Hong Kong: Bid-rigging And Joint Tendering – When Are They Prohibited Under Hong Kong's Competition Ordinance?

Last Updated: 16 October 2018
Article by John M. Hickin and Hannah C. L. Ha
Most Read Contributor in Hong Kong, September 2019

Since the Hong Kong Competition Ordinance (CO) came into force in December 2015, there has been a significant focus on bid-rigging conduct. The first case brought before the Competition Tribunal involved bid-rigging; the first market study commissioned by the Hong Kong Competition Commission (HKCC) identified bid-manipulation practices in the residential building renovation and maintenance market; and the HKCC has published various guidance on tendering, bid-rigging and model non-collusion clauses.

What has been less discussed is the legality of joint tendering. Joint tendering is commonplace in real estate development, construction and many other industries in Hong Kong, and it is critical for businesses to understand how such practices sit with the CO. Common questions that are asked about joint tendering include: 'can joint tendering ever be bid-rigging?' and 'would joint tendering be acceptable as long as the person calling the tender knows about the co-operation?'

What is bid-rigging?

Bid-rigging generally occurs when various parties come together to agree that they will not compete with each other for tendered projects. It can take many forms. Certain parties could, for example, agree not to submit a bid or withdraw a previously submitted bid. Alternatively, parties could agree amongst themselves to take turns at winning tenders, or to submit unattractive cover bids at high prices to allow another party to win the tender. In essence, any conduct that reduces the competitive tension in the bidding process could constitute bid-rigging. The HKCC considers bid-rigging to be inherently anti-competitive, and a contravention of the CO's prohibition against anti-competitive agreements that restrict competition in Hong Kong (the First Conduct Rule).

It is to be noted, however, that the CO carves out a subset of bid-rigging conduct by providing a definition of bid-rigging under S2(2) CO that amounts to serious anti-competitive conduct (Serious Bid-rigging). This is distinct from bid-rigging that does not amount to a serious anti-competitive conduct (Non-serious Bid-rigging), a key difference between the two being that Serious Bid-rigging can only arise when the person calling the tender does not know of the coordination between the bidding parties; there being no such statutory requirement to establish a case of Non-serious Bid-rigging.

It is important to differentiate between Serious Bid-rigging and Non-serious Bid-rigging because small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are only prohibited from engaging in Serious Bid-rigging and other serious anti-competitive conduct. Other than that, SMEs are exempted from the First Conduct Rule where the combined turnover of the parties engaged in the relevant conduct or agreement for the turnover period does not exceed HK$200 million (SME Exemption).

Other parties that do not fall within the SME Exemption would be prohibited from all types of bid-rigging – both serious and non-serious.

Is bid-rigging different from joint tendering?

The HKCC's First Conduct Rule Guidelines (Guidelines) appear to distinguish between joint tendering and bid-rigging by explaining that:

6.101 [j]oint tendering generally involves undertakings cooperating openly with a view to making a joint bid. Such conduct can be contrasted with bid-rigging which more often involves collusion by competing bidders which nonetheless submit separate bids.

(emphasis added)

However, a closer reading suggests the distinction based on whether a joint or separate bid is submitted may not be determinative of whether given conduct is bid-rigging or joint tendering. In particular, given the Guidelines use the term "generally" and "more often", there is room to argue other types of conduct may be classified as bid-rigging, even if only one joint bid is submitted.

Other parts of the Guidelines appear to support a broader interpretation of what is meant by bid-rigging that could include joint tendering, for example in referring to bid-rigging as conduct where "undertakings agree...that certain parties will not submit a bid...". The statutory definition of bid-rigging under s2(2) CO also gives space for joint tendering to constitute bid-rigging by defining bid-rigging as "an agreement [between undertakings] whereby one or more of those undertakings agree...not to submit a bid". Accordingly, where joint tendering involves an express or implied agreement for the parties not to put in separate independent bids, such an arrangement could fall within the above definition/explanation of bid-rigging.

It is important to ascertain whether joint tendering may be assessed as a form of bid-rigging because there are differences to how the conduct would be assessed, depending on whether it is Serious Bid-rigging, Non-serious Bid-rigging or joint tendering. For example, if the conduct is seen as bid-rigging, the HKCC will assess it as an object restriction (i.e. it does not have to demonstrate that the conduct had anti-competitive effects to find an infringement). If it were only assessed as joint tendering conduct, the HKCC would adopt an effects analysis and examine the actual or likely effects of the conduct on competition, which would be more difficult to prove. There are also differences in relation to whether the SME Exemption applies, and whether the HKCC would need to give warning before commencing proceedings. These are set out in the table below.

Assessed by object or effect?

SME Exemption applies?

Does HKCC need to give warning before commencing proceedings?

Serious Bid-rigging




Non-serious Bid-rigging




Joint tendering




It is not uncommon for a strict approach to be taken to joint tendering in other jurisdictions. In the EU, there is a recognition that certain types of joint tendering could restrict competition by object; for example, if it actually amounts to a form of joint selling that has the object of coordinating pricing policy of competing bidders, with no real pooling of resources or joint production involved.

In sum, it remains to be seen how the HKCC would assess joint tenders. While the Guidelines appear to suggest that joint tenders are distinct from bid-rigging, the possibility remains that they could nonetheless fall within the definition of bid-rigging, which is broadly defined. This can have significant consequences on how the conduct is treated by the HKCC.

How can I ensure that my joint tender complies with the CO?

Regardless of whether joint tendering is assessed as a form of bid-rigging, there are several key questions that parties should consider before entering into a joint tender, to ensure compliance with the CO:

  1. Are the joint bidders able to put in their own independent bids absent the joint tender? If not, the parties are unlikely to be actual or potential competitors, and any joint tender between them would unlikely raise competition issues.

  2. For it to be pro-competitive, the joint tendering minimally has to be carried out in the open and the arrangement has to be known to the tender organiser. If the joint tender is carried out in secret, it would unlikely be pro-competitive. Such transparency would also avoid the conduct being construed as Serious Bid-rigging.

    Note, however, that arranging a joint tender in the open may not of itself avoid a finding of infringement. There have been cases in the EU where an openly conducted joint tender was nonetheless considered to restrict competition by object.

  3. The form of cooperation envisaged under the joint tender is important to determining whether the joint tender is anti-competitive. If the joint tender involves pooling of parties' assets and joint production, it is more likely to be pro-competitive. For example, if the joint bidders have complementary skills or different specialties (e.g. access to different/complementary technology, access to raw materials, access to specialised workforce) cooperation between the parties is likely to be more pro-competitive.

    Conversely, if there is little actual pooling of resources or joint production, and the collaboration is closer to a means for the parties to sell jointly in order to eliminate competition, the joint tender is more likely to be anti-competitive. As in the EU, it is possible for the HKCC to adopt a strict 'object restriction' approach and consider this latter situation to be a form of bid-rigging.

  4. Even if the joint tender is not anti-competitive, parties have to consider if the various restrictions imposed as part of the joint tender are directly related to, proportionate to, and necessary for the implementation of the joint tender project, i.e. they are ancillary restraints.

    For example, if parties intend to include an express non-compete clause that prevents them from independently submitting competing bids, they need to be able to justify that this restriction is directly related to, proportionate, and necessary for the joint tender. Otherwise, this restriction may be construed as an agreement between competitors not to submit bids, which could fall within the definition of bid-rigging.

  5. If the SME Exemption applies to the joint tendering conduct, the First Conduct Rule would not apply. Qualifying SMEs can therefore put in joint tenders without fear of infringing the CO, as long as their joint tenders are known to the person calling the tender.

Once parties have agreed to put in a joint tender and cooperation on a joint project, they should also be careful that any competitively sensitive information that is shared in submitting the bid and in carrying out the cooperation is used strictly for the purposes of the joint project. The joint project should not be used as a vehicle for exchanging competitively sensitive information on parties' usual prices and costs unrelated to the cooperation. Otherwise, such an exchange of competitively sensitive information may also constitute a separate infringement under the First Conduct Rule.

There are many legitimate and pro-competitive reasons why parties may want to enter into joint tenders. There are also important red-lines and pitfalls that parties need to be aware of, and there is a need to proceed with care when entering into joint tenders.

Visit us at www.mayerbrownjsm.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2018. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions