Germany: Law Firms and Multinational Partnerships

Easier Admission Procedures For Non-German Lawyers To The German Bar
Last Updated: 20 January 2000

Germany is politically younger than the United States: its existence started in 1871. Since then its history does not have a record of being monotonous: Bismarck, a Kaiser. the Weimar Republic, a dictator, a democratic society in West-Germany, a Communist society in East Germany set the tone for music not always appreciated by the rest of the world.

Whether the lawyers mirrored that type of society each time remains an open question. Every time there was a change in society, it always took years of adjustment. To pass a law updating the status of lawyers varied between 3 and 14 years:

From 1871 to 1878 (See Endnote 1)

From 1933 to 1936 (See Endnote 2)

From 1945 to 1959 (See Endnote 3)

This article focuses on the issues of admission to the German Bar and its impacts on a global society in the new millennium

1) Development of the Legal Profession

In 1780 Prussia abolished the profession of lawyers. Before that they were required to wear long robes, because Frederic the Great wanted to make sure that the "rascals" ("Spitzbuben") should be "recognized from a proper distance". There was a complete turnaround almost 100 years later after the first German Unification in 1871. It was acknowledged that the principle of "free advocacy" is essential. Liberalism promoted the idea successfully that a lawyer has to be independent of the State. His profession was not considered as a business, but as a "service for law". This independence of the lawyer was celebrated as the Magna Carta for lawyers. The independence of the lawyer put him - in a sense - on equal footing with the judge.

These liberal ideas in the 19th century created the framework to make sure that lawyers play an important role in conflicts between the citizen and the State on one hand and between citizen themselves.

While the German lawmaker acknowledged this principle, it restricted at the same time that the lawyer may only plead in the local civil court where he is admitted. This restriction of admission to a certain civil court (Landgericht) was repealed as recently as January 1st 2000.

Finally a law was enacted to allow German lawyers to plead in all First instance German Civil Courts. The old restriction was only struck down due to developments on the level of European law and due to certain circumstances in East Germany.

After World War 2 a Federal Law was enacted in West Germany dealing with the rights and duties of lawyers in 1959.

A forerunner was enacted in the British Zone in 1949 (See Endnote 4).

The Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung (BRAO) envisaged primarily a lawyer representing his client in court. The number of practising lawyers was so small that advertisement was considered as an act of unfair competition.

This went so far that lawyers were not even permitted to quote their areas of practice.

No need was seen to specialize, because de jure, a lawyer was authorized to deal with every aspect of law. This turned out to be wishful thinking.

In the course of decades lawyers developed a reputation that they can talk about everything - even if they know little or nothing about the subject!

Competition was restricted to the local market, because every lawyer was admitted just to one local civil court.

The income of lawyers was secured by a Fee Schedule. A Federal Law prescribed the fees of a lawyer corresponding to the value of the litigation. The lawyer was not permitted to undercut these legal fees. That was considered as an act of unfair competition. Since the 1980s the fee schedules could not keep up with the cost explosion.

Fee agreements by charging clients on an hourly basis became more and more common. The US system was a model insofar, contingency agreements are still illegal today.

2. Growth of the legal profession

Right after World War 2 a handful of judges got the new Court system off the ground in Munich in October 1945.

Admission of lawyers was a slow process.

By 1965 about 20.000 lawyers were admitted.

Currently we are approaching 100,000 lawyers in a country with close to 80 million inhabitants.

There are two reasons for this extraordinary growth: students have been flooding the universities. No technical equipment was needed for law studies. It was sufficient to provide appropriate libraries and law professors. Medical studies on the other hand required expensive technical facilities. As a consequence it was difficult to stop the "Rebellion of masses" to join the legal profession different from other professions. (See Endnote 6)

Graduates had four options. They could join the court system as a judge, obtain a job in the legal departments of administrative bodies, join a legal division of corporate headquarters or become a lawyer.

Currently the court system cannot absorb more than 4% of the graduates as judges, about 75% become lawyers.

3. East Germany joins West Germany in 1990

East Germany had only 600 practising lawyers in October 1989 serving 17 million inhabitants. Between November 1989 and October 3rd 1990, the day of German unity, additional 1400 lawyers were admitted to the Bar. Needless to say, new careers were in the pipe-line.

By looking at the sheer numbers it becomes evident how limited the influence of the legal profession must have been in East Germany, more a matter of criminal defense and divorce cases.

Civil litigation was of extremely reduced significance in a closed system. There were other ways to settle economic differences without the intervention of lawyers.

"Going East" after 1990 produced a comparable mentality as "going West" in the United States in the 18th century. In spite of the same language and a common currency not all encounters have been happy ones in the legal profession.East German lawyers had little problems to be admitted to the West German system of lawyers, unless there was evidence of so-called "Stasi activities". (See Endnote 7)

The transition to a service-oriented society and the awareness to pay for such services was a new experience for East German citizens.

4. Supra-regional law firms

It was a typical situation to have just a one man law firm in the 1950's and 1960's. Compared to the Anglo-Saxon countries law firms remained extremely small in size. The main reason was the admission to one civil court. This situation was radically changed with a decision of the Federal Supreme Court allowing supra-regional law firms in 1989. (See Endnote 8)

A few months earlier the Bar Association of Dusseldorf had paved the road for the new development by allowing supra-regional law firms.

As soon as the ink of the decision of the Supreme Court was dry, supra-regional law firms were mushrooming all over Germany. A considerable number of them collapsed shortly after. The lawyers were not prepared for the management of such new entities. There was little infrastructure. The old truth came out again that Germany is a conglomerate of different mentalities: It turned out that a Bavarian law firm was better equipped to cooperate with an Austrian law firm than with a law firm from Hamburg. The Hamburg lawyer may have communicated easier with an English lawyer than with his Bavarian counterpart.

General trends in the international arena made it more and more transparent that the admission of the German lawyer to one civil court has become out-dated.

In 1994 the Federal Law maker allowed every West German lawyer to appear in every civil court (Landgericht) as of January 1st, 2000. (See Endnote 9). Some modifications were introduced at the end of 1999 to put East German lawyers on the same platform.

5. The Interprofessional Law Firm

Reviewing the legislative material of 1993, it becomes clear that there was no way to stop upcoming dramatic changes in the legal profession. (See Endnote 10)

One of the items was the interprofessional cooperation in form of a partnership. Lawyers may have a partnership with patents attorneys, tax consultants and auditors. (See Endnote 11)

Cooperation with other free professions, such as architects etc. is in the pipeline.

6. New forms of practice according to the "Partnerschaftsgesellschaftsgesetz"

The Partnerschaftsgesellschaftsgesetz (PartGG) was enacted on July 1st, 1995. (See Endnote 12)

Before that no lawyer was allowed to become shareholder of a corporation or to restrict his liability.

The PartGG is a start to restrict liability to some extent. Liability can be pinpointed to the partner being in charge of a particular case. As a consequence the remaining partners are not liable with their private property but just with the partnership's assets. Under certain circumstances the PartGG even allows to limit liability to a certain amount.

7. Lawyers organised under GmbH

After years of discussion the Bavarian Supreme Court declared for the first time that lawyers may organize themselves as GmbH (company with limited responsibility). (See Endnote 13)

That decision was reconfirmed in 1996. (See Endnote 14)

As of March 1st 1999 a Federal law permitted the existence of a lawyer's GmbH. To protect the client insurance requirements were raised by a factor of 10.

8. Multinational Law Firms

From the supra-regional partnership it was only a small step to legalize a multinational law firm. Such an enormous step forward would not have been possible without the ongoing discussion on the restrictive admission to civil courts. The main pressure, however, had come from outside, namely the European Court. In a landmark decision of the European Court of 1988 the court ruled against the Federal Republic of Germany, that a lawyer within the European Union giving services to his client should not be prevented from access to the courts in Germany. (See Endnote 15)

This was a new version of a "policy of revolving doors'

This ruling on admission procedure was the start of a new era. The philosophy on what lawyers are doing had changed.

It became possible to permit partnerships with other law firms of the European Union.

For the first time one could see other European law firms opening an office in Germany. The logistics behind that required some type of procedure be admitted to a local Bar Association.

The underlying principles were based on

  • Freedom of movement
  • Freedom of establishing a domicile
  • Freedom of offering services in the other country for a limited time.

Such freedoms were locked into the EC-Treaty since 1958. (See Endnote 16)

These principles had to be translated in a painstaking procedure into EC-Directives. The Member States have an obligation to transform European Directives into national law.

This tedious process has now gained substantial momentum in the legal profession.

9. Can US law firms form multinational partnerships with German law firms?

The German lawmaker decided to go beyond the boundaries of the European Union. It allows multinational partnerships, even if a lawyer comes from outside the European Union.

The crucial question is:

Can the lawyer be admitted to the local Bar Association?

Before the law of Section 206 and Section 207 BRAO was amended in 1989, a lawyer needed special permission on the grounds of a law, which was not even dealing with lawyers. (See Endnote 17)

It became more and more transparent that Germany had not sufficiently acknowledged, that the person submitting the application was a practising lawyer in his home country. Formerly a partnership with German lawyers was not legal. To open a law firm in Germany outside the European Union depended on the Reciprocity Clause. Germany signed the last update of the General Agreement on Trade and Services (GATTS) on April 15th, 1934. (See Endnote 18)

The Reciprocity Clause was replaced by the Most-Favoured-Nation-Treatment. Each Member accords to services of any other Member treatment no less favourable than it accords to like services of any other country. As a consequence all lawyers of the Member States of GATTS are now allowed to open a law firm in Germany. (See Endnote 19)

GATTS became effective on January 1st, 1995. There was a quick reaction of the Federal Ministry of Justice: 29 days later an Ordinance to improve the Position of Foreign Lawyers" stated that the US term "Attorney at Law" is on the same footing as the term of "Rechtsanwalt"

The Ordinance of January 29, 1995 entitles the American attorneys-at-law to open an office in Germany. (See Endnote 20) According to Section 206 BRAO in its latest version the attorney-at-law is free to give legal advice, however restricted to the law of the country of origin and the international law. Whether he can give advice on European law is still a matter of dispute.

The attorney-at-law is allowed to form a partnership with German lawyers. His title "attorney-at-law" supplemented with his country of origin may now be printed on the letter- head in association with his German partners.

More ordinances for other countries are expected to come. There is no doubt anymore that the title "Attorney at Law" is officially acknowledged. It may not be easy for the US reader to appreciate that this can be an issue. Titles in Germany, however, have caused more problems than anywhere else. (See Endnote 21)

US-multinational partnerships are permitted and in light of a global economy they are beneficial to serve business interests effectively.

However, an international partnership only works if the lawyers educate themselves about the differences in the method of practice in the other country.

While the end result of the substantive rules of law are relatively similar, the main distinction is in the manner in which cases are handled, most especially litigation, because of the differences in procedural rules and practice. Thus, for example, a German attorney must become acquainted with the extensive use of discovery and the possible consequences for failure to comply with discovery demands, whereas the American attorney must understand that the lack of discovery as a tool for preparation of a case in Germany requires a different approach to resolving a case.

10. Admission to the Bar

Different from the United States the German Bar Association does not take any examinations to he admitted. With qualification as "Assessor" the admission to the Bar becomes a mere formality.

In order to be admitted, the only obstacle to overcome is to give evidence on personal integrity.

11. Admission of Foreign Lawyers inside the European Union

In principle the Sections 206 and 207 BRAO authorize lawyers of the European Union to set up offices in Germany. The legal advice is limited to the law of the country of origin and international law. They may only carry their home title as a professional.

The Eignungsprufungsgesetz . enacted on January 1st, 1991 enlarges the scope of practice for lawyers of the European Union (See Endnote 22).

If they pass the exam they can practise as a member of the Bar.

It requires a law degree from one of the States of the European Union that entitles them to practise in their own jurisdiction. The professional training must have taken minimum of three years.

In case these requirements are satisfied, the foreign lawyer is qualified to pass an exam before the Board of Examiners who also take the Second State Examination for German jurists. Different from the Second State Exam for Germans the topics are adjusted to the situation of foreign professionals.

The exam focuses on four areas of law: Civil law and the Rules of Professional Conduct are mandatory. The candidates have to select two more topics as options.

The examination consists of a written and an oral part and has to be carried out in German. The candidate may repeat the examination twice.

The successful graduate cannot only practise in Germany. but may also keep his office in his home state.

The procedure of the Eignungsprüfung is only open for passport holders of the European Union.

12. Developments on the level of the European Union

The basic ideas of the establishment of the European Community (EC) are laid down in the Treaty of Rome of 1958.

The legal source for multinational entities can be found in Art. 5 to ff EWGW. These regulations, confirmed by the European Court, supported the principle of non-discrimination. (See Endnote 23)

Practically every European country has a different approach with lawyers.

Belgium providing the European capital has made an early start to liberalize the situation in favour of international lawyers since 1990. Of course such foreign lawyers had to be registered at the Belgian State Bar (8List) and are submitted to the Professional Rules of the Belgian Bar.

The foreign lawyer is restricted to advise in foreign law and European Law and needs 3 years of professional experience in Belgium.

A number of European countries permit law firms in the format of a corporation.

The Netherlands even permit a Holding. (See Endnote 24)

If a law firm incorporates the question comes up whether undisclosed shareholders are permitted. England. Wales and Northern Ireland do not exclude that, but impose certain restrictions. (See Endnote 25)

One successful international structure is called the EWIV, which was introduced in 1985. This can be a cooperation of law firms in different European countries. It has one legal seat and is officially registered.

13. Crossborder Legal Service

A European directive of 1977 imposed free crossborder services for European lawyers. The first transformation into German law was declared as null and void by the European Court of Justice (See Endnote 26).

The revised wording of the Rechtsanwaltsdienstleistungsgesetz (RADG) became effective in 1990. (See Endnote 27)

Since then lawyers of the European Union may practise law under their title used in their native country for a short period of time. Such rights have been without precedent: lawyers may plead at any German court except at the German Federal Supreme Court. European lawyers all of a sudden were on the fast track compared to German lawyers, who could only plead at the civil court of their home city.

If the statutes of the Court require respresentation by a German Rechtsanwalt, the foreign colleague may only plead in cooperation with a German Rechtsanwalt. The agreement has to be in writing as soon as the first court hearing starts.

Subsequent Court hearings can be handled without further local assistance.

With regard to liability a unique situation has come up: while the two lawyers cooperate, it does not create client-lawyer relationship with the German lawyer.

In case of doubt the foreign lawyer practising in Germany is subject to the Rules of German law. At any rate the non-German professional is bound to respect the Rules of Professional Conduct of the German Bar.

It has to be remembered the RAGD does not pave the road to set up an office or become a member of the German Bar. But it gives him an opportunity to follow up with his case directly to the German court. The number of cases involving "crossborder lawyers" are expected to increase substantially.

14. Conclusions

(1) Outdated admission procedures to the Regional Bar Association and to the German courts have blocked the development of the legal profession in Europe considerably. When it
comes to international law the situation has changed dramatically within the past 10 years. The train has not lost its steam

(2) The needs of global economies will probably speed up this process

(3) International lawyers advise their clients well to enter arbitration agreements in international contracts. As long as the court systems continue to be as different as they are, the needs of the clients are better served in international arbitration procedures. The selection of arbitrators with international experience and language skills helps to improve the quality of the procedure and accelerates to resolve a dispute.


(1) Rechtsanwaltsordnung of July 1st, 1878, RGB1 I, 60, RAO

(2) Reichs-Rechtsanwaltsordnung v. 21.02.1936, RGB1 I, 1470, R-RAO

(3) Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung of August 1st, 1959, BGB1I, 565, BRAO

(4) RAO for the British Zone of March 10, 1949, VOB1 for the British Zone p. 8

(5) Bundesgebührenordnung für Rechtsanwälte of 26.07.1957, BGB1 I. 907, BRAGO

(6) Ortega y Gasset used the term "Rebellion of the masses" for all type of incidents in Europe

(7) Gesetz zur Prüfung von Rechtsanwaltszulassungen, Notarbestellungen und Berufung ehrenamtlicher Richter of July 24th, 1992, RNPG

(8) BGH Z 108, 290 = NJW 1989, 2890

(9) There is a strong tendency for historic continuation. Technically every lawyer is still being admitted to one civil court, therefore Section 18 BRAO remains unchanged. Section 78 ZPO (Rules of Federal Civil Procedure) allows every lawyer to plead before a Landgericht (Postulationsfähigkeit).

(10) Bundestagsdrucksache of May 19, 1993, BT-Drucks. 12/4993, 33

(11) Section 59a Sect. 3 (2) BRAO

(12) BGBL 1, 1744

(13) BayObLG, Judgement of 24.11.1994, GmbHR 1995, 42

(14) BayObLG, Judgement of 28.08.1996, DB 1996, 2026

(15) EUGH of 25.02.1988 - Rs 427/1985 Commission/BR Deutschland NJW 1988, 887

(16) Art. 48 - 51 EGV; Art. 28 - 30 EWR-Abkommen

52-58 31-35

59-66 36-39

(17) Art. 1 1 Sect. 1 Sentence. 2 Rechtsberatungsgesetz, RBerG

(18) BGBL 1994, II, 1473 and 1643

(19) BGBL 1994, II, 1438

(20) BGBL 1995, I. 142

(21) Right before the outbreak of World War II a law was enacted on Academic Titles (Gesetz über die Führung akademischer Grade vom 07.06.1939). Many federal states have enacted new legislation. The old law has not been repealed until today

(22) BGBL 1990, I, 1349

1993, 512, 529, 1666

(23) EugH, Judgement of 27.9.1988, Rs. 81/87 (Daily Mail)

(24) Verordening op de Praktijk Vennotschap

(25) Rule 5 (2a) of the Solicitor's incorporated Practice Rules

(26) EUGH, Slg, judgement of 25.02.1988, NJW 1988, 887

(27) RADG, 14.03.1990. BGB1 I, 1479

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.