India: Delhi HC: Pending Reference Under SICA, Proceedings Before The Arbitral Tribunal Not To Be Stayed

Last Updated: 31 March 2017
Article by Dhir & Dhir Associates


Recently, the hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Appeals no. 41, 42, and 43 of 2015 of Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd v. SBQ Steels Ltd held that arbitration proceedings will not be stayed due to reference pending before the Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA). Under the appeals, the order of the Arbitral Tribunal was challenged wherein the Arbitral Tribunal has suspended the arbitral proceedings in view of the on the ground that the same are hit by Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 as reference was pending before the BIFR.

Provisions of Section 22(1) in SICA reads as under:

(1) Where in respect of an industrial company, an inquiry under section 16 is pending or any scheme referred to under section 17 is under preparation or consideration or a sanctioned scheme is under implementation or where an appeal under section 25 relating to an industrial company is pending, then, notwithstanding anything contained in the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), or any other law or the memorandum and articles of association of the industrial company or any other instrument having effect under the said Act or other law, no proceedings for the winding up of the industrial company or for execution, distress or the like against any of the properties of the industrial company or for the appointment of a receiver in respect thereof 32 [and no suit for the recovery of money or for the enforcement of any security against the industrial company or of any guarantee in respect of any loans or advance granted to the industrial company] shall lie or be proceeded with further, except with the consent of the Board or, as the case may be, the Appellate Authority.


  • Whether the arbitration proceedings are covered under the mney suit and would fall within the meaning of second part of Section 22(1) of SICA ?
  • Whether the order for suspension of arbitration proceedings is a valid order when the award is yet to be published?
  • Under which stage an award can be treated as a decree?
  • Whether in pending arbitration proceedings i.e. pre-award stage, the issue of SICA is entertainable or it could only be raised if permissible at the stage of enforcement of award (once it becomes a decree)?

Facts of the case

Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd (Goyal) and SBQ Steels Ltd (SBQ) entered into a contract dated 7th August, 2008 for the supply of oxygen and nitrogen gases through the installation of a 100 TPD Air Separation Plant/Unit (ASU) by the appellant Goyal to SBQ. Due to breach of contracts, disputes arose between the parties and the matter came up for arbitration pertaining to monetary claims. During the arbitration proceedings, SBQ filed a memo dated 17th March, 2015 before the Arbitral Tribunal, alleging that it has been registered with BIFR under SICA and during the pendency of the proceedings before BIFR, the arbitral proceedings be suspended. Goyal opposed the suspension of arbitral proceedings and in its memo sought removal of the ASU. In the common order dated 20th June, 2015, the Arbitral Tribunal had proceeded to dispose of the appellant's application under Section 17 of the Act, declining the interim measure as sought and instead relegating the appellant to BIFR and further suspended the arbitral proceedings due to pendency of the reference before the BIFR.

Conclusively, the Arbitral Tribunal held that, "having regard to the pendency of proceedings before BIFR, which has been held as an expert body vested with power of wide implications, it would be impermissible for the Tribunal to make any order on the said application filed by the claimant pending final order in reference no. 17/2015, pending before the BIFR."

The Arbitral Tribunal had declined to grant the interim measures only on the ground that the respondent had got its reference registered with BIFR, under SICA and the proceedings were suspended, the same cannot be considered on merit. The Appellant filed the appeal before the Hon'ble HC to challenge the aforesaid order of the Arbitral Tribunal on the ground that the Appellant is not required to approach BIFR for removing the ASU as the ASU is not the property of the Respondent.

SBQ responded stating that the arbitral proceedings are liable to be stayed under Section 22(1) of SICA since the arbitral proceedings are in the nature of a 'money suit'. Admittedly, the claims of the appellant are for recovery of the amount.

Judicial Reasoning

  • In KSL and Industries Ltd v. Arihant Threads Ltd [(2015) 1 SCC 166] three learned judges of the Supreme Court had an occasion to consider the scope and impact of Section 22 of SICA. In dealing with the overriding effect of the provisions of SICA, the object of Section 22 and the scope of powers vested with BIFR under Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the SICA, the court specifically observed in para 26, as to what stage of the proceedings instituted and pending gets attracted to and becomes suspended under Section 22 as here under:

"......the submission is that Section 22 lays down that only proceeding for winding up or execution, distress or the like shall not lie or be proceeded with where an enquiry is pending or a scheme is under preparation or consideration or a sanction scheme is under implementation etc.; whereas a proceeding for recovery shall lie against a sick company but an order made in it could not be executed against any of the properties of the industrial company, the effect being that the proceedings may continue without any consequence. Thus there cannot be any execution or distraint against the properties of the company but creditors may continue to apply for recovery before the DRT."
  • A three Judges Bench of the Supreme Court in Raheja Universal Ltd v. NRC Ltd (2012) 4 SCC 148 has discussed the said provisions in great details and held that the expression 'no proceedings' that finds place in Section 22(1) is of wide spectrum but is certainly not free of exceptions. The framers of law have given a definite meaning to the expression 'proceedings' appearing under Section 22(1) of SICA 1985. These proceedings are for winding up of the industrial company or for execution, distress or the like against any of the properties of the industrial company or for the appointment of a receiver in respect thereof. The expression 'the like' has to be read ejusdem generis to the term 'proceedings'. The words 'execution, distress or the like' have a definite connotation. These proceedings can have the effect of nullifying or obstructing the sanctioning or implementation of the revival scheme, as contemplated under the provisions of SICA 1985.
  • The applicability of embargo contained in Section 22(1) of SICA requires the cumulative and conjoint satisfaction of two conditions; namely;

o a) the proceeding sought to be suspended should clearly satisfy the ingredients of Section 22(1) and fall within one or more of the categories of proceedings indicated in the said provisions and

o b) additionally, the continuance of the proceeding should have the impact of

interfering with the formulation of the scheme

  • The Supreme Court has also made it clear that the applicability of the embargo contained in Section 22(1) of SICA depends on the facts and circumstances of each individual case; and no principle of universal application can be laid down in all such matters.
  • The Supreme Court in San-A Tradubg Co. Ltd v. I.C. Textiles Ltd (2012) 7 SCC 192 held that an arbitral proceeding is not a 'suit' within the meaning of Section 22(1) of SICA. It was further held by the Supreme Court that the arbitration proceedings were not covered by Section 22(1) of SICA and a reference to BIFR would not bar continuance of such proceedings.
  • In the case of Paramjeet Singh Patheja v. ICDS Ltd (2006) 13 SCC 322, the Hon'ble SC held that "It is a well established rule that a provision must be construed in a manner which would give effect to its purpose and to cure the mischief in the light of which it was enacted. The object of Section 22, in protecting guarantors from legal proceedings pending a reference to BIFR of the principal debtor, is to ensure that a scheme for rehabilitation would not be defeated by isolated proceedings adopted against the guarantors of a sick company. To achieve that purpose, it is imperative that the expression "suit" in Section 22 be given its plain meaning, namely any proceedings adopted for realization of a right vested in a party by law. This would clearly include arbitration proceedings".


The Hon'ble HC held that the pre-award proceedings were not covered by section 22(1) of SICA and such proceedings cannot be treated as suit. The award which is yet to attain finality cannot be called as decree. The plea of section 22(1) of SICA can only be raised in arbitration matters once the award becomes a decree and the same could only be raised at the stage of enforcement of decree.

However, as the Arbitral Tribunal declined the application for removal of the ASU on the ground of suspension of the Arbitral proceedings, and in view of pendency of the reference under SICA. With this observation, the Hon'ble HC relegated the Goyal to the remedy of seeking permission of BIFR for removal of its ASU. The Hon'ble HC also considered that Goyal had appealed to the court to decide the present appeal on merit. While passing the common order, the Arbitral Tribunal has not decided the application under Section 17 of the Act on merit. The Hon'ble HC proceeded to observe that the jurisdiction lies with the Arbitral Tribunal. Had the Arbitral Tribunal decided the application on merit, this Court would have considered the appeal on merit after hearing. And with the aforesaid observation the Hon'ble Court requested the Arbitral Tribunal to hear the application under section 17 of the Arbitration Act on merits.

The aforesaid judgment provides clarity on the issue of suspension of the arbitral proceedings and applicability of section 22(1) of SICA. The proposition is now settled that the proceedings before the arbitral tribunal should not be suspended due to the pendency of the reference before the BIFR and the protection provided under section 22 (1) does not extend to the arbitration proceedings before the arbitral tribunal. This judgment will assist the litigants as well as the arbitrators where similar issue was raised.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Vaish Associates Advocates
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Vaish Associates Advocates
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions