India: Disclosure Duplication a Waste of Time and Money

Last Updated: 15 April 2005
Article by Sandeep Parekh

The philosophy of disclosure in the securities markets is premised on the idea that securities represent a bundle of rights that are not visible to a potential buyer of securities and that the buyer must know the nature of the bundle of rights before investing. Disclosure also reduces the possibility of wrongdoing. Even if a disclosure is not read by anyone, the fact that something needs to be disclosed will provide a good prophylactic against wrongdoing. The idiom that sunlight is the best disinfectant succinctly describes a whole philosophy in the securities market. Every disclosure made by a regulated entity has effort and costs attached to it – and these costs are ultimately paid by the investor. To the extent the marginal cost of compliance exceeds the marginal benefit, time wastage should be eliminated. To the extent disclosure is duplicative, the added cost of disclosure has no value addition and the duplication must be removed. To the extent disclosure is made, but is not truly accessible, there is a need to that ensure the disclosure enters the public domain.

When a company attempts to access the public for raising capital, it must go through a complex and lengthy examination process. Much of the process relates to collecting, collating and presenting information about the company to prospective shareholders of the company. While disclosure is a good thing, it costs a good deal of money. A typical primary market issue could cost over 10% of the capital raised (though much of it also relates to costs incidental to disclosure costs). This cost is borne by the shareholders of the company. Further, management is often diverted from its usual productive function in gathering information for an issue, so there is a direct economic opportunity cost to the company, and to the economy in general.

Efficient capital market hypothesis

The theory of integrated disclosure is premised on the efficient capital market hypothesis (ECMH). According to the ECMH, information released into the public domain is promptly impounded in the price of a security. Once information is out in the public domain, no value will be added by repeating the same information when capital is raised.

Integrated disclosure

The pursuit of integrated disclosure has two objectives. Firstly, to make disclosure as meaningful, as non-duplicative and as non-burdensome as possible. Second, to make disclosure truly available and accessible, particularly when filings with a regulator make a document theoretically public but the process of access is made so cumbersome and the availability so fragmented that it fails to effectively enter the public domain.

Reduced duplication of disclosure would reduce time wastage by companies, which are stuck with filling and filing hundreds of forms with large overlapping disclosures. With thousands of listed companies and nearly 700,000 unlisted companies, the waste to the Indian economy can be staggering. The reduced filing would automatically result in a reduced workload on the regulator, which can then use its energies more efficiently in enforcement and policy issues. The regulator would also be able to catch fraud and non-compliance more easily as it would need to tap only one source to check data. Fewer bottlenecks would result in faster capital raising and reduced risk, making corporations more agile.

The US philosophy

A 1966 article by Milton Cohen in the Harvard Law Review "Truth in Securities revisited" was a seminal piece on the need for non-duplicative disclosures. Cohen advocated that continuous disclosure should be strengthened and issue of capital should invite minimal and only transaction-based information. Any correction, updates or supplementation to the continuing disclosure can also be provided to prevent staleness of company information. It later translated into the adoption of a single standard of company information for both primary issues and continuous disclosure for seasoned issuers. A seasoned issuer could incorporate by reference company information that was already out in the public domain. Where a company was coming to the primary market for the first time, the standards remained the same as in the past. Also introduced was the concept of shelf registration. Shelf registration allows multiple issues of securities with a single prospectus with a requirement to update the prospectus periodically and to distribute transaction details with each issue.

In India we have a sample of integrated disclosure in the form of shelf registration. However, the limited scope of the section makes it available only to a select group of financial institutions and for specific types of debt securities.

Primary market and secondary market integration

A public company that has previously tapped the capital market must comply with continuous disclosure norms under company law requirements, securities laws as laid down by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) regulations and the listing requirements of stock exchanges. For instance, each company must file an annual report and quarterly reports. To the extent that company-related information is already in the public domain, part of the disclosure made in tapping the capital markets is repetitive and adds no value. It is important to distinguish between company information and transaction- based information. The former is already in the public domain, while the latter relating to the particular issue of capital needs to be published in a prospectus. Such transactional details should include details of types of securities offered, underwriting commissions paid, and intended proceeds of capital raised. By contrast, company detail would include the issuer’s business, management compensation, capital structure and recent financial results.

A quick look at the statutory prospectus for primary issues in India, whether first time offerings or not, shows that it contains a mish-mash of company information and transaction information. The first step towards integrating primary market and secondary market disclosure is to segregate company information and transaction information in the prospectus into two distinct parts. The second step is to make sure that to the extent that the primary market company information provides superior disclosure, the secondary market disclosures (like the annual report) should also make such disclosure. The goal should be to make the company information in the continuous disclosures (annual report, quarterly reports) fungible with the company information in the prospectus.

A benefit of such fungibility would be the reduced cost of compliance. If a company goes to the capital markets for the first time in an initial public offering (IPO), it would find that because of the fungibility of company information, the cost and effort in creating an annual report would be reduced. Conversely, a seasoned listed company (which is listed for over one year and in compliance with the rules) already has its company information out in the public domain and could merely copy and paste this information into its prospectus along with any material updates and add the transactionbased information. This again would reduce the cost of compliance. An even more efficient means of integrating the information would be to incorporate the company information by reference into a prospectus. Incorporation by reference exists in the US markets (in form S-2, for example). Of course, any updates since the last annual or quarterly reports must be published as material updates in the prospectus along with the transactionbased information about the securities on offer. Integration could reduce the cost of compliance while at the same time improve the disclosure being made to investors.

Accumulative nature of regulations cause inefficiency

Much of the duplication in corporate disclosure can be attributed to the slow accretion to the body of regulations. New regulations add to the old, sacrificing an efficient quantum of disclosure at the altar of not missing any detail. Duplication also arises in the Indian context because some remnants of the Companies Act requirements relating to issue of capital from the public remain on the books, while Sebi has a comprehensive set of regulations. Sebi, although able to implement a holistic framework, is unable to delete statutory provisions like those contained in the Companies Act, which have outlived their relevance.

The argument for duplication

There are however cogent reasons for allowing duplication of disclosure. Unless one is able to overcome the arguments for duplication, it is difficult to justify the introduction of an integrated form of registration.

First, if information is not in the public domain, then a last mile delivery of company and transaction detail in a prospectus will become important. Disclosure after all is different from a theoretical filing with the registrar. The registrar of company offices in India are known for making public information difficult to access. So information has not entered the public domain and needs to be disclosed.

Second, if the two disclosures are qualitatively different, then a superior primary market disclosure would be necessary, even though parts of the disclosure are duplicative. The quality of primary market disclosure is also superior because it passes through various due diligences, particularly by the investment bank.

Third, if there are different liabilities attached to primary market versus continuing disclosure, then management would be more careful of disclosing information to prospective primary market shareholders than to the prospective secondary market shareholders, who could be more tolerant of mistakes. This is pronounced in the detailed liabilities attached to issuer, management, directors, signatories and experts under the Indian Companies Act for prospectusbased violations. The liability for inaccurate disclosure in the annual report is by contrast more generic.

Fourth, listed companies are mandated to file audited annual financial accounts in the annual reports to shareholders. They also file quarterly numbers and make them public. However, if such information is used for the issue of shares there is a possibility that the information has become out of date by up to three months.

Fifth, a listed company’s continuing disclosure may be less coherent or readable because of the dozens of filings made in the past to the stock exchange, registrar, Sebi or other bodies. It would not be fair to expect the investor to sweep the public domain for bits and pieces of information and piece them together to get the real picture. By contrast, primary issue prospectus is information contained in a single readable document.

Sixth, Sebi examines a primary market prospectus more thoroughly than annual filings.

Arguments supporting integrated disclosure

Each of the arguments against an integrated approach and for continuing the status quo must be tested. If the arguments can be met by some modifications to our current thinking, it may be appropriate to modify some of the requirements.

Public domain

While public bodies may not be forthcoming in making filings truly public, there is nothing that stops companies from putting up the same information on their website. In fact this would be one of the basic premises of a streamlined means of disclosure. For a company to enjoy the benefits of integrated disclosure, it must fulfill certain conditions; the first of which is to make all theoretically public information truly public by posting it on the corporate website.

Superior prospectus disclosure

It is certainly true that the information contained in a prospectus is qualitatively superior to that filed in annual and quarterly reports of the company. However, that is not an argument in itself for discarding integrated disclosure. That is instead, a reason why continuing disclosure should be strengthened. Such improvement will not only bolster prospective primary shareholders but also protect existing shareholders who until now have received inferior information.

Liability issues

Specific and more burdensome liabilities attach to primary issue violations as contrasted with more generic penalties for misstatements in the annual report and quarterly figures. If continuing disclosure attracts an easier burden of proof, one could argue that wrongdoers would have an easier time under the proposed mechanism. This issue too can be addressed. Top management could be required to file an attestation that they are not aware of any misleading disclosure and have not omitted any relevant material information. The liability of various intermediaries would apply as they would to a prospectus. The underwriter would need to conduct due diligence at a regular interval or before issue of capital. Any correction or update to the continuing duties of reporting would be made before an issue is made of securities. This would accompany the transaction-based details that would be distributed before each issue. These transaction details would be included as assessment of risk factors by the management.

Problem of staleness

The problem of information becoming out of date can easily be rectified, as discussed above. With each issue the management and directors would need to circulate two important categories of information. First any corrections and updates to the information related to the company and second, comprehensive transaction detail. Because a higher duty would be placed on updating the continuing disclosures even absent an issue, the duty to update and correct would presumably be minimal.

Coherence and readability

With filings being made to multiple regulatory authorities, the ability to patch different pieces of information to create a collage is a daunting task even for an analyst who is spending considerable time collating the information. The answer to the problem really lies with the company, which needs to make sense out of the mass of information. The company information can easily be put into a single document known as the continuously updated report (similar in structure to the annual report), with hyperlinks to various public filings made by it to various authorities. With today’s technology such hyperlinks can provide a readable document that does not compromise on depth of information. The basic document would be in readable simple English with links to more detailed, complex and subtle information. A company wishing to make use of integrated disclosure should be required to have such a readable document that does not compromise on detail or complexity. In India there is already an abbreviated prospectus attached to a public issue application. This is highly readable, and a great and unique system that ought to continue.

Sebi scrutiny

This is perhaps the most difficult issue to overcome. While the regulator combs prospectuses for disclosure violations, its control over a company would be diluted in the proposed regulatory environment. With India’s list of 9000 listed companies (the highest in the world), many of which do not fully comply with listing norms, it would be giving invitation to scandal to implement the scheme for all listed companies. Taking the Indian reality, implementing the scheme would need to be done cautiously, selectively and in phases. A company-based registration should be allowed only for seasoned companies with good track records that have complied with disclosure norms for at least five years.

Quality over quantity

Relying on a regulatory framework based on the requirements of a different era is a costly error that India may already be making. If, with today’s technology, India could improve the quality of information available while reducing the quantity, such information would become more readable, more widely accessible, and the empty formality of registration could be translated into true on-tap disclosure, available to all. In 1966 Cohen predicted: "At some point in the foreseeable future it will surely be economically feasible, as it is probably now technically feasible, to record all filed information in a computer for instant retrieval and communication – to produce a prospectus on call, so to speak." With India’s much vaunted technology edge, it surely has the technology today, but does India have the vision?

The author is an advocate with PH Parekh & Co and is chairman of Sebi’s advisory sub-committee on integrated disclosure. Views are personal. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.