India: Stop Cartelization In Public Procurement

Last Updated: 27 October 2014

Article by MM Sharma, Head Competition Law & Policy Practice, Vaish Associates, Advocates, New Delhi, India

Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

Public procurement in India constitutes about 30% of the GDP, with the total annual expenditure of around 15-20 Lakh Crores and that for Union Government alone in the range of Rs. 2.5 – 3 Lakh Crores. This is the government activity most vulnerable to corruption, not only between the suppliers and the government staff but also within the suppliers themselves. The latter emerges in the form of cartels i.e. bid rigging and collusive bidding. Though integrity of the procuring staff and competition between suppliers are two sides of the same coin, yet so far, the focus has largely remained on tackling departmental corruption and, except for blacklisting / holiday listing etc. against suppliers for a few years, there is hardly any policy to report bid rigging by suppliers or to detect and punish cartels of suppliers. There has been a lack of focus on the supply side issues, particularly, cartelization due to poor awareness on the tools of competition law in India.

Cartelization in suppliers has been the norm in public procurement and is the root cause for corruption in procurement staff of which the latter is only a symptom. Unfortunately public procurement policy has so far been confined to the symptomatic treatment of the problem ignoring the root cause and is a case of apparent misplaced priorities. Let us analyze the reasons for this misplaced priority.

No Central Public Procurement Policy – There is no laid down uniform public procurement policy in India and public procurement has been largely procedure based. Competition in public procurement is often misunderstood to merely mean "open tendering" or soliciting offers from a large number of vendors to show competition among suppliers. A major problem expressed by the procurement officials is the confusion created by the existence of multiple procurement guidelines and procedures issued by multiple agencies. There is neither a single comprehensive public procurement standard nor a single nodal agency to deal with public procurement policy.Lack of standardization and skilled manpower and proper documentation is also a major hurdle .Even the most critical and complex procurements are handled in a nonprofessional manner. Unlike in most developed countries, except for the Railways and the DGS&D, no other organization has created a specialized cadre for this purpose. Though since 2004, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has embarked on a programme of compelling organizations to introduce e-procurement and e-payment systems and to computerize all their activities which are vulnerable to corruption, yet the manual tendering systems still prevail, particularly in some State and Local Self Governments, facilitating cartelization among bidders.

Weak Legal and organizational framework- -"State Procurement" does not figure in any of the three Lists in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution as a distinct subject, and the Parliament has not enacted any law on the subject so far. Public procurement was then, perhaps, considered as a "minor" subject to be left for delegated legislation. . However, my friends in the government do not agree with this and point out to the vast existing legal framework, existing in the form of the General Financial Rules, 1963 (the GFRs), recently revised in 2005; the Manuals e.g. the Directorate General of Supplies and Disposal (DG S&D)'s Manual on Procurement and the CVC Guidelines for Public Procurement, which mandate compulsory "open (competitive) tender' system under the secure "Two-bid system" beyond a certain amount of procurement; The annual reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG); The Parliamentary Accounts Committee (PAC), the Standing Committees and the Legislative Accounts Committees in the States; Lokayuktas or Ombudsmen in some States; broader oversight mechanism framework is also provided by the common law i.e. The Contract Act, the Sale of Goods Act, the Arbitration Act, the Limitations Act, and the recent Right to Information Act, 2005, etc.; active participation of civil society and NGOs in the process through the process of Public Interest Litigation where the High Courts and the Apex Court can directly intervene.

But whether the above "vast" legal framework has been successful in curbing cartelization or bid rigging in suppliers? In the absence of a detailed scrutiny of each case a survey thereafter, there are no definite answers. As a practicing competition law practitioner, I strongly disbelieve.

Even in the WTO Norms on Public Procurement the focus is on transparency of procurement related documents and non –discrimination between suppliers. India with 31 other countries has an Observer status under the Plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), 1994 which came into force in 1996. The other two International agreements, namely, General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement (closed during the Doha Round of Discussions), the focus has been on non discrimination and transparency in public procurement. The norms prescribed have been incorporated by State procurement agencies and there is considerable transparency in the way the tender system is now designed. Of late the e-tendering process initiated by many State governments and PSUs have further helped in strengthening these International guidelines based on India's commitments in WTO. Still the focus on tackling cartelization in a systemic manner is missing.

Public Procurement Bill, 2012- An attempt to fill in the above lacuna was made by the UPA-2 regime and a comprehensive law was proposed through the Public Procurement Bill, 2012, introduced in May, 2012. The Bill partly addressed this root cause of cartelization among suppliers by prosing the. The Bill entails many provisions specially designed to counter the anti-competitive concerns in procurement process, prescribing penalty for those who engage in any form of bid-rigging, collusive bidding or anti-competitive behavior - imprisonment for a term up to five years and fine up to 10% of the assessed value of procurement; 'Open competitive bidding' to be the preferred method of procurement and mandatory recording of reasons for choosing any other method of procurement..

But the Bill also had some flaws such as –failure to establish an independent regulatory authority to monitor and ensure compliance of the proposed Act by all procuring agencies, to investigate any complaint relating to procurement and direct the relevant procuring entity to take necessary action and to advise the Government on diverse matters relating to public procurement. Similarly, the establishment of a separate Department of Procurement Policy, under the Ministry of Finance is considered necessary to exercise the powers to promote probity, transparency, quality and competition in procurement. Such a department could prescribe the procurement rules applicable to all procuring entities. Unfortunately, the Bill which was referred to the Standing Committee of Finance in May, 2012, which Committee was expected to give its report in August 2012 has since lapsed and is no longer under consideration of the new Parliament under the present NDA regime.

Can the Competition Act, 2002 provide the answer? Under the Competition Act, Competition Commission of India (CCI) can impose a penalty up to either 10% of the average on the last 3 year turnover upon each person or enterprise party to the cartel or bid rigging arrangement or 3 times of the profit earned by the cartel for each year of the continuance of the cartel or the bid rigging arrangement, whichever is higher. This is a sufficient financial deterrent on individual vendors / suppliers which will be apart from their blacklisting for 2 to 3 years prescribed under the various existing guidelines and also in the Public Procurement Bill 2012 (Since lapsed). This is like a dual punishment and can act as a deterrent for sustainability of existing and undetected cartels.

Since it started the enforcement of the Act in May, 2009, CCI has handed severe penalties on cartels and, till date, in 6 cases of bid rigging in public procurement but is this sufficient to be a deterrent to the cartels prevailing in suppliers of public procurement all over India? What are the reasons for this meager number of reported cases of cartelization under the Competition Act? The foremost is lack of awareness about the manner in which the competition is to be viewed on the supply side by most of the government procurement agencies.

Competition concerns in public procurement – competition concerns are largely same as in any ordinary market such as collusive agreements amongst bidders including collusive bidding, a type of bid rigging, creation of entry barriers for new entrants etc. Competition concerns in public procurement can be seen from both the demand side i.e. the procurer's side and from the supply side. However, as discussed above, the emphasis so far has been on tackling the concerns, mainly related to corruption on the demand side.

Competition concerns of the supplier's side - bid rigging, a form of cartel is the most pernicious concerns in public procurement and is nothing but a fraud in which vendors who are supposed to compete with each other on prices agree on the prices to be quoted in response to tenders floated by procuring agencies and fix the bids in advance through secret understandings or arrangements which include compensating those who lose the order. Bid rigging conspiracy usually fall in to one or more of the following categories – bid suppression, complementary or proxy bidding, bid rotation, subcontracting etc. The advocacy booklet of CCI on "Bid Rigging" available on its website: explains these categories well. Collusive bidding is not confined to bidding patterns or price fixing arrangements alone but may also involve strategic boycotts, quantity restrictions or capacity constraints to boost demand artificially.

OECD Guidelines For Fighting Bid Rigging In Public Procurement- The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) which has mostly developed countries of the European Communities, the United States and Australia has published useful guidelines which are used by CCI to scrutinize bidding patterns in suspected cases of cartelization. (

International experience –International experience indicates substantial gains from promotion of competition in public procurement. As per an OECD survey public treasuries saved between to 17 to 43 per cent. in some developing countries through the implementation of competitive public procurement regimes. Another study indicate cost savings between Euro 5 billion to Euro 25 billion in EU during 1993 to 2002 from increased competition. In Russia, as a result of reform in public procurement an amount of US Dollar 7 billion was saved in 2008. In Japan, promoting fair and free competition in public procurement reduced contract prices by merely 20 per cent. In Mexico, competitive procurement saved US Dollar 3 billion in 3 years. In Brazil, promoting competition in a Hydroelectric Plant Concession let to savings of around US Dollar 9 billion over 30 years of the concession agreement.

Indian experience so far- CCI has imposed penalties in hundreds of Crores of rupees on individual companies on complaints filed by or in respect of procurement in Central public procurement agencies such as IOCL, Coal India Ltd., Food Corporation of India, Safdarjung Hospital, DGS&D etc. and cases are now increasingly being filed by other large procurement agencies such as the Railways etc. However, till date no complaint from any State government or District or Municipal body has been filed in CCI.

What need to be done – There is a need to revise and modify the Public Procurement Bill, 2012 to synchronize it with the Competition Act as a long term solution. As a short term measure, there is an urgent need to sensitize the State Governments, Union Territories and local self government institutions such as Municipalities and Panchyati raj institutions at district and Taluka/ village levels on the advantages of sending information /references to CCI. There is a need to adopt a mandatory "reference to CCI" policy in all suspected cases of bid rigging. This can be done by including such provisions in the Public Procurement Bill.

There is also a need to sufficiently empower CCI to conduct "dawn raids" on the suspecting enterprises for which the proposed amendments to the Competition Act, 2002 need to be urgently taken up by the Parliament. Similarly, provisions may be included to allow CBI to assist the CCI to collect evidence of collusion to assist the investigation before the Director General, CCI, like all developed countries. For instance, in the USA, FBI is responsible to collect the evidence of collusive agreement for a successful prosecution before the civil courts by the FTC.

© 2014, Vaish Associates, Advocates,
All rights reserved with Vaish Associates, Advocates, 10, Hailey Road, Flat No. 5-7, New Delhi-110001, India.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.