Germany: 163. Knowledge and Know-How Exchange: Acute Transfer Pricing Risks for German Subsidiaries of Foreign Multinationals

Last Updated: 2 June 1999
KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website

For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.

1. Corporate streamlining and transfer pricing risks

Over the last eighteen months, numerous major multinational groups have announced, embarked upon, or claimed to have already made significant progress with ambitious plans to streamline their international organisations so as to increase group efficiency and enhance shareholder value. One key element of these plans is a detailed division of labour within the global group to enable each of the various group entities to concentrate on its core products and develop its core areas of competence to the fullest possible extent. This results in greater interdependence among the various group members and leads to increased exchanges of goods and services between them.

Of equal importance, however, is the broadest possible exchange of knowledge and know-how between group members with the goal of avoiding duplication of effort, unlocking synergy effects, and making group knowledge and know-how available in all locations in which it can be used to advantage. As economic structures and operations become more complex, the availability and effective use of knowledge and know-how are becoming the decisive factors in the formula for economic success.

The reorganisation measures necessary to implement structures in which the various group members can concentrate on their core areas of competence raise a host of potential capital gains issues. These are, however, not the subject of this article. We instead focus on the transfer pricing problems - one might even speak of a transfer pricing catastrophe in the making - created by the sweeping exchanges of knowledge and know-how into which, by their own admission, the world's multinationals have plunged.

Knowledge and know-how which originates inside an entity in one tax jurisdiction cannot be provided free of an arm's length charge to a related entity in a different jurisdiction. The attempt to do so will trigger adjustments of profits under standard transfer pricing principles. Competent authority procedures, which function bilaterally or at most trilaterally, are unlikely to be adequate to the task of coping with the resulting transfer pricing problems, which will be multilateral and interdependent in nature.

The new OECD Guidelines released starting in 1995 deal only with individual transfers of valuable knowledge and know-how. They do not specifically address the appropriate tax consequences of the massive and comprehensive exchanges contemplated by the world's multinationals because the conceptual planning which underlies these exchanges is of too recent date. The 1983 German transfer pricing guidelines (the so-called Administrative Principles) are of course silent on this subject as well. Nevertheless, both the OECD and German guidelines can be applied to the contemplated exchanges of knowledge and know-how, with similar results. Under the German guidelines, this means adjusting the profits of the transferring entity in accordance with sec. 1 AStG (International Transactions Tax Act) for transfers from a German parent to its foreign subsidiary and assessing a constructive dividend in the case of transfers from German subsidiaries to their foreign parents or affiliates.

The German Federal Office of Finance (Bundesamt fuer Finanzen) is known to be keenly interested in the above issues, which are highly visible thanks to numerous lengthy published interviews and newspaper articles stemming from high-ranking corporate officials.

2. Comprehensive operational knowledge and know-how

While patents are the classic example of intellectual property, know-how is today its pre-eminent form. Although the importance of know-how is generally recognised, attention has so far been focused on its traditional manifestations such as individual secret processing methods or specific inventions formally transferred pursuant to a know-how licence agreement. However, comprehensive operational knowledge and know-how has far greater importance than such specific forms of know-how. Comprehensive operational knowledge and know-how is transferred whenever multinational corporations establish manufacturing companies in foreign jurisdictions (in order to minimise costs, improve access to local markets, enjoy lower tax rates, etc.). This widespread practice is typically accompanied by significant transfers of know-how from a group entity in another tax jurisdiction to the entity in the low cost jurisdiction.

The bulk of the information transferred is not secret know-how. Rather, the transfer encompasses a complex body of knowledge, experience, techniques, organisational structures, and the like which the multinational has assembled in another jurisdiction in the process of developing its products, improving its quality-control systems, and implementing lean production structures. The resulting practical mastery of a complex body of logistical and manufacturing problems, including virtual warehousing and just-in-time procedures, with respect to specific operations will be the dominant form of intellectual property in the 21st Century. None of the know-how involved need be patented or indeed even patentable.

Comprehensive operational knowledge and know-how is not limited to production know-how, however. Also relevant in this connection is marketing and sales know-how, financial know-how such as cash-pooling techniques, and the enormous know-how residing in proprietary computer programmes and house-engineered computer solutions to control financial, marketing, and production processes and operate communications networks. Here again, it is not the quality of such computer solutions as such or their non-duplicability by others which counts, but rather the proven or anticipated functionality of such programmes in co-ordination with a host of other industry-specific and product-specific factors. Viewed in isolation, a particular network solution may be worthless. What counts is its functionality as part of a much larger production concept.

In some cases, product-specific production know-how is developed and tested (in the form of pilot production runs) at one of the multinational's high-tax locations with the intention of using the know-how exclusively in low-tax low-cost foreign production jurisdictions. Such multinationals maintain only research and development facilities in the high-tax locations and shift all production operations to low-tax jurisdictions. However, the object of such research and development operations is not merely product creation and design in the narrow sense, but rather the development of the sort of comprehensive operational know-how discussed above.

3. Germany as a centre of production knowledge and know-how

In numerous areas (cars and trucks, trains and public transport, tyres, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, machines and machine tools including precision machines, etc.), manufacturing enterprises, both large and small to medium-sized, continue to dominate German economic activity, which has not veered nearly so sharply towards the services sector as has been the case in certain other industrialised nations. German companies thus possess and are constantly developing and refining an enormous body of valuable production knowledge and know-how.

This production know-how is by no means limited to German-based multinationals. Many German companies possessing such production knowledge and know-how are subsidiaries of foreign multinationals which have used their German subsidiaries over the years to generate new products and production solutions for export to other group members.

German business management theory and corporate culture has traditionally regarded objective product characteristics and production technology as the central or even virtually exclusive value-generating factor in business operations. Image promotion, name recognition, advertising, trademark and logo development, and other aspects of marketing technology have been relegated to a distinctly subordinate status.

This bias towards production technology in German corporate culture finds its counterpart in a production-centred orientation on the part of German tax officials. It can be very difficult to convince these officials that the success of a group affiliate in another jurisdiction using production technology stemming from Germany is due to anything but this technology, for instance, to imaginative local marketing.

4. Tax implications of knowledge and know-how transfer by a German parent to its foreign subsidiary

So far, German knowledge and know-how owners have been able to export information at virtually no tax cost. The German accounting prohibition against capitalisation of self-developed intangible assets has been of help in this context. The know-how here under discussion is not only intangible by nature, but also invisible from an accounting perspective. Furthermore, it is difficult to define and value as a practical matter. Above all, its transfer is not directly perceptible and hard to measure.

One attention is focused on the problem, however, it is possible to identify objective indicators of knowledge and know-how transfer. Secondment of executives to foreign companies, organisation of training programmes, providing management services (for which the fees typically cover only the hourly rates of the personnel involved, not the value of the knowledge transferred), and distributing handbooks and manuals are but a few of the telltale signs. Furthermore, the transfer pricing methods devised in the United States over the last fifteen years for intangibles have now been refined and yield passably good results.

Leaving aside the above for the moment, let us examine the tax consequences of transfer of valuable knowledge and know-how by a German parent to its foreign subsidiary (reserving for the time being the similar issues raised when a German subsidiary makes such transfers to its foreign parent or affiliate). The initial question posed is whether a discrete asset has been transferred. From a German perspective, the answer to this question is probably negative. The subsidiary does not acquire exclusive control of the production know-how, nor is the know-how transferred for use during a defined or definable period of time. Under these circumstances, the subsidiary would seem to acquire only a use benefit, not a discrete asset.

This is probably positive from the point of view of the parent. If an individual asset is contributed by a parent to its subsidiary , this is a taxable event under the prevailing view. Contribution in return for new shares in the subsidiary is regarded as a quasi-exchange (asset for shares), resulting in gain to the extent of the excess of the asset's fair market value (gemeiner Wert) over its book value (which is zero in the case we are considering). Contribution without issue of new shares (disguised contribution) results in gain as well under the majority view. In either case, the parent would realise the full value of the know-how as taxable profit.

Even if no contributable asset is transferred, the arm's length principle would still appear to require that the parent receive compensation from its subsidiary for the know-how which the subsidiary is permitted to use. While this is preferable to immediate realisation of the full value of the know-how, one is left in a situation in which the profits of the parent may be corrected to take account of deemed royalty payments from the subsidiary for know-how transferred.

The same principles apply when a German subsidiary transfers knowledge or know-how to one of its foreign affiliates.

5. German subsidiaries as know-how transferors

As a practical matter, the attention paid by the German tax authorities to intra-group transfers of knowledge and know-how by the German subsidiaries of foreign-based multinationals will probably be disproportionate to these subsidiaries' relative economic weight.

A transfer by a German subsidiary to its foreign affiliate without adequate compensation will trigger a constructive dividend from the German subsidiary to its foreign parent, not to the affiliate (with all the consequences flowing from a dividend under the German imputational system of corporate taxation). The constructive dividend will be valued with respect to a periodic hypothetical royalty payment.

6. Initial report from the tax audit front

Practical experience shows that German tax auditors are already adjusting the profits of globally operative German parents and assessing constructive dividends against the German subsidiaries of foreign multinationals with scant regard for theoretical justification when they suspect that Germany has not received its "fair share" of the group's worldwide profits. So far, transfers of knowledge and know-how are not a prime source of such suspicions, but this may soon change.

The assessments are in some cases not made with the expectation that they will stand up in court, at least not without considerable refinement and revision of argumentation. Instead, they are seen by the tax authorities as a means of forcing the taxpayer onto the defensive and possibly extracting concessions. If the taxpayer is unyielding, the delay in finalisation of the tax assessments which results from the usually protracted and expensive ensuing litigation may well keep the case open until there has been a major shift in German transfer pricing methodology towards the new margin-based methods. Under these new methods, the tax authorities feel they will be in a superior position with regard to globally operative enterprises.

While there are advocates of profit-based methods in the fiscal administration, the statistical data necessary to apply these methods has so far not been assembled.

Germany's transfer pricing policies are still conservative. Senior German tax officials have consistently stated that comparable profit methods (CPM) and transactional net margin methods (TNMM) are unacceptable and that profit splits are only acceptable in rare instances as a method of last resort. They have also expressed their opposition to U.S.-style economic analysis and even voiced reservations concerning advance pricing agreements (APAs).

Objections of principle to APAs have since been withdrawn. There are also indications that a major change of position may soon occur with respect to profit splits and TNMM. For instance, the application of a profit split method to global trading by banks was advocated in an unofficial internal advisory letter issued to the German tax authorities on May 11, 1998 by a senior official in the Federal Ministry of Finance. Furthermore, senior tax officials at the national and state levels are increasingly urging the use of TNMM to resolve transfer pricing problems.

7. Risk-control: knowledge and know-how exchange arrangements (KKEA)

Instead of merely waiting to see if the tax authorities raise challenges based on the sorts of know-how transfers here discussed, the taxpayer may adopt at least three mutually compatible risk-control strategies:

  • Detailed assessment of knowledge and know-how actually transferred in the past and being transferred on an ongoing basis in order to gauge the associated risk and be prepared to refute excessive adjustments made by the tax authorities. Unfortunately, this type of analysis is likely to be time-consuming and expensive. It essentially amounts to compiling the information necessary for a transaction-based determination of an arm's length price.
  • Conclusion of an APA with the key taxing jurisdictions involved. While this is also a costly process, it would appear to provide maximum security against unexpected adjustments to profits.
  • Entry into a knowledge and know-how exchange arrangement (KKEA).

As a practical matter, there is probably no alternative to a KKEA for multinationals which intend to "streamline" their worldwide groups in the manner described at the outset of this article. At least de facto, a KKEA would be a component part of any conceivable APA. The basic concept of a KKEA must be the intentional set-off of advantages and disadvantages flowing from the exchange of knowledge and know-how within a global group. The KKEA can be modelled after cost contribution arrangements for the development of intangible assets. Whereas a CCA relates to an asset yet to be created, the essential task of a KKEA would be to regulate the exchange of existing knowledge and know-how. The key features of a KKEA, which must of course be entered into prior to the transfers it regulates, might include the following:

  • The KKEA must be multilateral in nature and, for instance, permit the benefit of know-how transferred by A-Corp. to B-Corp. to be equalised by a transfer from C-Corp. to A-Corp. The current German transfer pricing guidelines recognise only bilateral set-off agreements, however.
  • An entity can only be a "participant" in a KKEA if it expects both to transfer and to receive knowledge and know-how. Entities which only receive or only transfer knowledge and know-how would have to make or receive appropriate payments, as the case may be. A mark-up would be appropriate with respect to such payments. On the other hand, no mark-up would apply to knowledge and know-how exchanged among participants in a KKEA.
  • The knowledge and know-how to be exchanged would have to be specifically identified and valued. This task, while formidable, is not impossible. The transfer pricing methods developed in the United States for intangible property in principle provide an adequate framework. Any imbalance of benefits conferred and benefits received would have to be equalised by balancing payments.
  • Just as the cost allocation formula is the heart of a CCA, it may well be possible to install a "benefit claims formula" at the centre of a KKEA. The worldwide increased profits from the KKEA could be quantified and pooled, at least in part. Net contributors of knowledge and know-how would have claims against the profits pool in proportion to their pro-rata shares of total know-how pooled. This system might avoid or minimise the need for fixed balancing payments.
  • The arrangement must be examined to make certain that the knowledge and know-how received by a particular entity are of actual benefit to that entity. Furthermore, it would appear necessary to verify actual transfer of the knowledge and know-how, as opposed to mere creation of a contractual right to receive such.
  • Since exchange of knowledge and know-how is an ongoing process, the agreement should contain provisions for transfers of knowledge and know-how not yet in existence and/or not yet needed by potential recipients.
  • An adjustment clause is probably indispensable. There must be continual monitoring of the actual benefit received to ensure that it remains roughly commensurate with the value of knowledge and know-how transferred. Again, an imbalance would give rise to balancing payments.

8. Conclusions

Free exchange of operational knowledge and know-how is one of the central aspects of the "streamlining" of the global operations of multinational groups. This exchange is economically necessary in order to avoid duplication of effort and permit each member of a multinational group to concentrate on its core areas of competence. However, free exchange of knowledge and know-how raises the spectre of massive corrections to reported profits by the tax authorities.

German tax authorities are especially interested in this area because they correctly identify German companies as being net exporters of operational knowledge and know-how. While such information need not be limited to production knowledge and know-how, this would appear to represent the bulk of Germany's "exportable" operational knowledge. The German subsidiaries of foreign-based multinationals are also often repositories and generators of highly valuable knowledge and know-how. The German tax authorities can be expected to subject transfers of knowledge and know-how by the German subsidiaries of foreign multinationals to particular scrutiny. Whereas transfers by German parents to their foreign subsidiaries which are not supported by arm's length consideration will result in adjustments to the parent companies' profits under sec. 1 AStG (International Transactions Tax Act), transfers by German subsidiaries of foreign-based multinationals to related parties will trigger constructive dividends.

Short of relinquishing the benefits of free exchange of knowledge and know-how, multinationals can avoid these consequences only by setting up a multilateral advance agreement for know-how and knowledge exchange between group members.

Disclaimer and Copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Please note the date of each article and that subsequent related developments are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions