India: Supreme Court Elucidates Upon The Scope & Necessity Of Certificate Under Section 65B Of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Last Updated: 26 February 2018
Article by Rajiv Bhatnagar, Ritika Ahuja and Ratnil Chauhan

Most Read Contributor in India, July 2019


The Hon'ble Supreme Court (Apex Court), while deliberating upon the significance of videography as a crucial means of evidence in conjunction with the scope of applicability of procedural requirements under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act), vide its interim decision dated 30 January 2018 in Shafi Mohammad vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh observed that a party, who is not in possession of a device which has produced an electronic document, cannot be required to produce a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Act. It was further held that the requirement of producing a certificate can be relaxed by the court, if it is justified in the interest of justice. In effect, the matter stood adjourned to 13 February 2018 for the finalisation of the road-map for use of videography in the crime scene and the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

The key issue that was considered was whether a video recording of the scene of crime during investigation should be necessary to inspire confidence in the evidence collected and in the given context, what would be the scope of applicability of the procedural requirements under Section 65(B)(4) of the Act for furnishing a certificate in case of electronic evidence produced by a person not in custody of the device generating such evidence?

Key submissions advanced on scope of applicability of Section 65(B)(4) of the Act

In apprehension of the applicability of the conditions laid under Section 65B (4) of the Act to produce a certificate in relation to operation of relevant device generating such evidence or management of relevant activities, the following submissions were made:

  1. If electronic evidence was relevant and produced by a person, who was not in custody of the device from which the electronic document was generated, then the requirement of a certificate under Section 65B (4) of the Act could not be mandatory.
  2. Section 65B of the Act is a procedural provision to prove relevant admissible evidence.
  3. Section 65B is intended to supplement the law on the point by declaring that any information in an electronic record, covered by the said provision, was to be deemed to be a document and admissible in any proceedings without further proof of the original.
  4. Section 65B cannot be read in derogation of the existing laws on admissibility of electronic evidence.

In order to analyse the various aspects of law of evidence, primary evidence and secondary evidence, the Apex Court referred to following judgments:

In Ram Singh And Others vs. Col. Ram Singh, 1985 (Supp) SCC 611 and English-law judgments such as R. vs. Maqsud Ali, (1965)2 All ER 464 and R vs. Robson (1972) 2 ALL ER 699; as well from American Law, (American Jurisprudence 2d (Vol 29) Page 494) it was observed that it will be wrong to deny to the law of evidence advantages to be gained by new techniques and new devices, provided the accuracy of the recording can be proved. It was further observed that such evidence should always be regarded with some caution and assessed in the light of all the circumstances of each case.

In Tukaram S. Dighole vs. Manikrao Shivaji Kokate, (2010) 4 SCC 329 the Apex Court observed that new techniques and devices are order of the day and though such devices are susceptible to tampering, no exhaustive rule could be laid down by which the admission of such evidence may be judged.

In Tomaso Bruno and Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2015) 7 SCC 178 the Apex Court observed that advancement of information technology and scientific temper must pervade the method of investigation and scientific and electronic evidence can be a great help to an investigating agency.

In Anvar P.V vs. P.L Basheer & Others (2014) 10 SCC 473 the Apex Court observed that electronic evidence by way of primary evidence was covered by Section 62 of the Act to which procedure of Section 65B of the Act was not admissible. However, for the secondary evidence, procedure of Section 65B of the Act was required to be followed and a contrary view taken in State (NCT of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu that secondary evidence of electronic record could be covered under Section 63 and 65 of the Act, was not correct.

Judgment of the Apex Court

After hearing submissions of the parties and clarifying the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence (especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced) the Apex Court (in reference to aforesaid judicial decisions) made the following observations:

  1. Electronic evidence is admissible under the Act. Section 65A and 65B are clarificatory and procedural in nature and cannot be held to be a complete code on the subject.
  2. If the electronic evidence so produced is authentic and relevant, then it can certainly be admitted subject to the court being satisfied of its authenticity. The procedure for its admissibility may depend on the facts such as whether the person producing the said evidence is in a position to furnish a certificate under Section 65B (h).
  3. The applicability of the procedural requirement under Section 65B(4) of the Act of furnishing a certificate is to be applied only when such electronic evidence is produced by a person who is in a position to produce such a certificate being in control of the said device and not of the opposite party.
  4. In a case where electronic evidence is produced by a party who is not in possession of a device, applicability of Sections 63 and 65 of the Act cannot be held to be excluded. In such cases, procedure under the said provisions cannot be held to be excluded.
  5. A person who is in possession of authentic evidence but on account of manner of proving, such document is kept out of consideration by the court in absence of certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act, which party producing cannot possibly secure, will lead to denial of justice.
  6. A party who is not in possession of a device from which the document is produced cannot be required to produce a certificate under Section 65B (4) of the Act. Thus, the requirement of certificate under Section 65B is not always mandatory.


The judgment of the Apex Court, after adverting to several judicial precedents, seems to have restricted the applicability of the statutory certificate required under 65B(4) of the Act or may have carved out an exception to applicability thereof. This judgment may provide sanctity to considerably significant evidence that was earlier not taken into account in view of being procedurally uncertified in accordance with Section 65B(4) of the Act. It will be interesting to observe how the other court(s) interpret the view taken by the Apex Court.

In keeping with the varying views surrounding the issue pertaining to applicability of Section 65B (4) of the Act and the legal position qua the admissibility of electronic evidence enunciated in the judgment of Anvar P.V vs. P.K Basheer 2014(10) SCC 473, that has not been expressly over-ruled till date, the ruling of the Apex Court is expected to have implications on several ongoing proceedings and trials.

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions