Germany: 222. Transfer Pricing: Group Name Trademark Licensing: Federal Tax Court Overturns Lower Court Decision

Last Updated: 20 July 2001
Article by Rolf Heinrich
KPMG Germany Webpage
Click on the above link to visit the KPMG Germany webpage on the Mondaq website

For editorial cut-off date, disclaimer, and notice of copyright see end of this article.

1. Introductory

In a judgement dated 9 August 2000 (IStR 2001, 54), the Federal Tax Court held that a German subsidiary of a foreign group may be charged a royalty for the right to use a trademark identical to the group name and contained in the subsidiary's own corporate name. The judgement by Germany's highest tax court overrules the judgement of the Rhineland-Palatinate Tax Court of 14 December 1998 (EFG 1999, 499; DStRE 1999, 597 – reported on in article no. 205).

2. Facts And Court's Holding

The case involved the licensing of the group logo and the group name by a foreign affiliate to the German subsidiary of a British manufacturer of automotive brake systems and parts. The licensed intangibles were registered as trademarks. Trademarks of this sort are referred to in this article as "group name trademarks" for short. The royalty fee was 1.5 % of sales. The German subsidiary used the trademark and logo free of charge from 1985 to mid 1991, when a royalty was agreed on for the first time.

In considering the court's disposition of the case, one should distinguish between the following:

  • The use of a corporate name containing the group name as its primary element (e.g. X GmbH as a member of the X Group); and
  • The use of the group name contained in the corporate name as a trademark in connection with product marketing and advertising (e.g. using the term "X" as a product designation)

The court implies any royalty paid by X GmbH to the X Group for the right to use the term "X" in its corporate name would constitute a non-deductible constructive dividend for tax purposes. However, the decision contains no clear statement to this effect, much less an explanation of the underlying reasoning. Rather, the assumption that no fee may be charged for tax purposes for a subsidiary's right to include the group name in its corporate name is an unexamined premise on which the court's judgement rests.

The court goes to lengths to distinguish the corporate name as an identifying designation for the corporation from trademarks as identifying designations for corporate products. The court explains that trademarks and corporate names represent distinct protected rights that may be used independently of each other even where they are identical. In such situations, trademark rights may take precedence over the right to use a business name, not the other way around. The court states that a parent company is not required to permit its subsidiary to use a trademark free of charge even where the trademark in question is contained in the subsidiary's corporate name.

The relevant question in the court's mind thus becomes whether a fee is being paid for the right to use a corporate name containing the group name or for the right to use a trademark identical with the group name. An appropriate charge is permissible for the right to use the group name as a trademark as long as the trademark has some independent or intrinsic value.

Since the lower court applied fundamentally different standards in deciding the case, the Federal Tax Court remanded to the lower court for further deliberations on the issues of the trademark's intrinsic value and, if such exists, the appropriate amount of the royalty. The tenor of the court's decision indicates that only a low threshold need be crossed to affirm the presence of intrinsic value.

3. Decisions Above And Below Contrasted

The high court's decision is remarkable in that it brushes aside the contentions of the tax authorities and the lower court alike regarding a subsidiary's entitlement to "general group support".

The lower court held that trademarks, brands, logos etc., to the extent representing component parts of the group name (group name trademarks), were generally provided to group members as a function of the shareholder relationship. They were part of "general group support" (Rückhalt im Konzern), an inherent benefit of membership in a controlled group to which subsidiaries were somehow entitled free of charge. Only where the economic importance of the group name as a trademark eclipsed that of the group name as such was a separate charge for trademarks permissible by way of exception. The lower court thus established a general rule that group name trademarks could not be licensed with tax effect and created a narrow exception to this rule.

The high court rejects the lower court's terms of reference. In the high court's view, group name trademarks can generally be licensed with tax effect just like any other intangible. No exception is warranted for group name trademarks because the right to use a corporate name and the right to use a trademark are fundamentally distinct rights even where they relate to one and the same designation. As long as a group name trademark has some economic value, a royalty may be charged for its use.

The key issue under the new terms of reference laid down by the Federal Tax Court is thus not whether a royalty may be charged for group name trademarks, but in what amount. The relative importance of the group name as a component of the subsidiary's corporate name and as a trademark is irrelevant when deciding whether a royalty may be charged in principle, but the court says it may have bearing on the amount of the royalty.

4. Specific Issues

The fact that the group name trademarks had been used free of charge in the years prior to the implementation of a license agreement was of no concern to the Federal Tax Court, which considered that the parties were free to switch from a no-charge system to a charge system at any time.

In disallowing the deduction of the royalties on the grounds that the group name trademarks were not of paramount economic importance compared with the use of the group name in the subsidiary's own corporate name, the lower court cited various factors which cast light on the relative importance of using the group name in the subsidiary's corporate name and using the group name as a trademark.

Noting that the German subsidiary sold primarily to automobile manufacturers, the lower court contended that the purchasing decisions of automobile manufacturers were determined by considerations of price, quality, and reliability, hence that the trademarks attached to the products were of marginal importance. The high court comments that the lower court's findings on this point do not support the conclusion that the trademarks lack intrinsic value, which is the only grounds on which a deduction may be denied in toto.

The lower court furthermore attached importance to the failure of the subsidiary's sales to increase after the trademark and logo were licensed. The high court points out that the relevant question is not whether sales increased in fact, but whether a reasonable businessman in the subsidiary's situation might reasonably have expected sales to increase and hence agreed to pay a royalty. In other words, the issue of the trademark's value is to be assessed prospectively (ex ante), not retrospectively (ex post).

The lower court also gave weight to the fact that the subsidiary sold to automobile manufacturers instead of to final consumers and pointed out that the subsidiary had already established a certain reputation for itself before it licensed the trademark and logo. The high court states that trademarks may have economic value to companies at every level in the chain of production and distribution, and that even renowned companies may seek to improve their position further by licensing new trademarks.

5. Royalty Amount: The Unanswered Question

The high court judgement provides little guidance on the permissible amount of royalties charged for the use of group name trademarks. While virtually all of the factors discussed by the lower court (see sec. 4 above) appear relevant to the permissible amount of royalty payments, the high court's decision casts no light on quantification of these factors.

Since group name trademarks are, almost by definition, not licensed to unrelated third parties, comparable uncontrolled transactions will seldom be identifiable.

The court states that trademarks and logos have independent or intrinsic value where they are likely to promote sales ("suitable for contributing to an increase in sales"). The court provides a non-exhaustive list of factors indicative of intrinsic value:

  • Whether a premium can be charged for products marketed using the trademarks over comparable products which lacked the trademark
  • The degree of trademark name recognition
  • The worldwide or regional presence of the trademark
  • The export quota of the specific group company
  • Whether the licensor created and registered the trademark and bears the expense of maintaining and developing it, e.g. through advertising and other marketing measures

Most factors in the above list obviously bear both on whether a trademark has value and on the amount of such value.

The last factor in the list would appear to have less to do with the trademark's intrinsic value than with the question whether the licensor of the trademark controls the rights it purports to license. Where this is not the case, payment of the royalty would constitute a constructive dividend even if the trademarks were in fact valuable because the licensee would be regarded as having entered into the agreement because of the shareholder relationship instead of for arm's length reasons.

6. Concluding Remarks

The decision rejects the theory that subsidiaries are somehow entitled to use group name trademarks free of charge because of an inherent right to "general group support". The high court makes clear that royalty fees for group name trademarks will be accepted for tax purposes except where the trademarks lack intrinsic value. The required threshold of intrinsic value appears to be low. Hence, one would expect some royalty to be chargeable in most situations for group name trademarks. The decision thus shifts the focus of attention from whether royalty payments for group name trademarks are permissible in principle to the question of their permissible amount.

Also noteworthy is the court's holding that related parties are free to switch at any time from a no-charge system to a charge system for the use of group name trademarks.

Editorial cut-off date: 01 June 2001

Disclaimer And Notice Of Copyright

This article treats the subjects covered in condensed form. It is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be relied on as a basis for business decisions. Specialist advice must be sought with respect to your individual circumstances. KPMG Germany in particular insists that the tax law and other sources on which the article is based be consulted in the original, whether or not such sources are named in the article. Please note that the article is current only through its editorial cut-off date shown immediately above (not to be confused with the later date as of which the article was placed online – the date appearing at the article's outset). Related developments subsequent to the editorial cut-off are not necessarily reported on in later articles. Please note as well that later versions of this article or other articles on related topics may have since appeared on this database or elsewhere and should also be searched for and consulted. While KPMG Germany's articles are carefully reviewed, it can accept no responsibility in the event of any inaccuracy or omission. Any claims nevertheless raised against KPMG Germany on the basis of this article are subject to German substantive law and, to the extent permissible thereunder, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This article is the intellectual property of KPMG Germany (KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG). No use of or quotation from the article is permitted without full attribution to KPMG Germany and the article's stated author(s), if any. Distribution to third persons is prohibited without the express written consent of KPMG Germany in advance.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions