Germany: 255. Loss Disallowance: Injection of New Assets

Last Updated: 28 May 2002

Thomas Sauter, KPMG Frankfurt

For editorial cut-off date, disclaimer, and notice of copyright see end of this article.

1. New loss utilisation decision

The lead article of German News no. 3/1998 (sec. 2.2 of article no. 148) reported on the Federal Tax Court (FTC) judgement of 13 August 1997 construing the term "new business assets" (neues Betriebsvermögen) in § 8 (4) KStG, a statute designed to prevent the loss carryforwards of corporate shells from being used for tax avoidance purposes. In August 2001, the Federal Tax Court rendered its second major decision on § 8 (4) KStG (judgement of 08 August 2001 – I R 29/00 – DStR 2001, 1974). This decision likewise focuses on the injection of new assets.

The manner in which an injection of new assets is defined for purposes of § 8 (4) sent. 2 KStG has considerable impact on the practical consequences of the statute. This issue takes on even greater significance when one considers that it is a likely focus of pending and future tax audits.

The Federal Tax Court's comments on the term "new business assets" will have considerable impact on the method by which newly injected assets are counted and hence on the extent to which new assets are found to have been injected. The Federal Tax Court abandons the approach previously supported by the majority opinion under which only net asset increases with reference to a specific balance sheet date were relevant. Furthermore, the Federal Tax Court treats transactions as constituting injections of new assets within the meaning of § 8 (4) KStG which even the tax authorities had not previously regarded as such.

The Court does not address the potential unconstitutionality on formal grounds of the present § 8 (4) KStG. This issue is accordingly still open (See Dieterlen/Schaden, DStR 2001, 253 and the FTC ruling of 29 November 2000, DStR 2001, S. 253).

2. Text the statute

§ 8 (4) KStG reads as follows:

Loss deduction under § 10d of the Income Tax Act on the part of a corporate entity is contingent upon its being not just legally, but also economically identical to the corporate entity which suffered the loss. Economic identity is not present in particular when more than half of the shares in a corporation are transferred and the corporation continues or recommences its business (Geschäftsbetrieb) with predominantly new business assets (Betriebsvermögen). The injection (Zuführung) of new business assets is not damaging if the sole purpose served thereby is the rehabilitation (Sanierung) of the business which caused the remaining deductible loss within the meaning of § 10d (3) sentence 2 of the Income Tax Act and the corporate entity continues to operate the business on a comparable scale, in light of the overall economic circumstances, during the following five years. The same shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to the offsetting of loss [incurred] from the beginning of the fiscal year to the time of share transfer.1

For more background on § 8 (4) KStG, see KPMG German News nos. 3/1998 p. 2, 2/1999 p. 9, and 2/2001 p. 20 (articles nos. 148, 176, and 228 respectively).

3. Previous method for determining injections of new assets under § 8 (4) KStG

There are many unanswered questions with regard to injection of new fixed or current assets under § 8 (4) KStG. To date, neither the courts nor the tax authorities have resolved the controversial issues. With regard to fixed assets, the tax authorities have up till now applied the so-called "addition method" (see e.g. Dötsch marginal no. 545 on § 8 KStG). With regard to current assets, the prevailing view in the literature – shared even by high-ranking officials in the tax administration – has been that one must compare net current assets at the time of the relevant change in the corporation's ownership with subsequent net current assets.

The prevailing view in the literature furthermore accorded with the position taken by the tax authorities (cf. Federal Ministry of Finance directive of 16 April 1999, BStBl I 1999, p. 455, sec. 9). They treated injections of new assets as damaging for purposes of § 8 (4) KStG only to the extent they resulted from fresh debt or from shareholder contributions, as opposed to being self-financed, for instance, out of profits or by means of asset swaps.

4. FTC judgement of 8 August 2001 – impact on the determination of asset injections within the meaning of § 8 (4) KStG

4.1 Rejection of net balance sheet approach to determining asset injections

In its judgement of 8 August 2001, the Federal Tax Court takes the position that newly injected assets predominate within the meaning of § 8 (4) KStG not just when the net value of assets acquired less assets disposed of exceeds that of the original assets, but also when the gross value of newly injected assets exceeds that of the pre-existing assets.

The court takes a specific-asset approach in determining when newly injected assets predominate. Accordingly, the court rejects the position that the net value of the various balance sheet items is controlling. Under the Court's view, asset disposals are irrelevant, whereas under the net balance sheet approach, which looks to the difference between balance sheet items at the end and at the beginning of a fiscal year, disposals would reduce the value of the newly injected assets. If one follows the Court's approach, the value of newly injected assets would have to be determined by totalling all additions to current or fixed asset accounts as recorded on the relevant accounts (before transfers and reclassifications). In spite of all the arguments that can be raised against such an approach, including the practical difficulties of implementation, there presently exists a strong possibility that the tax authorities will adopt this procedure and apply it accordingly on all audits still open or that have yet to commence.

With respect to fixed assets, the specific-asset approach was advocated by certain commentators even prior to announcement of the Federal Tax Court's decision of 8 August 2001. In its statement of grounds (sec. B (4) (b) (aa) thereof), the Court states the following:

"Accordingly, the economic identity [of the corporation that incurred the losses with the corporation that is seeking to deduct them] must be affirmed as long as the business is operated using predominantly assets (fixed assets) that were present prior to the change in ownership."

Other aspects of the court's reasoning and the fact that, in our opinion, the newly injected asset in question was a debt claim properly classified as a current asset, create doubt whether the parenthetical use of the words "fixed assets" in the above sentence can be taken to mean that the specific-asset approach is limited to fixed assets and does not extend to current assets.

4.2 Injection of new assets through asset swap

In the case decided by the Federal Tax Court, the corporation (GmbH) that the court found to have forfeited its economic identity under § 8 (4) KStG held a debt claim against its former parent company (due to losses assumed by the parent). In conjunction with the change of ownership, the GmbH assigned its claim against its former parent company to its new parent company and took a claim against its new parent in return. The Federal Tax Court regarded this as an injection of new assets.

The Federal Tax Court is thus of the opinion that even a straight asset swap constitutes an injection of new assets. The position adopted by the Federal Tax Court goes well beyond the definition of newly injected assets previously applied by the tax authorities. The tax authorities only treated assets as newly injected if they were acquired using outside debt financing and/or through shareholder contributions.

After the decision of the Federal Tax Court, it must be assumed that asset injections will be evaluated solely on the basis of the specific-asset approach, and that this will mean the inclusion of assets acquired by the corporation through asset swaps or otherwise self-financed.

4.3 Guarantees and pledges of security for bank loans as transactions equivalent to injection of new assets

Subsequent to the change of ownership, the new parent company posted security to finance the purchase of merchandise by the corporation and made guarantees for its benefit. In the view of the Federal Tax Court, the extension of guarantees and pledges of security for bank loans can constitute transactions equivalent to the injection of new assets. By basing this holding on the general clause found in § 8 (4) sentence 1 KStG, as opposed to the narrower wording of this provision's sentence 2 ("... economic identity is in particular not present when ...."), the Court opens up the possibility of treating other situations previously thought to be outside the statute as "equivalent transactions".

Under the specific-asset approach adopted by the Court, merchandise purchased using the proceeds of a bank loan would appear to lead to a double injection of new assets. On the one hand, the disbursement of the loan would increase liquid funds. On the other, the use of these funds to purchase merchandise would increase inventories and constitute a second injection of new assets. To the extent the bank loan was covered by guarantees or other securities, these would seem to constitute yet another injection of new assets under the view espoused by the Federal Tax Court.

Even under this view, account would still have to be taken of loan collateral existing prior to the change of ownership for purposes of calculating the so-called "Comparison Figure I" (Vergleichsgröße I).

5. Summary

The Federal Tax Court judgement of 8 August 2001 considerably expands the concept of "injection of new business assets" compared with the previously prevailing views. The new decision neither provides a comprehensive definition of the injection of new business assets nor prescribes a detailed method by which to determine when such injections occur. Still, the decision shows that the net balance sheet item approach formerly advocated by a majority of commentators at least with regards to current assets is incompatible with the Court's reading of the law.

It is not presently possible to know whether and to what extent the tax authorities will adopt the approach to newly injected assets laid down by the Federal Tax Court, nor can one say what precise effect this would have on the rules by which the tax authorities determine injections of new business assets in specific circumstances. There is, however, reason to apprehend that the tax authorities will adopt the legal positions taken by the Court, which would lead to considerably higher valuations of newly injected current assets compared with the net balance sheet item approach.

Whether the Federal Tax Court is prepared to apply in an explicit manner the treatment of current assets that is implicit in its present decision is an interesting question, the resolution of which will have to wait until a appropriate case comes before the Court. Were the Court to do so, this would mean that, whenever more than half of an active corporation's shares change hands within a five year period, it would only be a matter of time before newly injected assets predominated and the corporation forfeited its loss carryforwards. Normal business operations would result in a steady accumulation of newly injected current assets such as inventories, merchandise, bank deposits, and debt claims.

While this would contravene the legislative purpose of § 8(4) KStG, the Federal Tax Court decision here reported on points in this direction. The judgement will thus result in further uncertainty in the area of loss utilisation planning and necessitate a critical review of existing strategies.

Editorial cut-off date: 20 March 2002

Disclaimer and notice of copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. KPMG Germany in particular insists that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note that the article is current only through its editorial cut-off date shown immediately above (not to be confused with the later date as of which the article was placed online – the date appearing at the article's outset). Related developments subsequent to the editorial cut-off are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While KPMG Germany's articles are carefully reviewed, it can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Any claims nevertheless raised against KPMG Germany on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Germany (KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG). No use of or quotation from the article is permitted without full attribution to KPMG Germany and the article's stated author(s), if any. Distribution to third persons is prohibited without the express written consent of KPMG Germany in advance.

1 Unofficial translation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.