On 1 April 2001, the Intellectual Property (Miscellaneous Amendment) Ordinance 2000 (the "Ordinance") came into effect. The Ordinance has been somewhat controversial as it amends, among other things, the Copyright Ordinance and the Copyright Piracy Ordinance.
The amendments to the Copyright Ordinance now make it an offence for any business (not just those whose business was dealing in infringing articles) to possess and use in the course of business infringing articles. The main aim of the Ordinance was to contain corporate end-user piracy activities, in particular the use of pirated software by businesses in Hong Kong. However, the criminal sanctions which it introduced do not catch only software piracy but also seemingly less "serious" acts of infringement such as making copies of newspaper articles and using them in the course of teaching.
In order to clarify and narrow the scope of the Ordinance, the Copyright (Suspension of Amendments) Bill 2001 was gazetted on 27 April 2001. This Bill proposes the suspension of the blanket criminal sanctions introduced by the Ordinance, with the exception of four categories of work to which these sanctions will continue to apply. These are movies, television drama, sound recordings of films and musical works and computer software.
The Amendment Bill proposes a suspension of the provisions of the Ordinance (with the exceptions mentioned) until 31 July 2002.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
This article enunciates the recent, much awaited, and landmark judgment delivered on September 16, 2016 by Hon'ble Delhi High Court throwing light on the important provisions of the Copyright Act, 1962.
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion recently issued an office memorandum pursuant to receiving representations from various stakeholders for guidance with respect to the applicability of the provisions of Section 31D of the Copyright Act, 1957.
An Invention Disclosure Form is the documentation of the invention. This is a means to document particulars of your invention and submitting it to the patent attorney who is filing your patent application.
The Patents Act 1970, along with the Patents Rules 1972, came into force on 20th April 1972, replacing the Indian Patents and Designs Act 1911. The Patents Act was largely based on the recommendations of the Ayyangar Committee Report headed by Justice N. Rajagopala Ayyangar. One of the recommendations was the allowance of only process patents with regard to inventions relating to drugs, medicines, food and chemicals.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).