KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website
For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.
In its ruling of 16 July 1997 (EFG 1997, 1166), the Cologne Tax Court asks the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to decide whether it is permissible under the 4th EEC Accounting Directive of 25 July 1978 for a company to set up general percentage accruals for its guarantee obligations based on its experience in the past or based on common experience in its branch of business. The court states that it has "considerable doubts" whether the 4th Directive permits such accruals because of the principle of specific valuation established by Article 31 (1) (e) of the 4th Directive and transformed into German law in sec. 252 (1) no. 3 HGB, from which sec. 252 (2) HGB allows exceptions only in extraordinary circumstances.
The case involves a construction firm which set up an accrual equal to 2 % of its sales. The court could discern no special circumstances which would justify an exception. General percentage accruals were accepted under German accounting law prior to 1987 when the Accounting Directives Law took effect. The tax authorities were willing to accept a general accrual of 0.5 %.
Should the ECJ decide that general percentage accruals are permissible as a basic matter, the Tax Court asks for guidance as to how they should be calculated and who bears the burden of proof in case of doubt.
This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Please note the date of each article and that subsequent related developments are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.