India: An Analysis Of Strict Product Liability

Last Updated: 23 November 2015
Article by Rahul Pandey


Strict Product Liability has evolved from the theory of Strict Liability which has itself developed from an English Case called Rylands vs Fletcher1 which is supposed to be the progenitor of the doctrine of Strict Liability. In that case a reservoir broke through an abandoned mine and flooded an active mine. The active mine owners sued the abandoned mine owners, and won. The court held that "if a person for his own purpose brings on his land and collects and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it at his peril, and if he does not do so, is prima facie answerable for all the damage which is natural consequence of its escape". Basically Strict liability in tort is the concept that in certain situation a defendant is liable for plaintiff's damages without any requirement on the part of the plaintiff to prove that the defendant was negligent.

In the line of the same theory, Strict Product Liability evolved for protecting consumers and it clearly cast the liability on the manufacturer, seller, or lessor of goods and they would be strictly liable, regardless of intent or the exercise of reasonable care, for any personal injury or property damage to consumers, users, and by-standers caused by the goods it manufactures, sells, or leases. In the matter of Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. 2, Supreme Court of California duly for the very first time held liable the manufacturer as in the instant case an injury was caused to an ultimate consumer by a defective power tool, the California Supreme Court assigned strict liability to the manufacturer who placed on the market a defective product even though both privity of contract and notice of breach of warranty were lacking. The ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Court clearly stated that "Strict liability does not rest on a consensual foundation but, rather, on one created by law. The liability was created judicially because of the economic and social need for the protection of consumers in an increasingly complex and mechanized society, and because of the limitations in the negligence and warranty remedies. The court's avowed purpose was "to insure that the costs of injuries resulting from defective products are borne by the manufacturer that put such products on the market rather than by the injured persons who are powerless to protect themselves."

Later on, the American Law Institute drafted and adopted Restatement (2d) of Torts §402A. It duly states that:

"(1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property, if (a) the seller is engaged in the business of selling such a product and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold.

(2) The rules stated in subsection (1) apply although (a) the seller has exercised all possible care in the preparation and sale of his product, and (b) the user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller."


Now the most important aspect of the whole theory is that, who may be held liable for damages caused by the defective products?

After the ruling put forward by the Supreme Court of California in the matter of Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc, it was construed that any entity involved in the chain of distribution for a defective product may be held liable for injuries caused by the defect. Potentially liable parties include the manufacturer, distributor, and retailer of the product. Generally, to prevail on a strict product liability claim, a plaintiff must prove that an inherent defect in a product caused the damages claimed. In other words, the plaintiff must prove (1) that the product was inherently defective and (2) that the defect in the product caused the injury or damage. Both elements of the strict product liability claim must be specifically and independently proved. That to establish the first element of a strict product liability claim, a plaintiff must prove that the product was inherently defective. That is, the plaintiff must prove that an inherent defect existed in the product at the time the product left the custody and control of the manufacturer/ supplier/retailer. To establish the second element of a strict product liability claim, a plaintiff must prove that the damages were caused by the defect in the product. Proving that the product was inherently defective is not, by itself, sufficient to establish a prima facie product liability claim. A connection must be established between the inherent defect and the injury. A defendant in a product liability case is not liable for damages caused by a defective product unless the damages were actually caused by the defect in the product.

It can very well be summed up that in order to succeed or to prevail in a Product Liability claim under Torts, the Petitioner need to prove or has to show the essential elements of Product liability under torts and those are as follows:-

a. That the defendant was the manufacturer or the supplier,

b. That the product was inherently defective,

c. That the defect in the product existed when it left the defendant's possession,

d. That the defect in the product caused the injury and damage to the Plaintiff or to his property,

e. Plaintiff's injury resulted from a use of the product that was reasonably foreseeable to the defendant.


It has been duly held in catena of judgments delivered by various courts of U.S.A that the doctrine of strict liability in torts would not be attracted where the Plaintiff has suffered only economic loss i.e neither physical injury nor any damages to his property. Hon'ble Supreme court of California in the matter of Seely vs. White Motor Co3. has clearly held that doctrine of strict product liability in torts does not apply to cases where "no blood has been spilled" as the economic loss is governed by the warranty provisions of Uniform Commercial Code. In the matter of Indelco Inc. vs Hanson Industries4, Court of Appeals of Texas, (14th District) has also held that no cause of action in strict liability could be maintained where only economic loss has been suffered by the Plaintiff. In the matter of Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed5, the Supreme court of Texas held that "the nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached, when the injury is only the economic loss then doctrine of Product liability would not be attracted. In another matter of Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. Shivers6, the Supreme Court discussed whether a consumer in the plaintiff's position could bring a cause of action under section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts 1 or the implied warranties of the Uniform Commercial Code when the consumer, without privity with the manufacturer, suffered only economic loss due to the defective product. The court concluded section 402A does not apply when only economic loss is suffered, but held the implied warranties provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code covered such situations.

Strict Product Liability and its applicability in India:

The jurisprudence relating to product liability in India has been constantly evolving and in the recent times the Indian courts have also adopted a pro-consumer approach while deciding on product liability claims. It would not be wrong to state that In India there is no specific statute which governs the product liability claims and the term product liability is also not defined under any Indian statute. In the absence of any specific Indian statute the Indian product liability law can be said to have been emerging from different Indian statues and the product liability claims could be ascertained under the following Indian statutes/ laws (hereinafter together referred to as "Indian Laws"): the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, The Indian Contract Act, 1872. Notably in the matter of Airbus Industrie Vs.Laura Howell Linton7, the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka has held in a plain and lucid manner that doctrine of Strict Product Liability does not exist in India.


1.(L.R. 3 H.L. 330)

2.(1963) 59 Cal.2d 57 [13 A.L.R.3d 1049]

3. (1965) 63 C2d 9, 18


5.711 S.W.2d 617, 618 (Tex.1986)

6.557 S.W.2d 77, 83 (Tex.1977)


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions