Deutsche Bank's executives have faced widespread
criticism from shareholders at the bank's AGM.
The meeting, which took place on 21 May in Frankfurt, saw
opposition to Deutsche Bank's executives on a large scale, with
39% of its shareholders voting against the bank's
The German corporate code gives shareholders a vote to respond
to the actions of executives over the past year. A vote to
discharge the executives is seen as supportive, however a vote
against discharge allows shareholders to express their
Although the vote was 61% in favour of Deutsche's
management, the large amount of opposition is indicative of the
irritation that shareholders have recently felt. The bank's
previous AGM saw 81% vote in support of the executives.
Deutsche faced criticism in the run up to its AGM, with many
shareholder's expressing their anger with the bank's
management. This follows several difficulties the bank has been
experiencing lately, including a $2.5billion pay-out made last
month to authorities in the UK and US in response to allegations
that Deutsche had manipulated the Libor benchmark rate.
Hermes Equity Ownership Services, which owns a stake of nearly
5%, publicly criticised the bank before the meeting. Hermes'
Director, Dr Hans-Christoph Hurt announced the day before the AGM
that: 'Hermes EOS, on behalf of the institutional investors it
represents, will vote against the so-called discharge of the
members of Deutsche Bank's management board. With this vote we
formally express our strong concerns about a range of issues and
our lack of confidence in the management board.'
Deutsche also came under fire from shareholder adviser ISS,
which advised investors not to back the bank's executives at
In an attempt to appease its shareholders, Deutsche announced
that it would be reshuffling its management the night before the
AGM, a move which Hermes dismissed as insufficient.
Deutsche's response to the AGM vote was apologetic. Co-chief
executive Anshu Jain acknowledged that the bank had experienced
several legal issues, and that cost-cutting efforts had not been as
successful as hoped. He announced that 'This will be a top
priority in the coming years.'
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In a recently released milestone decision, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court held, for the very first time, that the duty of financial intermediaries to report suspicions of money laundering...
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).