India: ADR: An Idea the Time for Which Has Come!

Last Updated: 6 September 2004
Article by Pawan Agarwal

"I am pained to observe that the judicial system in the country is almost on the verge of collapse. These are strong words I am using but it is with considerable anguish that I say so. Our judicial system is creaking under the weight of arrears."

- Former Chief Justice P.N. Bhagwati (1997 SCC page 10)


It is an uncontroversial fact that our country is suffering from acute problem of population explosion. This in turn has given rise to diverse problems including those of disputes, differences and conflicts. Even our judiciary is suffering from population problem i.e. docket explosion of pending cases. It is estimated that more than 25 Million cases are pending in over 8000 Indian courts. Besides, millions of fresh cases are filed every year. As a result court cases can take up to ten to fifteen years for the original trial hearing and thereafter another three to five years in appeals and there can be appeal against appeal. As a result, Counsels in India specialize in trying to obtain preliminary orders favorable to client which can virtually settle the issue at stake. Needless to say, these delays have caused widespread concern about legal systems. Frustrated litigants may resort to extra-legal methods for resolution of their disputes. This would be a dangerous trend and may ultimately erode the very rule of law and the entire fabric of democracy to which our country is solemnly committed.

A further bane of the legal system is the lack of consistency, as earlier decisions are often overruled and distinguished on facts. Even the Supreme Court has been overruling its own decisions in many cases leading to uncertainty in the law.

It is under these circumstances that from time to time attempts have been made to persuade the disputing parties to resort to Alternative Dispute Resolution methods (popularly known as ADR methods) to resolve their disputes. In commercial world where time is money, there is a general feeling that litigation be best avoided by providing for Arbitration in all commercial contracts, thus ousting the jurisdiction of the courts.


The success of ADR depends on willingness of the parties to get their disputes resolved by a commonsense method, using the services of experts who understand the subject matter of the dispute. The court practitioners, arbitral bodies and arbitrators must note that a sound and successful ADR system will require the followings:

  1. Sound substantial law to meet the requirements of business world.
  2. Trained arbitrators. Arbitral and professional bodies should take initiative in designing training programs.
  3. An ADR culture. The courts as well as adjudicators must change their mind sets.
  4. Secretarial and administrative assistance to conduct arbitral proceedings.

Litigation vs. ADR

An English judge said, "Litigation is an activity that has not markedly contributed to the happiness and welfare of mankind."

In the three tier system of our courts, parties will try their luck first in the District Civil Court, then the High Court on an appeal and finally in the Supreme Court with the leave of that court. In proceedings from the lowest court to the highest there is no fast track. They turn to the usual procedures and suits, interlocutory applications, injunctions and the like. The ADR system has normally one tier and is of binding nature provided the parties have entered into privities of contract.

It is not that there is something wrong with our judiciary. Our judiciary is independent and it has taken number decisions even against the government in many sensitive matters. Only problem is that it is over crowded and like a over burdened horse it cannot run fast.

One more problem with the litigation is that the cost is mounting day by day. It is said that ‘Litigation is a fruitful tree planted in the garden of a lawyer.’ Therefore nowadays ADR is the most preferred mode of resolving commercial disputes. Under ADR we have four basic method of dealing with disputes i.e. Negotiation, Mediation, Conciliation and Arbitration. Though the first two methods are non binding in nature the third method of Conciliation has been recognized by the statute of our country i.e. Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 (in short the Act). Compromise and Settlements are the necessary elements of all these three methods. However, the Arbitration is a process of adjudication wherein a third neutral person after hearing both the parties gives its decision. Arbitration has the following advantages over litigation:-

  1. Arbitration promises PRIVACY. In a civil court, the proceedings are held in public, which embarrasses the parties, especially during cross - examination.
  2. Arbitration provides liberty to choose an arbitrator, who can be a specialist in the subject matter of the dispute. The arbitrators may be experts and can resolve the dispute fairly and expeditiously as they are well versed with the usages and practices prevailing in the trade or industry.
  3. The venue of arbitration can be a place convenient to both the parties. It need not be a formal platform. A simple office cabin is enough. Likewise the parties can choose a language of their choice.
  4. Even the rules governing arbitration proceedings can be defined mutually by both the parties. For example, the parties may decide that there should not be any oral hearing.
  5. A court case is a costly affair. The claimant has to pay for the advocates, court fees, process fees and other incidental expenses. In arbitration, the expenses are lesser and many times the parties themselves argue their cases. The arbitration involves few procedural steps and no court fees.
  6. Arbitration is faster and can be expedited. The court has to follow its own system and takes abnormally longer time to dispense off the cases. It is a known fact that millions of unresolved cases are pending before the courts.
  7. A judicial settlement is a complicated procedure. A court has to follow the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Rules of the Indian Evidence Act. In arbitration, the procedure is simple and informal. An arbitrator has to follow the principles of natural justice.
  8. Section 34 of the Act provides very limited grounds upon which a court may set aside an award. The Act has also given the status of a decree for the award by arbitrators. The award of the arbitrators is final and generally no appeal lies from the award. While in a regular civil suit there may an appeal and appeal against Appeal.
  9. In arbitration, the dispute can be resolved without inflicting stress and emotional burdens on the parties, which is a common feature in court proceeding
  10. In a large number of cases, ‘Arbitration’ facilitates the maintenance of continued relationship between the parties even after the settlement.

Lets have a birds eye view of four basic ADR methods:-

NEGOTIATION: In Negotiation the disputant parties resolve their differences out of the court by way of negotiation. No lawyers or outsiders are generally involved. There are no hard and fast rules, no technicalities and complicated procedure. However, if a dispute cannot be resolved through negotiations, one can try mediation.

MEDIATION : In mediation generally a third party is involved who acts as a facilitator. In a typical mediation, there is always a win-win situation. However, the settlement reached through mediation is non-binding. So we come to the next best method, which is "Conciliation".

CONCILIATION: Conciliation is now recognized by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In Conciliation, the disputant parties resolve their disputes with the help of one or more conciliators. The settlement agreement reached by the parties and authenticated by the conciliator is binding upon the parties.

ARBITRATION: Arbitration is a quasi judicial method for resolving disputes outside the court. Arbitration is a preferred mode of dispute resolution in domestic as well as international trade. It is preferred over litigation as our overburdened courts are not in a position to provide timely justice.

ADR PROCESS : STRAULS Institute of Dispute Resolution of Pepper dine University has summarized the process of ADR as mentioned below :-






Usually Voluntary

Usually Voluntary






If there is an agreement it is enforceable as a contract

If there is an agreement it is enforceable as a contract

If there is an agreement it is enforceable as a contract

If there is an agreement it is enforceable as a contract





No third party involvement

Neutral selected by parties

Neutral selected by parties

Neutral selected by parties





Formalities established by parties

Formalities established by parties and Neutral

Formalities established by parties and Neutral

Formalities established by parties and Neutral





Usually unrestricted party presentations

Presentations limited by agreed rules

Presentations limited by agreed rules with a power to Neutral to give his/her opinion on the rules

Presentation limited by agreed rules However Arbitrator is empowered to give a decision on rules if warranted





Parties control process & outcome

Parties control process & outcome

Parties control process & outcome

Neutral controls process & outcome








Usually Private

OTHER METHODS: It may not be out of place to mention that in practice a number of combinations of ADR methods are used. The mechanisms of ADR is evolving and new experiments are constantly carried out by various arbitral organizations all over the world.

The following ADR methods have gained ground recently:-


It is a truncated form of litigation in which counsels for the parties present their client’s best case to mutually acceptable adjudicator. Mini-trial is really not a trial at all and parties are not allowed to produce oral evidences. The senior executives of both the parties attend the proceedings which helps them in reaching a settlement after the hearing is over. The adjudicator will reach his own opinion if the parties fail to reach a negotiable settlement. This method is very quick as the whole proceedings can be complete within couple of days.

Mediation – Arbitration (Med – Arb)

The disputing parties may agree to resolve the difference through Mediation failing which the matter would be referred to Arbitration. The advantage of the combined procedure of Med-Arb is the incentive that it offers for a good faith commitment by the parties.

Rent – a – Judge

In this method the parties retain a neutral third party (usually a retired judge) to decide a dispute (whether or not a case has been filed in court). Private judging is quite different from other ADR processes. In many states of U.S.A., decisions reached by the neutral third party are binding, filed with the court as a judgment, and include the right of appeal. The chief benefit to private judging is speed; disputes can be resolved without waiting for the courts backlog to clear. In addition, the parties can modify the litigation in process. Lastly, the parties agree in advance on a judge, which in complex commercial cases can be important.

Early Neutral Evaluation

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is a non-binding ADR process designed to improve case planning and settlement prospects by providing litigants with an early advisory evaluation of the likely court outcome. ENE is a forum in which attorneys present the core of the dispute to a neutral evaluator in the presence of the parties. This occurs after the case is filed but before the evidence is led. The evaluators help the parties clarify arguments and evidence, identifies strengths and weaknesses of the parties’ positions, and gives the parties a non-binding assessment of the case’s merits. If a settlement does not result, the neutral helps narrow the dispute and suggests guidelines for managing the case.

Ombudsman Strategy

It investigates and expedites complaints, helping either of the parties settle a dispute or proposing change to make the system (of employer, government agency, business, etc.) more responsive to the needs of the complainant.

Administrative or statutory tribunals

In these tribunals, adjudication follows certain specific statutory requirements, such as establishing rent levels, compensation awards, social security benefits or a range of other matters through tribunals and appeal tribunals.

Court-annexed arbitration

This method requires statutory introduction into the court system, and which, depending upon the model adopted, may be binding or initially non-binding, and may or may not provide for a re-hearing by a judge under certain circumstances.

In its various forms ADR is becoming popular and considered as a Co-operative problem solving system.

The President of American Arbitration Association MR. ROBERT COULSON has observed that:-

"Litigation has not kept up with modern, fast moving society ...... there have been revolutionary changes in the business practices since the basic court structure was adopted from English common law ..... Compared to modern business, civil courts have changed very little ... Alternative dispute resolution gives the lawyers an opportunity to use new processes, encourages problem-solving attitude and an openness to compromise"


Section 2(1) of the Act, defines Arbitration to mean any Arbitration whether or not administered by a permanent arbitral institution. The above definition has been given to clarify that the Arbitration contemplated by the Act-embraces all arbitrations whether or not administered by permanent arbitral institutions like Indian council of Arbitration, Indian Merchants chamber, international chamber of commerce etc. etc.

Arbitration is the settlement of a dispute by the decision not of a court of law but of one or more persons called arbitrators. Halsbury has defined Arbitration as follows:-

"Arbitration is the reference of dispute between not less than two parties, for determination, after hearing both sides in a judicial manner, by a person or persons other than a court of competent jurisdiction. (Halsbury Laws of England, Fourth edition vol. II)

From the above it will appear that Arbitration is a mode of resolving disputes without the intervention of the court. However, in practice, a court may have to intervene at various stages of arbitration. The Act ensures that the court’s interference is minimum. Section 5 of the Act provides that no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in part I of the Act. Part- I deal with the law relating to domestic arbitration.

These arbitration proceedings which are conducted without resource to an institution, is also commonly known as "Ad Hoc Arbitration". Thus Ad Hoc Arbitration is an arbitration agreement to and arranged by the parties themselves. The proceedings in Ad Hoc Arbitration are conducted by the arbitrators as per the agreement between the parties or with concurrence of the parties.

An Ad Hoc Arbitration may be:-

  2. Domestic Arbitration is that arbitration which takes place in India.

  4. International Arbitration is where at least one of the party is from any country other than India.

Foreign Arbitration is an arbitration conducted in a place outside India.

Thus, it may be noted that the Act broadly classifies arbitration according to the place of Arbitration. An International Commercial Arbitration if conducted in India will be known as Domestic Arbitration.


There are number of national and international organizations set up with the main objects of settling commercial disputes by way of Arbitration and other Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism. Indian Council of Arbitration, the International Center for A. D. R., various chambers of commerce etc. have framed rules of Arbitration and Conciliation for the benefit of their members as well as non-members.

These organizations lay down rules for the conduct of an Arbitration. These rules, however, cannot override the Act. These organizations handle the arbitration cases of the parties and provide valuable services like administrative assistance, consultancy and recommending names of arbitrators from the panel maintained by them. Since these organizations have experience and proper infrastructure to conduct the arbitral proceedings, it is quite often beneficial to the parties to avail of their services.

Arbitral Institutions claim that ad hoc arbitrations suffer from a number of problems which causes inordinate delays and cost in actual practice. Since, the arbitral institutions have advantage of well developed arbitration machinery, organizational setup and comprehensive rules of procedure; it saves the parties from avoidable delay, expenses and uncertainty.

However, it is quite common in our country that members of a particular organization take help of the arbitration machinery of that very organization.

Needless to say that in Adhoc arbitration, the disputant parties themselves, has to arrange for venue of meetings, secretarial services and other administrative measures.


Commercial Arbitration is by no means the exclusive preserve of lawyers. This is evident from the fact that only in four countries out of 125 plus countries which are parties New York Convention; there is an express legal requirement that an Arbitrator must be a qualified lawyer. It means that most of the countries, whether developed or developing, have encouraged the participation of non lawyers in ADR proceedings. There is a general feeling that too much lawyering creates problem in the growth of a vibrant ADR culture. Former Chief Justice of India, Justice Ahmedi once said that

"Of the total number of cases which go to the court hardly 50 percent require adjudication by a Court on issues of law. Most of the cases, almost 50 percent or more, essentially involve issues of fact, and they can certainly be resolved, outside the court."

An expert like a Chartered Accountant, Engineer, Secretaries, and Management graduates etc. is in advantageous position of appreciating the commercial background of a dispute or difference. His practical approach towards the issue helps in expediting the process of ADR. An arbitrator is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. However, he has to observe the principles of natural justice and the custom and usage of the trade. The ADR offers a promising opportunity to experts in various fields. He can involve himself in various proceedings as an Arbitrator, as a Conciliator or mediator and also as an authorized representative. He must look at ADR as a positive addition to the skill he can offer to his clients.


It will not be out of place to say that the field of ADR is bound to grow by leaps and bounds in time to come. Nani Palkiwala has once said "If I were appointed a dictator of this country, in the short period between my appointment and my assassination, I would promulgate a law making all commercial disputes compulsorily referable to Arbitration."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions