In the case of Kapurthala Improvement Trust vs. CIT: ITA.
No. 732 of 2013 (Amritsar) dated June 11, 2015, the issue
before the Tribunal was whether registration under Section 12 AA of
the IT Act can be withdrawn by invoking provisions of Section 2(15)
of the IT Act.
In that case, the assessee trust, incorporated under Punjab Town
Improvement Act, 1922, filed application seeking registration under
Section 12AA of the Act, which was rejected by CIT. On appeal
before the Tribunal, it held that the assessee was entitled to the
benefit of registration. The Revenue challenged the order of
Tribunal before the High Court but did not succeed. Subsequently,
the CIT, in view of amendment in Section 2(15) of the IT Act and
relying on the decision of the Amritsar Bench of Tribunal in the
case of Improvement Trust Phagwara in ITA No. 274 (Asr) /2013,
order dated 23.07.2013, cancelled the registration of the assessee
trust granted under Section 12AAby holding that assessee was
engaged in commercial activities. On appeal before the Tribunal,
the Tribunal while allowing the appeal of the assessee, held
thatthe scope of powers of Commissioner under Section 12AA (3) for
cancellation of registration already granted is limited in scope,
inasmuch as it can only be invoked only when –
The activities of the trust are not genuine, and
The activities of the trust or the institution are not being
carried out in accordance with the objects of the trust or the
In the absence of fulfilment of any of the aforesaid conditions
in the facts of the assessee trust, withdrawal of registration was
The Tribunal, on further examination of the provisions of
proviso to Section 2(15) of the IT Act, observed that rider set out
under first proviso to Section 2(15) can only come into play on
year to year basis and not in absolute terms since it is not only
the nature of the activity but also the level of activity which,
taken together, determines whether the disabling clause can come
into play. The safeguard against the objects of the trust being
vitiated insofar as their character of “charitable
activities” is concerned is inbuilt in the provisions of
Section 13(8) of the IT Act. The impact of the proviso to Section
2(15) will be that the assessee will not be eligible for exemption
under Section 11 of the IT Act in respect of income falling within
the purview of the former.
Comments: In view of the aforesaid decision, it
may be said that once the registration under Section 12AA of the IT
Act is granted to the assessee and the activities of the trust are
genuine and as per the objects of the assessee, CIT or any other
authority is not empowered to cancel registration on ground of
involvement of trust in any activity which may not be for
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should
be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in
this article are solely of the authors of this article.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Cummins Inc. is a foreign company, rendering services in respect of desktop/laptop software license and internet mail facilities to its Indian associated enterprises, i.e. CIL and CSSL which were paying IT charges provided by the taxpayer.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).