India: Supreme Court On Innoventive Industries: Recognition Of Paradigm Shift In Insolvency Law

In its first detailed ruling on some of the substantive legal questions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code), the Hon'ble Supreme Court (Apex Court) has delivered a landmark order in the matter of Innoventive Industries Ltd v ICICI Bank and Another with an expressly avowed objective of ensuring that all the courts and tribunals across the country take notice of a 'paradigm shift in the law' ushered in by the Code.

Brief Background

In January 2017, ICICI Bank (Financial Creditor) filed a petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Innoventive Industries Ltd (Corporate Debtor) for having defaulted in its repayment obligations, distinguishing the application as a first under the Code. The Corporate Debtor, while defending the application inter alia claimed that it was categorized as a 'relief undertaking' under the provisions of the Maharashtra Relief Undertaking (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 (MRU Act) pursuant to which, all the debt obligations of the Corporate Debtor towards its creditors stood suspended. It was further argued that there was a non-obstante clause under Section 4 of the MRU Act which lays down that that the provisions of the MRU Act applied to relief undertakings notwithstanding anything contained in any other law. The Financial Creditor argued that there is a similar nonobstante clause under Section 238 of the Code which prescribes that the provisions of the Code would apply notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained in any other law.

The NCLT held the Code would prevail over the MRU Act as the Code was enacted subsequent to the MRU Act and the latter law prevails over the former one. Further, there was no repugnancy between the objects of the MRU Act and the Code since the objects of the MRU Act and the Code operate in different fields viz. prevention of unemployment of the existing employees of a relief undertaking and protection of creditors of the said entity, respectively.

Aggrieved by the above, the Corporate Debtor preferred an appeal under Section 60 of the Code before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) inter alia the ground that no reasonable opportunity of hearing was granted to the Corporate Debtor. The NCLAT dismissed the petition inter alia on the following grounds:

  • Further to NCLT's reasoning on this point, the NCLAT held that the protection under the MRU Act cannot be extended to other legislations especially to the Code which is a union legislation and relates to insolvency resolution;
  • While relying on well-settled law expounded by the Apex Court (AK Kripak, Maneka Gandhi, Swadeshi Cotton Mills, State of Orissa v. Bina Pani dei), the NCLAT held that natural justice is essential and as per amended Section 424 of Companies Act, 2013, it is mandatory for the adjudicating authority to follow the principles of natural justice while passing an order under the Code. The NCLAT also noted that Rule 4(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 mandates a notice to be issued post filing of the application under the Code. However, there are exceptions to the rules of natural justice, inter alia: (A) where prompt action is needed; (B) where procedural effect has no effect on the outcome; and (C) where it is a useless formality. In the opinion of the NCLAT, the exceptions applied to the instant case; and
  • As far as the Master Restructuring Agreement dated 8 September 2014 (MRA) executed between the Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor was concerned; the Corporate Debtor cannot take advantage of the same. Even if it was presumed that fresh agreement came into existence, it does not absolve the Corporate Debtor from paying the previous debts which was due to the Financial Creditor.

The Corporate Debtor subsequently preferred an appeal before the Apex Court under Section 62 of the Code against the order of NCLAT on the ground that the 'debt' in question was temporarily suspended in terms of the notification issued under the MRU Act until 18 July 2017 and accordingly proceedings under the Code cannot be initiated against the Corporate Debtor. Further, the Corporate Debtor also relied on the MRA under which funds were to be infused by the Financial Creditor stating that the Corporate Debtor was unable to fulfil its repayment obligations as a direct consequence of the non-disbursal of funds by the Financial Creditor under the MRA.

Judgment of the Apex Court

The Apex Court after hearing the parties before it observed that under Section 17(b) of the Code, once an interim insolvency resolution professional has been appointed, the powers of the board of directors stand suspended and the erstwhile directors are no longer in the management of the company. Therefore, subsequent to the appointment of the interim insolvency professional, the erstwhile directors do not have any right to maintain an appeal on behalf of the company even if it pertains to challenge against the order of NCLT in terms of the provisions of the Code.

This observation of the Apex Court may raise some practical concerns with respect to filing of appeals by the Corporate Debtor whose CIRP is admitted by the NCLT. To provide a perspective, if according to the Apex Court's interpretation, only the person who is in management and control of the company can maintain an appeal on behalf of the company, the logical corollary of the same would be that only the insolvency resolution professional can maintain an appeal on behalf of the company. However, this would create a situation of potential conflict as the insolvency resolution professional is appointed on admission of the application filed by the creditors.

The Apex Court while observing that this procedural irregularity itself makes the appeal non-maintainable and liable to be dismissed, proceeded to address the other grounds of the appeal in order to substantively settle certain important legal questions under the Code to guide the subordinate courts and tribunals across the country.

Applicability of MRU Act Vis-À-Vis the Code

On the issue of inconsistency between the provisions of the Code which is a central legislation and the MRU Act, which is a state legislation, relying upon Article 254 of the Constitution of India, 1950 which recognises supremacy of central laws over state laws, to the extent of any repugnancy and authorities from several other jurisdictions across the world such as UK, USA, Australia etc., the Apex Court held that the provisions of the Code override the provisions of the MRU Act and the moratorium under the MRU Act would not come in the way of initiating proceedings under the Code.

After elaborately elucidating on different conditions under which legislation can be held to be repugnant with each other, the Apex Court while overruling the findings of the NCLAT held that the MRU Act was indeed in repugnance with the Code for the following reasons:

  • Both the legislations stem out of the subjects enshrined under the Concurrent List (i.e. Entry 9 for the Code and Entry 23 for the MRU Act), satisfying the primary test for repugnancy;
  • The Code envisages a CIRP of 180 days (extendable by another 90 days) during which the insolvency resolution professional shall take over the management from the board of directors, which stand suspended during this period. On the other hand, the MRU Act provides that if an entity has been categorized as a 'relief undertaking' then, the State Government may take over the management of such undertaking and a temporary moratorium is imposed restricting the creditors from proceeding against the concerned relief undertaking from recovering their debts. Therefore, giving effect to the provisions of the MRU Act, would certainly interfere with the operation and scheme of the Code, as it would directly impede the taking over of the management of the corporate body by the interim resolution professional;
  • Additionally, the moratorium imposed by the MRU Act would directly clash with the moratorium to be issued under the Code, as the moratorium under the MRU Act is discretionary and may relate to one or more matters, however, the moratorium under Section 14 of the Code is bereft of discretion and pertains to all matters set out therein;
  • Giving effect to the non-obstante clause under Section 4 of the MRU Act would necessarily come in the way of giving effect to the non-obstante clause under Section 238 of the Code; and
  • Lastly, the notification under the MRU Act, continues for 1 year at a time and can continue upto 15 years, as compared to the significantly shorter time period under the Code. Therefore, the vast difference in the length of the two provisions would scuttle the scheme and objective of the Code which is time bound resolution of stressed assets.

Failure of the Lender to Infuse Additional Funds

The Apex Court while rejecting the contention that failure of lenders to disburse under the MRA contributed to inability on the part of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its dues held that any such contention would not be maintainable in view of the unconditional nature of payment obligations under the MRA which did not depend upon infusion of funds by the creditors into the Corporate Debtor.

Basis the above two reasons, the Apex Court upheld the findings of NCLAT and dismissed the appeal filed by the Corporate Debtor.


The judgment of the Apex Court clearly recognises the objective and importance of the Code in so far as it provides a unified and time bound regime on insolvency and bankruptcy which can considerably ease the process of exit of entities in distress and help in protecting and preserving value of assets stuck in such distress situations. In this context, the multitude of overlapping legislations which would be repugnant to the provisions of the Code present a challenge in implementation of this landmark legislation and to that extent the ruling of Apex Court in Innoventive Industries is very welcome in so far as it clarifies and recognises the overriding nature of the Code in case of inconsistency. This would clearly provide an impetus for resolution of plethora of distressed accounts in the Indian banking system through the regime introduced under the Code.

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions