• All Regions
• >> North America <<
• UK
• Europe
• Offshore
• Asia Pacific
• Latin America

• You Are Here:
• Show All Content
• Litigation and Arbitration
• [ X ]
• North America
• [ X ]

Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., ____ F.R.D. ____, No. PWG-06-1893, 2007 WL 1300739 (D. Md. May 4, 2007)

Ensuring that e-mails are admissible as evidence in support of a motion for summary judgment may be vital to the success of the motion. In Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland denied Motions for Summary Judgment, without prejudice to re-file, based on each party's failure to ensure the admissibility of their proposed e-mail evidence in support of their petitions to enforce an arbitrator's award. Chief Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm's opinion provides a detailed and thoughtful approach to the necessity of ensuring that e-mails are admissible evidence for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) as well as at trial....

To read the full text of this article you need to login. Please login below, and click submit.   Email/ Username: Please enter your username or email address that your registered with us.   Password:   If you have fogotten your login details or need to register with Mondaq please select one of the options below.   This service is completely FREE but for the full article and thousands of other articles from 100+ countries please tell us about yourself by registering (and yes, our lawyers like to think you've read our Disclaimer).

Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

Do you have a question for the author?