Germany: 068. Draft Directive On The Tax Reorganisation Act

Last Updated: 1 July 1997
KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website
For disclaimer and copyright see end of this article.

1. Introductory

In April 1997, the Federal Ministry of Finance issued in draft form a highly detailed directive setting forth the position of the German tax authorities on numerous issues associated with the new Tax Reorganisation Act which took effect on 1 January 1995 (see article no. 5 "New German Reorganisation Law"). The draft directive is 179 pages in length and is the subject of comments which KPMG Germany submitted to the Institute of German Accountants (IDW) at the end of May 1997. The IDW issued its own comments in early June 1997. These agree in substance with those of KPMG unless otherwise stated.

The draft directive is too voluminous for comprehensive treatment and, being merely a draft, may yet change considerably before a final version is issued. The following article therefore focuses on those aspects which appear most significant, especially from the perspective of foreign investors. It is emphasised that not even all of the issues raised in KPMG's comments are covered, much less all those contained in the draft directive itself. Furthermore, the amount of time available for analysis of so complex a document has not been sufficient to ensure identification of all significant issues. Many of the matters omitted may be of considerable importance in a given reorganisation.

The sections of the Tax Reorganisation Law are cited in this article by section number followed by the abbreviation "UmwStG" (Umwandlungssteuergesetz). Those of the draft directive are cited as "no." followed by the abbreviation "DD" for "Draft Directive". The structure of the draft directive by and large mirrors that of the statute. For example, no. 01.01 DD refers to sec. 1 UmwStG, no. 02.01 DD to sec. 2 UmwStG, and so forth. The draft directive in addition contains an introductory part (numbered 00.01 - 00.14) and three subparts on special topics with special numbering (O.01 - O.10, GL.01 - GL.15, and 8a.01 - 8a.06, presently situated in the middle of the draft directive following the comments on sec. 18 UmwStG).

The Tax Reorganisation Act should not be confused with the Business Reorganisation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz) which defines the types of reorganisations permitted under company law (statutory reorganisations). Generally speaking, it is only statutory reorganisations under the Business Reorganisation Act which can be accomplished tax free under the Tax Reorganisation Act.

2. Positions taken in the draft directive on selected issues

2.1 Denial of reorganisation loss and stepped up basis for trade tax purposes

The most controversial position taken by the tax authorities in the draft directive is that, when a corporation is merged into or otherwise reorganised as a partnership, any step-up in the value of the assets received by the partnership from the disappearing corporation (sec. 4 par. 6 UmwStG) will not apply for trade tax purposes. Instead, the draft directive states that a separate calculation of taxable income based on the transfer values of the assets received is to take place for trade tax purposes. Furthermore, the draft directive would deny recognition for trade tax purposes to any reorganisation loss realised by the receiving partnership on the reorganisation (no. 18.02 DD). In situations where a step-up would otherwise occur, in particular where the reorganisation follows closely after purchase of the corporation at a premium, the denial of the step-up would typically lead to a reorganisation loss under the general rules.

KPMG considers that there is no basis in law for either of the above positions. For a discussion of the background issues involved, see section 4 of article no. 5 and article no. 28 "Share Deal Purchases Under the Tax Reorganisation Act").

2.2 Linkage of tax and commercial balance sheets

It is a general principle of German tax accounting law that, unless specifically provided otherwise, the commercial balance sheet controls for tax purposes as well (linkage of tax to commercial balance sheet - Massgeblichkeitsprinzip). The draft directive at various points contends that such linkage exists as well in reorganisation situations notwithstanding the apparent intent of the tax reorganisation law to create exceptions in which the tax balance sheet need not follow the commercial balance sheet. Hence the draft directive contends that upon merger of a corporation into a partnership the choice by the corporation of a transfer value above book value is impossible for tax purposes because the option created by sec. 3 UmwStG does not exist for commercial accounting purposes. Conversely, it is contended that the exercise of an option created for commercial accounting purposes by the Business Reorganisation Act (sec. 24 UmwG) for the receiving entity to value property received above the book values in the closing balance sheet of the transferring entity causes the transaction to lose the protection of the Tax Reorganisation Act altogether (no. 03.01, 03.02, 11.01 DD).

With respect to both issues, the tax authorities have failed to appreciate that instances are involved in which the tax regulations are independent of the commercial law regulations. KPMG has therefore urged that the respective passages in the draft directive be deleted in their entirety as without basis in law.

2.3 Definition of "branch of activity"

It is in various circumstances (e.g. in divisive reorganisations) necessary that the assets being transferred and/or retained constitute a branch of activity, an interest in a commercial partnership, or a 100 % share of a corporation. Assets and liabilities constitute a branch of activity (Betrieb or Teilbetrieb) if they have a certain degree of independence and are potentially capable of functioning as an independent business. At various places (nos. 15.02 and 20.08 - 20.11 DD), the draft directive adopts a definition of "branch of activity" which was developed under the German income tax law to determine when an individual qualifies for a special capital gains tax rate. This definition is stringent and, if applied in reorganisation contexts, would in particular require not just that the assets being transferred be potentially capable of functioning independently, but also that all material assets forming part of the branch of activity as previously operated be part of the transfer.

KPMG considers that the definition used in the draft directive is too strict and not in accordance with the definition of "branch of activity" as used in the EU Merger Directive. The term should be interpreted functionally in light of the purpose of facilitating economically sensible reorganisations. This policy goal differs from that of deciding when a preferential income tax rate should be accorded to an individual under German income tax law. Different policy goals require different interpretations of the term "branch of activity." The fact that certain material assets previously used in a branch of activity are not transferred should not cause the transaction to forfeit tax protection as long as the assets which are transferred constitute a branch of activity in the functional sense even without the assets which are withheld.

2.4 Branch of activity - other issues

In structuring a divisive reorganisation, it is important to have planning flexibility with regard to assets not necessary to any branch of activity of the entity being divided. Furthermore, certain assets may have been used by two or more branches of activity in the past (shared assets). The draft directive should be modified to recognise these problems and permit the taxpayer to assign such assets to the branch of activity of his choice, within reasonable limits. The IDW suggests an option to assign shared assets to the branch of activity of predominant use (comment on no. 15.07 DD).

The draft directive is silent on how to determine the branches of activity of a holding company when this is the subject of a divisive reorganisation. This is a matter of considerable practical significance with which the final version of the directive should deal.

2.5 General anti-abuse provision

At various places, the draft directive contains general descriptions of certain tax planning structures with the comment that, in such situations, the tax authorities are to consider whether or even to assume that the reorganisation in question is "abusive" within the meaning of sec. 42 AO (Tax Procedure Act) and hence to be disregarded for tax purposes. Missing in virtually all of these passages is the recognition of the need to consider whether, in a particular situation, a sound non-tax reason exists for the transaction as planned. If this is the case, the fact that, in addition to achieving a business purpose, a particular structure also yields tax advantages, is not in itself sufficient to bring the transaction under the anti-abuse provision. KPMG has therefore recommended that the passages in question either be brought into line with the leading court decisions on point or be deleted.

It can nevertheless be seen from the draft that the tax authorities are thinking carefully about possible abuse of the tax reorganisation act in a wide variety of contexts.

2.6 Specific anti-abuse provisions for divisive reorganisations

Section 15 par. 3 UmwStG provides that tax will be triggered on divisive reorganisations involving partnership interests or 100 % shares in corporations if the interest in question was acquired or increased in value during the three preceding years by contribution of property which was not itself a branch of activity. The draft directive (no. 15.17 - 15.19 DD) takes this provision very literally and says that any contribution of property to a partnership during the three preceding years will preclude a tax-free division. KPMG points out that such contributions in nominal amounts are common and recommends limiting the provision to material contributions. Otherwise, practically no tax free division involving a partnership interest will be possible.

The IDW argues that the statute in question applies only to the property transferred, not to that retained. In other words, the fact that property not constituting a branch of activity was contributed to the partnership within the preceding three years should make no difference as long as the contributed property stays in the original entity in any division. The IDW recommends deletion of the respective passage in the draft directive.

Section 15 par. 3 UmwStG likewise denies the protection of the statute to transactions which are the economic equivalent of or in preparation for a sale of the interest in question to third persons. No. 15.26 DD states that this is the case in the event of a subsequent transfer in the context of a merger, division, or contribution. However, not all such transactions are ipso facto the economic equivalent of a third party sale. The draft directive should be amended to focus on the legal issue involved. The IDW goes further and recommends a blanket provision that no tax free transfer of assets constitutes a sale or disposition within the meaning of sec. 15 par. 3 UmwStG.

2.7 Retroactivity of a reorganisation for tax purposes

The effective date of a reorganisation can generally be up to eight months before the date of its filing with the Commercial Register. This retroactivity, which is also accepted for tax purposes (sec. 2 UmwStG), poses many questions, some of which are addressed in the draft directive.

One such issue is whether the receiving entity in a merger must have been in legal existence at the effective date. The draft directive contends that this is the case (no. 2.09 DD). However, the retroactivity provided for in the Tax Reorganisation Act is for the purposes of attributing income to the entities involved in a reorganisation. For this purpose, it makes no difference whether the receiving entity was formed before or after the effective date. Similarly, it should make no difference when changing from corporate to partnership business form whether a corporate partner of the partnership-to-be is in legal existence at the effective date, as long as it had been formed by the time of the reorganisation resolution (no. 14.04 DD).

Another issue relates to dividends, including constructive dividends, paid by the disappearing corporation in a merger in the period after the effective date. This may include dividends paid prior to the merger resolution. The draft directive appears to attribute such dividends to the receiving entity except where they relate to the shares of shareholders who exercise an option to surrender their shares in the disappearing corporation in return for a cash settlement instead of participating in the merger and taking interests in the receiving entity. As to such shareholders, the dividend is to be attributed to the disappearing corporation. KPMG believes that this solution is neither required under the law as it is written nor practical and instead urges attribution of all declared dividends for a preceding fiscal year to the disappearing corporation where the receiving entity is also a corporation. If the receiving entity is a partnership, a declared dividend should still be attributed to the disappearing corporation where the stock of this corporation is widely held (Publikumsgesellschaft).

2.8 Thin capitalisation rules (sec. 8a KStG) and corporate mergers

For mergers and consolidations of two corporations, the draft directive proposes to attribute the shareholder debt of both the surviving and the disappearing corporation to the surviving corporation as of the effective date (no. 8a.01 ff. DD). Since the safe haven ratio for thin capitalisation purposes is determined with respect to equity in the commercial balance sheet at the start of each fiscal year, this can easily lead to serious problems wherever the effective date is not simultaneously the start of a fiscal year. KPMG proposes an option for the taxpayer to make the thin capitalisation calculation without regard to the retroactivity fiction. The IDW instead suggests solving the problem by calculating the thin capitalisation debt-to-equity ratio with respect to equity at the effective date of the merger or at the end of the fiscal year in question.

2.9 Denial of protection of sec. 8b KStG

Section 8b of the German corporation tax act provides a tax exemption inter alia for gains realised by German corporations on the disposition of shares in foreign corporations. The draft directive states (no. 03.11 DD) that any gain from upward valuation of such shares by the transferring corporation on its closing balance sheet shall not benefit from the tax exemption because such revaluation does not constitute a disposition. KPMG considers this unfortunate and suggests that the tax exemption should be accorded under such circumstances. The IDW does not comment on this point.

2.10 Blocking amounts under sec. 50c EStG

Section 50c of the German income tax law is a complex provision which operates generally speaking when the shares in a German corporation which has retained earnings are purchased from a foreign seller. Absent sec. 50c EStG, the buyer could obtain a refund of the corporation tax paid by the purchased corporation on its retained earnings by distributing these earnings after the purchase and then neutralising the resulting dividend income by means of a dividend-based write-down in the value of the shares. The provision is needed to close an otherwise existing loophole because the foreign seller will typically be shielded from German tax liability on his capital gain under the terms of a tax treaty. Section 4 par. 5 UmwStG provides that if a blocking amount exists with respect to the shares of a corporation which is being merged into (or otherwise reorganised as) a partnership, the receiving partnership must treat this blocking amount as income. Nos. 04.19 - 04.26 DD interpret sec. 4 par. 5 UmwStG and sec. 50c EStG in ways which would give rise to such reorganisation income in a variety of questionable circumstances. KPMG proposes deletion from the draft directive of the items in question.

2.11 Retroactivity of 1996 change to sec. 5 par. 3 UmwStG

The cited statute, which applies to mergers and conversions of corporations into partnerships, was amended by law enacted in December 1996. The amendment relates to the value at which shares in the disappearing corporation held by a partner of the receiving partnership in a domestic permanent establishment are deemed contributed to the partnership. The tax authorities have always claimed that the amendment only clarified what the statute meant all along. The draft directive states that the amendment is effective retroactive to 1 January 1995. This is subject to considerable doubt. KPMG hence recommends deletion of the relevant item (no. 05.14 DD). The IDW does not comment on this point.

2.12 Downstream mergers

The draft directive recognises the possibility of merging a parent into its subsidiary, but does so only "for equitable reasons" (no 11.22 ff. DD). KPMG considers that the permissibility of such transactions follows from the statute itself and proposes that the draft directive be amended to say so. The IDW does not comment on this point.

2.13 Loss carryforward of merged holding companies

It is recognised that a holding company carries on a business and hence that a tax loss carryover which it possesses may potentially be transferred when it is merged into another corporation (no. 12.17 DD). KPMG recommends that the relevant passage be amended to make clear that holding a single participation is sufficient to qualify as carrying on a business within the meaning of the relevant statute. The IDW does not comment on this point.

3. Conclusion

The draft directive will be the subject of considerable debate over the coming months. We will report on this matter as further developments warrant.

Disclaimer and Copyright
This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. We in particular insist that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While our articles are carefully reviewed, we can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Please note the date of each article and that subsequent related developments are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Any claims nevertheless raised on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG (KPMG Germany). Distribution to third persons is prohibited without our express written consent in advance.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions