Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., ____ F.R.D. ____, No. PWG-06-1893, 2007 WL 1300739 (D. Md. May 4, 2007)
Ensuring that e-mails are admissible as evidence in support of a motion for summary judgment may be vital to the success of the motion. In Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied Motions for Summary Judgment, without prejudice to re-file, based on each party's failure to ensure the admissibility of their proposed e-mail evidence in support of their petitions to enforce an arbitrator's award. Chief Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm's opinion provides a detailed and thoughtful approach to the necessity of ensuring that e-mails are admissible evidence for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) as well as at trial....
To access this article please LOGIN HERE. A link have been followed from a RSS Feed of our content. However, our site could not verify your user creditials from reading our cookie. There are many reasons for why our cookie has been dropped, from changing browser or you logged off from the site on your last visit. If you've forgotten your login details click here and we'll remind you by sending your details to your email address. If you have followed this link from another source and you have not registered please follow this link to our registeration form. This service is completely FREE but for the full article and thousands of other articles from 100+ countries please tell us about yourself by registering (and yes, our lawyers like to think you've read our Disclaimer). It only takes 30 seconds and as well as great content you get articles more relevant to you and other advanced features like an optional personalised once-weekly news alert and forward-to-colleague capabilities. |
Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.
 | Do you have a question for the author? |
