Keywords: competition law, restrictive covenants, employment contract, non-solicitation arrangements,

In the previous episode of this series, Mayer Brown JSM discussed the implication of non-solicitation arrangements with competitors. After mulling over what he has learned, Colin wonders if the Competition Ordinance would affect a very common aspect of his HR practice...

Colin: Would the Competition Ordinance affect the restrictive covenants in our employment contract with staff?

Mayer Brown JSM: The short answer to your question is "no". The Competition Ordinance will not affect the restrictive covenants in your employment contract with staff as long as they are reasonable, proportionate and necessary to protect your legitimate business interests, such as your trade secrets and client contacts.

A restrictive covenant that complies with employment law on restraints of trade will not fall foul of competition law.

In contrast, a non-solicitation agreement or arrangement between two or more competitors is a horizontal agreement. Except in the context of a proposed merger or acquisition of businesses, a non-solicitation agreement between competitors generally serves no legitimate business interest that requires protection by the law. A non-solicitation arrangement amongst competitors is usually an attempt to restrict the employees' job mobility and stabilise the employers' labour costs. This type of conduct is anti-competitive.

Colin: I see.

Originally published 2 December 2014

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.