Keywords: Hong Kong, foreign liquidators, Companies (Winding-up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance
Did you know that a liquidator of a foreign company may seek the assistance of the Hong Kong Court to obtain orders for the production of information which orders are, in substance, of the type made in Hong Kong windings-up under section 221(3) of the Companies (Winding-up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance?
In the recent matter of The Joint Official Liquidators of A Company v. B and Another1, Harris J confirmed that a liquidator of a foreign company may obtain orders for the production of information and documents in Hong Kong without the need for a parallel winding-up proceeding in Hong Kong to be commenced. In reaching this decision, his Lordship made the following observations:
The Companies Court may pursuant to a letter of request from a common law jurisdiction with a similar substantive insolvency law make an order of a type which is available to a provisional liquidator or liquidator under Hong Kong's insolvency regime...2
The present application is important for two reasons. First, because it provides an opportunity to state, what should never have been in doubt, namely that Rule 179 ["the authority of the liquidator appointed under the law of the place of incorporation is recognised in England" as set out in "The Conflict of Laws", Dicey, Morris & Collins, 15 ed] applies in Hong Kong. Secondly, because it demonstrates that there is in Hong Kong a mechanism available to foreign liquidators for obtaining information and documents without having to wind up a company.3
While his Lordship's decision is important in assisting liquidators of foreign companies to obtain information and documents in Hong Kong, there is a distinction between information and assets. In this regard, his Lordship stated, "[u]nlike the position in personal bankruptcy the common law maintains that a foreign liquidation has no automatic consequences in relation to the property of a foreign company in a local jurisdiction. As a consequence an application needs to be made by a foreign liquidator for an order vesting him with the title to the local property" 4.
Certainly in our experience, where there is a possibility of there being assets in Hong Kong to which a liquidator of a foreign company may wish to make a claim, perhaps the most prudent approach, if available, remains to make a parallel application for the winding-up of the foreign company in Hong Kong. His Lordship's decision is, however, a welcome confirmation that to the extent established common law principles require the Hong Kong Court to recognise foreign liquidators, it is both prepared and willing to provide assistance to them.
Originally published 4 August 2014
1.  HKCFI 1294.
2. Ibid at §18.
3. Ibid at §7.
4. Ibid at §6.
Visit us at www.mayerbrownjsm.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.