India: Stop Cartelization In Public Procurement

Last Updated: 27 October 2014

Article by MM Sharma, Head Competition Law & Policy Practice, Vaish Associates, Advocates, New Delhi, India

Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

Public procurement in India constitutes about 30% of the GDP, with the total annual expenditure of around 15-20 Lakh Crores and that for Union Government alone in the range of Rs. 2.5 – 3 Lakh Crores. This is the government activity most vulnerable to corruption, not only between the suppliers and the government staff but also within the suppliers themselves. The latter emerges in the form of cartels i.e. bid rigging and collusive bidding. Though integrity of the procuring staff and competition between suppliers are two sides of the same coin, yet so far, the focus has largely remained on tackling departmental corruption and, except for blacklisting / holiday listing etc. against suppliers for a few years, there is hardly any policy to report bid rigging by suppliers or to detect and punish cartels of suppliers. There has been a lack of focus on the supply side issues, particularly, cartelization due to poor awareness on the tools of competition law in India.

Cartelization in suppliers has been the norm in public procurement and is the root cause for corruption in procurement staff of which the latter is only a symptom. Unfortunately public procurement policy has so far been confined to the symptomatic treatment of the problem ignoring the root cause and is a case of apparent misplaced priorities. Let us analyze the reasons for this misplaced priority.

No Central Public Procurement Policy – There is no laid down uniform public procurement policy in India and public procurement has been largely procedure based. Competition in public procurement is often misunderstood to merely mean "open tendering" or soliciting offers from a large number of vendors to show competition among suppliers. A major problem expressed by the procurement officials is the confusion created by the existence of multiple procurement guidelines and procedures issued by multiple agencies. There is neither a single comprehensive public procurement standard nor a single nodal agency to deal with public procurement policy.Lack of standardization and skilled manpower and proper documentation is also a major hurdle .Even the most critical and complex procurements are handled in a nonprofessional manner. Unlike in most developed countries, except for the Railways and the DGS&D, no other organization has created a specialized cadre for this purpose. Though since 2004, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has embarked on a programme of compelling organizations to introduce e-procurement and e-payment systems and to computerize all their activities which are vulnerable to corruption, yet the manual tendering systems still prevail, particularly in some State and Local Self Governments, facilitating cartelization among bidders.

Weak Legal and organizational framework- -"State Procurement" does not figure in any of the three Lists in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution as a distinct subject, and the Parliament has not enacted any law on the subject so far. Public procurement was then, perhaps, considered as a "minor" subject to be left for delegated legislation. . However, my friends in the government do not agree with this and point out to the vast existing legal framework, existing in the form of the General Financial Rules, 1963 (the GFRs), recently revised in 2005; the Manuals e.g. the Directorate General of Supplies and Disposal (DG S&D)'s Manual on Procurement and the CVC Guidelines for Public Procurement, which mandate compulsory "open (competitive) tender' system under the secure "Two-bid system" beyond a certain amount of procurement; The annual reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG); The Parliamentary Accounts Committee (PAC), the Standing Committees and the Legislative Accounts Committees in the States; Lokayuktas or Ombudsmen in some States; broader oversight mechanism framework is also provided by the common law i.e. The Contract Act, the Sale of Goods Act, the Arbitration Act, the Limitations Act, and the recent Right to Information Act, 2005, etc.; active participation of civil society and NGOs in the process through the process of Public Interest Litigation where the High Courts and the Apex Court can directly intervene.

But whether the above "vast" legal framework has been successful in curbing cartelization or bid rigging in suppliers? In the absence of a detailed scrutiny of each case a survey thereafter, there are no definite answers. As a practicing competition law practitioner, I strongly disbelieve.

Even in the WTO Norms on Public Procurement the focus is on transparency of procurement related documents and non –discrimination between suppliers. India with 31 other countries has an Observer status under the Plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), 1994 which came into force in 1996. The other two International agreements, namely, General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement (closed during the Doha Round of Discussions), the focus has been on non discrimination and transparency in public procurement. The norms prescribed have been incorporated by State procurement agencies and there is considerable transparency in the way the tender system is now designed. Of late the e-tendering process initiated by many State governments and PSUs have further helped in strengthening these International guidelines based on India's commitments in WTO. Still the focus on tackling cartelization in a systemic manner is missing.

Public Procurement Bill, 2012- An attempt to fill in the above lacuna was made by the UPA-2 regime and a comprehensive law was proposed through the Public Procurement Bill, 2012, introduced in May, 2012. The Bill partly addressed this root cause of cartelization among suppliers by prosing the. The Bill entails many provisions specially designed to counter the anti-competitive concerns in procurement process, prescribing penalty for those who engage in any form of bid-rigging, collusive bidding or anti-competitive behavior - imprisonment for a term up to five years and fine up to 10% of the assessed value of procurement; 'Open competitive bidding' to be the preferred method of procurement and mandatory recording of reasons for choosing any other method of procurement..

But the Bill also had some flaws such as –failure to establish an independent regulatory authority to monitor and ensure compliance of the proposed Act by all procuring agencies, to investigate any complaint relating to procurement and direct the relevant procuring entity to take necessary action and to advise the Government on diverse matters relating to public procurement. Similarly, the establishment of a separate Department of Procurement Policy, under the Ministry of Finance is considered necessary to exercise the powers to promote probity, transparency, quality and competition in procurement. Such a department could prescribe the procurement rules applicable to all procuring entities. Unfortunately, the Bill which was referred to the Standing Committee of Finance in May, 2012, which Committee was expected to give its report in August 2012 has since lapsed and is no longer under consideration of the new Parliament under the present NDA regime.

Can the Competition Act, 2002 provide the answer? Under the Competition Act, Competition Commission of India (CCI) can impose a penalty up to either 10% of the average on the last 3 year turnover upon each person or enterprise party to the cartel or bid rigging arrangement or 3 times of the profit earned by the cartel for each year of the continuance of the cartel or the bid rigging arrangement, whichever is higher. This is a sufficient financial deterrent on individual vendors / suppliers which will be apart from their blacklisting for 2 to 3 years prescribed under the various existing guidelines and also in the Public Procurement Bill 2012 (Since lapsed). This is like a dual punishment and can act as a deterrent for sustainability of existing and undetected cartels.

Since it started the enforcement of the Act in May, 2009, CCI has handed severe penalties on cartels and, till date, in 6 cases of bid rigging in public procurement but is this sufficient to be a deterrent to the cartels prevailing in suppliers of public procurement all over India? What are the reasons for this meager number of reported cases of cartelization under the Competition Act? The foremost is lack of awareness about the manner in which the competition is to be viewed on the supply side by most of the government procurement agencies.

Competition concerns in public procurement – competition concerns are largely same as in any ordinary market such as collusive agreements amongst bidders including collusive bidding, a type of bid rigging, creation of entry barriers for new entrants etc. Competition concerns in public procurement can be seen from both the demand side i.e. the procurer's side and from the supply side. However, as discussed above, the emphasis so far has been on tackling the concerns, mainly related to corruption on the demand side.

Competition concerns of the supplier's side - bid rigging, a form of cartel is the most pernicious concerns in public procurement and is nothing but a fraud in which vendors who are supposed to compete with each other on prices agree on the prices to be quoted in response to tenders floated by procuring agencies and fix the bids in advance through secret understandings or arrangements which include compensating those who lose the order. Bid rigging conspiracy usually fall in to one or more of the following categories – bid suppression, complementary or proxy bidding, bid rotation, subcontracting etc. The advocacy booklet of CCI on "Bid Rigging" available on its website: explains these categories well. Collusive bidding is not confined to bidding patterns or price fixing arrangements alone but may also involve strategic boycotts, quantity restrictions or capacity constraints to boost demand artificially.

OECD Guidelines For Fighting Bid Rigging In Public Procurement- The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) which has mostly developed countries of the European Communities, the United States and Australia has published useful guidelines which are used by CCI to scrutinize bidding patterns in suspected cases of cartelization. (

International experience –International experience indicates substantial gains from promotion of competition in public procurement. As per an OECD survey public treasuries saved between to 17 to 43 per cent. in some developing countries through the implementation of competitive public procurement regimes. Another study indicate cost savings between Euro 5 billion to Euro 25 billion in EU during 1993 to 2002 from increased competition. In Russia, as a result of reform in public procurement an amount of US Dollar 7 billion was saved in 2008. In Japan, promoting fair and free competition in public procurement reduced contract prices by merely 20 per cent. In Mexico, competitive procurement saved US Dollar 3 billion in 3 years. In Brazil, promoting competition in a Hydroelectric Plant Concession let to savings of around US Dollar 9 billion over 30 years of the concession agreement.

Indian experience so far- CCI has imposed penalties in hundreds of Crores of rupees on individual companies on complaints filed by or in respect of procurement in Central public procurement agencies such as IOCL, Coal India Ltd., Food Corporation of India, Safdarjung Hospital, DGS&D etc. and cases are now increasingly being filed by other large procurement agencies such as the Railways etc. However, till date no complaint from any State government or District or Municipal body has been filed in CCI.

What need to be done – There is a need to revise and modify the Public Procurement Bill, 2012 to synchronize it with the Competition Act as a long term solution. As a short term measure, there is an urgent need to sensitize the State Governments, Union Territories and local self government institutions such as Municipalities and Panchyati raj institutions at district and Taluka/ village levels on the advantages of sending information /references to CCI. There is a need to adopt a mandatory "reference to CCI" policy in all suspected cases of bid rigging. This can be done by including such provisions in the Public Procurement Bill.

There is also a need to sufficiently empower CCI to conduct "dawn raids" on the suspecting enterprises for which the proposed amendments to the Competition Act, 2002 need to be urgently taken up by the Parliament. Similarly, provisions may be included to allow CBI to assist the CCI to collect evidence of collusion to assist the investigation before the Director General, CCI, like all developed countries. For instance, in the USA, FBI is responsible to collect the evidence of collusive agreement for a successful prosecution before the civil courts by the FTC.

© 2014, Vaish Associates, Advocates,
All rights reserved with Vaish Associates, Advocates, 10, Hailey Road, Flat No. 5-7, New Delhi-110001, India.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions