India: Bengaluru Tribunal Taxes Regional Support Provided By A UAE Company To Its Indian Group Company As Royalty And Also Makes Certain Adversarial Game Changing Observations Regarding Permanent Establishment Rules

Last Updated: 26 July 2017
Article by SKP  

Bengaluru Tribunal taxes regional support provided by a UAE company to its Indian group company as royalty and also makes certain adversarial game changing observations regarding Permanent Establishment rules

In a recent decision1 (pertaining to Financial Year (FY) 2009-10 and FY 2010-112), the Bengaluru Tribunal was dealing with the issues arising from the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the United Arab Emirates. In order to appreciate the issues involved, the relevant provisions of the DTAA are broadly outlined below:

Eligibility to claim relief under the DTAA

As per Article 4(1)(b) of the DTAA, a company is a tax resident of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) if it is incorporated in the UAE and is managed as well as controlled wholly in the UAE.

As per Article 29 of the DTAA, if one of the main purposes of creation of any entity is to obtain benefits of the DTAA, then such entity shall not be entitled to the benefits of the DTAA. This Article shall also cover the case of any legal entity not having bona fide business activities.

Permanent Establishment (PE) provisions under the DTAA

As per Article 5(1) of the DTAA, the term PE means a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on (Fixed Place PE).

As per Article 5(2)(i) of the DTAA, the term PE also includes the furnishing of services by UAE entity, through employees or other personnel, in India if such services continue for the same project or connected project for the aggregate periods of more than 9 months within any 12 month period (Service PE).

Royalty definition under the DTAA

As per Article 12(3) of the DTAA, the term 'royalties' has been defined to include payment received as a consideration for information concerning Industrial, Commercial or Scientific (ICS) experience.


  • The taxpayer, a company incorporated in the UAE, claimed to be engaged in the business of providing regional service activities for the benefit of ABB Group legal entities in India, Middle East and Africa (IMEA).
  • Pursuant to Regional Headquarter Service Agreement (Agreement), which was effective from 1 January 2010, the taxpayer received a certain amount from ABB Ltd (Ico), a company incorporated in India. Three employees of the taxpayer visited India for 25 days till March 2010.
  • The taxpayer claimed the amount received from Ico as non-taxable in India since there are no Fees for Technical Services (FTS) Article in the DTAA. Furthermore, such amount is not taxable in India under Other Income Article of the DTAA since the taxpayer does not have a PE in India.
  • The Assessing Officer (AO) took a view that the amount received from Ico is taxable as FTS under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) in the absence of FTS Article in the DTAA. Alternatively, such amount is taxable as royalty under the Act as well as the DTAA.
  • Upon the filing of objections by the taxpayer, the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)3 confirmed the action of the AO. The DRP also held that taxpayer has a PE in India.
  • Being aggrieved, the taxpayer filed an appeal before the Bengaluru Tribunal.

Key observations, views and conclusions of the Bengaluru Tribunal

Issue 1: Whether the taxpayer is eligible to claim the DTAA benefit or relief?

  • In order to claim any benefit or relief under the DTAA:

    • Tax Residency Certificate (TRC), in support of taxpayer's tax residence in UAE, should be obtained from the UAE tax authorities;
    • Taxpayer is required to prove that it is managed and controlled wholly in the UAE; and
    • Income of the taxpayer should be assessable under the Act as well as tax law of the UAE.
  • The TRC obtained by the taxpayer would not help the FYs under dispute since it is valid for a period of one year with effect from 1 April 2012.
  • Furthermore, the taxpayer has not placed any evidence to show that it was wholly managed as well as controlled in the UAE and it is a tax entity in UAE.
  • The taxpayer has also not filed any document to show that income arising to it was taxable in UAE.
  • Accordingly, the taxpayer is not entitled to any benefits of the DTAA.

Issue 2: Whether the taxpayer has a Service PE in India?

  • The services can be rendered without physical presence of the employees of the taxpayer since services can be provided with various virtual modes (like email, internet, video conference, remote access, etc.) in the present age of technology.
  • Service PE (Article 5(2)(i)) is an independent clause and it does not require to fulfil the requirement of Fixed Place PE (Article 5(1)).
  • There is no requirement of stay of employees for more than nine months, but there is a requirement that the services should be rendered for a period of nine months.
  • Once the activity of the taxpayer commenced only in January 2010, it is not expected to complete nine months before March 2010. The completion of 9 months activities was only conceived in a period of 12 months. However, it is undisputed that taxpayer continues to render services from January 2010 and thereafter, also in subsequent FY.
  • Thus, the Service PE is only dependent upon the continuation of activity for the same project or connected project for periods aggregating to more than 9 months within any 12 month period.
  • Accordingly, the taxpayer is having a Service PE in India.

Issue 3: Whether the amount received by the taxpayer from Ico is taxable as royalty in India?

After gauging activities of the taxpayer from various clauses of the Agreement and distinguishing certain judgments relied on by the taxpayer, the Tribunal held that:

  • The information provided to Ico were acquired by the taxpayer from its expertise, experience and knowledge based on its association with ABB Group Zurich. This information remains unrevealed to the public and also cannot be acquired by Ico on its own effort.
  • The taxpayer has merely provided access to the specialised knowledge, skill and expertise. After giving such access to Ico, the taxpayer has not done anything more for rendering the services.
  • It was not possible for the taxpayer to render services merely with the help of three employees sent to India only for 25 days since the nature, scope and ambit of clauses or activities in the Agreement are very wide.
  • The taxpayer has also not provided any evidence of actual rendering of services.
  • Therefore, instead of taxpayer providing services through its employees, the taxpayer had merely granted access to Ico of various secret, confidential and Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) protected information and other information acquired by the taxpayer from its past experience.
  • If the services were actually rendered by the taxpayer, then it is essential that the taxpayer would have sent some of its employees to actually execute the services at various branch offices of Ico.
  • The taxpayer rendered activities in the form of sharing or permitting the use of special knowledge, expertise and experience of the taxpayer, which it has acquired from its parent company, and was shared by it with Ico.
  • As evident from the Secrecy Clause of the Agreement, the dominant character of the Agreement was for sharing secret, confidential and IPRs protected information.
  • The visits of the employees of the taxpayer to Ico was only for the purposes of providing access for using the information concerning ICS experience belonging to the taxpayer and to assist Ico in commercially exploiting it.
  • Thus, the information provided by the taxpayer to Ico were in the nature of know-how contract and squarely falls within the realm of 'royalty' as defined under the DTAA.
SKP's comments

Although the Bengaluru Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the taxpayer after taking a view that it is not entitled to any benefits of the DTAA, the Tribunal decided to adjudicate other grounds relating to Service PE and royalty taxation. Furthermore, even Tribunal's view that the taxpayer has a Service PE in India also seems to have become academic since Tribunal ultimately took a view that income earned by the taxpayer is in the nature of royalty for providing information concerning ICS experience.

However, it is still worth pondering all the three issues before the Bengaluru Tribunal since they shake certain basic principles of international taxation.

As regards, Issue 1 of eligibility to claim the DTAA benefit or relief before the Bengaluru Tribunal, the possible questions that may crop up are:
  • Whether the TRC was a relevant document for disputed FYs 2009-10 and 2010-11 before the Bengaluru Tribunal when the requirement to obtain the TRC was inserted in the Act only from FY 2012-13?
  • Once any UAE company passes the tests of Article 29 of the DTAA dealing with Limitation of Benefits (LoB) and General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) provided in the Act, is it necessary for such UAE company to establish that it is wholly managed and controlled in UAE? Whether valid TRC issued by UAE tax authorities certifying UAE company as a tax resident of UAE under the DTAA for the relevant period should not be considered as conclusive evidence in this regard? If the UAE company is required to establish that it is wholly managed and controlled in UAE despite such valid TRC, would it not amount to lifting the corporate veil by the Indian tax authorities? Whether such lifting of corporate veil is permissible beyond the scope of Article 29 of the DTAA and GAAR provisions of the Act?
  • Is it also necessary for the UAE Company to show that it is taxable in UAE post-substitution of Article 4 of the DTAA, dealing with the tax residence of such company, by CBDT4 Notification dated 28 November 2007? Post such substitution, is it not true that the entire controversy of 'liable to tax' and 'actual payment of tax' has been done away with?
As regards Bengaluru Tribunal's view on Issue 2 that the taxpayer has a Service PE in India, it appears to us that the DTAA provision dealing with Service PE has not been interpreted correctly. It is a fundamental principle of international taxation that a Foreign Enterprise (FE) shall constitute a PE in the source state (India in the instant case) only if FE has an economic presence in India for conducting its business activities. Such economic presence could be either the physical presence (through an office in India, visit of employees, personnel of FE to India, etc.) or through a Dependent Agent in India.

Based on the judicial precedents in India, Article 5(1) (Fixed Place PE) and Article 5(2) of the DTAA need to be read harmoniously. Accordingly, the physical presence of employees or other personnel of the taxpayer in India beyond the threshold period provided in the DTAA should be considered as a necessary condition for constitution of Service PE in India.

However, the Bengaluru Tribunal seems to be taking a view that Service PE is constituted in India if the overall activity of the taxpayer exceeds the threshold period provided in the DTAA and for this purpose, the actual visit of employees or other personnel of the taxpayer in India is not a relevant criteria. Although this view of the Bengaluru Tribunal does not seem to gel with the fundamental principles of international taxation, the possibility of lower-level tax authorities taking such a view and hence, the possibility of litigation cannot be ruled out at this stage.

As regards Bangalore Tribunal's view on Issue 3 that the amount received by the taxpayer is taxable as royalty income, there appears to be a dichotomy in the Tribunal's order. On one hand, while dealing with Service PE issue, the Tribunal is taking a view that the physical presence of employees in India is not necessary for rendering services in the present age of technology. On the other hand, while dealing with the royalty issue, the Tribunal is taking a view that the taxpayer has not rendered any services since only three employees of the taxpayer visited India, only for 25 days.

Having said that, it has become necessary nowadays to take conscious and proactive tax position in relation to cross-border arrangements (especially intra-group arrangements) for any activities or services after assessing the substance of the transaction and determine whether it is a transaction of providing know-how or it is a transaction of rendering services. The principles laid down in the international taxation commentaries and judicial precedents pronounced in India should be duly considered in this regard. Furthermore, it goes without saying that the underlying documentary evidence shall play a vital role in deciding the nature of activities actually performed at the ground level.


1. ABB FZ - LLC vs DCIT in IT(TP)A No. 1103/Bang/2013 and 304/Bang/2015 dated 21 June 2017

2. Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12

3. DRP is a collegium of three Principal Commissioners or Commissioners of Income Tax

4. Central Board of Direct Taxes - Apex Direct Tax administrative body in India

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions