India: Corporate Criminal Liability: Revisiting Iridium


The complexity shrouding the issue of criminality of a corporation was settled by the Supreme Court ("SC") in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Inc.1 case. In January 2015, it got an opportunity to decide criminal liability of corporate officers for the acts of a company and to examine the principle of alter ego. This recent ruling in Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation ("CBI") and Others2 once again chartered into the territory of the corporate criminal liability and relied on Iridium case to determine the issue at hand.

This newsletter discusses the principle of attribution, which talks about the identification of the person whose acts will be instrumental in imputing criminal liability to the company. It touches upon the evolution in the concept of attributing mens rea to a company by analyzing the case of Iridium and Sunil Bharti Mittal.

1. Background

Companies are juristic persons and, hence, the prevalent view was that a company could not be charged of offences because of procedural difficulties of arrest, etc. Due to absence of requisite intention to commit a crime no criminal liability could be attributed to them. In Assistant Commissioner, Assessment-II, Bangalore v. Messers Velliappa Textiles Ltd.3 the SC had endorsed alter ego theory. However, it had by majority held that a company cannot be prosecuted for offences requiring imposition of imprisonment only or of mandatory term of imprisonment coupled with fine. However, a year later in Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement4, a five-judge constitution bench overruled Velliappa Textiles dictum. From thereon, the SC has inched forward in determining the issue of corporate criminal liability and has provided jurisprudential value through Iridium and Sunil Bharti Mittal rulings.

2. Jurisprudential Position

The issue of criminality of corporate acts has always been controversial in nature. Legal position of corporate criminal liability has been evolving over the years and with time courts in India have taken a stricter approach while determining liability of a corporate body for acts committed by its directors and other agents.

2.1 Iridium case & issue of mens rea

The significance of Iridium lies in the fact that it clarifies the law on the point as to whether a company can be punished for crimes requiring mens rea. In this case Iridium had filed a criminal complaint against Motorola under sections 120 (Conspiracy) and 420 (Cheating) of the Indian Penal Code based on which the magistrate in Pune started proceedings against Motorola. Motorola then moved to the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the proceedings started by the judicial magistrate. The High Court allowed the petition quashing the proceedings at the magistrate level giving several reasons, one of them being that a company is incapable of having a guilty mind therefore no offence of cheating can be committed by it. Iridium, by way of appeal approached the SC. The SC framed the following two issues for its consideration: firstly, can mens rea be attributed to the companies for the criminal liability and secondly, what is the criminal liability for misstatements in the context of securities offerings made to specific investors on a private basis.

Substantially, the SC was concerned about the corporate criminal liability of the company. This was done by way of principle of attribution. This principle is invoked when the question as to whose mental element shall be attributed to the company for foisting criminal liability, comes up. In this judgment the court ruled that the person who is in direct control and in-charge of the affairs of the company and the degree of the control is so intense and rigorous that the company is said to act through the person, is instrumental in attributing criminal liability to the company. The two main points on which the court gave its ruling were: first that a company is capable of possessing the requisite mens rea and secondly that the rigid test of identification of the directing mind of the company has to be followed in determining the requisite metal element.

The court had relied on the case of Tesco Ltd.5 wherein it was laid down that the people who are specifically entrusted with the powers and duties towards the company and are mentioned in the Memorandum of Association ("MOA"), Articles of Association ("AOA"), named by the directors or approved of such powers in the general meetings of the company will be held liable and their acts will be instrumental in attributing criminal liability of the company. Iridium goes one step ahead by holding any natural person accountable and attributing liability to the company on behalf of their actions. The only requirement is that the person should be in charge of the affairs of the company. The court further held that non-disclosure of proper information would be treated as mis-representation thereby constituting the criminal offence of cheating for which the company can be held liable. The court finally ruled that criminal liability can be attributed to the company since it is capable of possessing the requisite men rea for commission of the offence.

2.2 Analysis of Iridium

Iridium went for the strict applicability of the directing mind and will of the company test. This approach is more suitable to the Indian scenario because of the fact that the relaxation in the requirement of mens rea in India is done by way of legislative interventions and not judicial pronouncements. This decision is still in line with the criminal jurisprudence because the requirement of having inherent certainty in the attribution of the criminal liability is being fulfilled by following the rigid approach. No liability is attributed to the people who might be responsible for handling the affairs of the company as against those who are actually named in the MOA/AOA or other relevant documents to do the same. The question of, under what circumstances would a company not be liable for the acts of the directors, etc. was left unanswered by the court.

The reliance on the case of Tesco Ltd. provides the scope of applying the rigid rule of attribution of criminal liability in synchronization with the principle that vicarious liability cannot be attributed in the criminal cases. This leads to non-application of the doctrine of attribution in a flexible manner. This would hence lead to the non-attainment of the true objective and purpose of the concept of the corporate criminal liability. It might filter out those situations where the actual people who are in charge of the affairs of the company might not have a corresponding designation and hence their acts might not get reflected upon the company and hence the company might run scot free in such cases.

2.3 Sunil Bharti Mittal case

A converse scenario as to the ruling laid down in the Iridium case is discussed in the Sunil Bharti case. This case discusses the proposition as to whether the directors (or any one representing the alter ego of the company) can be prosecuted on the account of criminal acts of the company. This case pertains to the alleged irregularities in relation to the grant of license and allocation of the spectrum in the 2G band wherein CBI had issued summons to the directors of the companies involved once the offences were laid down in the chargesheet.

The SC in the said case comprehensively scrutinizes whether and under what circumstances the principle of attribution (alter ego) be used to make the people in charge of the company liable for the acts (offences committed) of the company.

2.4 Analysis of Sunil Bharti Mittal

The court relied its decision on the previously discussed Iridium case. The judgment delivered by Justice AK Sikri (on behalf of the three judge bench) said that the Iridium case lays down the proposition that the corporations can no longer claim immunity from punishments under those offences, which require mens rea. The case however does not discuss the converse application of the alter ego principle as laid down in the Iridium judgement.

Next the court observed that the directors could be prosecuted for an offence committed by the company only in the following two circumstances. There should either be active involvement and sufficient evidence to adduce the criminal intent of that person, or the legislation should itself impose the liability on the director or person in charge of the affairs of the company. The court noted that there is no such evidence so as to draw an inference that the directors had a criminal intent. Also there is no statutory provision to the effect where the vicarious liability of the director is discussed in context of the offences committed by the company. Thus, it said that mens rea is attributed to the company on the principle of alter ego and it does not apply in reverse where vicarious liability is imputed on the persons dealing with the business of the company.

The principle borrowed from Iriduim is limited only to the extent that mens rea can be imputed to the companies and they cannot claim immunity on that ground. This case hence by way of analogy relies on Tesco Ltd. The SC has referred the decision of Tesco Ltd. in many cases and has very clearly laid down that the vicarious liability under strict liability statutes can be attributed to the person who is actually in charge of the company. Hence, clarifying the principle of attribution in cases of vicarious liability where they form part of specific offences in the statutes governing strict liability offences. But this case in general fails to talk about the vicarious liability aspect when it is not clubbed with strict liability offences.


Since the concept of corporate criminal liability has been evolving with time initially there were many difficulties as to how will the evidence be adduced and what will be the standard of proof required for culpability of the offender i.e., the corporate. Gradually, with time, the courts started filling up the voids by answering some of the pertinent questions. In the two cases analyzed above, the courts have further clarified the concept of corporate criminal liability and have widened its ambit. As of today, Iridium is the law as to the fact that mens rea can be attributed to the corporate entities and they cannot claim immunity on the ground of absence of legal personality. In the same case the court has refrained itself from laying down clear cut pointers as to the vicarious liability of the companies in case there are no specific offences vis-ŕ-vis strict liability offences. Hence, further judicial interventions are required to add another feather in the chapter of evolution of the concept of corporate criminal liability.


1 (2011) 1 SCC 74

2 Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2015 (arising out of Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No. 3161 of 2013 decided on January 9, 2015

3 AIR 2004 SC 86

4 AIR 2005 SC 2622

5 Tesco Supermarkets Ltd. .v. Nattrass (1971) 2 All E.R. 127

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.