Germany: 094. Tax Consolidation Under Dual Resident Corporations

Last Updated: 10 December 1997
KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website
For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.

In article no. 40, we dealt at length with the status in Germany of corporations organised under the law of another country (foreign corporations). The article covered both tax questions and issues under civil and company law, including in particular Germany's conflict of law rules.

Under German corporation tax law (sec. 1 KStG) and tax treaty law, a corporation is "resident" in Germany, i.e. subject to tax in Germany on its worldwide income (so-called "unlimited" or "comprehensive" tax liability) if either its "legal seat" (Sitz, a term resembling that of "registered office") or its principal place of management (Geschaeftsleitung) is in Germany.

In our previous article, we reported the Federal Tax Court's holding that a corporation organised under foreign law (a foreign corporation) with its principal place of management in Germany cannot qualify as the lead or dominant company in a consolidated tax group for corporation tax purposes even though it is "resident" in Germany by reason of having its principal place of management here (13 Nov. 1991 - BStBl II 1992, 263). Such a corporation would in effect have dual residence: in Germany by reason of its place of management and in its country of incorporation by reason of such incorporation. In our previous article we stated that, notwithstanding the decision of the Federal Tax Court regarding tax consolidation for corporation tax purposes, such dual resident corporations should still qualify as the lead company in a tax consolidated group for trade tax purposes.

In an as yet unpublished decision, the Tax Court of Rheinland-Pfalz has now upheld our position (FG Rheinland-Pfalz case no. 5 K 2307/95 - 9 June 1997). The tax authorities have appealed the judgement to the Federal Tax Court (docket no. I R 102/97).

1. Factual background

The (slightly simplified) facts of this important case are as follows:

Q Holding Inc. (hereinafter: the dual resident company or DRC) is the parent company of a worldwide group which manufactures and sells machine tools and related products. The DRC was organised in 1988 under the laws of the state of Delaware, U.S.A., where it had its registered office. From the company's inception, its principal place of management was located in Germany, where it maintained offices with some 25 employees. On 6 March 1989, these offices were registered in the local Commercial Register as a branch establishment (Zweigniederlassung) of the DRC pursuant to sec. 13d ff. HGB.

The DRC had two German subsidiaries, one profitable and one which produced losses, in which it held virtual 100 % interests in the years at issue. The structure met the integration requirements for corporation and trade tax consolidation of both subsidiaries under the DRC. This is to say, both subsidiaries were integrated organisationally, financially, and economically into the German principal place of management of the DRC. Formal agreements of domination and profit and loss assumption (Beherrschungs- und Gewinnabfuehrungsvertraege - required only for corporation tax consolidation) were also in place between the DRC and each of its subsidiaries.

The tax authorities refused to permit trade tax consolidation of the two subsidiaries under the DRC and the two subsidiaries filed suit after rejection of their administrative appeals.

2. Tax consolidation for corporation tax purposes

Tax consolidation for purposes of corporation tax was not directly at issue in the case. We nevertheless discuss this controversial point because it is implicated in the case on which we are reporting and noteworthy in its own right.

2.1 Provisions of corporate tax law

The Federal Tax Court held in its ruling of 13 November 1991 (BStBl II 1992, 263) that consolidation for corporation tax purposes was impermissible on the facts set forth in section 1 above. In particular, it ruled that a foreign corporation with its principal place of management in Germany was precluded from being the lead company in a consolidated group (i.e. the company to which the gains and losses of the group's members are attributed) because sec. 14 no. 3 KStG applied by its terms only to corporations with both their principal place of management and their "legal seat" (Sitz) in Germany.

Whether or not one analogises a registered office to a legal seat in the German sense, the DRC in the case we are discussing had no legal seat in Germany. To acquire one, it would in effect have had to reorganise under German law.

Sec. 18 KStG does permit consolidation of German corporations under the domestic registered branch establishment of a foreign corporation. However, in its ruling, the Federal Tax Court construed this provision as applying only to foreign corporations with neither their legal seat nor their principal place of management in Germany. While the statute was not explicit on this point, it did assume the foreign corporation to be subject to tax in Germany only on its German source income ("limited" tax liability). Since a corporate entity is subject to tax in Germany on its worldwide income ("unlimited" or "comprehensive" tax liability) if it has either its legal seat or its principal place of management in Germany, the Federal Tax Court held sec. 18 KStG not to apply to situations such as that presented in the case under discussion.

The nexus between the DRC and Germany was thus too strong for it to qualify under sec. 18 KStG (because of its German principal place of management), but at the same time too weak to fall under sec. 14 KStG (because it lacked a German legal seat).

2.2 Rationale of the law

The irony of result reached by the Federal Tax Court raised the issue as to whether it was in fact intended by the legislature and supported by a rational legislative purpose. The taxpayer argued that the intention of sec. 14 KStG was to permit any corporate entity subject to tax in Germany on its worldwide income to be the lead or dominant company in a consolidated group because the income of the member companies attributed to it would then remain within the German tax sphere. Likewise, the taxpayer saw the purpose of sec. 18 KStG as allowing the domestic branch establishment of foreign corporations to be the lead or dominant company because attribution of the income of the member companies to a domestic branch establishment would likewise keep the income within the German tax sphere under the permanent establishment principle. In both cases, the only concern was that the income of the members of a consolidated group remain subject to German taxation. These requirements are doubly fulfilled in the case of a foreign corporation with a domestic branch which is also the sole place of management. Hence, the taxpayer believed that no rational purpose was served by refusing to permit consolidation in such a case.

The Federal Tax Court could adduce no tax policy reason in support of its reading of the law. Instead, it stated that the legislature's purpose was to prevent entities which lack separate legal existence under German conflict of law rules (discussed at length in article no. 40) from acquiring the benefits of tax consolidation. Since Germany determines the company law applicable to a corporate entity with respect to its "seat of management" (Verwaltungssitz), a corporation organised under foreign law with a German principal place of management is as a rule not recognised as having separate legal existence because it has not been formed in accordance with German law. Exceptions can apply under bilateral treaties, however (see section 3.2 (iii) below). Notwithstanding this denial of civil and company law recognition, such corporations are recognised as entities subject to corporation tax (for details see article no. 40).

3. Consolidation for trade tax purposes: the legal arguments

3.1 Argument of the tax authorities

The tax authorities argued essentially that, as regards the status of the entity under which consolidation is to take place, the conditions for consolidation for trade tax purposes were identical to those for corporation tax purposes. In this view, consolidation was possible under a corporation with both its principal place of management and its legal seat in Germany or under the registered domestic branch establishment of a foreign corporation with neither its principal place of management nor its legal seat in Germany, but not under a corporation with only its principal place of management, but not its legal seat in Germany.

3.2 Taxpayers' arguments

The two plaintiff subsidiaries of the DRC advanced three separate arguments in favour of tax consolidation for trade tax purposes.

(i) Firstly, they attacked the reasoning of the Federal Tax Court's ruling of 13 November 1991 as lacking any basis in policy (section 2.2 above). They urged the Tax Court to refuse to follow the logic of the higher court and in effect to hold that the relevant requirements for corporation tax consolidation were fulfilled, hence that trade tax consolidation was permitted even if the trade tax requirements mirrored those of corporation tax in the respects at issue.

(ii) Secondly the taxpayers called attention to the failure of the controlling trade tax provisions (sec. 2 (2) sentences 2 and 3 GewStG) to incorporate by reference all of the corporation tax requirements in question. In effect, the taxpayers urged the Tax Court to construe the trade tax law differently from the corporation tax law and to permit consolidation as long as the trade tax income of the members of the consolidated group remained subject to German taxation in the hands of the lead or dominant group member.

(iii) Lastly, the taxpayers sought to rely on the anti-discrimination clause of the 1954 German-American Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation (German-American Friendship Treaty). Article XXV (5) of this treaty provides for mutual recognition by both treaty states of corporations duly formed under the laws of the other treaty state, and Article XI (1) prohibits German discrimination against U.S. corporations. Since a German corporation with a German principal place of management could qualify as the lead or dominant member of a tax consolidated group, the argument ran that it would conflict with the anti-discrimination clause not to permit a U.S. corporation with a German principal place of management to so qualify. (The Federal Tax Court had rejected this argument as well in its ruling of 13 November 1991, discussed in section 2 above.)

4. Decision of the Tax Court

The Tax Court refused to follow the taxpayers' first argument and instead affirmed the position taken by the Federal Tax Court with respect to the requirements for consolidation for corporation tax purposes.

The Court nevertheless decided in the taxpayers' favour based on their second argument. It agreed with the taxpayers that the requirements for trade tax consolidation differed from those for corporation tax consolidation based on the different wording of the trade tax law on point. In the Court's opinion, the trade tax law divided commercial enterprises into only two categories: "domestic commercial enterprises" and "foreign commercial enterprises". It construed the term "domestic commercial enterprise" so that the DRC fell into this category and so qualified as the lead company in a consolidated group.

The Court did not address the taxpayers' argument based on the German-American Friendship treaty.

5. Outlook

The appeal filed by the tax authorities means that the Federal Tax Court will review the decision here reported on. This will give the taxpayers the opportunity to present their first and third arguments as well to Germany's highest tax court and will give this court the opportunity to reconsider its 1991 ruling on these arguments.

Disclaimer and Copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Please note the date of each article and that subsequent related developments are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.