On December 3, 2007, after several years of discussions, the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong ("SEHK") introduced third party clearing.
Prior to the introduction of third party clearing, SEHK Trading Rules required Exchange Participants ("EPs") (i.e. trading members of the SEHK) to be clearing participants in the Hong Kong Securities and Clearing Company ("HKSCC"), the clearing house for the SEHK and required that all trades of an EP be cleared by the EP itself through its clearing participantship in the HKSCC. All EPs would therefore act as executing broker, clearing broker and carrying broker.
The position on the SEHK contrasted locally with the position for the SEHK Options Market and the Hong Kong Futures Exchange, both of which permitted a split between executing brokerage and clearing and carrying brokerage. More significantly, the position of the SEHK contrasted globally with international securities markets, where third party clearing has been widely permitted.
New Third Party Clearing Arrangements
Under the new third party clearing arrangements, the HKSCC will establish 2 new categories of clearing participants, namely General Clearing Participants ("GCPs") and Direct Clearing Participants ("DCPs"). As a result, EPs will have 3 options.
Maintain Status Quo
First, EPs may elect to remain (or, for new EPs, to become) clearing participants of the HKSCC as DCPs, thereby acting as executing brokers as well as their own clearing brokers and carrying brokers for their own trades and those of their clients. All current EPs who are broker clearing participants of the HKSCC will automatically become DCPs.
Expand Business Scope
Secondly, EPs may elect to become clearing participants of the HKSCC as GCPs, thereby acting as executing brokers as well as a clearing and carrying brokers for themselves, other EPs and their respective clients.
Focus on Executing Brokerage
Thirdly, EPs may elect to cease (or, for new EPs, to never become) clearing participants of the HKSCC, thereby acting solely as executing brokers. In this case, an EP would enter into an arrangement with a GCP which will assume all trade settlement obligations of the EP. All trades executed by the EP would then be given-up to the GCP for settlement and clearing. A GCP would not be entitled to decline any trade so given-up.
In light of settlement risk concerns, the HKSCC Rules establish high threshold eligibility requirements for a GCP, which include (but are not limited to) the following:
a GCP must be licensed or registered with the Securities and Futures Commission ("SFC") for Type 1 (dealing in securities) regulated activity;
a GCP must have an established clearing business in securities listed or traded on the SEHK or the financial and operational capacity to establish and operate a clearing business in securities listed or traded on the SEHK;
in the case of a GCP that is not a bank, the GCP must either (i) maintain minimum liquid capital of HK$300 million or more (depending primarily on its liabilities), or (ii) have minimum paid-up capital of HK$300 million and maintain minimum liquid capital of HK$100 million or more (depending primarily on its liabilities); and
in the case of a GCP that is a bank, the GCP must maintain a minimum credit rating of A3 or equivalent, or be a Hong Kong dollar note-issuing bank.
A GCP may be an EP but is not required to be an EP nor is it required to hold a Stock Exchange Trading Right (i.e. a right to usage of SEHK trading terminals upon approval as an EP). In other words, a GCP may, if it so chooses, focus only on clearing and carrying broker functions.
Where an EP elects to settle and clear trades through a GCP, the GCP may custody the positions of the clients of the EP either on a "fully disclosed" or an "omnibus" basis. In the former, clients of the EP will open an account with the EP for execution and the GCP for clearing and carrying. In this case, as client positions are carried by the GCP exclusively, the GCP is responsible for providing back office client side services.
In the latter case, clients of the EP will only open an account with the EP. The EP will, in turn, maintain an omnibus account with the GCP. All client positions are thus carried by the EP who then carries them through the GCP. In this case, as client positions are carried by the EP, the EP is responsible for providing back office client side services.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The committee set up to draft a Code on Resolution of Financial Firms, by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, on September 28, 2016, released a draft bill – The Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Bill, 2016...
In a race to adopt technology innovations, Banks have increased their exposure to cyber incidents/ attacks thereby underlining the urgent need to put in place a robust cyber security and resilience framework.
RG 256 deals primarily with remediation programs conducted by licensees who provide personal advice to retail clients.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).