Guernsey: OECD: Implications For Guernsey

Last Updated: 27 February 2001
Article by Jonathan Hooley

Appendix 1 sets out a summary of the principal international initiatives affecting Guernsey. Of these, attention is currently focused on the OECD initiative, partly because it is the most recent body to have reported, but largely because it represents unfinished business.


The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) was established in 1960 as a co-operative organisation to promote policies that would 'achieve highest levels of sustainable economic growth' and 'contribute to the expansion of world trade '. Its membership currently comprises some 29 different countries, including all G7 countries and all member states of the EU. As such, it does not have any legislative or governmental function and is merely an advisory body. However, its pronouncements carry substantial authority and it is likely that many countries, including non-members, would take careful note of any recommendations made by it. Tax issues are the responsibility of the Committee on Fiscal Affairs which, amongst other things, has been instrumental in drafting and promoting a standard double tax agreement, which has formed the basis of many of the bilateral double tax agreements that are currently in existence.

OECD Review Of Harmful Tax Competition

The process of reviewing offshore financial centres commenced in May 1996 as part of a wider exercise, whereby the OECD was asked to 'develop measures to counter the distorting effects of harmful tax competition on investment and financing decisions and the consequences for national tax bases', and report back in 1998. The Committee on Fiscal Affairs created a body known as the 'Special Sessions on Tax Competition;, under the joint chairmanship of representatives from France and Japan, which was responsible for the production of a report in early 1998. Although the report produced by this body was approved by the OECD council, it did not receive the OECD's unanimous approval. Both Luxembourg and Switzerland abstained and issued their own statements on the report's conclusions. This report led to the establishment of a Forum charged with the review of two matters. Firstly, preferential tax regimes offered by the OECD member countries, and secondly, the identification of 'tax havens'. The Forum published its initial report on 26 June 2000.

OECD Forum Report

The Report of the OECD Forum, published on 26 June 2000, contains two lists. Firstly, a list of the preferential regimes available in OECD member countries that are regarded as potentially harmful, and secondly, a list of jurisdictions that have been classified by the OECD as tax havens that had not, by the time the report was produced, given a commitment to co-operate with the OECD to eliminate what the OECD regard as harmful tax practices. As was expected, Guernsey, in common with Jersey and the Isle of Man, appears on the second of these two lists. The former list is of no specific relevance to Guernsey. However, it is worthy of note to those in the insurance industry, that the lists include preferential regimes applying to insurance in eight OECD member countries, ie. Austria, Belgium, Finland, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Luxembourg and Sweden, with the result that the 'harmful' features of these regimes will have to be removed by April 2003. The second list is less specific. It does not identify the specific tax measures that are regarded as being harmful. Quite how the OECD arrived at this list is not clear. The published criteria are not capable of objective re-evaluation.

What Does The OECD Want?

Precisely what the OECD expects is difficult to ascertain. In their report of 26 June 2000, the OECD Forum made much of the fact that six jurisdictions - Bermuda, The Cayman Islands, Cyprus, Malta, Mauritius and San Marino - had made a political commitment to 'eliminate their harmful tax practices and to comply with the principles of the 1998 report', and even published the letters of commitment on the OECD website. However, the letters published did not include the all important annexes to these letters, listing the specific commitments that have been given by those jurisdictions. One of the key matters which the OECD are likely to press for is a commitment to exchange information. However, this is a far from straightforward matter which raises a number of issues, including:

  1. whether the information will merely need to be supplied on request or spontaneously;
  2. whether it covers civil as well as criminal matters;
  3. whether it would be supplied with the conclusion of a comprehensive double tax agreement or merely an agreement to exchange tax information.

The other aspect likely to be of interest to the OECD is a 'ring-fenced' tax regime. The Isle of Man pre-empted the publication of the OECD report with a proposal to levy zero rates of tax on certain types of business, including insurance and shipping, without restricting this benefit to businesses owned from outside the Isle of Man. The equivalent in Guernsey would be to remove the conditions that companies have to satisfy in seeking exempt or international status, whilst safeguarding the potential loss of tax from Guernsey resident shareholders by enhanced anti-avoidance measures. However, the essential point is whether this would be acceptable to the OECD. At this stage this is difficult to predict.

Appendix 1

International Initiatives Affecting Guernsey

The Edwards Report

An investigation by the UK Government into the financial regulation of the Crown Dependencies Report, published in November 1998. The Report contained some recommendations concerning legislative approach and regulation. However, Guernsey's reputation for stability, integrity, professionalism, competence and good regulation was endorsed by the Report. The Island's regulatory systems, judicial and prosecution systems and co-operation with other jurisdictions were praised.

Financial Stability Forum

The repot by the Financial Stability Forum considered the implications of offshore financial centres (OFC's) for global financial stability, ranking jurisdictions into three categories based on their perceived quality of supervision and degree of co-operation. The report was based on a survey of all OFC's into their standards for supervision, co-operation and information sharing. The report categorised OFC's into three groups. Guernsey was placed in the top group.

Financial Action Task Force

The exploitation by criminals of weaknesses in jurisdictions, enabling the continuation of money-laundering activities, was investigated by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). All countries and territories which are part of the global financial system have been urged to change any rules or practices which impede the fight against money-laundering. Those with serious systemic problems were identified in the report by the FATF, which sought to identify those countries that are non-co-operative in the 'fight against money-laundering', or more specifically, who have rules and practices which impede against international co-operation against money-laundering. Fifteen jurisdictions, including a number of recognised OFC's, were names as having non-co-operative practices. The list did not include Guernsey.

EU Code Of Conduct

In December 1997 the ECOFIN Council of the EU member states decided to establish a committee under the Chairmanship of Dawn Primarolo, a UK Government Treasury Minister, to consider fiarness in taxation. This committee was charged with reviewing preferential tax regimes, ie. regimes that provide a lower rate of tax than that generally applicable in the jurisdiction concerned, in the European member states and their dependent territories. The work of the European Code of Conduct was similar, but not identical, to that of the OECD. Firstly, it encompassed all aspects of taxation, not just those related to financial transactions. Secondly, it sought to identify preferential tax regimes, rather than characterise a jurisdiction as a whole as a tax haven or not a tax haven. Adoption of the Code of Conduct Group's work was tied to agreement on two other EU tax measures, including the proposed Saving Directive, and was therefore delayed. However, the report of the EU Code of Conduct Group was finally accepted by the heads of the EU member states at their summit on 20 June 2000. The final list, produced by the Code of Conduct Group, listed five measures applicable to Guernsey as being potentially harmful:

  1. exempt companies
  2. international loan business;
  3. international companies;
  4. offshore insurance companies;
  5. insurance companies.

The latter measure refers to the little used concession available in Guernsey, whereby qualifying offshore insurers, who have elected to pay tax at 20% on their income, are entitled to defer their liability by reference to a claims related formula.


A study undertaken by a Forum established by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) intended firstly to identify potentially harmful preferential regimes operated by OECD member countries and to identify jurisdictions regarded as tax havens. And secondly, to recommend actions to be taken against the jurisdictions concerned. The Forum produced its report on 26 June 2000, listing 35 jurisdictions that were found to meet the tax haven criteria set by the OECD. The listing does not include the names of the jurisdictions which have already made a political commitment to eliminate their harmful practices. Guernsey was included on this list. A further list, the 'OECD List of Unco-operative Tax Havens' is due to be completed by 31 July 2001. The OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs has recommended that OECD member countries adopt a general framework which will facilitate the ability of countries to take defensive measures against unco-operative jurisdictions. It is proposed that once the Forum finalises its recommendations , defensive measures are implemented against the jurisdictions appearing on the list of 'Unco-operative Tax Havens' as of 31 July 2001.

Appendix 2

Key Factors In Identifying Tax Havens For the Purposes Of The OECD Report

  1. No Or Only Nominal Taxes
  2. No or only nominal taxation on the relevant income is the starting point to classify a jurisdiction as a tax haven.

  3. Lack Of Effective Exchange Of Information
  4. Tax havens typically have in place laws or administrative practices under which businesses and individuals can benefit from strict secrecy rules and other protections against scrutiny by tax authorities, thereby preventing the effective exchanges of information on taxpayers benefiting from the low tax jurisdiction.

  5. Lack Of Transparency
  6. A lack of transparency in the operation of the legislative, legal or administrative provisions is another factor in identifying tax havens.

  7. No Substantial Activities

The absence of a requirement that the activity be substantial is important, since it would suggest that a jurisdiction may be attempting to attract investment or transactions that are purely tax driven.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions