Hong Kong: Identifying Terrorist Funds: Continuing Problems

Last Updated: 29 April 2003
Article by Peter Gallo

International efforts to address the problem of Terrorist Financing have been predicated on the ability to identify known or suspected terrorists. Legislation enacted around the world in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks in the United States have imposed a responsibility on the financial community to screen their customer lists for names of known or suspected terrorist individuals and organisations.

In the early days, it appeared that considerable headway was being made in the effort to find and freeze terrorist assets, beginning with the publication of a list of names which set the pattern for what has since come to be understood as the responsibilities of the financial community in the war against Terrorist Financing.

In the United States, this ‘terrorist blacklist’ is produced by various bodies including the U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), but it is through the directives of the United Nations that these names are relayed throughout the world. The whole concept of supplying the private sector with a list of named terrorist entities, however, is fraught with great practical problems.

The relatively simple task of trying to identify people by name can be enormously difficult. The current threat comes from individuals whose names were originally in Arabic. The western convention of a Mr Firstname Middlename Lastname is not the universal model, and different alphabets and romanisations further confuse the issue. Wong, Ong, Huang and Wang are different Western attempts to write the very same Chinese surname, just as Muhammad is Mohammed is Mohamed is Mohamet, but there is only one way to write it in Arabic, and Usama is Osama.

A bank operating in, say, Japanese is unlikely to record a customer by his name in the original Thai or Arabic script, but will make use of some local representation of that name, some ‘fuzzy logic’ is obviously required in the search process.

Some institutions might not actually want to attract the odium of identifying such an account anyway. Provided they do not have a customer whose name is an exact match; they might turn a blind eye (wilfully or otherwise) to a "Hosama Bin Leyden."

Other information, such as addresses and telephone numbers are similarly important. Even if the customer’s name was unrelated, would it not be relevant that his address was the same as one known to have been a known terrorist centre?

Throughout the era of the Cold War, the greatest counter-espionage challenge was not the Cultural Vice-Consul at the Embassy who everyone knew was a spy, but the ‘sleeper’ who had been infiltrated into the country illegally many years before. Al Qaeda is known to have infiltrated many of their trained terrorist operatives into Western countries, and we do not know how many hundreds or thousands might still be undetected, waiting for their day to strike.

Soon after the Sept 11 attacks, the ‘Mamoun Darkazanli Import-Export Company’ was identified and named as an al-Qaeda connected company in Hamburg, Germany. Banks may have searched their records to ensure they never facilitated any transactions involving that company, but without an address, they may well miss the account of another individual, who might similarly be connected to the al-Qaeda organisation, and who can be connected to them from having used that Hamburg address.

Is all the effort and emphasis being placed on these terrorist blacklists of any value whatsoever? What are they really worth? They do, at least, have some soporific value; allowing the banking world to say, and perhaps even feel that they are "doing their bit" to make the world a safer place. The reality, however, is that at the current level. they are probably of very little, if any, practical use at all.

Certainly, if al-Qaeda was funded entirely by Bin Laden himself through his personal current account, it might be relevant, but the his name on the EO 13224 list was purely for international consumption. He had been added to the OFAC blacklist in the United States after the bombings of the Embassies in East Africa in August 1998. Some estimates of bin Laden’s personal wealth suggest he inherited as much as US$300 Million, but even the US$100 Million amount actually frozen, however, has not disabled his organisation.

Apart from the possibility he might use a false identity or two, is it not conceivable that he might have a few dollars in a bank account in his wife's name. He certainly has enough to chose from; having at least four wives, one ex and a total of some twenty three children. Interestingly enough, US intelligence sources believe that one of his sons; Saad bin Laden, has an increasingly active in role in the management of al-Qaeda.

Neither Saad, nor any of bin Laden’s other children, nor any of his wives or other relatives, are on the OFAC or UN lists, and there are countless other examples of names that have never been blacklisted.

Labels, of course, are subjective. In the oft quoted phrase "One man’s Terrorist is another man’s Freedom Fighter", and one government’s view of what constitutes a terrorist organisation is not always shared, even by its allies.

How and why are some names deemed to be designated terrorist entities and others not?

In the Philippines, the New People’s Army has been engaged in armed resistance against government since the Marcos administration. The organisation was lead, since the early days, by Jose Maria Sison.

Whether it is a para-military group, a liberation movement or a terrorist organisation may depend on one’s political point of view, but the NPA has been a military force in the Philippines for thirty years. At its peak, the organisation was believed to have has 26,000 men under arms. Waging a guerrilla war, it represented the principal security threat to the country’s elected government.

Yet, as far as the banking world is concerned, the only name associated with the financing of that movement is Jose Maria Sison. On 29 August 2002, the US Treasury added his name to their list of known terrorist entities. Are we expected to believe that an insurrection that lasted thirty years is another ‘Lone Gunman’ case, or is his name on the list for political reasons that do not extend to anyone else associated with the movement?

How was the NPA financed? When money was sent to support the movement; was it kept in cash in a shoe box under the bed, or were there front companies with bank accounts involved in the process? If so, are none of these of law enforcement interest?

The problem is not with supplying information to the private sector; nor is it with the banks checking their customer databases for listed names. The problem is that they are not supplied with enough information. More importantly; a customer could still be involved in the financing of a terrorist group even though his name is not on a list.

Whether the goal to deprive terrorist organisations of funding or to identify and prosecute drug traffickers or other benefiting from the proceeds of crime, the governments’ problem is the same; the volume and the complex intricacies of financial transactions are such that law enforcement bodies cannot cope without the active co-operation of the private sector.

This trend has begun. It is not just the scale, but the nature of the threat that is the catalyst for further legal and business changes; the threat to the security of democratic countries having changed, the response must likewise change to address it.

Al Qaeda is not an organisation that can be compared to the Provisional IRA or any other ‘traditional terrorist’ movement. It is an organisation established and headed by a financier; thus suggesting there is more logic in an unconventional attack against its ability to finance acts of terrorism, rather than a conventional military attack against countries deemed to be supportive of their activities.

One of the unorthodox aspects of al-Qaeda’s funding has been the heinous abuse of charitable funds; raising a very serious jurisprudential question: if knowingly donating money for the purchase of arms and explosives is an offence; is there a material difference between supplying a terrorist movement with weapons or weapons training, and supplying the same movement with other supplies and equipment? To what extent should a donor be expected to know how those funds will be used?

This is not only a question for wealthy Saudis whose charitable donations end up funding terrorist movements; the largest single donor to the Palestinian Authority is the European Union, giving 10 Million Euros a month. Although this is ostensibly used for the salaries of Palestinian public sector employees, repeated reports that this money was being diverted into the personal accounts of corrupt Palestinian officials or used to finance attacks on Israeli civilians have resulted in an official investigation being initiated.

Should it be legal to provide non-military equipment to an organisation that exists to support the activities of another organisation that advocates the use of violence? Should it be permissible to provide boots, vehicles or flight training; on a promise that the boots will not be worn on terrorist operations and that the flight training is for purely civil purposes?

The question is a practical one for bankers; irrespective of whether or not it might technically be legal, is the revenue from that customer worth the potential liability when some of that non-military equipment turn out to have a dual purpose after all.

The terrorist threat, not unlike the drugs threat, is a global one. It represents a serious hazard to the security of large numbers of people. This cannot be compared to the long-established warfare model of invasion by a hostile army, so new means of countering this threat have to be evolved. Given the perverse ‘success’ of the financially sophisticated al-Qaeda, like the major drug trafficking syndicates; it is obvious that a large part of that response must be directed at the financial infrastructure level.

Unfortunately, given that such activity takes place on paper in the private sector, it is there that the defence is needed. It is not enough just to check a name against a list. No list of names will ever be exhaustive, nor will it ever be more than a tiny fraction of the financial institutions’ responsibilities. If the terrorist threat is to be diminished, at least at that level, the volume of information flowing from government law enforcement agencies to the private sector will have to increase exponentially; and likewise the amount of financial intelligence returned will also be dramatically more than would ever be envisaged at the present time.

Although it may not be politically expedient or popular to use the word ‘laxity’ or to describe current levels of Customer Due Diligence as ‘cursory’ – compared to the steps that may be needed in the future; we may well be living in the carefree "good old days."

A compliance programme based on prohibition and saying "No, no, no, don’t!" all the time will be a hindrance rather than a help to business, if we are to put up a credible line of defence, it will come from an atmosphere where the private sector is assiduous in its desire not to incur the burdens associated with criminal or terrorist elements.

If that is to happen, the most serious and insidious problems will be those that are, even now, already rooted. It will be the customer whose suspicious financial activities were not examined too closely who becomes a long-term problem. Like cancer, if not identified and removed at an early stage; the situation might develop and grow until even the surgery is life threatening.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions