Under the Hong Kong Copyright Ordinance as amended by the Intellectual Property (Miscellaneous Amendments) Ordinance 2000 with effect from 1 April 2001, it is a criminal offence to use an unauthorized copyright work, such as a newspaper article, for purpose of, in the course of, or in connection with any trade or business or to possess the same with a view to committing an act of infringement. The maximum penalty is 4 years imprisonment and a fine of HK$ 50,000 per infringing copy.
The above 1 April amendment to the Copyright Ordinance has attracted a flurry of criticisms from the small to medium businesses, the education establishments and the general public since about 1 month prior to its introduction up to present. There were talks by Legislative Council members bringing a private bill to amend or suspend the 1 April amendment.
Finally the Government bowed to the public pressure and announced on 12 April that it will table an amendment bill on 25 April (to be passed in one seating) to suspend part of the 1 April amendment. According to the speech of the Secretary of Commerce and Industry Mr. Chau Tak Hay at the Legislative Council on 12 April, those sections to be suspended are "criminal provisions as they affect works in the printing media, including newspapers, magazines, periodicals and books, as well as broadcasts and cable programmes, and the downloading of information from the Internet. But the suspension will not apply to the downloading of computer programmes, music or films from the Internet. Provisions in the [1 April amendment ] as they affect computer programmes, music and films will remain in force."
While some may argue that the proposed suspension of part of the 1 April amendment will seriously undermine the Government’s efforts to stamp out use of unauthorized computer programmes in offices, the impact cannot be determined until after 25 April 2001. Meanwhile, comfort may be drawn from the fact that there were wide spread discussions of copyright issues in unprecedented extent and latitudes before and after the 1 April amendment. The objective of increasing public awareness and respect of copyright ownership has been achieved.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
This article enunciates the recent, much awaited, and landmark judgment delivered on September 16, 2016 by Hon'ble Delhi High Court throwing light on the important provisions of the Copyright Act, 1962.
The Patents Act 1970, along with the Patents Rules 1972, came into force on 20th April 1972, replacing the Indian Patents and Designs Act 1911. The Patents Act was largely based on the recommendations of the Ayyangar Committee Report headed by Justice N. Rajagopala Ayyangar. One of the recommendations was the allowance of only process patents with regard to inventions relating to drugs, medicines, food and chemicals.
The Policy stresses on the need for a holistic approach to be taken on legal, administrative, institutional and enforcement issues related to IP.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).