Germany: 094. Tax Consolidation Under Dual Resident Corporations

Last Updated: 10 December 1997
KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website
For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.

In article no. 40, we dealt at length with the status in Germany of corporations organised under the law of another country (foreign corporations). The article covered both tax questions and issues under civil and company law, including in particular Germany's conflict of law rules.

Under German corporation tax law (sec. 1 KStG) and tax treaty law, a corporation is "resident" in Germany, i.e. subject to tax in Germany on its worldwide income (so-called "unlimited" or "comprehensive" tax liability) if either its "legal seat" (Sitz, a term resembling that of "registered office") or its principal place of management (Geschaeftsleitung) is in Germany.

In our previous article, we reported the Federal Tax Court's holding that a corporation organised under foreign law (a foreign corporation) with its principal place of management in Germany cannot qualify as the lead or dominant company in a consolidated tax group for corporation tax purposes even though it is "resident" in Germany by reason of having its principal place of management here (13 Nov. 1991 - BStBl II 1992, 263). Such a corporation would in effect have dual residence: in Germany by reason of its place of management and in its country of incorporation by reason of such incorporation. In our previous article we stated that, notwithstanding the decision of the Federal Tax Court regarding tax consolidation for corporation tax purposes, such dual resident corporations should still qualify as the lead company in a tax consolidated group for trade tax purposes.

In an as yet unpublished decision, the Tax Court of Rheinland-Pfalz has now upheld our position (FG Rheinland-Pfalz case no. 5 K 2307/95 - 9 June 1997). The tax authorities have appealed the judgement to the Federal Tax Court (docket no. I R 102/97).

1. Factual background

The (slightly simplified) facts of this important case are as follows:

Q Holding Inc. (hereinafter: the dual resident company or DRC) is the parent company of a worldwide group which manufactures and sells machine tools and related products. The DRC was organised in 1988 under the laws of the state of Delaware, U.S.A., where it had its registered office. From the company's inception, its principal place of management was located in Germany, where it maintained offices with some 25 employees. On 6 March 1989, these offices were registered in the local Commercial Register as a branch establishment (Zweigniederlassung) of the DRC pursuant to sec. 13d ff. HGB.

The DRC had two German subsidiaries, one profitable and one which produced losses, in which it held virtual 100 % interests in the years at issue. The structure met the integration requirements for corporation and trade tax consolidation of both subsidiaries under the DRC. This is to say, both subsidiaries were integrated organisationally, financially, and economically into the German principal place of management of the DRC. Formal agreements of domination and profit and loss assumption (Beherrschungs- und Gewinnabfuehrungsvertraege - required only for corporation tax consolidation) were also in place between the DRC and each of its subsidiaries.

The tax authorities refused to permit trade tax consolidation of the two subsidiaries under the DRC and the two subsidiaries filed suit after rejection of their administrative appeals.

2. Tax consolidation for corporation tax purposes

Tax consolidation for purposes of corporation tax was not directly at issue in the case. We nevertheless discuss this controversial point because it is implicated in the case on which we are reporting and noteworthy in its own right.

2.1 Provisions of corporate tax law

The Federal Tax Court held in its ruling of 13 November 1991 (BStBl II 1992, 263) that consolidation for corporation tax purposes was impermissible on the facts set forth in section 1 above. In particular, it ruled that a foreign corporation with its principal place of management in Germany was precluded from being the lead company in a consolidated group (i.e. the company to which the gains and losses of the group's members are attributed) because sec. 14 no. 3 KStG applied by its terms only to corporations with both their principal place of management and their "legal seat" (Sitz) in Germany.

Whether or not one analogises a registered office to a legal seat in the German sense, the DRC in the case we are discussing had no legal seat in Germany. To acquire one, it would in effect have had to reorganise under German law.

Sec. 18 KStG does permit consolidation of German corporations under the domestic registered branch establishment of a foreign corporation. However, in its ruling, the Federal Tax Court construed this provision as applying only to foreign corporations with neither their legal seat nor their principal place of management in Germany. While the statute was not explicit on this point, it did assume the foreign corporation to be subject to tax in Germany only on its German source income ("limited" tax liability). Since a corporate entity is subject to tax in Germany on its worldwide income ("unlimited" or "comprehensive" tax liability) if it has either its legal seat or its principal place of management in Germany, the Federal Tax Court held sec. 18 KStG not to apply to situations such as that presented in the case under discussion.

The nexus between the DRC and Germany was thus too strong for it to qualify under sec. 18 KStG (because of its German principal place of management), but at the same time too weak to fall under sec. 14 KStG (because it lacked a German legal seat).

2.2 Rationale of the law

The irony of result reached by the Federal Tax Court raised the issue as to whether it was in fact intended by the legislature and supported by a rational legislative purpose. The taxpayer argued that the intention of sec. 14 KStG was to permit any corporate entity subject to tax in Germany on its worldwide income to be the lead or dominant company in a consolidated group because the income of the member companies attributed to it would then remain within the German tax sphere. Likewise, the taxpayer saw the purpose of sec. 18 KStG as allowing the domestic branch establishment of foreign corporations to be the lead or dominant company because attribution of the income of the member companies to a domestic branch establishment would likewise keep the income within the German tax sphere under the permanent establishment principle. In both cases, the only concern was that the income of the members of a consolidated group remain subject to German taxation. These requirements are doubly fulfilled in the case of a foreign corporation with a domestic branch which is also the sole place of management. Hence, the taxpayer believed that no rational purpose was served by refusing to permit consolidation in such a case.

The Federal Tax Court could adduce no tax policy reason in support of its reading of the law. Instead, it stated that the legislature's purpose was to prevent entities which lack separate legal existence under German conflict of law rules (discussed at length in article no. 40) from acquiring the benefits of tax consolidation. Since Germany determines the company law applicable to a corporate entity with respect to its "seat of management" (Verwaltungssitz), a corporation organised under foreign law with a German principal place of management is as a rule not recognised as having separate legal existence because it has not been formed in accordance with German law. Exceptions can apply under bilateral treaties, however (see section 3.2 (iii) below). Notwithstanding this denial of civil and company law recognition, such corporations are recognised as entities subject to corporation tax (for details see article no. 40).

3. Consolidation for trade tax purposes: the legal arguments

3.1 Argument of the tax authorities

The tax authorities argued essentially that, as regards the status of the entity under which consolidation is to take place, the conditions for consolidation for trade tax purposes were identical to those for corporation tax purposes. In this view, consolidation was possible under a corporation with both its principal place of management and its legal seat in Germany or under the registered domestic branch establishment of a foreign corporation with neither its principal place of management nor its legal seat in Germany, but not under a corporation with only its principal place of management, but not its legal seat in Germany.

3.2 Taxpayers' arguments

The two plaintiff subsidiaries of the DRC advanced three separate arguments in favour of tax consolidation for trade tax purposes.

(i) Firstly, they attacked the reasoning of the Federal Tax Court's ruling of 13 November 1991 as lacking any basis in policy (section 2.2 above). They urged the Tax Court to refuse to follow the logic of the higher court and in effect to hold that the relevant requirements for corporation tax consolidation were fulfilled, hence that trade tax consolidation was permitted even if the trade tax requirements mirrored those of corporation tax in the respects at issue.

(ii) Secondly the taxpayers called attention to the failure of the controlling trade tax provisions (sec. 2 (2) sentences 2 and 3 GewStG) to incorporate by reference all of the corporation tax requirements in question. In effect, the taxpayers urged the Tax Court to construe the trade tax law differently from the corporation tax law and to permit consolidation as long as the trade tax income of the members of the consolidated group remained subject to German taxation in the hands of the lead or dominant group member.

(iii) Lastly, the taxpayers sought to rely on the anti-discrimination clause of the 1954 German-American Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation (German-American Friendship Treaty). Article XXV (5) of this treaty provides for mutual recognition by both treaty states of corporations duly formed under the laws of the other treaty state, and Article XI (1) prohibits German discrimination against U.S. corporations. Since a German corporation with a German principal place of management could qualify as the lead or dominant member of a tax consolidated group, the argument ran that it would conflict with the anti-discrimination clause not to permit a U.S. corporation with a German principal place of management to so qualify. (The Federal Tax Court had rejected this argument as well in its ruling of 13 November 1991, discussed in section 2 above.)

4. Decision of the Tax Court

The Tax Court refused to follow the taxpayers' first argument and instead affirmed the position taken by the Federal Tax Court with respect to the requirements for consolidation for corporation tax purposes.

The Court nevertheless decided in the taxpayers' favour based on their second argument. It agreed with the taxpayers that the requirements for trade tax consolidation differed from those for corporation tax consolidation based on the different wording of the trade tax law on point. In the Court's opinion, the trade tax law divided commercial enterprises into only two categories: "domestic commercial enterprises" and "foreign commercial enterprises". It construed the term "domestic commercial enterprise" so that the DRC fell into this category and so qualified as the lead company in a consolidated group.

The Court did not address the taxpayers' argument based on the German-American Friendship treaty.

5. Outlook

The appeal filed by the tax authorities means that the Federal Tax Court will review the decision here reported on. This will give the taxpayers the opportunity to present their first and third arguments as well to Germany's highest tax court and will give this court the opportunity to reconsider its 1991 ruling on these arguments.

Disclaimer and Copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Please note the date of each article and that subsequent related developments are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions