India: New Strategies To Combat Counterfeiting

In this sponsored Q&A article, Lucy Rana and Nidhi Chopra of S. S. Rana & Co. discuss how counterfeiting in India is harming its public and offer suggestions as to what more can be done

How serious is the problem of counterfeiting in your jurisdiction? Please give an overview of the situation.

The low barriers to the market entry and infiltration has led to rampant infiltration of counterfeit and pirated products across all industries including medicines, auto and aeroplane parts, electrical components, toys, and food and beverage. Apart from the significant economic loss to the government (for example, in terms of sales tax, excise tax, income tax and customs duty, and loss of jobs), the counterfeit products pose risks to millions of individual consumers in terms of health and safety and even leads to child labour, money laundering and human trafficking. It also puts the reputation of the brand owners at risk, where they not only loose brand value and revenue but also lose consumer patronage, sales and profitability.

How robust are the laws that are in place to tackle counterfeiting? Please summarise the key pieces of legislation.

To meet the interest of customers, ensure incentives for companies investing in research and development and encourage continued innovation, India has designed a stringent framework of laws and the Government has introduced several legislative policy reforms and regulations to block counterfeiting and prevent the movement of smuggled goods in the trade channels. The key piece of legislation are as follows.

The Trademarks Act of 1999 provides for statutory registration and protection of trade marks of right holders. Under this Act, the penalty for selling or applying false trade marks or trade descriptions includes from six months' to three years' imprisonment in addition to a fine of at least Rs50, 000 ($808) up to Rs200,000.

The Copyright Act 1957 defines offences and penalties, including imprisonment for at least six months and up to three years, in addition to a fine of at least Rs50,000 and up to Rs200,000.

The Information Technology Act 2000 provides legal recognition for transactions carried out by means of electronic data interchange and other means of electronic communication. It also provides penalties for damage to computers and computer systems, for example.

The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 empowers certain government agencies to not only inspect but also seize and confiscate any product that is found to be "adulterated", "spurious" or "misbranded" (the definitions of which are provided under the Act).

To counter the spread of fake drugs in India and their export to other countries, the drug controller general of India stipulated procedures in 2011.

Is it possible to register your trade marks with Customs and, if so, what procedures need to be followed to do this and what fees are involved?

In order to limit the adverse affects of counterfeit and unauthorised imports, the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules 2007 was issued by the Government of India. This provides a mechanism for registration of Intellectual Property Assets (patents, trade marks, copyright, designs and geographical indications) with the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC). Registration with CBEC empowers the Customs Authority to intercept, seize, and confiscate goods found to be or suspected to be infringing IP rights registered and in force in India by any person other than the IP rights holder or without permission or authorisation of the IP rights holder.

Under the said Rules, registration is obtained by filing a notice for protection of IP rights with the commissioner of Customs to suspend the clearance of infringing or counterfeit goods. Once registered, the Customs Authority stores the IP rights in their electronic database which is flashed across all entry points in India. Custom officials can detain the counterfeits before they enter circulation, either on the basis of the registration appearing in the electronic database or even suo motu in the interest of the trade and protection of IP rights.

By making one application, the applicant can cover all the Custom air cargo complexes, seaports and land Customs stations through which importation or exportation of pirated articles in India is suspected.

How effective is the civil enforcement system? Are ex-parte orders or evidence preservation orders available?

The statute and the precedents with respect to orders passed in cases of counterfeiting reflects that the civil enforcement system, in cases of counterfeiting, is proactive and effective.

The civil remedies which can be availed by a right holder in case of counterfeiting are: injunction; damages; rendition of accounts; and, delivery of goods.

Section 135 enumerates the types of relief available to a right holder in case of infringement. It states that an order of injunction may include an ex-parte injunction for the discovery of documents, and the preservation of infringing goods, documents or other evidence, to restrain the defendant from disposing of or dealing with their assets in a manner which may adversely affect the plaintiff.

Therefore, the law provides for ex-parte orders in cases of counterfeiting and in some cases the judiciary has implemented the same. For example, in the recent cases of Philip Morris Products v Sameer and Microsoft Corporation v Jayesh, the courts granted immediate relief to the plaintiff by passing an ex-parte order against the defendants, thereby restraining them from selling, exhibiting or offering for sale any infringing goods.

Therefore, the Indian judiciary has time and again supported the need for prompt action in cases of infringement (in particular counterfeiting) and has supported the issuance of exparte orders and injunctions.

Is it possible to use the criminal law to tackle counterfeiting? If so, please give details of how widely the criminal system is used and how it functions.

Yes, along with civil remedies, criminal remedies are available under law for tackling counterfeiting.

The Trademark Act 1999, though not specifically addressing the offence of counterfeiting, enumerates the offences of "falsifying a trade mark" and "falsely applying a trade mark", which may be seen to overlap with the nature of trade mark counterfeiting.

Offences Meaning
Falsifying a trade mark A person will be deemed to falsify a trade mark, who: (a) makes the trade mark or a deceptively similar mark, without the permission or authorisation of owner of the trademark; or (b) falsifies any genuine trade mark, whether by alteration, addition, effacement or otherwise (section 102)
Falsely applying a trade mark A person will be deemed to be falsely applying a trade mark who, without the consent of the proprietor of the trade mark: (a) applies such trade mark or a deceptively similar mark to goods or services or any package containing goods; or (b) uses any package bearing a mark which is identical to or deceptively similar to the trade mark of such proprietor, for the purpose of packing, filling or wrapping any goods other than the genuine goods of the proprietor of the trade mark.


Offence Penalty
Falsifying a trade mark, falsely applying a trade mark or applying a false trade description Imprisonment for at least six months, and up to three years, in addition to a fine of at least Rs50,000 and up to Rs200,000 (section 103).
Intentionally selling goods or providing services to which a false trade mark or false trade description is applied Same as above.
Subsequent conviction for the above offences Imprisonment for at least one year, and up to three years, in addition to a fine of between Rs100,000 and Rs200,000.

Is internet-based infringement a big problem in your jurisdiction? What tools are available to track down and fight counterfeits being sold online?

E-commerce in India is experiencing remarkable growth and changing the way people do business. The internet has become a strategic platform for the sale of counterfeit goods, as it serves as an attractive additional channel to promote and sell forged products. The anonymity and flexibility to move across jurisdictions that it provides to counterfeiters has spurred the growth of counterfeit sales online.

Online portals usually take several measures to address the issue of anti-counterfeiting on the internet.

Websites incorporate comprehensive terms of service and sales which specifically prohibit counterfeiting by advertisers. They also discourage infringing activity through strict takedown policies on receiving complaints from IP owners.

Authentication procedures are adopted to enable sites to ensure that third party sellers who want to advertise on their websites are marketing genuine products, thus maintaining the genuineness of its seller's listing.

An easily understandable and publicly visible process are available to trade mark owners, clearly indicating the steps and time the website will take to complete the action under the process.

Online retailers often advise and warn users about the consequences of violating the applicable policies and laws, including a permanent loss of access to the service and being reported to the appropriate law enforcement officials.

In addition, other best practices can be adopted. Shopping websites should educate users about their policies and procedures, so that people are not caught unaware; trade mark owners can release a list of authorised dealers from time to time and send notices to online shopping portals of identified counterfeiters; and trade mark owners can give offer insight into their mark or logo by pointing out indicators to show which products are genuine and which are fake.

Has the government handed down any new legislation in the last 12 months that was designed to deal with the problem of counterfeiting?

Aimed at simplifying export procedure, the self-certification bar-coding for drug firms has been introduced by the Government of India. Such a coding aids in tracking and tracing the origin of drugs and therefore helps in identifying spurious and substandard drugs.

The Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Bill 2013, which is pending, proposes the establishment of a Central Drug Authority that will subsume the existing Central Drugs Standards Control Organisation. It also envisages provisions to ensure a standard quality of drugs, cosmetics, and medical devices and specifies conditions under which they will be considered misbranded, adulterated, and spurious. It also specifies penalties and offences for the same.

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion is all set to draft the National IPR Policy. The Policy will identify the areas in intellectual property where study needs to be conducted to provide possible implications of demands by negotiating partner countries, to keep the government informed about recent developments taking place in IP cases, and to report on the best practices adopted by foreign countries. It will also help the Government to take steps to improve the infrastructure of IP offices and tribunals.

Have there been any important court decisions handed down in the last 12 months that concern counterfeiting?

In Microsoft v Jayesh 2014, the case of the plaintiff was that it is the owner and manufacturer of a gaming console sold under its registered trade mark Xbox. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant infringed its registered trade mark by selling counterfeit and pirated versions of its Xbox gaming consoles. Therefore, the plaintiff asked for an injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing their trade mark rights, for the delivery of the infringing goods and the rendition of accounts.

In view of damage being caused to the plaintiff, the court passed an ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff and appointed a local commissioner to visit the premises of the defendant and inspect gaming consoles bearing the plaintiff's trade mark.

On the basis of commissioner's report and evidence adduced by the plaintiff, the court held that it was an established case for the grant of a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from selling or distributing Xbox gaming consoles that are unauthorised imports, and pirated or counterfeit versions of the Xbox games.

In Philip Morris v Sameer 2014, the case of the plaintiff was that it has been the seller and manufacturer of cigarettes bearing the registered trade mark Marlboro since 1924. The plaintiff alleged that various retailers in the Fort and Colaba area of Mumbai were indulging in the sale, stocking and distribution of counterfeit and grey-market versions of the plaintiffs' products. The plaintiff asked for the grant of an injunction, to restrain the defendants from the sale and distribution of infringing goods, an order for the rendition of accounts and the delivery of all infringing goods.

The Court granted ex-parte injunction to the plaintiff and also appointed local commissioners to investigate the case. Based on the trans-border reputation and goodwill of the plaintiff's mark along with the local commissioner's report, the court granted relief to the plaintiff and made the following observation:

Counterfeits, which are not the genuine products manufactured by the plaintiffs/ affiliates but are sold by the said defendants under the suit trade marks as plaintiffs' original products, indeed infringe plaintiffs' rights in the suit trade marks under section 29 of the Act. They are selling the impugned cigarettes, bearing the suit trade marks, to the patrons of the plaintiffs' brand of cigarettes, who buy these cigarettes in question from their stalls believing them to be the genuine 'Marlboro' cigarettes, ie the products of the plaintiffs. Thus, the counterfeit products of the said defendants are being passed off as the cigarettes of the plaintiffs.

What steps would you like to see the government take to tackle counterfeiting?

The Government, industry and right holders must all ensure technological collaboration in anti-counterfeiting and antipiracy measures so that existing rules and legislation and laws can be implemented against the entities engaged in piracy and counterfeiting.

Capacity building programmes to educate officials and the general public to distinguish between a fake and real product should be facilitated by government and trade organisations.

Originally published by ManagingIP.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.