Germany: New Developments in German Domain Name Case Law

Last Updated: 28 July 2004
Article by Dietrich Beier

Germany has had, for several years now, a vital case law development in domain name matters. Almost a hundred decisions are published every year. Others remain unpublished and are known only to the parties. Although many of the published decisions are finally decided by the instance courts, some of them have reached the Federal Supreme Court which took the chance to provide guidance. In the past, the Federal Supreme Court allowed generic domain names under certain requirements in view of Unfair Competition Law ( = and ruled on domain name constellations where identical names were in question (

In three new decisions, the highest German civil court clarified an important detail in German name law (, denied certain claims against the German domain name authorities DENIC ( and did not object to the prohibition of the generic domain name with an indication of a city as in (= These decisions will be discussed below.

Federal Supreme Court, - the scope of name rights conflicting with domain names

The plaintiff with the family name Maxem sued the proprietor of the domain name based on his name right according to section 12 of the German Civil Code. The domain name owner argued that he is using maxem as a pseudonym based and built on the first names of his grandfather, his father and himself (Max, Erhardt, Matthias). The defendant was active with this "pseudonym" in role-playing games in the internet.

The Court of Appeal decided against the plaintiff and founded its decision on the fact that there are many persons in Germany with the last name Maxem and that, therefore, a confusion with the plaintiff is not likely, adding that a civil name has no natural priority towards a pseudonym which can also enjoy name protection.

The Federal Supreme Court lifted this decision and granted the request of the plaintiff. First of all, a name right does not require a concrete confusion actually occurred. The fact that a name owner cannot use a respective domain name with a .de TLD is considered as a violation of its name rights, if the domain name owner has no better right or, at least, a peer right to use the domain name. Furthermore, it was decisive in this case that a pseudonym requires not only the use of a name as a pseudonym, but also a secondary meaning, comparable to an author or an artist publishing under this pseudonym or performing in public in order to enjoy name protection for the pseudonym. Since the established use of maxem in the Internet by the domain name owner was not of this kind, the name was not considered as a protected pseudonym. Otherwise, the Court explained, the established name protection would be significantly impaired, in particular in view of the common practice in the internet to act under a nickname or an alias. The Federal Supreme Court further confirmed that this injunction only covered the use of the domain name "" including related e-mail addresses, but not necessarily the use of maxem in another form outside the internet.

Interesting enough, the plaintiff still has no access to the domain name, since this domain name was transferred during the proceedings through three instances to another person with the civil name Detlef Maxem. The plaintiff had failed to block the transfer of the challenged domain name with the German domain name authorities DENIC by requesting a so-called "dispute entry" with which the plaintiff declares to resolve the domain name issue with the current owner out of court, or in court based on better rights which must be briefly substantiated in the request. After the grant of such a dispute entry, the domain name owner can fully use the domain name for his web site or email traffic, but is prohibited to transfer the domain name until the dispute entry becomes valid. The dispute entry is valid for one year and can be extended if the plaintiff substantiates that the initiated proceedings or discussions with the current owner will last longer (which is usually the case). The practical lesson from this case is to never initiate court proceedings without having a granted and valid dispute entry concerning the domain name in question.

Federal Supreme Court, (

The Federal Supreme Court has now granted its second decision in the field of Unfair Competition Law after the milestone decision ( which allowed generic domain names in Germany even if only one competitor can use such a domain name with a broad content, provided the circumstances of the case do not lead to deception of the consumer, or if not (almost) all equivalents under other TLDs are blocked.

This recent decision was not issued with a substantiation since the Federal Supreme Court denied a further appeal against a decision of the Court of Appeal Hamm concerning the domain name, which is possible without a detailed substantiation. By rejecting this further appeal, the Federal Supreme Court has nevertheless given an indication that it agreed with the decision of the lower instance.

The Court of Appeal had granted an injunction against the use of the domain name on the basis of Unfair Competition Law, since it was of the opinion that the course of trade will get the wrong impression considering this domain name as an indication for an extraordinary and very specific diving school in the German town of Dortmund. The diving school in question was one of three diving schools in Dortmund, without being able to claim that it was any bigger or better or more experienced.

The distinction between the decisions concerning and the decision must be seen in the further specification of the city by adding "-Dortmund". This may cause a more specific consumer understanding than only the generic domain name "". The decision is of general importance, since it clarifies that a concrete use of a domain name can be inadmissible only for the reason that it bears an inherent character of deception. Another reason for it being considered deceptive is the combination of the domain name with the related content on the website. The question of whether the domain name alone or only the domain name seen in context with the website can be considered deceptive is being heavily discussed in Germany. Many lawyers were of the opinion that the pure combination of a generic term with a geographical indication as the name of a city must be allowed in view of the prior case law of the Federal Supreme Court. There were, however, also other voices and decisions such as (in translation) "" for a single law firm in the city of Hanover, which was held inadmissible, because the consumer supposedly expects an overview of lawyers admitted in Hanover (Court of Appeal Celle). Also the domain name "" for another single law firm in the little town of Dachau in Bavaria was prohibited (Court of Appeal Munich), for the same reason.

Despite the general message of this decision that only the domain name as such can be considered as deceptive in certain cases, the concrete finding in the present case could be disputed, since the singular of diving school in connection with the geographical indication Dortmund for one of the bigger cities in Germany does not necessarily lead to an understanding that this diving school using the domain name is unique in comparison with other diving schools in this city.

Federal Supreme Court,

A further recent decision of the Federal Supreme Court of February 2004 deals with the obligations of the German domain name authorities DENIC.

The former president of the German state of Saxony, Mr. Kurt Biedenkopf, filed a complaint against DENIC to obtain a judgement that DENIC shall not be allowed to assign "his" domain name to another person than himself, whilst Mr. Biedenkopf himself was not interested in using this domain name for his own website. His request against DENIC to block this domain name for all time was, however, denied in all three instances. The Dresden Court of Appeal held that this claim was, at least in the present case, not justified since it could not be excluded that another person with the name Kurt Biedenkopf can have a justified interest as good or even better than the interest of the former president Kurt Biedenkopf to use this domain name for his own purposes. It can be assumed that the Federal Supreme Court will confirm this reasonable argumentation in its substantiation to follow.

This decision relates to the fact that in the entire field of intellectual property in Germany neither the plaintiff is obliged to get successfully attacked IP rights registered for himself nor do the patent offices have an obligation to consider prior court decisions granting injunctions against colliding trademarks of certain defendants, at least as long as the offices do not examine prior relative rights during the examination of the trademark application.

The above decisions, along with several hundreds of other published decisions concerning domain name disputes in Germany, show the good working practice of the German Courts in line with traditional and, where necessary, adapted argumentation patterns known from trademark-name law and Unfair Competition Law, as well as showing the economic importance domain names still have. In particular, the case demonstrates, however, that future case law must draw many more borderlines between admissible and non admissible domain names in the field of Unfair Competition law.

© Dietrich Beier, 2004

The author is an attorney at law and partner with Bardehle, Pagenberg, Dost, Altenburg, Geissler, Munich. This article was first published with MIP Brand Management Focus 2004.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions