India: Arbitral Awards: It Would Be Advisable For Foreign Investors To Tread Cautiously

In the space of a month, the Delhi High Court has delivered two judgements that significantly impact the interplay between enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in India and the foreign exchange regime

Additionally, they have an important signalling effect for the Indian economy by emphasising the sanctity of contract.

In the space of a month, the Delhi High Court has delivered two judgements that significantly impact the interplay between enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in India and the foreign exchange regime. Additionally, they have an important signalling effect for the Indian economy by emphasising the sanctity of contract. These rulings, which allowed for certain foreign arbitral awards to be enforced in India, negate the contentious argument that enforcement of these awards would be contrary to the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, and therefore opposed to the 'public policy of India'. This is likely to have a significant impact not just on future proceedings involving the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, but also on RBI's position on remittance of these. Unitech-Cruz City case

The judgement, in this case, held that a simpliciter violation of a particular FEMA provision does not offend the 'fundamental policy of India', particularly since the scope of this phrase has been narrowed by the Arbitration Amendment Act, 2015. The court noted that enforcement of a foreign award invariably involves exchange control issues, and may require RBI approval as well as FEMA compliances for remittance. It further noted that violation of FEMA provisions do not render a contract void, although the Indian party could be penalised under relevant FEMA provisions, the enforcement of the arbitral award would not be prevented on this account. The Delhi HC sought to balance the need to enforce a foreign arbitral award, with the requirement to ensure compliance with FEMA.

Another crucial aspect is the importance given to the commitments made by the parties in the contract. The court specifically noted that Unitech had made express representations that its obligations under the agreement were valid, binding, and enforceable; that the transaction did not require any approval or filing with any authority; and that all applicable laws had been complied with. The court took the view that allowing Unitech to renege on its contractual commitments at the stage of enforcement by taking the excuse of violation of FEMA, would allow it to take advantage of its own wrong.

Tata-Docomo case Right on the heels of its ruling in the Unitech-Cruz City case, another judgement was delivered in the Tata-DoCoMo case. After reviewing the shareholders agreement, the court observed that the obligations of Tata were two-fold. Their 'primary obligation' was to find a buyer for DoCoMo's shares in the Indian joint-venture company at the 'sale price', which was less than the 'fair market value' of the shares as per FEMA pricing guidelines. Their 'secondary obligation' was for Tata to acquire the said shares of DoCoMo itself at such 'sale price'. The 'secondary obligation' was required to be undertaken only if the 'primary obligation' was not fulfilled.

The court noted that RBI may have had concerns with respect to the performance of the 'secondary obligation'. However, Tata could very well have fulfilled the 'primary obligation' by finding a 'non-resident' buyer for DoCoMo's shares (since DoCoMo is also a non-resident). The transfer of shares between these non-residents at a price greater than the FMV would have been freely permitted under FEMA. The fact that FEMA pricing guidelines may have prevented Tata from performing this 'secondary obligation' was not considered relevant, since it would arise only if the 'primary obligation' was not performed.

It held that the breach of the 'primary obligation' by itself entitled DoCoMo to damages in the form of the arbitral award. The court, crucially, went on to observe that the issue of an Indian entity honouring its contractual commitments to a foreign entity would 'indubitably have an impact on the foreign direct investment inflows', and that would also be an important factor when examining whether the enforcement of the award would be consistent with the public policy of India. RBI's role

Another important aspect to the Tata-Docomo case was the court's ruling that RBI has no locus standi to interfere in the proceedings under the Arbitration Act. The court noted that if the parties do not object to the enforcement of the award, and the court does not find any impediment to such enforcement, then the upheld arbitral award, which takes the view that no special permission of the RBI is required for remittance of the award amount, would be binding on the central bank. RBI cannot refuse such remittance, except if the court order is appealed and consequently struck down. The Delhi HC here has been at variance from the case of Unitech-Cruz City, where while enforcing the arbitral award, had made the remittance subject to compliance with relevant FEMA regulations and obtaining any requisite RBI approvals.

The court further noted that since the arbitral award was in the nature of damages (with the delivery of share certificates to Tata being only incidental), and did not amount to payment for the transfer of DoCoMo's shares, FEMA regulations would freely permit the remittance of the amount outside India without requiring RBI approval. While arriving at this conclusion the court had requested RBI to place on record any regulation under which its approval was required for remittance of damages outside India. Significantly, RBI did not place any such regulations before the court, despite its consistent past assertions in various instances that its regulations relating to remittance of assets and capital account transactions require that RBI approval is obtained for remittance of damages and indemnity payments outside India. While Unitech has already appealed the judgement in Unitech-Cruz City, it remains to be seen if RBI will challenge the Tata-DoCoMo verdict.

These rulings are particularly significant given the government's efforts to project India as one of the most attractive investment destinations in the world. Despite significant policy measures, including the 2015 overhaul of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and an introduction of commercial courts, India has been consistently rated poorly in international rankings. The World Bank's 2017 'Ease of Doing Business' report ranked India at a dismal 172 out of 191 countries in 'enforcing contracts'. In this backdrop, the seemingly simple act of the Delhi HC in making an Indian party accountable for its contractual commitments may be viewed as being praiseworthy and in line with the pro-arbitration outlook that has been adopted by the Indian judiciary recently and will help restore the perception of India as an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction. Crucially, it reassures foreign investors that the representations and undertakings given by their Indian partners will actually be enforced.

That said, the Delhi HC has raised pertinent questions on the role and functions of RBI, as well as the statutory interpretation of FEMA regulations, and it would be interesting to see how, in future, regulators such as the RBI, SEBI, CCI would react to orders for enforcement of arbitral awards, in the event its implementation creates inconsistencies with the exercise of their power under their respective statutes, particularly given the differing interpretations accorded to RBI's role in implementing enforcement orders in both cases. Further, while the Delhi HC in Tata-DoCoMo has classified the award amount as being 'damages', the classification could pose challenges from a commercial, tax and regulatory perspective, for parties may intend for at least a part of the award amount to be classified as share transfer consideration.

With contractual commitments turning gospel, and only parties to the dispute being allowed to challenge an arbitral award, there may be a perverse incentive to undertake arbitration outside India in order to achieve commercially intended results, even though such results are not strictly permitted under Indian regulations. It is worth remembering that these very regulations have in past situations been employed by RBI, for example in helping prevent capital flight after the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy during the 2008 global financial crisis.

Finally, it is unclear how events would have played out if DoCoMo had obtained the arbitral award solely on account of Tata's failure to perform its 'secondary obligation', ie, the 'put option', given that FEMA norms which prohibit assured returns are still very much in force. Separately, time has certainly come for RBI, in line with its observations in the Sixth Bi-Monthly Monetary Policy Statement 2014-15, to examine whether downside protection to a foreign investor should be differentiated from 'assured return' option arrangements as the intended commercial objectives of both are distinct. Until such time, it would still be advisable for foreign investors to tread cautiously and bear in mind the FEMA norms prohibiting 'assured returns'.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions