Canada: Privacy Versus Patriots

Last Updated: September 20 2005

Article by Wendy Gross and Michelle Kisluk*

Published in CA Magazine, September 2005.

Those who handle individuals’ personal information, including financial details, in the course of business are required to treat that information in accordance with Canada’s privacy laws. This includes getting an individual’s consent as to where and to whom this information is disclosed. If it is stored with, processed at or otherwise shared with a US or US-controlled Canadian company, there is a risk the US-linked company could be compelled to disclose that information to US authorities without the individual’s knowledge or consent. While the risk of access by US authorities has always been present, the introduction of US anti-terrorism legislation has raised concerns about the increasing ease and secrecy of access and its interaction with Canada’s privacy laws.

The US Patriot Act was introduced in the wake of the events of September 11, 2001 as a means of increasing the government’s ability to intercept and obstruct terrorist communications and activities. To this end, the act facilitates, among other things, the ability of US authorities to conduct searches and to seize or compel the disclosure of records. The implications of the act on Canadian businesses and the security of Canadians’ personal information,

while still somewhat unknown, are highly relevant to any business that handles Canadians’ personal information and shares or transfers that information to US-linked entities.

Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) requires organizations engaged in commercial activities to obtain individuals’ consent to the collection, use or disclosure of their personal information. In Alberta, BC and Quebec, provincial private sector privacy legislation has been deemed substantially similar and applies within the province in place of PIPEDA. Disclosure of personal information to a third party without the individual’s consent constitutes a breach of these laws, except in specified circumstances.

When personal information held by an organization is transferred to a third party for processing, the organization’s responsibility for that information continues and it must provide protection while the information is in the hands of that third party. This obligation is met by, for example, including provisions in outsourcing contracts that limit the third party’s use or disclosure of the information.

BC’s information and privacy commissioner undertook extensive consultations resulting in a report on the Patriot Act’s implications on the BC government’s decision to outsource to a US-linked firm certain healthcare provision functions for members of its public servants’ union. The BC commissioner found that the Patriot Act could possibly be used to compel disclosure of information outsourced to a US-linked company, in breach of the BC government’s obligations under the provincial public sector privacy legislation.

Although the situation in BC emerged in relation to public sector privacy legislation, Patriot Act powers could be applied equally to information transferred by Canadian private sector entities to US-linked organizations, risking the security of that data and a possible breach of Canadian private sector privacy legislation.

Prior to the passage of the Patriot Act, Canadians’ personal information in the custody or control (interpreted by a US court as "the legal right, authority or practical ability to obtain the materials sought upon demand") of US-linked organizations could be accessed by US authorities through national security letters, grand jury subpoenas or governmental channels. The Patriot Act, it was suggested by the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, simply "broadened the scope and lowered the standard for the issuance of such orders."

The Patriot Act amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to permit the FBI to seek orders from the secret FISA court requiring the production of "tangible things" (defined to include books, records, papers, documents and other things) relevant to "an investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities." The Patriot Act also lowered the standard for a FISA order: from foreign-intelligence gathering being "the purpose" of the search or surveillance to its being "a significant purpose." These changes, among others, have raised concern that the Patriot Act will allow "the US government to engage in large-scale fishing expeditions."

As a result of the secrecy in which the FISA court operates, little information is available on how these provisions have been used. Furthering the secrecy of FISA orders is the prohibition on an organization of disclosing that it has received or disclosed information under a FISA order. This means the US-linked company receiving the order may not tell the organization or relevant individuals that gave it information that information was requested by or disclosed to US authorities.

Once Canadians’ personal information is transferred to the US, it is subject to US law, including the Patriot Act. Whether the Patriot Act could be used to compel a US parent to disclose records held by a Canadian subsidiary remains a matter of debate. The BC Commissioner Report found that it is a "reasonable possibility" the FISA court would order production of documents that are within the custody or control of a US company, such as a US parent with access to records held by a Canadian subsidiary. If a US-linked company makes a disclosure to US authorities without the consent of the Canadian individuals named, this may result in the Canadian organization that transferred the information breaching Canadian privacy legislation unless the disclosure meets an exception in the applicable Canadian privacy legislation.

PIPEDA permits disclosure without consent in some circumstances, including:

  • when an organization is required to comply with a court order to compel the production of information;
  • when the disclosure is to a government institution in response to a request for information related to national security or international affairs; or
  • for the purpose of enforcing a law of Canada or of a foreign jurisdiction.

PIPEDA does not expressly limit these exceptions to Canadian court orders or government institutions. In a submission to BC’s information and privacy commissioner, Michael Geist and Milana Homsi argued if these exceptions permit disclosure to foreign authorities without consent, Patriot Act orders wouldn’t violate PIPEDA. If, however, PIPEDA exceptions don’t apply to requests from foreign government authorities, compliance with such orders would violate PIPEDA. Unfortunately, adding to the uncertainty around the Patriot Act, application of these exceptions to foreign orders or institutions hasn’t yet been clarified by PIPEDA or the privacy commissioner.

The need for clarity on the interaction between PIPEDA and the Patriot Act becomes apparent in the many instances that could arise in the course of business. For example, personal client information held by the Canadian office of an international accounting firm on a shared database and accessible to colleagues in its US-linked company may constitute custody by the US-linked company and could lead to it being ordered to produce that information to US authorities.

In provinces where privacy legislation applies to employees of an organization, or in certain federal operations in which PIPEDA applies to employee information, including banks and telecommunication companies, issues may arise with respect to employees’ personal information being put in the hands of US authorities without employees’ knowledge or consent. For example, an in-house accountant who outsources the company’s payroll or benefits processing to a US-linked firm is, arguably, making employees’ personal information accessible to US authorities. This may constitute a breach of the applicable privacy legislation by the employer organization.

A practical implication of the Patriot Act may be that individuals will choose to deal with businesses that do not share information with US-linked affiliates or service providers. With media attention and increasing awareness of the Patriot Act, as well as its inherently political nature, clients may be scared off — even if in practice the result is not that different than before the Patriot Act.

Even if disclosure is permitted by PIPEDA, other statutes may block compliance with a FISA order. The Business Records Protection Act (Ontario) was enacted in response to "aggressively extra-territorial, ‘long arm’ " US legislation. The act prohibits removing business records from, or taking or sending them out of, Ontario, except in specific circumstances, including where such transfer "is provided for by or under any law of Ontario or of the Parliament of Canada."

Whether the act could effectively block a US order to disclose records to the US government is uncertain. It has been suggested that "US courts have not granted the statute high deference due in part to its lax enforcement." A further complication is that to argue that the disclosure is blocked by the act, the Ontario company holding the records would have to disclose the existence of the FISA order, breaching the Patriot Act and risking resulting penalties.

The secretive nature of the Patriot Act complicates measuring the effectiveness of steps taken to keep data held by US-linked companies out of the reach of US authorities. Measures may nonetheless be taken to enhance the protection of the data and minimize the Canadian organization’s exposure under Canadian privacy legislation.

According to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, a company in Canada that outsources information processing to the US, where it will be subject to US laws, should notify its customers that the information may be made available to the US government or its agencies under a lawful order made in that country. Such notification would give individuals the option of refusing to provide personal information if they object to risking its access by US authorities. This approach may result in clients’ refusing to do business with the organization. On the other hand, such an approach could become a logistical nightmare for the organization if clients permit the organization to provide them with services, but refuse to allow certain pieces of their personal information to be disclosed to US-linked companies. The organization would then be required to keep track of the specific pieces of personal information that must be treated in a special manner.

Other approaches are found in the Master Services Agreement between the BC government and its service provider. The terms of the agreement were noted with approval by the BC Superior Court in dismissing the BC public servants union’s at-tempt to have that agreement quashed. It is unknown, however, whether these measures will in fact insulate the data from the reach of the Patriot Act and US authorities. These provisions include a trust structure under which the province would obtain the shares of the BC subsidiary providing the outsourcing services in case of a risk of disclosure. Other measures include restrictions on the use and control of electronic equipment and devices by employees, a fine upon breach of confidentiality, employee training and the requirement that all data remain the property of the province.

Until the US government releases more information about the uses it might make of its Patriot Act powers, it will be difficult to determine how worried Canadian businesses should be and what should be done to protect the personal information of Canadians in the hands of US-linked companies. In the meantime, by ensuring that clients are aware of when and how their information may be at risk of access by US authorities, and by exploring other means of contractually protecting the data, Canadian CAs and their firms can protect themselves to some degree from breaches of Canadian privacy legislation.

The information and analysis were accurate at press time. In July, the House of Representatives voted to extend the Patriot Act.

*Wendy Gross is a partner in the Technology Law Group in the Toronto office of McCarthy Tétrault. Michelle Kisluk is an associate in the Technology Law Group in the Toronto office of McCarthy Tétrault.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions