European Union: European Parliament's Approval For "EMIR 2.2" Raises Further Concerns For CCPs

Last Updated: 31 August 2018
Article by Michael Huertas and Katja Michel

Quick Take: With the EU closer to changing the landscape for euro OTC derivatives clearing, post-BREXIT planning for preparatory steps may be necessary.

On May 16, 2018, the Economic and Monetary Committee of the European Parliament backed a proposal (the Proposal) of the European Commission (the Commission), as the executive of the EU, which included amendments aimed at centralizing the oversight over central clearing counterparties (CCPs).

The Proposal is the latest and most serious legislative commitment that, come what may in terms of BREXIT, the business of clearing financial transactions in EUR—the currency of the 19 Eurozone Member States—is to move back into the EU’s Single Market. The Proposal also aims to support making the Single Rulebook more single and also to deliver another building block of the EU’s Capital Markets Union initiative. This Client Alert assesses the scope of the Proposal and what these changes might mean for CCPs as well as clearing members and the clients and counterparties with which they engage. 

What does the Proposal do?

The increased oversight of EU and third country CCPs would be achieved by:

  • Expanding the role of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) including supervisory tools and on-site inspections;1
  • Changing the recognition procedure for third country CCPs based on their activity and systemic importance in relation to one or more Member States of the EU and allocating them in relevant “Tiers”; and
  • Introducing requirements for non-EU CCPs that are categorized as ‘systemic’ to relocate and establish themselves in the EU in order to access the EU’s Single Market.2

The relocation idea has been the subject of a heated debate in recent months due to the potential to relocate the euro over-the counter (OTC) derivatives clearing, 75 percent of which currently takes place in London,3  back to the EU after BREXIT, given that the UK will upon its exit become a “third country” hosting “third country CCPs”. These changes will also impact the circa 17 CCPs established in the EU, all of which are authorized per EMIR to offer services in the EU, but may not in fact do so across all asset classes.

The Proposal will also impact the 28 third country CCPs that have already been recognized by ESMA, and probably impact another 10+ seeking clearance under EMIR equivalence provisions, as a condition to offering their services in the EU.4 The current supervisory arrangements of those third country CCPs have been found to be slow if not deficient, often with certain shortcomings of accessing or sharing information and conducting on-site inspections. As elaborated below, the Proposal’s mandatory relocation kicks-in where the oversight of such third country CCPs were deemed insufficient to meet systemic risk mitigation and / or other supervisory concerns.

Quick Recap: Current regulatory framework for CCPs in the EU

The current regulatory framework for CCPs is set out in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR),5 which besides changing how derivatives are documented, executed, reported and supervised, also introduced the obligation to clear OTC derivatives through CCPs and also imposed authorization and prudential requirements on CCPs. Under EMIR, all EU CCPs were required to apply for an authorization with the national competent authorities in September 2013, whereas third country CCPs had to be granted recognition to be able to conduct business in the EU.

EU CCPs are supervised by “colleges” of national supervisors, ESMA and relevant central banks, regardless of whether the euro is the currency of jurisdiction, along with other relevant authorities. At present, the concern is that without a greater centralized coordination by ESMA and the ECB, CCPs are relevant for the entire EU financial system, but supervisory standards are not fully harmonized and there are divergent practices and misalignments between standards of equivalence, recognition and on-going supervision of third country CCPs.

What do the Proposal’s changes to CCP regulation and supervision mean in detail?

The Commission’s Proposal includes amendments to two existing EU directly applicable regulations: EMIR and the regulation establishing ESMA.6 The amendments to EMIR focus on strengthening the framework for authorization of EU-based and third country CCPs (these changes are known as EMIR 2.2), whereas the changes to the competencies granted to ESMA include extending ESMA’s decision-making and oversight powers to ensure consistency of EU-wide supervision of CCPs.

  1. Greater centralization of pan-European supervisory decision-making

The amendments to ESMA’s competencies include setting up a new committee within ESMA to centralize the supervisory decision-making relating to CCPs. The national authorities will retain their supervisory powers over CCPs, but in the interest of ensuring consistency of application of supervisory discretion across the EU, will need to either consult or obtain prior consent for their decision from specially formed committee within ESMA—the ESMA Board of Supervisors in the CCP Executive Session (the CCP Executive Session).

The ECB and the relevant central banks will be permanent members of the CCP Executive Session, as well as supervisory colleges, and will have binding powers for certain questions. The changes introduced by the Proposal will thus have market-wide as well as individual CCP relevant changes, including possibly members of affected CCPs and their clients.

This dedicated CCP committee will have power in relation to decisions pertaining to prudential requirements for CCPs (Title IV of EMIR) and rules on interoperability (Title V of EMIR). Other decisions related to CCP supervision will be subject to the non-objection of the committee. The Board of Supervisors in its CCP Executive Sessions will include members of the Board of Supervisors of ESMA and a representative of the Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB), the national competent authorities and the central bank of issue.7

This change reflects a move towards more supervisory convergence and a more consistent EU-wide approach, similar to the one introduced in banking supervision in 2014 through the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the European Central Bank as its core centralized decision-maker. A significant application of ESMA’s new extended powers relates to the authorization process of EU and third country CCPs.

  1. Greater involvement of the central banks in CCP supervision

The new European supervisory mechanism for CCPs, envisaged in the Commission’s Proposal includes involvement of not only national competent authorities and ESMA, but also greater engagement with the “central banks of issue”. In the Eurozone the central bank of issue is the ECB. The Proposal introduces a requirement for the national competent authorities to seek consent from the central banks of issue with regards to certain decisions relating to the supervision of CCPs.8 If the central bank of issue objects to the decision, such a decision cannot be adopted. Any amendments proposed by the central bank must also be considered.

The type of decisions include the authorization of a CCP, extension of activities and services of a CCP, withdrawal of authorization, margin requirements, liquidity risk controls, collateral requirements, settlement and approval of interoperability arrangements. On July 4, 2018, the European Parliament voted in favor of amending Article 22 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, thereby granting the expanded oversight powers.

  1. Changes to the recognition process of third country CCPs

The Proposal amends the procedure of recognition of third country CCPs, which enabled clearing houses established outside of the EU to provide clearing services within the Union upon being recognized by ESMA under the EMIR equivalence provisions. The new legislation will, as part of the recognition process, classify third country CCPs according to the risk they present to the financial stability of the EU or one of its Member States.9

The classification criteria will include “the nature, size and complexity of the CCP’s business, including the value of the transactions cleared in each EU currency, the impact of failure of the CCP on the EU markets, as well as the CCP’s structure and interdependencies with other market participants.”10 The European Commission has been tasked with issuing a Delegated Act, which will further set out the risk assessment criteria that CCPs can be measured against. A classification must be reviewed at least every two years.11

The Proposal aims to improve supervisory oversight by distinguishing third country CCPs further than the current regime and splitting them into a two-tier system of:

  • Non-systemically important CCPs (so-called Tier 1 CCPs): which will continue to be able to operate under the existing EMIR equivalence framework; and
  • Systemically important CCPs (so-called Tier 2 CCPs): which will be subject to stricter requirements. A limited number of systemically important CCPs may be of such systemic importance, that the requirements are deemed insufficient to mitigate the potential risks (so called ‘substantially systemically important’ (Tier 2 SSI CCPs) in the absence of having been defined perhaps by the easier term “Tier 3 CCPs”. In such instances, a decision may be taken by the European Commission, on recommendation from ESMA (and possibly national supervisors) allowing a CCP to provide services in the EU if it is authorized under EMIR and establishes itself in the EU i.e., it relocates.

The Proposal’s approach, specifically in its focus on systemic criteria, creates clear options for CCPs and the market participants that interact with CCPs. Whilst a lot of the Proposal may be relevant in the context of BREXIT, its drafting is “jurisdiction agnostic” and fits in with other EU and/or Banking Union regulatory and supervisory workstreams. Those other workstreams have a proven application of referencing an entity’s’ “systemic profile” as a distinguishing feature and thus whether these should be subject to specific risk mitigation and/or additional compliance measures, or in addition, be subject to direct oversight, regardless of where the business is conducted.

Tier 2 CCPs, will need to demonstrate compliance with EMIR's prudential requirements (Titles IV and V of EMIR) and may be subject to onsite inspections by ESMA.12 A Tier 2 CCP will also need to comply with any requirements posed by the relevant EU central banks of issue, such as availability of certain type of collateral, levels of haircut applied to collateral, investment policy or collateral segregation, availability of liquidity arrangements between the central banks involved and the impact that the failure of the CCP would have on the financial stability of the EU.

The aim of the proposed provision is to enhance the access to information from a CCP with a view to increasing the insight into the risk management practices, enabling the monitoring and the changing supervisory framework in third countries and ultimately ensuring a level playing field between the EU and third country CCPs. ESMA will consider the extent to which the prudential requirements are satisfied through the CCP’s compliance with the comparable rules applicable in third countries. As part of this system, a third country CCP classified as Tier 2 may request that ESMA assesses the comparability of EMIR requirements and the relevant third country standards. If the rules are found to be comparable, ESMA may waive the application of all or some of EMIR requirements.

CCPs which have already been recognized under EMIR will continue to operate as Tier 1 CCPs until ESMA decides that a relevant third country CCP is a Tier 2 CCP. Both Tier 1 and Tier 2 third country CCPs will also be required to pay annual fees to ESMA for its ongoing supervision tasks. The Commission will develop a Delegated Act which will set out in detail the types and amount of fees to be paid by both EU and Tier 1 and Tier 2 third country CCPs.

The highly debated part of the Proposal is the process allowing ESMA, in consultation with the relevant central banks, to recommend to the Commission to issue an implementing act refusing to recognize a third country Tier 2 CCP, if the CCP is of such systemic importance that compliance with EMIR or comparable requirements is deemed insufficient to ensure financial stability of the EU or a particular Member State. In such scenario, the CCP will need to establish itself in the EU in order to be able to provide services within the Union. The economic consequences of this “last resort” provision, if triggered, could be very disruptive.

So how much will this cost and who will pay it?

Increased supervisory scrutiny comes at cost. This includes costs borne by supervisors themselves and paid by CCPs. The Proposal’s financial and staffing projection through to year-end 2020 for the CCP Executive Session calls for ESMA to create and fill circa 50 positions and for it to receive an operating budget of circa €22 million, which is to cover operating costs including additional office space as well as event-driven costs related to supervisory missions, i.e. inspections to CCPs which are anticipated to run to €240,000 a year. The third country CCP costs on recognition and ongoing supervision will reflect whether they are a Tier 1 CCP or a Tier 2 CCP and are intended to be proportionate to the actual costs ESMA incurs.

All of these additional expenses are to be “largely met” by supervisory fees paid by CCPs. Whilst the Proposal explains some of the calculations for ESMA’s costs, it is silent as to exact additional costs of the ECB and national supervisors and what this might mean for CCPs supervisory fee notices.

Implications of the proposal on the post-BREXIT clearing landscape

Concentration has long been central to CCPs and their operations as well as their risk profile. Example of such concentration is visible in the market for clearing of euro OTC derivatives where London’s LCH Clearnet holds a dominant position (97 percent of euro-denominated interest rate derivatives are cleared there). The EU’s concern, which it is aiming to address with the Proposal, is that after BREXIT those CCPs, which are of systemic importance to the EU, could be located outside the Union’s borders.

The consequence of EMIR 2.2 and the possible refusal of recognition of a systemic third country CCP could be a move of a large portion of euro OTC derivative clearing to the EU - an option which sparked a heated discussion between the two sides of the English Channel in June 2017, when the Commission published the Proposal. The EU has had a longstanding ambition to move euro derivative clearing to the EU, or even more restrictively, to the Eurozone. In March 2015, the ECB lost a case against the UK in the European Court of Justice where the EU court supported UK’s request for annulment of an ECB policy attempting to restrict euro clearing to the Eurozone. The decision will no longer be binding if the “last resort” option, requiring a third country CCP to establish itself in the EU, is exercised by the European Commission, following a recommendation from ESMA.

With EMIR 2.2, the EU lawmakers attempt to prevent regulatory and supervisory arbitrage by foreign regulators in favor of third country based CCPs and at the expense of EU-domiciled CCPs. One of the arguments in favor of the relocation of clearing would be the possibility to create a more uniform regulatory landscape, encompassing supervision, recovery and resolution. The Commission’s proposal on a recovery and resolution framework for CCPs, approved by the European Parliament in January 2018, complements the CCP regulatory architecture. A banking crisis involving systemically important ECB-supervised banks would have a significant impact on the relevant CCPs. The converse situation, involving a failing CCP and a knock-on effect on its clearing member banks is also possible. In these low probability but high impact cases, a tight cooperation among EU supervisors would be necessary and such cooperation, the argument goes, would be impeded if a CCP was domiciled outside of the EU.

On the other end of the Channel, a number of UK market players voiced their concerns about the proposed amendments, including in their responses to the Commission’s consultation on the proposed rules in 2017. The Proposal has been criticized for acting as a "location policy", restricting the freedom of choice of a clearing venue and artificially forcing flows away from certain CCPs. The effect of these changes, the UK market participants argue, could be to replace a market-driven concentration in the clearing market with a geographical one. The relocation of euro clearing could reduce liquidity by fragmenting the market, increasing the difficulty of finding the other side to a position, and as a result raising costs which would be passed on to EU citizens. Mark Carney, in his speech on 20 June 2017,13 pointed to the increased costs stemming from the application of a location policy on clearing which took place in Japan. Additional expenses could also be borne at the point of default. Clearing members are required to contribute to a default fund by virtue of EMIR. The members of a small CCP could bear a higher financial burden stemming from the default of one of the small CCP’s clearing members than in the case of a larger global one. In this way, the inherent risk management system built in the CCP design, relying on risk being distributed amongst a large group of participants, could be compromised. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), in its April 2018 paper14 advocated against implementing EMIR 2.2 and instead focusing on establishing an international regulatory cooperation framework.

Implications for clearing members

The EMIR 2.2 proposal adds another level of complexity and uncertainty to BREXIT-related contingency planning for financial institutions in relation to their clearinghouse memberships and the continuity of their derivative contracts. In addition to considerations relating to whether the UK CCPs will be granted EMIR equivalence post-BREXIT, the Proposal also imposes another layer of regulatory risk through the more remote, but equally severe option to deem third country CCPs as systemic. Both of these events may require a move of an unprecedented volume of derivative risk between CCPs across different jurisdictions, including tremendous operational costs related to the legal and technical execution of the portfolio relocation. The potential need to switch between CCPs is an operation which will require advance planning. As pointed out by ISDA: “Connecting to a CCP is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process, requiring legal, operational, financial and risk management expertise.”15

Moreover, the initial margins requested by EU CCPs and thus specific types of collateral assets are predicted to increase due to reduced netting opportunities resulting from the EU CCP’s, at least initially, smaller and less diversified clearing portfolio. Funding costs would thus increase as clearing members need to source the extra collateral. The clearing members may also be required to hold additional capital. The exact increase in capital requirements will depend on the risk assessment, determining the revised risk profiles of the CCPs. The contributions to the CCP default fund made by the clearing members are also risk-weighted. As these contributions increase, so does the regulatory and economic capital required to be held against them.

Outlook and next steps

The EU legislative changes on CCPs seem to be well underway; however, the exact consequences, in particular whether ESMA will be making use of its “last resort” option in order to bring euro clearing to the EU, will only be known after BREXIT. What is known is the comprehensive EMIR regulatory framework, encompassing prudential, conduct, interoperability rules and on-site inspections, will continue to apply to both EU-based CCPs, and, after EMIR 2.2 enters into force, also to third country systemic CCPs.

Some third-country CCPs may already want to start forward planning to either move to the EU-27 or the Eurozone or demonstrate how they are either a Tier 1 CCP as opposed to a Tier 2 CCP, and, if a Tier 2 CCP, to justify how they are not a Tier 2 SSI CCP that would otherwise be susceptible to regulatory driven relocation. Such measures could involve CCPs working with their counsel, specifically in relation to the relevant opinions that are required, and professional advisers to benchmark their own operations, and ability to split these out, against the relevant criteria but also to assess how their operations and perceived systemic risk profile compares against those EU CCPs and whether they are a Tier 2 SSI CCP that will likely have to relocate its EU relevant business to the EU.

One issue that could derail relocations from happening as rapidly as EU policymakers would like, is that the EU financial centers (currently) lack the same concentration of transatlantic cables linking data and routing centers and thus the orders in respect of financial transactions across the Atlantic. For the moment, that could mean (assuming those cable/satellite/microwave connections remain resilient) that, depending on the tone of BREXIT negotiations, that clearing might stay a little longer in the UK and be overseen by more invasive EU supervision prior to a forced move. This however does not derail the opportunities for those looking to move ahead regardless.

If you would like to receive more analysis on the Proposal or any other issues raised herein, please contact one of our Eurozone Hub key contacts listed on the right.

Footnote

1. See our dedicated coverage on the ECB’s own new rules on supervisory inspections which may be of interest: https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2018/august/3/the-draft-ecb-ssm-supervisory-guide-to-on-site-inspections-and-internal-model-investigations 

2. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 as regards the procedures and authorities involved for the authorization of CCPs and requirements for the recognition of third country CCPs https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:80b1cafa-50fe-11e7-a5ca-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

3. According to the Bank of International Settlements.

4. ESMA periodically updates the list of CCPs in accordance with Art. 88(1) EMIR, so the following provides an indicative list: https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/ccps_authorised_under_emir.pdf

5. Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of July 4, 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories

6. Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 24, 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority)

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010R1095&from=EN

7. Article 1(7) of the Proposal, page 40.

9. Article 2(9) of the Proposal, page 48.

10. Article 2(9)(b) of the Proposal, pages 48-49.

11. Article 2(9)(c) of the Proposal, page 49.

12. Article 2(9)(b) of the Proposal, page 48.

13. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/speech/2017/a-fine-balance.pdf

14. https://www.isda.org/a/8hmEE/The-Case-for-CCP-Supervisory-Cooperation.pdf

15. https://www.isda.org/a/U8iDE/Brexit-paper-1-final1.pdf

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
20 Sep 2018, Seminar, London, UK

Environmental regulation and liability have risen up the boardroom agenda over the past decade. Recent changes to environmental sentencing have brought this area of risk even more into focus.

20 Sep 2018, Other, London, UK

We are hosting the latest in our series of round tables focusing on SMCR implementation for wealth and asset managers. This event will be co-hosted by Dentons and consultancy firm Baringa Partners.

20 Sep 2018, Seminar, London, UK

Environmental regulation and liability have risen up the boardroom agenda over the past decade. Recent changes to environmental sentencing have brought this area of risk even more into focus.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions