India: Practical Realignment Of Arbitration Law By The Supreme Court Of India: An Analysis

Arbitration in India has been one of the rather uncertain fields of jurisprudence. The lack of uniformity in the judiciary's approach, multiple levels of challenge (which are more often than not exploited as appeals) and overburdened courts suffering from chronic delays, have largely impeded India's growth as a preferred jurisdiction for international arbitration(s). One of the most discussed, criticised and written upon issues in this sphere has been the over-reaching attitude of the Indian courts to sweep within their jurisdiction arbitral proceedings "seated" outside India. The law, as it exists today, in relation to foreign seated arbitrations, arising out of agreements entered into after 6th September 2012, has been settled by the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court in Bharat Aluminium Company v Kaiser Aluminium Services Inc.1 (Balco). In the said case, the Supreme Court has held that Part 1 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) shall not be applicable to foreign seated arbitral proceedings.

Balco, therefore, overruled the earlier decision in Bhatia International v Bulk Trading S.A.2 (Bhatia) (which was followed in Venture Global Engineering v Satyam Computer Services Limited3) which held that even in case of arbitrations held outside India, Part 1 of the Act shall be applicable, unless the same is excluded either expressly or impliedly by the parties. The decision in Bhatia, needless to mention, led to an anomalous situation wherein the under-equipped courts in India were forced to entertain petitions under Part 1 of the Act even in foreign seated arbitrations. Further, it is also not difficult to imagine the continual hardship caused to a party who has to defend a favourable award passed in a foreign institutional arbitration before courts in India and witness the sluggish (often endless) judicial vagaries. The approach of the apex court in the Bhatia case, wherein the court assumed within its jurisdiction those arbitrations which had their seat outside India, led to the reference of the decision in Bhatia to the constitutional bench in the Balco case.

As the applicability of the decision in the Balco case was made prospective i.e., only to agreements which were entered after 6th September 2012, the agreements entered before the said date still continue to be governed under the Bhatia case regime; a regime which has been evolving constantly. The fate of such agreements, and the subsequent arbitral proceedings in view of the constantly evolving judicial approach, forms the subject of discussion in this Article.

In this regard, one may take note of the recent case of Carzonrent India Pvt. Ltd v Hertz International Limited4 (Carzonrent) decided by the Delhi High Court. This case presented the Delhi High Court with an interesting occasion to decide the applicability of Part 1 of the Act to an award under the Bhatia regime, in an International Commercial Arbitration seated at Singapore. The Respondent in the Carzonrent case had objected to the very maintainability of the petition under Section 34 of the Act, inter alia, relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in Reliance Industries Limited & Another v Union of India5 (Reliance), which was followed by the Supreme Court in a very recent judgment in Harmony Innovation Shipping Limited Vs. Gupta Coal India Limited6 (Harmony).

The Delhi High Court, in its judgment, while noting the above decisions, observed that there have been decisions subsequent to Balco where the Supreme Court had to apply the law as explained in Bhatia. However, the Court missed the significant shift in the law governing such awards, as recorded in Reliance. Contrasting to the ratio of the Reliance case, the Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of the petition on the basis of "closest and most real connection test", while noting the following parameters:

  1. There is absolutely no connection between Singapore and the present contract except that the seat of the arbitration was in Singapore.
  2. The Petitioner is an Indian party and the Respondent is incorporated in U.S.A.
  3. The contract was to be performed entirely in India.
  4. The governing law of the contract is Indian law.

Applying the above test, the Delhi High Court observed that there was no implied exclusion (one of the requirements under the Bhatia regime) of Part 1 of the Act, and accordingly held that petition under Section 34 of the Act was maintainable.

It is interesting to note that the Reliance case, which was cited before the Delhi High Court in the Carzonrent case, noted that the crux of the issue before it was whether Part I of the Act would be applicable to the Award, given by a Tribunal seated in London. The Supreme Court further noted that it was conscious of the fact that the decision in the Balco case is prospective and that the matter at hand fell under the Bhatia regime. After a brief discussion of the relevant clauses of the agreement in question and the international jurisprudence on the subject, the Supreme Court in the Reliance case concluded that the seat of the arbitration would tantamount to an exclusive jurisdiction clause. In doing so, the Supreme Court heavily relied upon its earlier decision in Videocon Industries Limited vs. Union of India7 (Videocon) to hold that court below erred in not applying the ratio of Videocon to the case at hand. Just to recapitulate, in the Videocon case, the Supreme Court had held that where the parties agree to a foreign law as governing law of the arbitration agreement, the Indian courts did not have the jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Section 9 of the Act.

It is to be noted that the Supreme Court, while dealing with the Reliance case (falling under the Bhatia regime), conveniently extended the ratio of the Balco case by taking recourse to the reasoning of the Videocon case and certain English judgments to conclude that, seat of the arbitration would tantamount to an exclusive jurisdiction clause. The Supreme Court, accordingly excluded the applicability of Part 1 of the Act. The relevant observation of Supreme Court in the Reliance case is as follows:

"45. In our opinion, it is too late in the day to contend that the seat of arbitration is not analogous to an exclusive jurisdiction clause....."

By doing so, the Supreme Court in the Reliance case has endeavoured to negate the prospective applicability of the Balco case, decided by the constitutional bench. The Reliance case marks a major shift in law for agreements entered into under the Bhatia regime, as under the said regime, the Parties had to go a step further and prove an express or implied exclusion of Part 1 of the Act even where the seat was situated outside India. The decision in Reliance, therefore, leads to the inescapable conclusion that even under the pre-Balco regime, the seat of the arbitration, if located outside India, would confer exclusive jurisdiction on the courts of that place and Indian courts cannot assume jurisdiction over such matters.

To conclude, while the decision in the Reliance case is a welcome step in the process of aligning the Indian municipal law with international practice and procedure, the same, however, raises concerns in relation to the consistency of judicial opinion in India on this aspect. The decision in the Reliance case is likely to come at the cost of those parties who, under the Bhatia regime, preferred objections in India and are now barred by limitation, from filing objections in the courts of the country where the seat was located. One can imagine this to be a crucial factor, which the Apex Court must have considered while making the ruling in the Balco case prospective. Interestingly, the same pen has authored both, the Reliance and Balco judgments.

Therefore, the question as to whether the judgment in the Reliance case will serve the ends which it seeks to meet, or not, will be answered only in time. However, the Reliance case can, surely, be seen as a ray of hope for the countless foreign awards weakening in the registries of various courts in the India, which may finally see light of the day.


1. (2012) 9 SCC 552

2. (2002) 4 SCC 105

3. (2008) 4 SCC 190

4. O.M.P. 193/2013 and O.M.P. 732/2013

5. (2014) 7 SCC 603

6. AIR 2015 SC 1504

7. (2011) 6 SCC 161

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Singhania & Partners LLP, Solicitors and Advocates
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Singhania & Partners LLP, Solicitors and Advocates
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions