Hong Kong: Appealing Against Arbitral Awards

Last Updated: 28 July 2003

The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ("the CFA") was recently given its first opportunity to consider the exercise of the judicial discretion to grant leave to appeal against a domestic arbitral award. In Swire Properties Ltd & Others v Secretary for Justice [2003] HKEC 840, the CFA threw out Swire Properties’ application for leave; as a result, the Hong Kong conglomerate faces the prospect of having to pay a substantial land premium to the Government. The case is another example of the pro-enforcement stance often adopted by the Hong Kong Courts, with respect to arbitration awards. However, the leading judgment (of the Hon. Mr. Justice Bokhary PJ) widens the scope to appeal against an award where the dispute arises out of a standard form clause.

The dispute in the Swire Properties case arose from the terms of an agreement made with the Government, limiting the commercial space at Swire Properties’ Taikoo Shing project. The parties disagreed over the implementation of the arrangements and submitted their dispute to arbitration. An arbitral award was made against Swire Properties in January 2001. Dissatisfied with the arbitrator’s decision regarding an alleged breach of the commercial space restriction for the development, Swire Properties applied to the Court of First Instance for leave to appeal on a question of law. On 7 May 2001, that application was refused. On 11 June 2002, the Court of Appeal similarly refused such leave. The CFA finally dismissed Swire Properties’ appeal on 7 July 2003, on the basis that the arbitrator’s decision was not "obviously wrong". However, the CFA also took the opportunity to review the test for granting leave to appeal, where a question of law of general public importance or the construction of a standard clause was involved. In so doing, the CFA lowered the threshold for leave to appeal in such cases. Leave to appeal on a question of law arising out of a common standard form will now be granted if the applicant can show that there is a "serious doubt" as to the correctness of the arbitrator’s decision.

The test for granting leave: one-off and standard disputes

Under the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 341), the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a domestic arbitral award unless, having regard to all the circumstances, the determination of the question of law could substantially affect the rights of one or more of the parties (s. 23(4)). Even if that requirement is satisfied, the Court will not automatically grant leave to appeal. The Court will only grant leave if it is satisfied that it should intervene on the basis of the guidelines laid down by Lord Diplock and the English House of Lords in The Nema (Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd [1982] AC 724), as explained and applied in The Antaios (Antaios Cia Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB [1985] AC 191).

The Nema guidelines recognise that all cases lie somewhere on a scale from a "one-off" dispute (which may arise from a uniquely worded contract) to a "standard" dispute (which may arise from a standard form contract). When a court is faced with a one-off dispute, it will only grant leave to appeal from an arbitral award if the arbitrator’s construction of the contract appears to be obviously wrong. However, when a court has to consider a case at the other end of the scale, that is a dispute between Hong Kong parties in relation to standard forms of contract in regular use in Hong Kong, leave to appeal will be granted if there is a strong prima facie case that the arbitrator was wrong in law.

Applying the test in the Swire Properties case and beyond

The Swire Properties case concerned a one-off dispute. Accordingly, the CFA applied the test of whether the arbitrator’s construction of the agreement between the parties was obviously wrong. The CFA unanimously held that in this case the arbitrator was not obviously wrong, a decision that was consistent with the Court’s preference to hold parties to their choice of arbitration.

Although the issue did not directly arise in the Swire Properties case, the Hon. Mr. Justice Bokhary PJ reviewed the circumstances in which leave to appeal could be granted in respect of awards arising out of standard contractual disputes. In doing so, the CFA has departed from the Nema guidelines, preferring the concept of a serious doubt, to Lord Diplock’s requirement of a strong prima facie case.

On this point, the CFA appears to have been influenced by the recent decision of the English Court of Appeal in CMA SA v Beteilingungs–KG MS "Northern Pioneer" [2003] 1 WLR 1015. That case compares the Nema guidelines with the statutory criteria in the UK Arbitration Act 1996, which replaced them. Section 69(3)(c)(ii) of the Act provides that leave to appeal may be granted where the question is one of general public importance and the decision of the arbitral tribunal is at least open to serious doubt. Giving the leading judgment of the English Court of Appeal, Lord Phillips MR observed that the statutory criteria: "open the door a little more widely to the granting of permission to appeal than the crack that was left by Lord Diplock".

The CFA has endorsed the English Court of Appeal’s approach, apparently considering the absence of a similar provision in the Ordinance to be no bar to adopting the serious doubt test in Hong Kong. The Hon. Mr. Justice Bokhary PJ stated: "Where a question of law of general public importance or the construction of a standard clause is involved, I think that our courts should normally grant leave to appeal from an arbitral award when, but only when, there is at least a serious doubt as to its correctness".

Conclusion

Following the Swire Properties case, parties who submit a one-off dispute to arbitration are unlikely to find it any easier to obtain leave to appeal against an arbitral award. An applicant for leave to appeal such an award will have to show that the arbitrator was clearly wrong in law. However, an applicant who wishes to dispute an arbitrator’s construction of a standard form of contract in regular use in Hong Kong may find the Court more willing to exercise its discretion in favour of granting leave to appeal, as long as he can show that there is a serious doubt about the correctness of the award.

Article by Craig Shepherd and Mark Lloyd-Williams

© Herbert Smith 2003

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions