India: Competition Law (October 2016 - December 2016)

Competition Commission of India ("CCI") directs the DG to cause an investigation for the allegation of abuse of dominance against GAIL (India) Limited

An information was filed by one Rico Auto Industries Ltd., Omax Autos Ltd., and Rico Castings Ltd. ("Informants"), primarily engaged in the business of auto components manufacturing. It was alleged that GAIL (India) Ltd. ("GAIL"), had imposed unfair and discriminatory conditions under the Gas Sale Agreement ("GSA"), in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Abuse of Dominant Position).

The CCI inter alia observed that the mysterious silence by the opposite party in not replying to the Informants for reduced contracted quantity, not replying to the proposal of the Informants for amicable settlement of the alleged dispute in spite of there being a provision of the same within the GSA and not divulging the reasons for suspension of gas, together appear to be pima facie unfair. The CCI also noted that suspension of gas supplies without prior notice, denial of dispute resolution when an informant contests the legality of take or pay liability, also suggest pima facie that GAIL has abused its dominant position in the relevant market.

Consequently, the CCI vide its order dated October 03, 2016 directed the Director General ("DG") under the provisions of Section 26(1) of the Act, to cause investigation into the alleged contravention.

CCI directs DG to investigate into unfair price discrimination by Association of Man-made Fibre Industry of India

An information was filed by a non-profit organisation ("Informant") against Association of Man-made Fibre Industry of India and several others inter alia alleging for the abuse of dominance with regard to practice of unfair price discrimination and following non-transparent practice by refusing to disclose discount policies to the customers, thereby contravening the provisions of Section 4 of the Act (Abuse of Dominant Position).

The CCI on perusal of the information filed by the Informant inter alia observed that the opposite party, in order to protect its business interests, alogwith its entire value chain in the domestic market, had adopted discriminatory pricing policy by segmenting the buyers in the VSF market, which was unfair and discriminatory in terms of Section 4(2)(a)(ii) of the Act.

Based on the above discussion, the CCI vide its order dated November 10, 2016 directed the DG to cause investigation into the matter and file a report of the same.

CCI Closes the Case against Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. for alleged abuse of dominance

An information was filed by Shri Prem Lal and Shri Amrish ("Informants") against Indian Oil Corporation and others inter alia alleging that arbitrarily transferring their LPG consumer numbers from one opposite party to the other without their consent amounted to the abuse of dominance, which is in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act (Abuse of Dominant Position).

The CCI vide its order dated November 10, 2016 identified the relevant market as the market for the provision of services for distribution of LPG cylinders in Badaun district of UP, and concluded that the market share of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. was very low to be a dominant player in the relevant market and hence no case can be made out for abuse of dominant position.

CCI closes case against M/S Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd on Account of no Competition issue

An information was filed by one Mahendra Kumar Rathore ("Informant"), sole proprietor of "Baran Cable Network (BCN)" and authorised to run cable signals in the town of Baran, Rajasthan. It was alleged that M/S Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd. had imposed a unilateral MOU on the informant as a pressure tactic to enter into an understanding with it to broadcast its copyrighted work, which the informant does not require.

The CCI on perusal of the information filed by the informant inter alia observed that the MOU was primarily a copyright infringement notice, which was issued against violation of copyright and for protecting the Intellectual Property Rights of the copyright holder. The CCI concluded vide its order dated November 10, 2016 that the allegations raised by the Informant did not raise any competition concerns and the matter was dismissed under Section 26(2) of the Act.

CCI closes case against DLF Universal Ltd. on grounds of Lack of Retrospective Effect

An information was filed by Shri Abdul Basit and Shri Abdul Azim ("Informants") against DLF Universal Ltd. inter alia alleging for the abuse of dominance by DLF with regard to refusal to give possession of the apartments to the Informants and forfeiture of the 75% of the entire sale consideration.

The CCI vide its order dated December 05, 2016 observed that the apartments were allotted to the Informants, possession was offered subject to payment of outstanding dues, completion of paper work, cancelation of allotment and forfeiture of amount related to a time when either the Act itself was not enacted or Section 4 of the Act was not in force. Thus, the CCI dismissed the matter on the grounds that the alleged abuses were made prior to enforcement of Section 4 of the Act.

COMPAT affirmed the CCI order against the car manufacturers for anti-competitive conduct in the spare parts market

The Competition Appellate Tribunal ("COMPAT") vide order dated December 09, 2016 found that Ford India Pvt. Ltd ("Ford"), Nissan Motor India Pvt. Ltd ("Nissan") and Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd ("Toyota") are guilty of anti-competitive conduct in the spare parts market, ruling that there could not be any restrictions on the supply of spare parts.

COMPAT upheld a 2014 order of the Competition Commission of India ("CCI") pertaining to 14 car makers. The penalty imposed by COMPAT differs from that levied by CCI. The COMPAT imposed a 2% penalty on the companies' annual average turnover from spare parts for the three financial years proceeding the year of inquiry into the issue of their anti-competitive activity.

In its order, the COMPAT said that the three companies—Ford, Nissan and Toyota—denied independent workshops access to spare parts. The companies also entered into agreements which led to restrictions being placed on third-party workshops.

COMPAT directed the companies to remove all restrictions on original equipment suppliers selling spare parts in the aftermarket. The companies are also required to open additional distribution channels for spare parts. These changes have to be effected within a year. Further the COMPAT directed the companies to make information available regarding spare parts manufactured, their maximum retail price, and arrangements for their availability over the counter, and details of matching quality alternatives and maintenance costs.

COMPAT partially upheld CCI order in the Public Sector Insurance Companies matter

The Competition Appellate Tribunal ("COMPAT") vide order dated December 09, 2016 found that National Insurance, New India Assurance, Oriental Insurance and United India Insurance are guilty of cartelization and bid rigging by the Kerala government for selecting insurance service provider for Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojna ("RSBY") for 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13.

COMPAT upheld a 2014 order of the Competition Commission of India ("CCI") pertaining to 4 national Insurance companies. The penalty imposed by COMPAT differs from that levied by CCI. COMPAT reduced INR 6.71 billion penalty slapped by the CCI on four public sector insurance companies to just INR 20 million.

The COMPAT held that "there is no hesitation in confirming that bid rigging constituting contravention of Section 3 of the Act did take place, and on the facts of the case and the legal position, we agree that the Appellants should suffer the penal consequences."

However, the COMPAT questioned the interpretation of the term "turnover" used to calculate the 2 per cent penalty imposed by the CCI and noted that "penalty has to be calculated with reference to the gross premium received by UIICL as insurance provider under RSBY scheme and penalty for each of the Appellants will be a proportion of their share in such premium."

COMPAT set-aside penalty imposed on Indian Jute Mills Association (IJMA) and Gunny Trade Association (GTA) by CCI on account of cartelizing to hike the price of jute bag

The Competition Appellate Tribunal ("COMPAT") by its order dated July 01, 2016 has over-ruled the above stated order of CCI wherein the Indian Jute Mils Association (IJMA) and Gunny Trade Association (GTA) were penalized for alleged cartelization in pricing of jute bags. It was alleged that the jute manufacturers have acquired a monopoly position as a result of the circular of the Government under the Jute Price Maintenance Act, 1987 that 100% sugar to be produced by the sugar factories is to be mandatorily packaged in the jute bags.

It was further alleged that IJMA and GTA took advantage of their monopoly, the jute mills have unreasonably hiked the prices of jute bags from INR 53.50/bag in April 2010 to INR 64.50/bag in February 2011. It was alleged that such a drastic increase in the sale price of the jute packaging material was possible only because of an agreement/understanding among all the members of the IJMA and GTA, who were quite conscious of the fact that they enjoy complete monopoly.

The COMPAT noted that "A careful scrutiny of the record shows that neither the informants produced nor the DG could collect any substantive evidence to prove that there was an agreement between GTA and IJMA about fixation of price" further the COMPAT observed that the case for proving a cartel offence essentially boils down to production of viable evidences (direct or circumstantial) which should be substantial and impactful so that an act of collusion can be established in terms of Section 3(3) of the Competition Act. Robust and modern techniques for investigations (such as e-discovery examination etc) should be developed by the DG for establishing the cartel offences.

COMPAT reverses the order given by the CCI by ordering investigation on ground of Lack of Proper Finding

The Competition Appellate Tribunal ("COMPAT"), vide its order dated November 09, 2016 reversed the decision given by the CCI on June 08, 2016 by ordering the Director General ("DG") to investigate into the allegations abuse of dominance and role of private standards in foreclosing competition against Digital Cinema Initiatives, Walt Disney Company and other producers of Hollywood films.

The information was filed by M/s K. Sera Sera Digital Cinema Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in the business of digital cinema services involving digital projection and screening of films in India. COMPAT expressed complete disagreement with the CCI's decision to not direct an investigation into the allegation of 80% of Hollywood film producers mandating screening of their films only by the use of a particular technology, which drove out several exhibitors who want to use a different technology. While COMPAT agreed with the CCI's ruling of private standards not necessarily foreclosing competition, however, it disagreed with the pre-liberalization stance taken by the CCI in justifying this alleged anti-competitive act.

COMPAT observed that the allegations need to be examined in a broader context because it would help in validating claims and counter claims. In order to be sure of what is reasonable and to what extent restrictions can be imposed is a matter of appreciation and required fact finding. COMPAT also observed that it is imperative to adopt the approach of determining the relevant market in order to examine the issue of dominance effectively before dismissing the ground, however, this approach was not adopted by the CCI in this particular case.

COMPAT Remanded the Uber Taxi matter to CCI with a direction to DG to cause an investigation

The Competition Appellate Tribunal ("COMPAT"), vide order dated December 07, 2016 directed the Director General ("DG") to conduct an investigation into the allegations contained in the Information filed by M/s. Meru Travels Solutions Private Limited ("Meru") against M/s. Uber India Systems Private Limited ("UBER") for abusing its dominant position in radio taxi market by way of predatory pricing in Delhi-NCR.

COMPACT has heard both the parties had has referred to all the facts and allegations being provided. As per them Dominance has to be examined on the benchmark of Section 4 read with Section 19(4) in order to form a prima facie view in accordance with Section 26(1) of the Act. In order to justify the Commission's opinion, the order has considered transport as a State subject and has considered the taxi market as Delhi (Not NCR).

COMPACT has given a deadline of 60 days for investigations which can be extended with due reason and will give its judgment after giving opportunity to the parties to file their replies/objections and affording them opportunity of personal hearing.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.