India: SKP Tax Trends – April – June 2018

Last Updated: 7 August 2018
Article by SKP  

We are pleased to present the latest edition of Tax Trends, SKP's Direct Tax Newsletter. This edition covers the period from April to June 2018. As we write this, the due date of 31 July is fast approaching for tax filing for individuals and other non-corporate entities not having to get their accounts audited. The due date this time assumes additional importance as there is now a mandatory fee of INR 5,000 payable as per Section 234F of the Income Tax Act if the return is filed after 31 July. The fee increases to INR 10,000, if the return is filed after 31 December. However, if the total income of the person does not exceed INR 500,000, then the fees payable would be restricted to INR 1,000. This is in addition to interest payable under Section 234A. Of course, this has created a furor as the Indian taxpayers have never been penalized for late filing of the tax returns. In fact, a writ petition has been filed before the Kerala High Court challenging its constitutional validity, besides representations by Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society along with other Chartered Accountant Associations.

This quarter witnessed some high profile judgments being delivered regarding Permanent Establishment (PE) and royalty taxation. The taxpayers involved in these cases were Mastercard, Nokia and Google.

The issue in the case of Mastercard was with respect to the existence of PE and the taxation of the transaction processing fees received from Indian Banks. Mastercard's wholly owned subsidiary was providing support services and owned the Mastercard Interface Processor (MIP) which was compensated on cost plus basis. Mastercard had applied for an Advance Ruling where the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) ruled that Mastercard had a fixed place PE in the form of MIP and the Indian subsidiary. It also had a Dependent Agent PE and the Service PE as the employees of Mastercard visited India for business meetings. The AAR also held that transaction processing fees and other charges would constitute royalty on account of use of equipment (MIPs), use of process (transaction processing) and use of software (embedded in MIPs) and since Mastercard had a PE, the royalties would be effectively connected to PE and would be taxed accordingly.

In the case of Nokia, again the issue of PE and profit attribution were discussed. In this case, Nokia Finland used to supply the telecom equipment to customers based in India and its subsidiary, Nokia India entered into contracts with Indian customers for the installation of such equipment. The overall responsibility of such installation was with Nokia Finland. The tax authorities held Nokia India to be a PE of Nokia Finland as it virtually projected the presence of Nokia Finland in India. There was a divergent view amongst the members of the Tribunal, but the majority of the judges ruled that there was no PE in India. The minority judge had held that Nokia India is a virtual projection of Nokia Finland and it also laid down the formula for attribution of profits.

In case of Google, Google India (Indian subsidiary) had entered into distribution agreement with Google Ireland under which Google India was appointed as a non-exclusive distributor of AdWords program to Indian advertiser. Under this arrangement, Google India purchased the advertising space from Google Ireland and sold the same to Indian advertiser. Assistance and training were also provided to the Indian advertiser. A separate agreement was also entered into by Google India with Google Ireland for providing IT enabled services. The tax authorities held that payment made by Google India to Google Ireland for the purchase of advertising space was nothing but royalty for the use of IP, customer database and google trademark. The contention was upheld by the Tax Tribunal.

SPOTLIGHT

Food for thought: Is India's SEP concept in line with OECD's recommendations on taxation of the digital economy?

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), together with G20 countries, introduced the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plans principally to curb tax evasion and double non-taxation. Briefly, BEPS refers to tax avoidance strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to artificially shift profits to low or no-tax jurisdictions.

BEPS contains 15 Action Plans, of which Action Plan 1 deals with addressing challenges posed by taxation of the digital economy. It discusses and analyzes potential options to address the challenges posed by taxation of the digital economy which are:

  • New nexus in the form of a Significant Economic Presence (SEP);
  • Withholding tax on certain types of digital transactions; and
  • Equalization levy. Some of the proposals of the BEPS Action Plan, like equalization levy, Country-by-Country-Reporting, limiting interest deduction, etc. were already implemented by India in its domestic tax laws.

However, none of the aforesaid options were eventually recommended by the Action Plan 1. Notwithstanding the above, it was inferred that the countries could introduce all or any of the aforesaid options in their domestic tax laws or in their tax treaties as interim measures against BEPS provided the countries respect existing tax treaty obligations.

Basis the Action Plan 1, the G20 Countries directed OECD to deliver an interim report on the implications of taxation of digital economy by April 2018 and a final report in the year 2020. India being pro-active, introduced in its domestic tax law the concept of equalization levy with effect from 1 June 2016 and SEP as additional safeguards against BEPS in February 2018 while the OECD released the said Interim Report in March 2018.

Besides providing in-depth analysis on tax challenges posed by taxation of digital economy, the Interim Report also provides for certain common considerations that are required to be followed by India and other countries who have introduced these interim measures in their domestic tax laws against BEPS so as to avoid any uncertainty in deciphering taxation of digital economy across jurisdictions.

Through this article, we make an attempt to analyze whether India has introduced these interim measures in line with the recommendations by OECD in the Interim Report read with Action Plan 1 and whether India's SEP is in line with other countries such as Israel and Slovakia (see Table 1 below)

Has India introduced interim measures in line with recommendations by OECD?

Countries (such as India, Israel, Slovakia, etc.) that are in favour of introduction of interim measures duly acknowledge that challenges such as possibility of over taxation, compliance and admin costs, impact on welfare, uncertainty, inefficiency, etc. may arise on account of adopting horde of different onesided measures by these countries.

Thus, it is all the more imperative to set out common considerations on the design of such interim measures so as to limit any possible adverse consequences associated with these challenges posed by the interim measures. These common considerations vis-à-vis India's approach have been discussed below:

Table 1:

Common Considerations Interim Report Recommendations India's Position Remarks/Status
Compliant with international obligations An interim measure must not come into conflict with tax treaties. Given that the interim measures are introduced in the domestic law, the provisions of the tax treaties would override the former in case of a conflict between the two. India is in line with the recommendations of OECD.
Temporary An interim measure is introduced in the absence of a global consensus which provides for a common solution to offset the digital tax challenges.

Thus, when a global consensus is determined, it should be implemented in a coordinated manner and the interim measure should not jeopardize its implementation.
On a plain reading of the domestic tax law with respect to the interim measures, India has not provided any guidelines for implementation of interim measures vis-à-vis global consensus.

Thus, the applicability of the interim measures after reaching a global consensus is still a grey area which the government would be required to address post 2020 when the final report is released
It appears that India is not in line with the recommendations of OECD.
Targeted As the interim measure does not intend to provide an exhaustive solution across all jurisdictions, it should not seek to cover all transactions wherein digitalization poses or seems to pose some risk.

The scope of the interim measure should be well defined and focused on a particular set of digital transactions only.
The interim measures so introduced in India seeks to cover all transactions within its ambit.

Currently, it does not provide any exceptions (i.e., transactions not covered) in the domestic law. As a result of which, there could be the potential collateral impact on other elements of the domestic as well as the international tax system.
It appears that India is not in line with the recommendations of OECD.
Minimize over-taxation The key objective of the interim measure is to strike a right chord between the adverse impact of the challenges posed by the digital economy and the risk of over-taxation of taxpayers.

This can be achieved by levying a lower rate of tax commensurate with the profit margins of the taxpayer and the scope of the interim measure specifically intimating the type of transactions it seeks to cover.
The concept of SEP has been included within the meaning of business connection as enshrined under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act.

Currently, a country earning income from India is taxed at the rate of 40% in the absence of a tax treaty between the two.

Thus, it is likely that a company having SEP in India would be taxed at the rate of 40% in lines with that of the company having a business connection in India.

The tax law does not specify the nature of transactions it seeks to cover within its ambit. Thus, the scope of the interim measures is not clear at the moment. It would be interesting to see how the government would implement
It appears that India is not in line with recommendations of the OECD as far as lower rate of tax is concerned. Of course, it seeks to tax only the income attributable to the transactions carried out in India and on a net basis.
Minimize impact on start- ups, business creations or small businesses The interim measure should be adjusted in such a manner that the impact on business creations, start-ups and small businesses is minimal since they (in)-directly assist in improving the economic growth and productivity of the country.

Thus, it is imperative that the interim measure is required to have a threshold which is designed as per the requirements of the start- ups, business creations and small businesses such that the tax burden due to interim measures does not make them unviable.
India has not provided any negative list which would exclude start-ups, business creations, small businesses and other like ventures from the scope of the interim measures.

However, it is expected that India would prescribe the threshold for applicability of SEP in terms of quantum of revenue and the number of users in India which will be decided post-consultation with the stakeholders.
India is more or less in line with the recommendations of the OECD.

Once India specifies the threshold, it will automatically exempt start- ups, business creations and small businesses from the applicability of SEP
Minimize cost and complexity The compliance and administration cost should always be the primary focus for taxpayers as well as tax administrators especially when such measures are supposed to be temporary in nature.

Ideally, administration of tax due to such measures should be engrained in the domestic tax law itself so that proper weight is given to it by the taxpayers as well as the tax administrators.
India has not introduced any special provisions with respect to the administration of tax arising from such measures.

This would inadvertently lead to an increase in litigation and administration costs of the Indian tax administrators.
It appears that India is not in line with recommendations of the OECD.

To read this Newsletter in full, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions