India: Seat Is Not The Centre Of Gravity- Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

The term "subject matter of arbitration" cannot be confused with "subject matter of suit". The term "subject matter" in Section 2(1) (e) is confined to Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (herein after referred to as "Indian Arbitration Act"). It has a reference and connection with the process of dispute resolution. Its purpose is to identify the courts having supervisory control over the arbitration proceedings. Hence, it refers to a court which would essentially be a court of the seat of the arbitration process.

Section 2(1) (e) of the Indian Arbitration Act provides for the definition of the term "Court"-

(e) "Court" means the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district, and includes the High Court in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, having jurisdiction to decide the questions forming the subject-matter of the arbitration if the same had been the subject-matter of a suit, but does not include any civil court of a grade inferior to such principal Civil Court, or any Court of Small Causes;

The definition of Section 2(1) (e) includes "subject matter of the arbitration" to give jurisdiction to the courts where the arbitration takes places, which otherwise would not exist. On the other hand, Section 47 which is in Part-II of the Indian Arbitration Act dealing with enforcement of certain foreign award has denied the term "court" as a court having jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the award. This has clear reference to a court within whose jurisdiction the asset/ person is located, against which/whom the enforcement of the international arbitral award is sought. Therefore, the provisions contained in Section 2(1) (e) being purely jurisdictional in nature can have no relevance to the question whether Part-I applies to arbitrations which take place outside India.

The provision in Section 2(1) (e) has to be construed keeping in view the provisions in Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act, which gives recognition to party autonomy.

Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1908 defines "Place of Arbitration" which is as under-


(1) The parties are free to agree on the place of arbitration.

(2) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), the place of arbitration shall be determined by the arbitral tribunal having regard to the circumstances of the case, including the convenience of the parties.

(3) Notwithstanding sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, meet at any place it considers appropriate for consultation among its members, for hearing witnesses, experts or the parties, or for inspection of documents, goods or other property."

A plain reading of Section 20 leaves no room for doubt that where the place of arbitration is in India, the parties are free to agree to any "place" or "seat" within India, be it Delhi, Mumbai, etc. In the absence of the parties agreement thereto, Section 20(2) authorizes the arbitration tribunal to determine the place/seat of such arbitration. Section 20(3) enables the arbitration tribunal to meet at any place for conducting hearings at a place of convenience in matters such as consultations among its members for hearing witnesses, experts or the parties.

In light of the BALCO1 judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India it is no more res integra that Part-I of the Indian Arbitration Act is applicable only to all the arbitrations which take place within the territory of India and hence will have no application to International Commercial Arbitration held outside India. Therefore, such awards would only be subject to the jurisdiction of the Indian courts when the same are sought to enforced in India in accordance with the provisions contained in Part-II of the Indian Arbitration Act.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court India in BALCO judgment (supra) has taken the view that the legislature has intentionally given jurisdiction to two courts i.e. the court which would have jurisdiction where the cause of action is located and the courts where the arbitration takes place. This was necessary as on many occasions the agreement may provide for a seat of arbitration at a place which would be neutral to both the parties. Hence, the courts where the arbitration takes place would be required to exercise the supervisory control over the arbitral process.

For instance, if the arbitration is held in Mumbai, where neither of the parties from Mumbai and Mumbai having been chosen as a neutral place as between a party from Bengaluru and the other from Kolkata and the tribunal sitting in Mumbai passes an interim order under Section 17 of the Indian Arbitration Act, the appeal against interim order under Section 37 must lie to the Courts of Mumbai being the Courts having supervisory jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings and the tribunal. This would be irrespective of the fact that the obligations to be performed under the contract were to be performed either at Bengaluru or at Kolkata, and only arbitration is to take place at Mumbai. In such circumstances, both the Courts would have jurisdiction i.e. the Court within whose jurisdiction the subject matter of the suit is situated and the courts within the jurisdiction of which dispute resolution i.e. arbitration is located.

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in M/s Sai Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd. & Ors.2 decided one of the issue raised by the Respondents as to the territorial jurisdiction of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court wherein the contract was awarded by the Respondent to the Petitioner from its Mumbai office and the work was to be executed in the State of Chhattisgarh and the same was managed from the office of Chhattisgarh. Thereby the Respondent alleged that since no cause of action has arisen in Delhi and also earlier the Petitioner had withdrawn the writ petition filed in Delhi High Court on the ground of no territorial jurisdiction and thereafter filed writ petition in the High court of Chhattisgarh. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi on taking into consideration the averments in the petition more particularly the arbitration proceedings having been held in Delhi pursuant to Clause 16.01 of the contract followed the BALCO judgment and did not find any merit in the submission of the Respondent with regard to territorial jurisdiction of Hon'ble Delhi High court and proceeded further in deciding the case.

Recently, the Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in NHPC Vs. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.3 has overruled the decision passed by one of the Ld. Single Judge in Apparel Export Promotion Council Vs. Prabhati Patni, Proprietor Comfort Furnishers4 wherein view was taken that the situs or seat of arbitration or the fact that the award was made at a particular place, would not be relevant for conferring jurisdiction. But, that decision was rendered prior to the Supreme Court decision in BALCO (supra). So, after BALCO (supra), the AEPC (supra) decision, even for persuasive value, would not come to the aid of the appellant. In fact, after the BALCO (supra) decision, this question of jurisdiction has been considered by a division bench in Ion Exchange (India) Ltd. Vs. Panasonic Electic Works Co.5 This court, inter alia, held as under:-

"12. We are unable to agree with the view taken by the learned single Judge in his order dated 04.02.2014. Section2(1)(e) of the Act defines the meaning of "Court" as, inter alia, the High Court exercising original civil jurisdiction to decide questions forming the subject matter of arbitration if the same had been the subject matter of a suit. As per Section 2(2) of the said Act, Part I is applicable where the arbitration is held in India. Further, Section 9 of the said Act, which falls in Part I of the said Act, sets out the various interim measures that the "Court" may direct either before, during or at any time after the making of the arbitral award. Section 20 of the Act gives the parties to the arbitration, the freedom to choose not only the seat of arbitration but also gives the parties the right to choose the venue of the arbitration. Section 42 of the said Act, which starts with a non obstante clause, states that where any application under Part I has been made to a Court, that Court alone will have jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings and subsequent applications arising out of the Agreement.

13. In this backdrop, let us take an example where the cause of action has arisen in place 'A' and the place of arbitration is place 'B'. If a party to the arbitration agreement were to move an application under Section 9 of the said Act, he could not file it in place 'B', if the view of the learned single Judge were to be accepted as, according to him, an application under Section 9 does not invoke the 'supervisory jurisdiction'. And, because of Section 42, no other application under the said Act could ever be filed in place 'B' (i.e. the place of arbitration). So, the occasion to exercise supervisory jurisdiction would never accrue to the Courts at place 'B'. This would run counter to the decision of the Supreme Court in Bharat Aluminium (supra) where, at the cost of repetition, it was observed that-

"The legislature has intentionally given jurisdiction to two courts, i.e., the court which would have jurisdiction where the cause of action is located and the courts where the arbitration takes place."

14. In these circumstances, we find ourselves unable to agree with the view of the learned single Judge expressed in his order dated 04.02.2014. We agree with the view taken in Sai Consulting (supra) and hold that the Courts at the seat or place of arbitration would have territorial jurisdiction to entertain an application under the said Act subject to the provisions of Section 42 thereof irrespective of the fact that the cause of action arose elsewhere and/or the respondent resides elsewhere.

In Hon'ble Supreme Court of India view, the correct depiction of the practical consideration and the distinction between "seat" (Section 20(1) and 20(2)) and "venue" (Section 20(3)) would be quite crucial in the event, the arbitration agreement designates a foreign country as the "seat"/ "place" of the arbitration and also select the Indian Arbitration Act as the curial law/ law governing the arbitration proceedings.


The fixation of the most convenient "venue" is taken care by Section 20(3) of the Indian Arbitration Act. Section 20, has to be read in the context of Section 2(2) of the Indian Arbitration Act, which places a threshold limitation on the applicability of Part-I, where the place of arbitration is in India. Therefore, Section 20 would also not support the extra-territorial applicability of Part-I, as far as domestic arbitration is concerned and only if the agreement of the parties is construed to provide for the seat /place of arbitration being in India the Part-I of the Indian Arbitration Act would be applicable.


1. (2012) 9 SCC 552

2. 198 (2013) DLT 507

3. 2015 (4) ABLR 297 (Delhi)

4. (2006) 86 DRJ 48

5. (2014) 208 DLT 597

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions