Guernsey: Distribution Of Trust Assets – The Court's Blessing In Times Of Unrest

Last Updated: 26 July 2016
Article by Simon Davies

The Royal Court of Guernsey has the power to approve the distribution of trust assets, which can be particularly important for trustees where there are warring beneficiaries since approval will prevent complaining beneficiaries from alleging breach of trust and seeking compensation.

Simon Davies, a partner in Guernsey's dispute resolution team examines the recent decision of the Royal Court of Guernsey in A (As Trustee of the Trust) –v- R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 and the way in which the court approaches such applications by trustees.

The Application

The trustee ("A") applied to the Royal Court for a distribution of the Trust's assets in accordance with the Trust Deed and in the proportions provided for by the Settlors in their Letter of Wishes, the relevant part of which read:

"After the demise of the last one of us, we would like the Trustee to immediately distribute the remaining Trust Fund in the following percentages:

  • To our daughter, (R2)................23.5%
  • To our son, (R1).......................4.5%
  • To our grandson, (R3)...............22%
  • To our granddaughter, (R4)........25%
  • To our grandson, (R5)...............25%"

The Dispute

The last surviving Settlor died in July 2015 and there was an unfortunate family dispute between R1 and the other beneficiaries.  This was considered by the Directors of A at a Board Meeting in October 2015 and minuted.  R1's concerns were listed, but A decided to proceed in accordance with the Letter of Wishes.  This was opposed by R1 hence the application.

Pursuant to section 69 of the Trusts (Guernsey) Law, 2007, as amended, the court has power to make orders in respect of the execution, administration and enforcement of a trust.

Applicable Legal Principles

The governing law of the Trust was that of the Bahamas.  In that regard, it was noted that foreign law must be pleaded and proved by expert evidence, the burden of proving it lying on the party who bases his claim or defence on it.  If no evidence or insufficient evidence is adduced, the court in England would apply English law[1].  The Court held there was no reason why the very well established principles should not be followed in Guernsey by substituting "Guernsey" for "English".

The Court noted this was a case where A sought the sanction of the Court for a so-called "momentous decision" as per Public Trustee & Another –v- Cooper & Ors [2001] and, as such, was not a surrender of the trustee's discretion to the Court, rather, the Court would consider whether the trustees' proposals "were ones which they could properly be given general liberty to carry into effect".

In doing so, the Court must act cautiously, there must be full disclosure on the part of the trustees and it is not simply a rubber stamp exercise.  The Court referred to Tamlin –v- Edgar [2011] and said that trustees must satisfy the court they properly considered their proposals to be for the benefit of the advancees or appointees.  This required full and frank disclosure of all relevant facts and documents.

It was noted that these principles were approved in the more recent case of Cotton & Another –v- Brudenell-Bruce & Others [2014] and where it was further held that the court would not approve a trustee's decision without a proper evidential basis for doing so, but equally should not deprive a trustee of approval without good reason.  Further, the court should not place insurmountable hurdles in the way of trustees.

The decision also defined the procedural approach to applications of this type which are supposed to be "quick and accessible" and matters of fact should not be tried with oral evidence.  The court are not being asked to find facts, rather they are being asked to decide whether the trustees have presented sufficient evidence to show that they have fulfilled their duties to the beneficiaries and have formed a view which reasonable trustees could properly have formed.

There was previous Guernsey authority consistent and in accord with the English decisions.  In the Guernsey Court of Appeal case of Re F [2013], it was pointed out that in exercising this supervisory jurisdiction, the court was effectively making declarations:

  1. that the trustees' proposed exercise of the power was lawful (i.e. that the proposed exercise was within the proper ambit of the power);
  2. that the trustees were acting honestly;
  3. that in reaching their decision, the trustees had taken into account all relevant matters and had not taken into account irrelevant matters and had not reached a decision that no reasonable body of trustees could have reached

the effect of which would be to protect the trustees from any challenge to their decision by persons interested in the trust, and to make clear that the trustees were entitled to indemnity from the trust assets in respect of the costs or financial consequences of their decision. 

Reference was also made to two Jersey judgments which were consistent with the English and Guernsey decisions.  In the Jersey Court of Appeal case of Kay –v-HSBC International Trustee Ltd & Ors [2015] it was held that the court needed to be satisfied as to the rationality of the decision and that the length to which the court must go in examining the process by which the trustee arrived at the decision would depend on the particular decision.

The second Jersey case was helpful when considering the status of a letter of wishes.  In In the matter of the Rabaiotti 1980 Settlement [2000] it was said that if trustees were to slavishly follow a letter of wishes, their decision could be quashed on the grounds it is not their decision since the trustees must make up their own minds as to how they should exercise their discretion in the best interests of the beneficiaries.

This was supported by legal text[2] where it was said that the trustees must be careful to provide documentation revealing that they consciously exercised an independent discretion when making decisions.

Test to be applied

The court referred to the Jersey Kay case and said the essential test was that the court must satisfy itself:

  1. that the trustee's decision has been properly formed in good faith;
  2. that the decision is one which a reasonable trustee properly instructed could have reached; and
  3. that the decision has not been vitiated by any actual or potential conflict of interest.

Further, the court must not act as a rubber stamp and must be satisfied as to the rationality of the decision.  The court is not putting itself in the shoes of a trustee and exercising a discretion, but deciding if the decision is one which the trustee could properly be given general liberty to carry into effect.  It was noted in particular, that the court should not deprive a trustee of approval without good reason and that it should not place insurmountable hurdles in the way of trustees.

Parties' submissions

The Respondents argued that the trustees had adduced insufficient evidence for the application to be granted and further, there was an almost complete focus on the validity of the Letter of Wishes to the exclusion of other considerations.  Further, there was no real discernible evidence to set out the basis of A's decision, nor was there any evidence of the decision-making process.  They submitted that A was not aware of the individual circumstances of the beneficiaries or of there had been any changes to those.

In response, A argued that the decision was explained by the Letter of Wishes and that there was a minute by the independent directors setting matters out.  It was rare for a trustee to be criticised for following a letter of wishes.  Further, R1 had given no information to A as to why the proposed distributions were not in his interests, R1 was simply dissatisfied with his share.


The court held that a review of the documentation showed that A had considered the relevant points and had done its best to address them.  An affidavit filed by A showed a rational decision-making process and an explanation for the decision made.  R1 had chosen not to engage with A.  A would have been on unsafe ground if the Letter of Wishes had been blindly followed but R1 had not put up anything of substance to counteract it.


A trustee needs to show that that their decision has been properly formed in good faith. Is one which a reasonable trustee properly instructed could have reached and that the decision has not been vitiated by any actual or potential conflict of interest.  A trustee who blindly follows a letter of wishes may have difficulty in justifying a decision but if a proper decision-making process has been followed which produces a rational result, the court will not refuse to bless a decision simply because it may have reached a different conclusion.


[1] The Conflict of Laws, Dicey, Morris & Collins (15th Ed)

[2] Law relating to Trusts and Trustees, Underhill and Hayton (18th ed)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions