India: Year In Review: Key Decisions And Developments In Indian Arbitration Law In 2014

Last Updated: 21 January 2015
Article by Economic Laws Practice


The judicial developments in arbitration in India in 2014 have been both encouraging and curious at the same time. We briefly review some of the key decisions rendered by Indian courts this year and their impact on the arbitration jurisprudence.

Challenging foreign awards in pre-Balco arbitration agreements under Section 34 becomes increasingly difficult

Having overruled Bhatia International1prospectively, BALCO2created much curiosity in respect of the treatment that challenges to foreign awards from pre-BALCO arbitration agreements under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("1996 Act") would receive in Indian Courts. A rather encouraging decision this year (in the post-BALCO era) dealing with a pre-BALCO arbitration agreement is Reliance Industries Limited v. Union of India.3

The Apex Court followed Videocon4(a pre-BALCO decision) and held that choice of foreign seat coupled with a choice of foreign law governing the arbitration agreement indicates an intention by the parties to exclude the application of Part I of the 1996 Act, even if the contract was governed by Indian law.

The Court however went a step further and made the following noteworthy observations - "it is too late in the day to contend that the seat of arbitration is not analogous to an exclusive jurisdiction clause...."

Incidentally, another decision of the Supreme Court this year on a separate issue also confirmed this position. In Enercon,5 while granting an anti-suit injunction against proceedings brought in England, the Supreme Court held that, once the seat of arbitration was established, (which in this case was India) it was clear under Indian law, that the courts of the seat of arbitration would have exclusive jurisdiction to exercise supervisory powers over the arbitration.

Arbitral Tribunals can now determine issues concerning fraud

A decision that has long been controversial in India under the 1996 Act is that of Radhakrishnan,6which held that serious allegations of fraud can only be inquired into by a court and not an arbitrator. This decision had resulted in significant speculation as to the arbitrability of issues of fraud under Indian law.

Two decisions of the Supreme Court in 2014 have significantly weakened the impact of Radhakrishnan. First, the decision in World Sports7distinguished between domestic and foreign arbitrations, to hold that Radhakrishnan does not apply while determining an application under Section 45 of the 1996 Act, i.e. courts must refer parties to arbitration where the seat of arbitration is outside India, even if allegations of fraud are in issue. Second, the decision in Swiss Timing,8while dealing with a domestic arbitration, held that Radhakrishnan is per incurium.

In World Sport, the Court observed that, while considering an application under Section 45, "a court must refer disputes to arbitration unless the arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed". The Court elaborated on the expressions "null and void", "inoperative" and "incapable of being performed". With reference to the expression "null and void", the Court recognized that the arbitration agreement must be treated as a "distinct agreement" and can be void or voidable only on grounds which relate directly to the arbitration agreement. It was held that allegations of fraud and false misrepresentations might make the contract voidable, but that by itself did not affect the arbitration agreement which is independent and severable from the contract. With reference to the expression 'inoperative', the Court held that it 'covers those cases where the arbitration agreement has ceased to have effect, such as revocation by the parties'; and that the expression 'incapable of being performed' applies 'to those cases where the arbitration cannot be effectively set into motion', for example where the arbitration clause is too vaguely worded. The Court observed that, 'where allegations of fraud have to be inquired into' does not fall within either of the aforesaid expressions of Section 45 and is not therefore a bar on the Court to refer disputes to arbitration.

While World Sport was a welcome breather in this controversy, the Apex Court drew a somewhat artificial distinction on this point between arbitrations seated in India and outside India – restricting the application of its ratio to foreign seated arbitrations. However, Swiss Timing came to the rescue a few months later when the Supreme Court categorically held that the decision in Radhakrishnan was per incurium on the grounds that it did not follow or distinguish the decision in Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.;9 that it did not even consider the decision in P. Anand Gajapathi Raju & Ors;10and that it did not consider the provision contained in Section 16 of the 1996 Act. The Court has held that allegations that a contract is vitiated by fraud do not shut out arbitration.

The Supreme Court's decision in Swiss Timing has been questioned, since it is a single-judge decision departing from a two-judge bench decision. This problem magnifies from the perspective of lower courts as to which Supreme Court decision ought to be followed. When there are two divergent views expressed by the Supreme Court, then precedent suggests that lower courts should follow the larger bench decision (in this case, Radhkrishnan).11 The situation in Swiss Timing is tricky because it is not just a divergent view of the Supreme Court but it considers Radhakrishnan and declares it per incurium.

The treatment received by Swiss Timing in the Bombay High Court is revealing. The Bombay High Court rejected the argument that Swiss Timing ought not be followed being a single-judge decision whereas Radhakrishnan was decided by a two-judge bench.12 The Bombay High Court finally followed Swiss Timing to refer the disputes to arbitration. It may however, be too soon to conclude that Radhakrishnan is passé. The question whether lower courts will follow Swiss Timing or Radhkrishnan will continue to loom in the days to come until a larger bench considers the validity of Radhakrishnan.

Arbitral Tribunals have power to award Interest on Pre-Award Interest

Until recently, the decision of the Supreme Court in S.L. Arora13 held the field on the arbitrator's powers to award post-award interest on the sum awarded as interest for the pre-award period. This decision has been subject to some criticism given that, while such interest could be claimed if the dispute was brought to court, it could not if it was before an arbitration tribunal.

In 2013, S.L Arora was referred to a three-judge bench in Hyder Consulting14, for being per incurium certain previous Supreme Court decisions of equivalent benches.

The majority in Hyder Consulting has now held that an arbitrator indeed has the power under Section 31(7) of the 1996 Act to award post-award interest on both the principal sum and interest until the date of award, as such interest is to be considered as subsumed in the principal sum.

Scope of Public Policy expanded

The effect of the much celebrated case of Shri Lal Mahal15 which reinstated the Renusagar16position with respect to enforcement of foreign awards has been diluted with two decisions of the Supreme Court this year.

The decision in Associate Builders17 and Western Geco,18have once again unsettled the position with respect to the meaning and scope of the term 'public policy' under Section 34 of the 1996 Act affecting both domestic and foreign awards.

In Western Geco the Apex Court held that three 'distinct and fundamental juristic principles' form a part and parcel of "fundamental policy of Indian law": first, the court or adjudicating authority must adopt a 'judicial approach' when determining the rights of a citizen. This implies that it cannot act in an 'arbitrary, capricious or whimsical manner'; second, the court or quasi-judicial authority must determine rights and obligations of parties in accordance with principles of natural justice which encompasses that the authority deciding the matter must apply its mind to the attendant facts; and third, a decision which is perverse or so irrational that a reasonable person could not have reached such a conclusion may not be sustained in a court of law. Associate Builders has confirmed this position.

Consequently, parties will undoubtedly have a wider scope for challenging domestic awards. In particular, the Court's ability to interfere with awards on merits has been significantly broadened. In addition, since the Renusagar test includes inter alia the parameter of 'fundamental policy of India', these decisions we fear, will most likely give an impetus to recalcitrant parties to also delay enforcement of foreign awards.


1 Bhatia International vs Bulk Trading S. A. & Anr (2002) 4 SCC 105.

2 Bharat Aluminium Co v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services (2012) 9 SCC 649.

3 Reliance Industries Limited and Anr. v. Union of India (UOI) (2014) 7 SCC 603.

4 Videocon Industries Ltd v. Union Of India (2011) 6 SCC 161

5 Enercon (India) Ltd. & Ors v. Enercon GMBH & Anr (2014) 5 SCC 1.

6 N. Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers (2010) 1 SCC 72.

7 World Sport Group (Mauritius) Ltd v MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd (2014) 11 SCC 639.

8 Swiss Timing v. Organizing Committee, Commonwealth Games (2014) 6 SCC 677.

9 Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd vs M/S. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums (2003) 6 SCC 503.

10 P. Anand Gajapathi Raju & Ors v. PVG Raju (2000) 4 SCC 539.

11 State of UP v. Ram Chandra Trivedi (1976) 4 SCC 52

12 Avitel Post Studioz Limited v HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited (2014) SCC Online Bom 929.

13 State of Haryana v. S L Arora and Co. (2010) 3 SCC 690.

14 Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd. v. Governor, State of Orissa(2014) SCC OnLine SC 940.

15 Shri Lal mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa (2014) 2 SCC 433.

16 Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994) Supp. (1) SCC 644.

17 Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority (2014) SCC OnLine SC 937

18 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Western Geco International Ltd (2014) 9 SCC 263

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.