Germany: New Dual Consolidated Loss Rules in Germany

Last Updated: 28 January 2003
Article by Dieter Endres

By Dieter Endres and Angelika Thies, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Frankfurt/Germany

Prof. Dr. Dieter Endres is the head of the tax and legal services practice in Germany, Dr. Angelika Thies is an international tax partner in Frankfurt

As usual in the closing weeks of the year the German legislators have again come up with an omnibus tax bill. The Corporate Tax Development Act adds a, by German legal standards, short sentence to the Organschaft provisions of the Corporation Tax Act stating that, "A loss of an Organschaft parent is not to be taken into account for domestic taxation insofar as it is taken into account in a foreign state when levying a tax comparable to the German taxation on the Organschaft parent." The government's official explanation of this proposed change to the law attached to the bill laid before parliament says, almost equally succinctly, that, "The additional new sentence is to prevent losses of dual resident companies from being offset twice over, at home and abroad, or the offset always being to the detriment of the Federal Republic of Germany as a result of the national rules of foreign countries (e.g. in the USA)."

This new provision and its official explanation seem, at first sight, logical, reasonable and, above all, relatively innocuous for most multinational companies or other cases of cross-border investment to or from Germany. Closer examination reveals, however, that none of this is so. The explanation does not explain the bill as drafted, the wording of the statute is vague, and there seems to be no consensus at any level of society as to which abuses are to be curbed and why. Almost certainly, the provision will require repair very soon, be it by changing the statute, or be it by issuing a long, explanatory implementation decree purporting to explain the statutory provision with examples, but, in fact, changing it into something at least workable.

The immediate prompt for the change was an amendment to the Organschaft definition changing the demand that an Organschaft parent have both its seat and place of management within Germany to one requiring only one of the two criteria. Thus, a German Organschaft parent can now, for the first time, be resident in two countries.

The German provision is modelled on the US dual consolidated loss rules of Sec. 1503 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Sec. 1503 (d) is designed to prevent double dipping of losses, although it only became workable once extensive regulations on its application were promulgated some six years after it attained statutory force. These US regulations cover matters such as how losses are to be calculated when accounting rules differ between the two countries, recapture provisions in the face of future profits, application of the rules to permanent establishments and to comparable vehicles such as partnerships and check-the-box entities, interaction with other US legislation and intermeshing with mirror legislation abroad. There is no indication that the German counterpart to this legislation will prove any simpler in practice. Unfortunately, there is also no reason to believe that those responsible for the German statute have even thought about the implications beyond those on the (unrevealed) specific abuse they had in mind. To cap all, the new provision entered into force on December 25, 2001 with application to the 2001 year of assessment. Effectively, application is therefore retroactive for almost the entire year - or, indeed, for a full business year already over for most companies with non-calendar year ends - and this is bound to raise questions as to its conformity with the constitutional prohibition on retroactive taxation. For some, the position is exacerbated by the consideration that the original Bill carried a different wording of different import when laid before Parliament, so that the ministry civil servants cannot claim realistically that taxpayers could (should?) have known of the coming changes in time to react (abroad?).

There are many other open questions which must be answered, if the new rule is to be accepted by the taxpaying public as fair, reasonable and in accordance with the constitution. Perhaps the most important of these is the fundamental question as to why the provision applies to Organschaft parents only and not to other companies. After all, any German company can have a second residence in any country basing tax residence on the place of management as a, or the, sole criterion. The answer to this question may well reveal a breach of the constitutional requirement of equality of taxation varying only according to the ability to pay.

From the functional point of view, the question must be asked as to whether dual residence is really the target at all. The official explanation to the Bill says that it is, but the statute itself does not mention dual residence as a concept one way or the other. The USA allows a German subsidiary, which can easily be an Organschaft parent, to opt for the status of a disregarded entity under the check-the-box rules, which would mean that its German results, profits or losses, would automatically flow into the tax return of its US parent. Within Europe, at least France and Denmark allow tax groups to include foreign subsidiaries under certain circumstances. In all three cases, the absence of any form of recapture provision in the German statute will lead to serious questions of double taxation. If, for example, the German Organschaft parent's loss is taken into account in France by its own French shareholder under the bénéfice consolidé rules, that loss will not be deductible in Germany against future profits under the new provision. Once the future profits are earned they will be taxable in Germany and in France without relief for the previous loss (though, in France, this will already have been offset against other income). The German tax now payable will be credited against the French tax, although it is hard to see why the French government should be prepared to give a credit for German tax that has only been paid because of Germany's refusal to allow offset of a German loss, and it seems equally unrealistic to expect the French shareholder to accept the resulting double taxation without seeking relief through the courts or under the EU Arbitration Directive. A request for arbitration proceedings under that Directive could, of course, quite easily lead to the German statute being held to be an illegitimate barrier against freedom of movement within the EU.

Seen at a more local level, questions remain as to what exactly is meant by some of the terms used in the statute. This starts with the reference to the loss of the Organschaft parent. Common sense suggests that the entire net loss of the Organschaft - after all profit surrenders and loss subventions from or to the subsidiaries have been taken into account - must be meant, although the wording of the Act is not necessarily so clear.

The reference to a "comparable tax" abroad might be taken to mean that the Organschaft parent must be taxable abroad in its own name, or it might also include those cases where the results of the German company are included in the taxable income of another company abroad, whether as the consequence of a US check-the-box election, or of membership of a French or Danish tax group.

In the same vein, it is not entirely clear what is meant by "taking a loss into account". Is the actual offset abroad against non-German income meant, or will the German right to carry forward the loss be forfeit as soon as the loss is carried forward abroad for later offset against as yet unearned future profits?

As a final remark, it would seem fair to suggest that the amending statute was drafted under the assumption that the German Organschaft parent must necessarily be a corporation with its own legal identity and tax personality. If so, the assumption was false. A German Organschaft parent, though not the subsidiary, can be any business entity operating in Germany, that is in particular, it can easily be a partnership or the German branch of a foreign company or other business. If a partnership is involved, it is, by German definition, the partners and not the partnership that are subject to tax. If these are foreign corporations (or individuals), it would seem impossible to deny them the right to carry forward their German losses in Germany without regard as to what happens in their home countries, without reaching the non-discrimination clauses of the relevant double tax treaty.

In the view of the authors, the German tax legislator has not only failed to hit the target, he has not even clearly said what he is aiming at. There is no doubt of the need for clarification, whether as a further amendment to the statute or as an interpretative decree.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions