Hong Kong: Dirty money and dubious structures: 7 practical insights into the revamped Hong Kong AML/CTF regime

Last Updated: 4 June 2012
Article by Richard Mazzochi and Urszula McCormack

The new anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF) regime came into force on 1 April 2012. One month on, we answer 7 of our clients' most frequently asked questions about criminal liability, funds, SOEs and more in this alert.

A quick intro

Hong Kong has a new AML/CTF regime for Hong Kong-regulated financial institutions (FIs). The reforms respond to a 2007 "mutual evaluation" by the global standard-setter, which identified systemic weaknesses in Hong Kong's existing framework.

The new regime comprises two tiers of regulation:

  • legislation - the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Financial Institutions) Ordinance (Cap. 615) (AMLO); and
  • guidelines - supplementary guidance issued by each regulator, which includes guidelines that apply to all types of FIs, plus sector-specific guidelines (Guidelines).

While some aspects of the new Hong Kong regime stayed true to the old, there are some fairly substantial developments. The volume of the AMLO and Guidelines – more than double the previous industry guidelines - testifies to this.

King & Wood Mallesons was heavily involved in negotiating changes to both the AMLO and the banking industry Guidelines during 2010-2012. The following insights are drawn from that project and follow-up work with our clients.

1. Criminal liability - who it affects and how to avoid it

The most dramatic change to the Hong Kong AML/CTF rules is criminal liability.

Individual staff and managers can be criminally liable if they "knowingly cause" or "knowingly permit" a breach of customer due diligence (CDD, also known as "KYC") and other requirements.

The upshot is up to 7 years' imprisonment and a fine of up to HK$1 million, with the highest penalties applying where there is an "intent to defraud".

These penalty provisions are broad and severe. They potentially capture anyone associated with the breach, no matter how innocent the act itself. For example, they can penalise the banker facing the client, the business manager assisting with onboarding, the back-office employee processing an instruction, the compliance team approving it and the senior manager overseeing the relevant department as a whole.

However, there is a defence - complying with internal policies and procedures that were designed to ensure compliance with the relevant requirement.

The 6 takeaways for staff are as follows:

  1. Assume you are potentially on the hook, no matter what your role.
  2. Follow policies and procedures.
  3. Escalate the issue if the policies do not cover the situation or a deviation is needed.
  4. Keep a paper trail - the law expects the staff member to prove they complied.
  5. Anyone involved in designing policies and procedures must be extremely careful. The buck may ultimately stop with you. Include escalation procedures and when to obtain legal advice. Consider having policies reviewed by an external lawyer.
  6. Grey area? Don't risk it - speak to your legal advisors.

2. Who is a "customer"?

This depends on who is asking. The overarching principle is that "customer" has its "everyday meaning...in the context of industry practice".

Each sector then has its own flavour of that concept:

Banking sector Generally, each party with whom a business relationship is established or for whom a transaction is carried out, and excludes third parties.
Securities sector Each person who is a "client", as defined in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), unless the context requires otherwise. This is linked to regulated activities under the SFO.
Insurance sector The insurance policy holder.

As simple as this appears on paper, the question is more complex in practice. Offshore-booked accounts, the use of affiliated arrangers and prepaid cards are just three examples of tricky arrangements, where a small change in facts has material regulatory impacts.

Factual considerations include the following:

  • Is there any direct contact with the person?
  • If so, what is the nature of that contact – when, what and how?
  • What services are provided (directly or indirectly) to that person?
  • Who pays for those services?
  • Who receives the benefit?
  • In whose name are any accounts held?
  • Does any monitoring take place?

Substance is more important to regulators than form, and that assessment is not always easy. If in doubt, speak to us.

3. Investment vehicles - is DD required on underlying investors?

Investment vehicles can take a number of forms, including corporations, special purpose vehicles (or "SPVs"), trusts and other collective investment scheme structures (better known as funds).

What these have in common is the pooling of funds from groups of investors. Structures are often complex, with a fund manager, trust administrator or other person at the helm. Many refuse to disclose information about their investors given the sensitivities involved. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, for FIs to obtain information about those investors.

Under the AMLO, such underlying investors are "beneficial owners" of an investment vehicle and therefore subject to statutory due diligence (DD) requirements, if they hit the threshold ownership / control tests. This places FIs under considerable pressure when caught between an uncooperative client and potential criminal liability for a breach of those DD requirements.

However, there are exceptions available. The exceptions apply where:

If one of these exceptions apply, the FI need not look beyond the investment vehicle itself – it can effectively rely on DD having been performed on the underlying investors by someone else.

It is ultimately up to each FI to determine if non-FIs satisfy the compliance measures test in the boxes above. In some cases, a simple confirmation may be sufficient, but in others, more information may be warranted - for example, sighting actual AML/CTF program documents. Details of regulatory supervision are usually readily available from public sources or through local counsel.

If no exception applies, all investors that own or control 10%+ of the investment vehicle must be identified. If appropriate, FIs can rely on a written confirmation from the investment vehicle or a relevant appointed person (eg fund manager, trust administrator, agent etc) for that purpose, on a risk-sensitive basis. However, verification of any relevant interests identified (ie 10%+ or 25%+ depending on risk level) must still be undertaken by the FI itself.

4. Using signatory lists - when and how?

Gathering documents to identify and verify the signatories of a customer can be an overwhelming task. The Guidelines provide relief for large entities, by permitting the use of a "signatory list" provided by the customer itself.

When - The Guidelines allow FIs to use signatory lists to verify the signatories of:

  1. other FIs;
  2. listed corporations; and
  3. other customers with long signatory lists, on a risk-sensitive basis.

How - The signatory list should:

  1. record the name of each signatory;
  2. include a confirmation that each signatory is authorised to act on behalf of the customer; and
  3. be signed by a person / department within the customer that is independent to those identified in the signatory list (eg compliance, audit or human resources).

This streamlined approach means that other identity information (such as nationality, date of birth etc) and documents (eg passports / HKID cards) do not necessarily need to be collected, and makes DD substantially easier. However, if it is possible to include additional identity information in the signatory list, we suggest doing so - it may assist screening and reputational risk management.

5. State-owned enterprises - simplified or full CDD?

The short answer is - the closer the state and the simpler the structure, the simpler the CDD.

Simplified CDD can vastly reduce the amount of information needed about a particular customer, because it dispenses with the need to conduct DD on the customer's beneficial owner(s). For customers with a long and complicated ownership chain, this is good news.

There are some obvious candidates for simplified CDD, such as FIs, certain other financial institutions, listed corporations and governments (Special Category Persons).

But what about state-owned enterprises (SOEs)?

These are not Special Category Persons in their own right. However, the AMLO recognises that customers that have a Special Category Person somewhere in their ownership chain should be entitled to relief. That relief comes in the form of a permission to stop DD on beneficial owners beyond the Special Category Person.

The following diagram illustrates how this kind of 'modified simplified CDD' works for a basic corporate SOE that is wholly owned by a government or public body:1

Naturally, things become more complicated where there are multiple owners, numerous layers and other complexities such as trust structures.

For example, where there are multiple owners, the approach looks more like this:

Importantly, not all SOEs are considered equal. The "state" concerned must fall within one of the following categories:

  • the government of Hong Kong or an equivalent jurisdiction;
  • a "public body" in Hong Kong (broadly defined); or
  • a body in an equivalent jurisdiction that performs functions similar to a public body.

See item 6 in relation to what is an "equivalent jurisdiction".

6. What is an "equivalent jurisdiction"?

There are two types of equivalent jurisdictions:

  • members of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF); and
  • jurisdictions that impose requirements similar to those imposed under Schedule 2 of the AMLO, as assessed against the criteria in paragraph 4.15.2 and 4.20.3 of the Guidelines and, where necessary, the provisions of Schedule 2 itself.

There are a number of advantages for a jurisdiction to be considered "equivalent" under the AMLO. For example, FIs can:

  1. conduct simplified CDD - adopt simplified CDD measures for certain entities incorporated in, governments of, investment vehicles incorporated in and public bodies in, equivalent jurisdictions;
  2. use intermediaries - carry out their Hong Kong CDD responsibilities overseas by means of certain third parties incorporated, established or practising in equivalent jurisdictions; and
  3. use certifiers - rely on certification of documentation by lawyers, accountants and other persons in equivalent jurisdictions.

We are currently working closely with The Hong Kong Association of Banks (HKAB) on equivalence assessments for a number of non-FATF member jurisdictions, including the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, Taiwan and Malaysia.

For further information, please contact us.

7. Remediation of pre-existing customers - what to do

Many FIs are concerned about how the AMLO and Guidelines apply to their pre-existing customers - that is, those already on the books as at 1 April 2012.

Thankfully, remediation is not required automatically and the principles reflect (and require) common sense. Understanding customer behavioural norms is key.

When (trigger events) - The new CDD standards only kick in with respect to pre-existing customers if one of the following events occur:

  • an unusual, suspicious or inconsistent transaction takes place;
  • a material change occurs in the way in which an account is operated;
  • you suspect the customer or their account is involved in ML/TF;
  • you doubt the veracity or adequacy of information previously obtained for CDD purposes;
  • another trigger event specific to your business or customers occurs - examples include the re-activation of a dormant account or a change in the beneficial ownership or control of an account.

There is no set time limit for remediation, but it should be initiated immediately and completed as swiftly as possible. If not, the business relationship must be terminated as soon as reasonably practicable.

Some FIs have asked us whether customers of their affiliates can be treated as "pre-existing customers". Strictly speaking, no. Full CDD needs to be carried out when that person first becomes a customer of that FI - irrespective of their relationship with another entity in the same group - not only when a trigger event occurs.

What - Remediation means obtaining CDD information right up to the standard required under the AMLO and Guidelines. Remediation can therefore impact:

  • who you have information about;
  • what information you need to collect;
  • which types of documents you can use to verify that information;
  • how you verify their authenticity (eg certification); and
  • further steps you might need to take.

This emphasises the need for a detailed gap analysis between your current policies and procedures and the new AMLO and Guidelines. FIs should now have this well underway. If not, please contact us. We recently worked with HKAB on a 'new versus old regime' analysis.

How - There is no magic to remediation – the gap must simply be closed. FIs are free to adopt an approach that suits their business and customers best.

However, special care is required to avoid tipping off a customer - a serious offence under Hong Kong law. This is particularly risky where the trigger event for remediation is a suspicion that the customer is engaged in ML/TF. Tipping off has been the subject of much discussion in the last few months and there are no clear answers about how to manage that risk against the need to conduct CDD.

Given the very serious consequences of tipping off and of breaching the AMLO, speak to us if you are in any doubt about how to approach remediation.

Periodic reviews - Until remediation takes place, it is still necessary to conduct periodic reviews on pre-existing customers. However, only the documents, data and information currently held (ie under pre-1 April standards) need to be updated.

Practically speaking, this means that there is no need to obtain new kinds of materials that may be required under the AMLO or Guidelines until a trigger event actually occurs.


We are working with a number of our clients on their transaction structures, onboarding procedures and AML/CTF policies. If you have any questions about the AMLO or Guidelines, please contact us.


1 The diagrams in this alert apply the shareholding test of beneficial ownership. There may be other beneficial owners involved - see full definition of "beneficial owner" in section 1, Schedule 2, AMLO.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.