals could be filed against decisions of the controller in a pre-grant opposition;
  • post-grant opposition could be filed before the controller (under Section 25(2)); and
  • all appeals against the controller's decision in post-grant oppositions had to be filed before the newly established Intellectual Property Appellate Board.

Although the legislature had passed these laws and they had received presidential assent, they were not notified in the Official Gazette.

Taking into consideration the complexities involved in this case, the Supreme Court held that the respondent could not be left without a remedy and thus held that the appeals would be heard and disposed of by the High Court in accordance with Section 116 of the 1970 act as it stood before the amendment.

Action Against Parties Not Pleaded In Proceedings

In another recent case Sony Kabukishi Kaisha, also known as Sony Corporation, filed a suit (Suit 867/2007] for trademark infringement, passing off and damages in order to put an end to the rampant piracy of its Sony memory sticks in a major New Delhi market.

The Delhi High Court passed an injunction against three identified defendants ordering them to stop dealing in counterfeit Sony products. It also appointed local commissioners of the Delhi High Court to visit the market and seize all counterfeit goods bearing the SONY trademark.

In a significant step forward in combating piracy, the court also empowered the local commissioners to visit the premises of other businesses in the market which were not involved in the proceedings under a John Doe order and to search and seize products from these premises. Further, the court allowed the plaintiff to seek the assistance of the Economic Offences Section of the Delhi Police in order to ensure the smooth operation of the orders.

Contempt Proceedings

In Vestergaard Frandsen v M Sivasamy (CS (OS) 599/2007) Vestergaard Frandsen, a Danish company specialising in disease control textiles, brought a suit before the Delhi High Court seeking to restrain an Indian mosquito net manufacturer from using its confidential information.

When the defendant refused to allow the court-appointed local commissioners to enter its premises to take samples of products, Vestergaard filed a contempt application against the companies for obstructing the court-appointed commissioners. After hearing Vestergaard's arguments, the court took a harsh view of the company's conduct and restrained it from manufacturing or marketing nets containing insecticide.


Sound Marks

One of the most important recent developments at the Indian Trademark Office was the registration of the first sound mark in India when the Yahoo! yodel was granted trademark registration. This was an important first in India as it may open doors to more unconventional trademarks. Provided that such marks are capable of being graphically represented, trademark owners may now be able to seek registration for even unconventional trademarks such as motion marks and position marks.

Well-Known Marks

Another significant development is the fact that in a recent opposition proceeding, the Trademark Office declared FORD, owned by The Ford Motor Company, a well-known trademark in India. This means that the trademark is now tantamount to an invented mark and is capable of being protected for all types of goods and services.

Geographical Indications

The well-known pashmina of India has now been registered as a geographical indication. This comes as a huge relief to the manufacturers of genuine pashmina products, which previously had to compete with manufacturers of man-made viscose pashmina-like products.


By 2010, trademark filings are expected to increase to about 150,000 a year and patent applications to about 100,000 a year. These developments are important as they highlight the increased awareness of intellectual property in India, as well as the fact that it is one of the world's sought-after IP destinations.


The unprecedented economic development in India in recent years has excited companies around the world and companies are queuing up to enter the lucrative Indian market. These foreign companies not only bring with them valuable intellectual property, trade secrets and confidential information, but also inspire Indian companies to create IP assets of their own.

Over the past decade the Indian economy has undergone a transformation from an agrarian economy to a knowledge-based economy where IP assets have grown in importance and value, rapidly outpacing physical assets. Thus, to keep up with developments in commerce and trade, it is important for the industry, government agencies and the judiciary to work together closely and continue to develop tools to safeguard IP rights and to enable India to improve and expand its own pro-IP regime.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions