Keywords: competition law, internal compliance review
In the previous episode of this series, Mayer Brown JSM discussed the implications of group boycotts against competitors. Now that Colin is satisfied that all his questions have been answered, he begins to think about the next steps...
Colin: Alright, I think I am ready to return to my HR practice and work on a competition compliance policy. Any tips from you?
Mayer Brown JSM: To recap, when conducting an internal compliance review, be particularly vigilant of any agreement or arrangement that has the object or effect of fixing wages, preventing solicitation of employees from competitors, or boycotting competitors. Avoid unnecessary contact with competitors, whether formal or informal, where there is a risk that commercially sensitive information may be exchanged. When such exchanges are inevitable, consult your legal advisers first – they may be able to help you find a legally compliant solution to achieve the same purpose without having to disclose commercially sensitive information to a competitor. Remember that an actual agreement is not required for the behaviour to be considered anti-competitive, a one-way disclosure or tacit acknowledgment could just as likely land you in trouble.
There are many facets of competition law that may affect HR matters. Due to the unique nature of each position, business and industry, different legal standards may apply. As such, there is no "one-size-fits-all" approach when preparing a competition compliance policy and you should seek the assistance of your legal advisers in preparing the most appropriate and commercially sensible compliance policy for your business.
The Competition Ordinance will likely come into operation by mid-2015, so now is the time to start preparing.
Mayer Brown JSM's Antitrust & Competition Team would be pleased to advise businesses on the steps to take on compliance and risk-management issues in relation to the new law.
Visit us at www.mayerbrownjsm.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.