Germany: Commercial And Company Law

Last Updated: 19 September 2014
Article by Johannes Grooterhorst

I. Stock Corporation Law – Duties of the management board in the area of compliance

By Dr. Johannes Grooterhorst

Liability of the CFO of Siemens AG

In its ruling of December 10, 2013 the Landgericht Munich I has decided that members of the management board of a public limited company are liable for the establishment, operability and efficiency of a compliance system in a large company. The case ruled on relates to Siemens AG and, personally, to the former CFO.

For the affected board members – who had mostly left the board in the meantime - the problem of a highly – negative – publicity of their case arises in this context and case reviews are partly published with their real names. The question whether the persons affected can take legal action against this, has to be pursued separately due to such cases.

Bribe payments by violating the OECD convention of December 17, 1997

The breaches of duty of the defendant CFO discussed by the Landgericht Munich dated back to the early 2000s. At that time the OECD Convention regulating the fight against corruption as of December 17, 1997 had already been in force: Cross-border bribe payments constituted a violation of law. According to the Landgericht Munich each member of the management board has to ensure that the company is organised and controlled in such a manner that no violations of law take place. Decisive for the scope in the individual case are the type, size and organisation of the company, the regulations to be observed, its geographical presence as well as suspected cases of the past. In the specific case Siemens invoked the fact that the defendant had established a deficient compliance system which he had also controlled insufficiently. The establishment of such a system for the use of corruption payments had to comply with strict standards of due care.

The Landgericht Munich blamed the defendant of the fact that particularly the review of the efficiency of the existing compliance system had been necessary because the management board would have been informed about suspected cases of corruption payments at regular intervals. That had been lacking for the following reasons:

  • The defendant and the management board as a whole had not taken care of a clear regulation as to who had been in charge of the overall responsibility for compliance at full board level.
  • Furthermore, one would have had to endeavour that the persons commissioned for controlling the compliance benchmarks had been provided with sufficient authority to draw consequences from violations.
  • The board member in charge of compliance had to be granted clear rights to issue instructions to the business unit managers. Particularly in the absence of a line of reporting with competences to be derived thereof for disciplinary measures, the management board as well as the defendant should have intervened.
  • The duty to establish a functioning compliance system as well as the monitoring of its efficiency affected the full board of management and therefore, in that specific case, the defendant.
  • The defendant could not invoke the fact that the full management board had not followed his arguments. He could have brought forward counter-arguments and he should have called in the supervisory board, if necessary.
  • Since slight negligence sufficed for the breach of duties of the management board, some fault was attributed to the defendant because of the objective breach of the aforementioned duties.

Practical considerations: Questions under procedural law

As far as court proceedings were concerned it was remarkable that the defendant in persona (not as member of the management board of Siemens AG!) had to take the responsibility concerning the knowledge about the Siemens organisation. It represented his own perceptions to which the defendant board member had to take a stand. Otherwise the proposal of the applicant company was deemed granted (§ 138 Sec. 4 Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO). In that case it had to be examined whether these principles could have also applied if the board member had been sued as a private person. Apart from that, the Landgericht of the defendant referred to his entitlement to information against the AG.

Assessment ex post?

The defendant had tried to exonerate himself by means of the fact that at the time of the violation the term "compliance" had not yet been established. The Landgericht did not attribute any significance to that circumstance. One has to ask whether the perspective could be consistent with the due ex-ante perspective of the court.

Or ex ante?

Actually the Landgericht Düsseldorf obviously decided in the opposite direction in the Apo- Bank ruling of April 24, 2014 (FAZ of April 26, 2014). The defendant members of the board management had weighed up the decision-making basics of the investments with due care. The massive decline in prices, which occurred later, regarding assets accredited with the highest rating until then was not to be expected, even in the event of the most diligent review.

All depends on the individual case!

II. Private limited companies law - § 40 Sec. 2 Private Limited Companies Act (GmbHG) – Effectiveness of submitting a list of shareholders at the commercial register by a foreign notary in charge of the notarisation

By Jörg Looman

In its ruling of December 17, 2013 (Az.: II ZB 6/13) the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ruled that the submission of a list of shareholders by a foreign notary pursuant to § 40 Sec. 2 Private Limited Companies Act (GmbHG) is actually valid if the notarisation which took place abroad is an equivalent to the notarisation attested by a German notary.

Notarisation of a change of shareholders at a German private limited company (GmbH) by a notary in Basel/Swizerland

A notary located in Basel/Switzerland had notarised a change of shareholders of a German private limited company (GmbH) and had submitted the updated list of shareholders at the registry court. The registry court refused to enter the list of shareholders in the commercial register, because the submission made by a foreign notary did not comply with the requirements of § 40 Sec. 2 Private Limited Companies Act (GmbHG). While the Oberlandesgericht Munich has confirmed the refusal, the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has annulled that decision and obliged the registry court to include the list of shareholders.

Effects of the German Act to Modernise the Law on Private Limited Companies and Combat Abuses (MoMiG)

When any changes are made to the persons of the shareholders the managing directors have to submit an updated list of shareholders pursuant to § 40 Sec. 1 Private Limited Companies Act (GmbHG). The notary in charge of the notarisation of a fair change hat to submit this list at the registry court according to § 40 Sec. 2 Private Limited Companies Act (GmbHG). Prior to the coming into effect of the German Act to Modernise the Law on Private Limited Companies and Combat Abuses (MoMiG) it was approved that even foreign notaries were able to notarising and submitting the list of shareholders if their activity was comparable to that of a German notary. Subsequent to the law reform various – and in part contradictory – court rulings resulted in a substantial uncertainty as to whether a notarisation effected abroad could still be made with legal effect.

Equivalence of the notarisation

The Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has confirmed the old legal position by way of its current ruling: A notarisation abroad is valid if it is deemed an equivalent to a notarisation attested by a German notary. This is indeed the case with the notary registered in Basel/Switzerland. Whether this applies to notaries in all cantons in Switzerland, and to which other foreign notaries, has not yet been finally decided.

Practical considerations

The ruling of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) has ensured legal certainty: In the event of foreign notarisations it has, to be ensured that this notarisation is deemed an equivalent to the notarisation of a German notary. As a matter of fact, in case of an ineffective notarisation or submission of a shareholder list the new shareholder is - pursuant to § 16 Sec. 1 Private Limited Companies Act (GmbHG) – not deemed a shareholder regarding the company and he is, therefore, also not able to exercise any shareholder rights.

To read this Newsletter in full, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions