Germany: 255. Loss Disallowance: Injection of New Assets

Last Updated: 28 May 2002

Thomas Sauter, KPMG Frankfurt

For editorial cut-off date, disclaimer, and notice of copyright see end of this article.

1. New loss utilisation decision

The lead article of German News no. 3/1998 (sec. 2.2 of article no. 148) reported on the Federal Tax Court (FTC) judgement of 13 August 1997 construing the term "new business assets" (neues Betriebsvermögen) in § 8 (4) KStG, a statute designed to prevent the loss carryforwards of corporate shells from being used for tax avoidance purposes. In August 2001, the Federal Tax Court rendered its second major decision on § 8 (4) KStG (judgement of 08 August 2001 – I R 29/00 – DStR 2001, 1974). This decision likewise focuses on the injection of new assets.

The manner in which an injection of new assets is defined for purposes of § 8 (4) sent. 2 KStG has considerable impact on the practical consequences of the statute. This issue takes on even greater significance when one considers that it is a likely focus of pending and future tax audits.

The Federal Tax Court's comments on the term "new business assets" will have considerable impact on the method by which newly injected assets are counted and hence on the extent to which new assets are found to have been injected. The Federal Tax Court abandons the approach previously supported by the majority opinion under which only net asset increases with reference to a specific balance sheet date were relevant. Furthermore, the Federal Tax Court treats transactions as constituting injections of new assets within the meaning of § 8 (4) KStG which even the tax authorities had not previously regarded as such.

The Court does not address the potential unconstitutionality on formal grounds of the present § 8 (4) KStG. This issue is accordingly still open (See Dieterlen/Schaden, DStR 2001, 253 and the FTC ruling of 29 November 2000, DStR 2001, S. 253).

2. Text the statute

§ 8 (4) KStG reads as follows:

Loss deduction under § 10d of the Income Tax Act on the part of a corporate entity is contingent upon its being not just legally, but also economically identical to the corporate entity which suffered the loss. Economic identity is not present in particular when more than half of the shares in a corporation are transferred and the corporation continues or recommences its business (Geschäftsbetrieb) with predominantly new business assets (Betriebsvermögen). The injection (Zuführung) of new business assets is not damaging if the sole purpose served thereby is the rehabilitation (Sanierung) of the business which caused the remaining deductible loss within the meaning of § 10d (3) sentence 2 of the Income Tax Act and the corporate entity continues to operate the business on a comparable scale, in light of the overall economic circumstances, during the following five years. The same shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to the offsetting of loss [incurred] from the beginning of the fiscal year to the time of share transfer.1

For more background on § 8 (4) KStG, see KPMG German News nos. 3/1998 p. 2, 2/1999 p. 9, and 2/2001 p. 20 (articles nos. 148, 176, and 228 respectively).

3. Previous method for determining injections of new assets under § 8 (4) KStG

There are many unanswered questions with regard to injection of new fixed or current assets under § 8 (4) KStG. To date, neither the courts nor the tax authorities have resolved the controversial issues. With regard to fixed assets, the tax authorities have up till now applied the so-called "addition method" (see e.g. Dötsch marginal no. 545 on § 8 KStG). With regard to current assets, the prevailing view in the literature – shared even by high-ranking officials in the tax administration – has been that one must compare net current assets at the time of the relevant change in the corporation's ownership with subsequent net current assets.

The prevailing view in the literature furthermore accorded with the position taken by the tax authorities (cf. Federal Ministry of Finance directive of 16 April 1999, BStBl I 1999, p. 455, sec. 9). They treated injections of new assets as damaging for purposes of § 8 (4) KStG only to the extent they resulted from fresh debt or from shareholder contributions, as opposed to being self-financed, for instance, out of profits or by means of asset swaps.

4. FTC judgement of 8 August 2001 – impact on the determination of asset injections within the meaning of § 8 (4) KStG

4.1 Rejection of net balance sheet approach to determining asset injections

In its judgement of 8 August 2001, the Federal Tax Court takes the position that newly injected assets predominate within the meaning of § 8 (4) KStG not just when the net value of assets acquired less assets disposed of exceeds that of the original assets, but also when the gross value of newly injected assets exceeds that of the pre-existing assets.

The court takes a specific-asset approach in determining when newly injected assets predominate. Accordingly, the court rejects the position that the net value of the various balance sheet items is controlling. Under the Court's view, asset disposals are irrelevant, whereas under the net balance sheet approach, which looks to the difference between balance sheet items at the end and at the beginning of a fiscal year, disposals would reduce the value of the newly injected assets. If one follows the Court's approach, the value of newly injected assets would have to be determined by totalling all additions to current or fixed asset accounts as recorded on the relevant accounts (before transfers and reclassifications). In spite of all the arguments that can be raised against such an approach, including the practical difficulties of implementation, there presently exists a strong possibility that the tax authorities will adopt this procedure and apply it accordingly on all audits still open or that have yet to commence.

With respect to fixed assets, the specific-asset approach was advocated by certain commentators even prior to announcement of the Federal Tax Court's decision of 8 August 2001. In its statement of grounds (sec. B (4) (b) (aa) thereof), the Court states the following:

"Accordingly, the economic identity [of the corporation that incurred the losses with the corporation that is seeking to deduct them] must be affirmed as long as the business is operated using predominantly assets (fixed assets) that were present prior to the change in ownership."

Other aspects of the court's reasoning and the fact that, in our opinion, the newly injected asset in question was a debt claim properly classified as a current asset, create doubt whether the parenthetical use of the words "fixed assets" in the above sentence can be taken to mean that the specific-asset approach is limited to fixed assets and does not extend to current assets.

4.2 Injection of new assets through asset swap

In the case decided by the Federal Tax Court, the corporation (GmbH) that the court found to have forfeited its economic identity under § 8 (4) KStG held a debt claim against its former parent company (due to losses assumed by the parent). In conjunction with the change of ownership, the GmbH assigned its claim against its former parent company to its new parent company and took a claim against its new parent in return. The Federal Tax Court regarded this as an injection of new assets.

The Federal Tax Court is thus of the opinion that even a straight asset swap constitutes an injection of new assets. The position adopted by the Federal Tax Court goes well beyond the definition of newly injected assets previously applied by the tax authorities. The tax authorities only treated assets as newly injected if they were acquired using outside debt financing and/or through shareholder contributions.

After the decision of the Federal Tax Court, it must be assumed that asset injections will be evaluated solely on the basis of the specific-asset approach, and that this will mean the inclusion of assets acquired by the corporation through asset swaps or otherwise self-financed.

4.3 Guarantees and pledges of security for bank loans as transactions equivalent to injection of new assets

Subsequent to the change of ownership, the new parent company posted security to finance the purchase of merchandise by the corporation and made guarantees for its benefit. In the view of the Federal Tax Court, the extension of guarantees and pledges of security for bank loans can constitute transactions equivalent to the injection of new assets. By basing this holding on the general clause found in § 8 (4) sentence 1 KStG, as opposed to the narrower wording of this provision's sentence 2 ("... economic identity is in particular not present when ...."), the Court opens up the possibility of treating other situations previously thought to be outside the statute as "equivalent transactions".

Under the specific-asset approach adopted by the Court, merchandise purchased using the proceeds of a bank loan would appear to lead to a double injection of new assets. On the one hand, the disbursement of the loan would increase liquid funds. On the other, the use of these funds to purchase merchandise would increase inventories and constitute a second injection of new assets. To the extent the bank loan was covered by guarantees or other securities, these would seem to constitute yet another injection of new assets under the view espoused by the Federal Tax Court.

Even under this view, account would still have to be taken of loan collateral existing prior to the change of ownership for purposes of calculating the so-called "Comparison Figure I" (Vergleichsgröße I).

5. Summary

The Federal Tax Court judgement of 8 August 2001 considerably expands the concept of "injection of new business assets" compared with the previously prevailing views. The new decision neither provides a comprehensive definition of the injection of new business assets nor prescribes a detailed method by which to determine when such injections occur. Still, the decision shows that the net balance sheet item approach formerly advocated by a majority of commentators at least with regards to current assets is incompatible with the Court's reading of the law.

It is not presently possible to know whether and to what extent the tax authorities will adopt the approach to newly injected assets laid down by the Federal Tax Court, nor can one say what precise effect this would have on the rules by which the tax authorities determine injections of new business assets in specific circumstances. There is, however, reason to apprehend that the tax authorities will adopt the legal positions taken by the Court, which would lead to considerably higher valuations of newly injected current assets compared with the net balance sheet item approach.

Whether the Federal Tax Court is prepared to apply in an explicit manner the treatment of current assets that is implicit in its present decision is an interesting question, the resolution of which will have to wait until a appropriate case comes before the Court. Were the Court to do so, this would mean that, whenever more than half of an active corporation's shares change hands within a five year period, it would only be a matter of time before newly injected assets predominated and the corporation forfeited its loss carryforwards. Normal business operations would result in a steady accumulation of newly injected current assets such as inventories, merchandise, bank deposits, and debt claims.

While this would contravene the legislative purpose of § 8(4) KStG, the Federal Tax Court decision here reported on points in this direction. The judgement will thus result in further uncertainty in the area of loss utilisation planning and necessitate a critical review of existing strategies.

Editorial cut-off date: 20 March 2002

Disclaimer and notice of copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. KPMG Germany in particular insists that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note that the article is current only through its editorial cut-off date shown immediately above (not to be confused with the later date as of which the article was placed online – the date appearing at the article's outset). Related developments subsequent to the editorial cut-off are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While KPMG Germany's articles are carefully reviewed, it can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Any claims nevertheless raised against KPMG Germany on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Germany (KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG). No use of or quotation from the article is permitted without full attribution to KPMG Germany and the article's stated author(s), if any. Distribution to third persons is prohibited without the express written consent of KPMG Germany in advance.

1 Unofficial translation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions