Germany: 107. Loss Utilisation Following Purchase Of A Corporate Shell

Last Updated: 17 December 1997
KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website
For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.

1. Current corporate loss carryforward provisions

The 1990 Tax Reform Act repealed the previous five year time limit for use of loss carryforwards and permitted net operating losses to be carried forward indefinitely for income, corporation, and trade tax purposes. For income and corporation tax purposes, the indefinite carryforward applied to losses which could not be carried back to either of the two years preceding that in which they were incurred. The trade tax has no loss carryback provision.

In part in reaction to a recent development in the case law and in part out of general fear that the ability to carry losses forward without time limit might invite trafficking in loss carryforwards attached to corporate shells, the legislature also added a new provision to the corporation tax law in 1990 which provided that a corporation is only entitled to a loss carryforward (or carryback) if it is economically, as well as legally, identical to the entity which incurred the loss (sec. 8 (4) KStG).

The requirements of sec. 8 (4) KStG for "economic identity" were tightened with effect from the tax year 1997 onwards as a result of the "Act for the Further Reform of the Taxation of Enterprises" which entered into force on 31 October 1997 (see articles nos. 80 and 99). As Manfred Orth points out in his recent article on the loss utilisation amendments (DB 1997, 2242), the new restrictions may well have been motivated by the 1992 corporation tax statistics released in the summer of 1997 showing that in the year 1992 corporations alone had already accumulated loss carryforwards of DM 251 billion. Orth reminds us as well that an even more restrictive loss carryforward provision was contained in the tax legislation which failed to win the approval of the Federal Council (see article no. 70, sec. 3) and surmises that this provision or something similar to it may be part of the next major tax bill passed.

2. Recent decision interpreting loss carryforward provisions in force through 1996

The Federal Tax Court recently handed down its first judgement interpreting the loss carryforward restrictions in force through 1996 (BFH DStR 1997, 1843 - 13 August 1997). While the case involves neither large sums nor a typical "big business" context, it provides guidance on a number of key issues. Most importantly, it evidences a determination of the part of the tax courts to construe the requirements of "economic identity" as tightly as possible.

2.1 Requirements for economic identity through 1996

The previous version of sec. 8 (4) KStG first provides that a corporation is only entitled to utilise a loss carryforward or carryback (or the loss for the year in progress) if it is economically identical to the corporation which incurred the loss. Instead of defining "economic identity," the statute describes by way of example a situation in which economic identity is forfeited. Accordingly, economic identity is not present when:

i. More than 3/4 of the shares in a corporation change hands and
ii. The corporation thereafter recommences its business activity and
iii. Uses predominantly new business property (Betriebsvermoegen) in so doing.

While the law provides an example instead of a definition, the example nevertheless sets the standard by which other situations leading to loss of economic identity are judged.

2.2 Facts of the Federal Tax Court decision

X-GmbH was organised in 1987 with the statutory minimal capital of DM 50,000 as a suntan and fitness studio under the management of its sole owner, Mrs. T. By the end of 1989, the GmbH had lost about DM 140,000 and had negative net worth of DM 90,000. In October 1989, Mrs. T sold a 10 % share in the GmbH to Mr. N at face value (DM 5,000). Mr. N also loaned Mrs. T the sum of DM 45,000. The articles of incorporation were amended to extend the business purpose to include "gastronomic consulting and services" and to provide that unanimity was required for all shareholder resolutions. Dispositions (sale, assignment, pledge, loan) of shares in the GmbH were made subject to shareholder approval. Mr. N personally guaranteed the entire bank debt of the GmbH as of 31 December 1989 (some DM 208,000).

The GmbH discontinued its suntan and fitness studio business as of November 1989. It sold the equipment used in this business at a loss, gave notice on its lease, and moved to new premises the same year. The gastronomic consulting business was started up in 1990 and proved to be profitable.

At the end of February 1991, sixteen months after sale of the initial 10 % interest, Mrs. T sold Mr. N the remaining shares in the GmbH at face value (DM 45,000). Payment was effected by cancellation of Mr. N's debt claim against Mrs. T. Mr. N became the new general manager and X-GmbH was renamed "N-GmbH". The business purpose was again changed to relate exclusively to gastronomy.

The GmbH deducted the losses incurred from 1987 to 1989 on its tax returns for 1990 and 1991. The tax authorities denied the deduction and were upheld by the Tax Court (DStRE 1997, 158).

2.3 Court's holding and analysis

The Federal Tax Court affirmed the lower court's decision and held that deduction of the loss carryforwards was barred under sec. 8 (4) KStG because the GmbH was, from 1990 on, not economically identical to the entity which had incurred the losses. The court found that all three statutory elements required for a break in economic identity were fulfilled.

Recommencement of business activity:

It is was obvious that X-GmbH had discontinued its suntan and fitness studio business in November 1989 and commenced an entirely new business a few weeks later. A business is discontinued when its selling activity ceases, not when the winding up phase, which may be protracted, is finally concluded.

Use of predominantly new business property:

This aspect was problematic because there was apparently no infusion of new capital into the company. It seems that the personal guarantee of Mr. N kept the banks from foreclosing on their loans and that, with the help of the liquidity raised from selling the equipment of the old suntan studio, the company was able to operate its gastronomy business. This business generated profits, hence there was no need for additional capital.

The court stated that, while the term "business property" (Betriebsvermoegen) was often synonymous with "equity" in other contexts, here the logic of the statute required "business property" to be construed as referring only to the asset side of the balance sheet. We quote: "The Court understands the factual findings of the lower court to be that the business property of the terminated business was sold by and large. It was not used in the new business.... The newly started business was operated by and large using newly provided (neu zugefuehrte) assets." This affirms the position taken by the tax authorities in their controversial 1990 directive (BStB1 I 1990, 252).

While it does not come right out and say so, the court thus appears to believe that it is above all the fixed assets which decide whether a recommenced business uses "predominantly new business property" or not. If more than half of the fixed assets are new, this would appear to fulfil the element in question.

The court's justification for looking only to the asset side of the balance sheet (which we think is tantamount to looking to fixed assets) is that otherwise sec. 8 (4) KStG could be easily avoided by purchasing new business property with borrowed funds. Obviously, equity will not be affected by a loan of funds.

Transfer of more than 3/4 of the shares in the company

Transfer of more than 3/4 of the shares in the company did not occur until February 1991. This was more than 16 months subsequent to the recommencement of the business and hence not legally relevant since the transfer must precede the recommencement.

However, the court in effect held that the legal position acquired by Mr. N in October 1989 was tantamount to purchase of the entire company at this date. It called attention to the changes in the articles of incorporation to require unanimous shareholder resolutions and noted that the later purchase of the rest of the shares was accomplished by cancelling a loan extended in 1989. (The court could also probably have noted that, at the time of sale, a 90 % interest in the GmbH was worth more than the face value of the shares because the company had been earning profits for two years straight.) Above all, the court inferred that purchase of the company must have occurred as an economic matter in 1989 because there was no other reason why Mr. N would have guaranteed the debt of an entity with negative net worth and nothing of value except its loss carryforward. The fact that Mr. N later assumed full management control was cited as evidence that it was his know-how and energy which had guided the company in fact from 1990 on. Hence, he was regarded as having acquired economic ownership of the GmbH in October 1998.

2.4 Comments on the court's holding

The most significant aspect of the court's holding is its understanding of the term "new business property" within the meaning of sec. 8 (4) KStG. Here the court establishes a criterion which is at the same time objective and very strict.

The court's understanding of the term "new business property" also differs from that which we employed in our previous article on the "Act for the Further Reform of the Taxation of Enterprises" (article no. 80) in which we interpreted the term as referring to capital, whereby we meant to include both equity and possibly debt capital. The court definitely appears to have rejected this reading of the law, however.

The specific circumstances leading the court to conclude that economic ownership had passed considerably in advance of the transfer of formal ownership are unlikely to reoccur in the same constellation in future cases. The significant fact here is the court's willingness to look critically at attempts to conceal passage of economic ownership until sometime after the recommencement of the business.

3. Loss utilisation from 1997 on

From 1997 on, the basic "example situation" of sec. 8 (4) KStG has been revised so that economic identity is broken if the following occurs:

i. More than 1/2 (previously 3/4) of the shares in a corporation change hands and
ii. The corporation thereafter recommences or continues its business activity and
iii. Uses predominantly new business property (Betriebsvermoegen) in so doing.

An exception is created, however, if the new business property is used solely to recapitalise the business activities which generated the losses in the first place and the corporation continues to operate this branch of the business on a similar scale, viewed economically, for the following five years.

The provisions of the new law apply starting with the 1997 tax year. In a recently published essay (DStR 1997, 1427, 1436 ff.), Fueger/Rieger interpret this provision as referring to the tax year in which loss carryforwards are utilised, not the tax year in which the events occurred which caused the corporation in question to lose its "economic identity". If they are correct, this would mean that recapitalisations or purchases of loss corporations in years prior to 1997 which did not cause a loss of economic identity under the old law but result in such loss under the new wording would be affected by the new law to the extent they have not exhausted their loss carryforwards by 1996 at the latest.

However, an amendment is expected in the new law which would retard the effective date by one year for corporations which lost their legal identity (under the new stricter standards) prior to 6 August 1997. For such corporations, the new provisions would apply starting with the 1998 tax year, permitting them to use their loss carryforwards for the last time in 1997. See also article 99.

Disclaimer and Copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Please note the date of each article and that subsequent related developments are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions