Germany: Germany Strengthens Data Protection Act, Introduces Data Breach Notification Requirement

Last Updated: 2 November 2009
Article by Mauricio F. Paez and Jörg Rehder

In July 2009, the German legislature passed various controversial amendments (the "Amendments") to the Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, Germany's Federal Data Protection Act ("BDSG" or the "Act").1 While these Amendments were not as extensive as many had initially hoped or feared, a few of the Amendments will undoubtedly have an immediate impact on companies doing business in Germany.

The Amendments cover a range of privacy and business issues, including marketing use of data lists, administration of employee data, and contractual provisions in data transfer agreements. They also increase the maximum fines for violating data protection laws and grant greater powers to data protection authorities ("DPAs"). The most significant change, however, is a new requirement to provide notification for data breaches2 that is similar in scope to state statutes in the United States.3


The BDSG prohibits the collection,4 processing,5 and use6 of "personal data," unless the affected individual (the "Data Subject") expressly consents to, or German law specifically authorizes, the activity.7 Under the BDSG, "personal data" is broadly defined as any information concerning the personal or material circumstances of a natural person.8 One of the widely disputed activities permitted by the BDSG is the "list privilege" exception.

Under the previous "list privilege" exception, personal data such as a person's name, address, job title, and year of birth may be used for a company's own advertising and marketing purposes and transferred to third parties (such as direct marketing companies) for similar purposes without the prior consent of the Data Subject, provided that such data is pooled in a list covering a group of people.9 Data Subjects are entitled to object to such activities,10 but they rarely do. Many privacy advocates believe that this exception allows for large volumes of personal data to be sold at relatively low prices, particularly over the internet.11 Accordingly, the amended BDSG requires the individual or legal person who is collecting, processing, or using personal data (the "Data Controller")12 to obtain consent from Data Subjects when engaging in any of these activities for the purpose of marketing or selling personal data,13 unless certain relatively simple conditions are met.14

In recent years, Germany experienced a dramatic increase in data breaches and scandals involving the illegal trade of address lists and bank account information.15 In addition, some of the largest German companies in key industries, including transportation, finance, automotive, retail, and health care, have been accused of encroaching on employees' constitutional rights to privacy,16 e.g., by monitoring the personal data and activities of their employees.17 Media coverage of these developments sparked widespread public interest among politicians, trade unions, and consumers on the mishandling of personal data.18 Consequently, a number of legislative proposals earlier this year centered on a complete abolition of the "list privilege."

In the face of looming German federal elections,19 however, many lawmakers were hesitant to institute any major legislative changes. Certain interest groups also claimed that data protection limitations on direct marketing would seriously harm entire industry sectors and lead to a higher unemployment rate, which was politically unacceptable. As a compromise, the German legislature passed the Amendments to impose tighter restrictions on the commercial use of personal data while keeping the "list privilege" mostly intact. Most noteworthy among the Amendments is the introduction of a data breach notification requirement.

Data Breach Notification

Under the Amendments, Data Controllers must notify Data Subjects and DPAs of any unauthorized access or unlawful transfer of personal data, if the incident "threatens significant harm" to the rights and protected interests of the Data Subject.20 The Act does not specifically define "significant harm," which means that companies are given a certain amount of leeway to determine whether an unauthorized or unlawful activity meets this threshold. Nonetheless, if "significant harm" is threatened, then notification must be provided "immediately" after measures have been taken to secure the data and ensure that criminal investigations will not be adversely affected.21 This notice requirement is limited to a breach of certain kinds of data or data elements, such as bank or credit card information, "sensitive information," or information that is subject to professional or official confidentiality protections.22 The Act defines "sensitive information" as any information concerning an individual's race, ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, membership in a trade union, health, or sex life.23 By contrast, in the United States, notification is typically triggered by unauthorized access or use of a Data Subject's name along with another identifying element, such as government-issued Social Security number, certain banking information, personal health information, or other personal information that can be used to commit identity theft.24 Thus, the Amendments require only a single trigger for notification while most U.S. state statutes require two.

The Amendments also provide guidelines for delivery of data breach notifications. For example, in cases where individual notification of an incident that affects a large number of Data Subjects is too burdensome, notice must be made via at least a half-page advertisement in at least two daily national newspapers or by other means that would provide similar exposure.25 This requirement is similar to the substitute notice requirements under many U.S. state statutes.26 Companies should carefully consider the reputational and public relations impact of making such a notification via newspaper or other media before doing so.

Although public disclosure of data breaches in Germany will probably bring to light many objectionable activities that may otherwise go unreported, the new notification requirement will add costs to companies operating in Germany or maintaining data that falls under German jurisdiction. In 2008, the average cost of a data breach in Germany was more than €2.41 million (approximately $3.5 million) per breach and €112 (approximately $165) per compromised record,27 which includes the average cost of notifications at €80,000 per breach or €4 per record.28 These figures are low relative to data breach costs in the United States because the previous BDSG did not require notification to Data Subjects or publication of data breaches.29 In the United States, where the majority of states require some form of data breach notification,30 the average cost of a data breach in 2008 was more than $6.6 million (approximately €4.5 million) per breach and $202 (approximately €137) per compromised record.31 These costs are expected to grow in future years, particularly in connection with the anticipated increase in data protection or privacy litigation.32 In general, the U.S. legal obligations and industry best practices related to a data breach—e.g., notification to individuals and state agencies, legal and reputational risk containment, and technical remediation—have proven to be more costly to businesses than other data protection and privacy safeguards required by U.S. law.33 Such differences between the two countries suggest that the costs associated with a data breach in Germany, at least those related to providing notification, are likely to rise under the new BDSG.

Further, it is important to note the possibility of a domino effect that Germany's data breach notification requirement may have on the European Union and its Member States.34 The history of data breach notification requirements in the United States began when one state, California, enacted a data breach notification law in 2003.35 Since then, a majority of U.S. states have followed suit,36 and the U.S. Congress is now considering a national breach notification statute.37

While the implementation of the E.U. Directive on Data Protection38 by individual Member States has made the European Union one of the most highly regulated jurisdictions in the world with respect to protecting personal data, the European Union still has no general data breach notification requirement. There is evidence, however, that the European data protection landscape may be changing. The E.U. Council is in the process of amending its telecommunications directives to include an industry-specific data breach notification obligation for communication services providers.39 Some neighboring non-E.U. jurisdictions, such as Norway, already have laws requiring notice to DPAs of data breaches.40 The United Kingdom has a de facto notification law imposed through the U.K. independent data protection agency's recommendation that companies notify it of "serious" breaches,41 which may explain why there is ongoing debate on whether to adopt legislation42 and the U.K. Parliament has considered such laws but declined to pass them.43 These conditions, along with Germany's recent Amendments to its BDSG, suggest that E.U. Member States, or the European Union as a whole, may be moving toward a more comprehensive data breach notification regime.

Other Amendments

Other Amendments to the BDSG include:

Protection of Employee Data. Any processing of employee data is permissible only if the processing is necessary for the administration, i.e., establishment, maintenance, or termination, of the employment relationship.44 For the purposes of investigating employee offenses, employee data can be collected only where (1) the data substantiates the suspicion that the employee has committed an offense in the context of employment, (2) the collection, processing, and use of the data is necessary for the investigation, and (3) the type and scope of the collection, processing, and use of the data is proportional to the employee's protected rights and the circumstances of the investigation.45

Contractual Requirements for Outsourcing. If a company outsources its direct marketing to a third party, the contracting entities must enter into a written agreement concerning the processing of the personal data. This agreement must meet 10 new conditions to be valid and legally enforceable.46 These conditions include, for example, scope, purpose, security measures, obligations, subcontracting rights, return or disposal of data, and the requirement to audit the third party.47 Failure to conclude such a contract exposes each of the parties to a potential fine.48 Practitioners believe that DPAs are likely to enforce this provision quite vigilantly because (1) the German public consistently expresses concern about direct marketing activities in Germany, and (2) DPAs can quickly determine whether parties are in compliance with this requirement.

Protection of the Data Protection Officer. A company's internal data protection officer ("DPO"), who ensures the company's compliance with Germany's data protection laws and acts as a contact person for employees on privacy matters, may be dismissed only for cause.49 This special protection extends until one year after the end of employee's term as the company's DPO, unless management has "important grounds" for terminating the DPO.50 Companies must also permit and finance the continued education and training of their DPOs on data protection matters.51 A natural, though probably unintended, consequence of this new provision is that many companies will invariably prefer an external DPO over an internal DPO. External DPOs are specifically permitted under the Act52 and are less cumbersome to remove.

Increased Power of DPAs. DPAs can order companies to remediate compliance, technical, or organizational failures relating to the collection, processing, and use of personal data.53 Depending on the circumstances of the violation, they can also implement special data processing procedures or prohibit companies from collecting, processing, or using personal data.54

Stricter Punishments. The maximum fine for failure to comply with data protection laws is now €50,000 (previously €25,000) for ordinary offenses, e.g., failing to appoint a DPO, encrypt a data transfer, or ensure that a third-party service provider meets the technical or organizational measures prescribed by the Act, and €300,000 (previously €250,000) for serious offenses, e.g., accessing, collecting, or processing data that is not publicly available, processing or using data beyond the scope of their authorized purpose, or failing to inform Data Subjects of a breach that may cause them "significant harm."55 Moreover, if the Data Controller made profits that exceed €50,000 or €300,000, respectively, by violating data protection rules, then the authorities may raise the fine proportionally.56

These revisions became effective September 1, 2009, although data collected prior to this date for marketing purposes will be subject to a transition period under which the previous rules are effective until August 31, 2012.


Europe, like the United States and other countries around the world,57 may be developing a trend for adopting data protection laws that include a general obligation to notify government agencies, individuals, or both of the unauthorized access or use of personal data. The Amendments reflect a growing awareness of data protection issues among the European public and the potential for increased enforcement of data protection laws by European DPAs. For example, in September 2009, nearly 25,000 people took to the streets of Berlin to demand better protection of personal data,58 and Germany's new coalition government—which will be formed by the end of October 2009—has declared that it intends to pass legislation specifically concerning data protection for employees and in the workplace. These activities suggest that any infringement of data protection rules will become riskier.

To ensure compliance with the Amendments and likely future legislation in the European Union, companies should at minimum:

  • Establish standard policies and operating procedures for data breach investigations, remediations, and notifications related to personal data, which include data beyond that which would trigger notification under U.S. law;
  • Assess and restructure the use or transfer of data lists and other personal data; and
  • Review and consider renegotiating service, employment, and other data-related contracts.

In making these changes, companies may want to take advantage of the opportunity to evaluate their overall data protection practices and consider implementing a more holistic approach to data protection compliance that anticipates subsequent legislation in this area. To avoid business risks, including fines, audits, and reputational damage associated with legal noncompliance, companies must properly focus their compliance efforts. Companies should consult with legal counsel for assistance in handling these matters.


1.Bundesdatenschutzgesetz [Federal Data Protection Act], Dec. 20, 1990, BGBl. I at 2954, as amended.

2."Data breach" is a generic term encompassing any event that results in the compromise of the security or integrity of personal data.

3.In the United States, 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands have enacted legislation requiring notification of security breaches involving personal information, although the triggers for and the recipients of any notification vary on a state-by-state basis. States with no data breach notification law are Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, New Mexico, and South Dakota. State Security Breach Notification Laws, National Conference of State Legislatures, available at (all web sites herein last visited October 20, 2009).

4."Collection" means the acquisition of data on the Data Subject. BDSG § 3 para. 3.

5."Processing" means the storage, modification, transfer, blocking, and erasure of personal data. BDSG § 3 para. 4.

6."Use" means any utilization of personal data other than processing. BDSG § 3 para. 5.

7.BDSG § 4 para. 1.

8.BDSG § 3 para. 1. By contrast, like many other U.S. states, California more narrowly defines "personal information" as a prescribed combination of specific categories of data:

'personal information' means an individual's first name or first initial and last name in combination with any one or more of the following data elements, when either the name or the data elements are not encrypted:
(1) Social Security number.
(2) Driver's license number or California Identification Card number.
(3) Account number, credit or debit card number, in combination with any required security code, access code, or password that would permit access to an individual's financial account.
(4) Medical information.
5) Health insurance information.

California Computer Security Breach Notification Act, Cal. Civ. Code Ann. § 1798.82(e) (2009).

9.BDSG § 28 para. 3 (previous version). It is legal to transfer or use personal data for purposes of marketing and advertisement if the data, compiled in lists or otherwise combined, concern members of a group of persons and are restricted to:

  • the Data Subject's membership of this group of persons,
  • occupation or type of business,
  • name,
  • title,
  • academic degrees,
  • address,
  • year of birth,

and if there is no reason to assume that the Data Subject has a legitimate interest in his data being excluded from transfer. Id.

10.BDSG §§ 6 para. 1, 28 para. 4.

11.Jochen Lehmann, Amendments to Federal Data Protection Law: Analysis, Cecile Park Publ'g, Aug. 2009, available at .

12.Similar to the E.U. Data Protection Directive, see infra note 34, the BDSG defines "Data Controller" broadly to refer to any person or body collecting, processing, or using personal data on his or her own behalf or commissioning others to do the same. BDSG § 3 para. 7.

13.BDSG § 28 para. 3.

14.Consent is not required if the data is necessary for: (1) marketing the Data Controller's own goods and services; (2) advertising in a business context, e.g., for professional services; and (3) advertising for charitable donations. Aggregated personal data, e.g., data lists, can also be transferred without consent if (1) both the sender and the recipient keep records of the transfer for two years, and (2) the advertisement clearly identifies the original collector of the data. BDSG § 28 para. 3, § 34 para. 1a.

15.Privacy and Data Protection Law: European Developments, Ernst & Young, July 2009. For example, Deutsche Telekom lost personal data for about 17 million T-Mobile Germany customers in the spring of 2006 when thieves got their hands on a storage device containing personal data, such as names, addresses, cell phone numbers, birth dates, and email addresses (including some for high-profile German citizens). T-Mobile Germany said it has taken multiple steps to shore up its security since the breach, including tighter restrictions on who has access to information, more complex passwords, and increased monitoring of security systems. "T-Mobile Lost 17 Million Subscribers' Personal Data," Information Week, October 6, 2008, available at .

16.Grundgesetz [Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany], arts. 1, 2. Articles 1 and 2 of the German Constitution provide for the respect for "human dignity" and "personal freedoms" that have been interpreted by German courts to include the right to be free of employer monitoring, unless specifically provided for under the employment contract.

17.Privacy and Data Protection Law: European Developments, Ernst & Young, July 2009. Some of these activities include: (1) screening the workforce for corruption and automatic filtering, deletion, and control of private emails of employees; (2) spying on employees by compliance teams; and (3) illegal storage and transfer of medical data of employees. Id.


19.German federal elections took place on September 27, 2009.

20.BDSG § 42a.



23.BDSG § 3 para. 9.

24.See, e.g., California Computer Security Breach Notification Act, supra note 8.

25.BDSG § 42a.

26.See, e.g., California Computer Security Breach Notification Act, CAL. CIV. CODE ANN. §§ 1798.29(g)(3), 1798.82(g)(3) (2009).

27.The average cost is a composite of cost factors, which include:

  • outlays for breach detection, escalation, notification, and response;
  • fees for legal, investigative, and administrative services;
  • losses due to customer defections, opportunity cost, and reputation management; and
  • expenses associated with customer support, such as information hotlines and credit monitoring subscriptions.

See Cost of Data Beach, Germany 2008 Annual Study, Ponemon Institute, available at . Data breaches with mobile devices are more expensive: Lost or stolen laptop costs averaged €123.63 per data record compared with €106.85 for other data breaches. Id.



30.See supra note 3.

31.See Cost of Data Beach, United States 2008 Annual Study, Ponemon Institute, available at .

32.Since 2005, the cost of a data breach has grown by nearly 40 percent or more than $64 on a per-victim basis. Id.

33.See Cost of Data Beach, United States 2008 Annual Study, Ponemon Institute, available at .

34.A "Member State" of the European Union is any one of the 27 sovereign states that have acceded to the European Union. A complete list of the current E.U. Member States is available at .

35.California Computer Security Breach Notification Act, Cal. Civ. Code Ann. § 1798.82, et seq. (2009).

36.See supra note 3.

37.S. 1490, 111th Cong. (2009) (entitled, "A bill to prevent and mitigate identity theft, to ensure privacy, to provide notice of security breaches, and to enhance criminal penalties, law enforcement assistance, and other protections against security breaches, fraudulent access, and misuse of personally identifiable information").

38.Council Directive 1995/46, 1995 O.J. (L281) 31 (EC), at .

39.Resolution on the Common Position Adopted by the Council with a View to the Adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2002/22/EC on Universal Service and Users' Rights Relating to Electronic Communications Networks, Directive 2002/58/EC Concerning the Processing of Personal Data and the Protection of Privacy in the Electronic Communications Sector and Regulation (EC) No. 2006/2004 on Cooperation between National Authorities Responsible for the Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws, Eur. Parl. Doc. (TA 360) 6 (2009), available at .

40.Personal Data Act 2000, § 27 (Nor.), available at .

41.The Information Commissioner's Office does not specifically define what constitutes a "serious" breach but provides general guidelines and examples for making such an assessment; important factors for determining a "serious" breach include potential of harm to individuals and the volume and sensitivity of compromised data. See Information Commissioner's Office, Notification of Data Security Breaches to the Information Commissioner's Office, Mar. 27, 2008, available at .

42.See, e.g., Tom Espiner, "Data Breach Law: IT Managers Say 'No,'" ZDNet UK, June 5, 2008, available at,1000000567,10008370o-2000331828b,00.htm .

43.See, e.g., House of Commons Justice Committee, First Report, 2007-08, H.C. 154 (recommending data breach reporting requirements under the Data Protection Act 1998), available at .

44.BDSG § 32.


46.BDSG § 11 para. 2.


48.BDSG § 43 para. 1 no. 2b.

49.BDSG § 4f para. 3. The Act requires (1) all companies that have more than nine individuals regularly involved with automatic data processing, (2) all companies involved in the commercial transfer of personal data, and (3) companies involved with the commercial transfer of personal data for market research or opinion research purposes to appoint DPOs in Germany.



52.BDSG § 4f para. 2

53.BDSG § 38 para. 5.


55.BDSG § 43 para. 3. Ordinary violations are enumerated in BDSG § 43 para. 1; serious violations are enumerated in BDSG §§ 43 para. 2, 44.

56.BDSG § 43 para. 3.

57.Outside of the United States and the European Union, countries such as Australia, Canada, and Japan have laws directly imposing data breach notification obligations. Alana Maurushat, Data Breach Notification Law Across the World from California to Australia, Univ. of New S. Wales L. Research Series (Paper No. 11), Apr. 2009, available at .

58."25,000 March for More Privacy from Authorities," The Local: Germany's News in English, at .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Mauricio F. Paez
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.