ARTICLE
9 November 2006

The Little Polar Bear

L
Linklaters

Contributor

Our clients want a law firm they can trust, one that stands out for a commitment to investing in them and empowering our teams. We want to stand out for our distinctive Linklaters mind-set so our clients want to work with us above all others.

Delivering excellent client service and using our global capabilities to help them pursue the right opportunities means they benefit from long and lasting relationships.

To put clients at the heart of all we do, we recruit and develop exceptional people empowering them to do and think differently. We serve our clients as a team, with a common focus on innovation, efficiency and agility.

The Federal Patent Court decided in a recently published decision that the designation “Der kleine Eisbär” (“The little Polar Bear”) is registrable as a word mark for “recorded data carriers, exposed films and printed matters”. Der kleine Eisbär is a cartoon character which is very popular, especially among children, in Germany.
Germany Intellectual Property

The Federal Patent Court decided in a recently published decision that the designation "Der kleine Eisbär" ("The little Polar Bear") is registrable as a word mark for "recorded data carriers, exposed films and printed matters". Der kleine Eisbär is a cartoon character which is very popular, especially among children, in Germany.

The German Patent and Trade Mark Office had rejected the application for several goods and services due to a lack of distinctiveness. The Office thought that the relevant public would understand the designation as a mere description of contents and not as an indication of origin. The applicant appealed successfully against that decision.

The Federal Patent Court said that the designation Der kleine Eisbär was not a mere description of contents but a fantasy title that was distinctive with respect to the relevant goods and services according to section 8 para. 2.1 of the German Trade Mark Law (Markengesetz). It held that the designation did not relate only to goods (eg recorded films or printed matters) that dealt with young or little polar bears, but to a concrete individual, namely the cartoon character Der kleine Eisbär. The court, therefore, thought that the relevant public would understand Der kleine Eisbär to be an indication of the origin of the company that produces the goods and services in connection with the animal character. As a result, the Court held that the trade mark was not descriptive and did not lack the ability to distinguish the goods and services of one company from those of another. It was not relevant whether the trade mark had been accepted among the relevant trade circles.

This article is intended merely to highlight issues and not to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Should you have any questions on issues reported here or on other areas of law, please contact one of your regular contacts at Linklaters.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More